PředmětyPředměty(verze: 945)
Předmět, akademický rok 2023/2024
   Přihlásit přes CAS
Kurs hostujícího učitele III - JMB073
Anglický název: Visiting professor III
Zajišťuje: Katedra ruských a východoevropských studií (23-KRVS)
Fakulta: Fakulta sociálních věd
Platnost: od 2018
Semestr: oba
E-Kredity: 5
Rozsah, examinace: 2/0, Zk [HT]
Počet míst: zimní:neurčen / neurčen (20)
letní:neurčen / neurčen (20)
Minimální obsazenost: neomezen
4EU+: ne
Virtuální mobilita / počet míst pro virtuální mobilitu: ne
Stav předmětu: nevyučován
Jazyk výuky: francouzština
Způsob výuky: prezenční
Způsob výuky: prezenční
Poznámka: předmět lze zapsat opakovaně
předmět je možno zapsat mimo plán
povolen pro zápis po webu
při zápisu přednost, je-li ve stud. plánu
předmět lze zapsat v ZS i LS
Garant: doc. PhDr. Jiří Vykoukal, CSc.
Termíny zkoušek   Rozvrh   Nástěnka   
Literatura - angličtina
Poslední úprava: VYKOUKAL (17.02.2011)

Scholarly articles and reports:

Asmus, Ronald D., Richard L. Kugler and F. Stephen Larrabee. 1993. Building a New NATO.

Foreign Affairs - September/October

Baranovsky, Vladimir. 2001. Nato Enlargement : Russia's Attitudes. IISS/CEPS

Berenskoetter, Felix. 2005. Mapping the Mind Gap: A Comparison of US and European

Security Strategies. Security Dialogue vol. 36, no. 1, March.

Brzezinski, Z. 2009. An Agenda for NATO. Foreign Affairs, 88(5), 2-20.

Cornish, Paul. 1996. European Security: The End of Architecture and the New

NATOInternational Affairs, Vol. 72, No. 4: 751-769.

Council of the European Union Presidency. 2010. Draft Internal Security Strategy for the

European Union: "Towards a European Security Model" February 23. 5842/2/10 REV 2

Deighton, Anne. 2002. The European Security and Defence Policy. JCMS, Vol. 40, No. 4:

719-41.

European Union. 2008. Report on the Implementation of the European Security Strategy-

Providing Security in a Changing World. December 11 S407/08.

Kagan, Robert. 1998. The Benevolent Empire. Foreign Policy, Summer: 24-35.

Kamp, Karl-Heinz. 1995. The folly of rapid NATO expansion. Foreign Policy. Spring 1995. ,

Iss. 98: 116130.

Kay, Sean. 2001. NATO's Open Door : Geostrategic Priorities and the Impact of the European

Union. Security Dialogue, 32: 201-215.

Krastev, Ivan. 2007. NATO in the Age of Populism. CROSSROADS The Macedonian Foreign

Policy Journal, issue: 03: 194-203,

Moravcsik, Andrew. 2003. Striking a New Transatlantic Bargain. Foreign Affairs, Jul/Aug ,

Vol. 82, Iss. 4: 74.

Noetzel, Timo, and Benjamin Schreer. 2009. Does a multi-tier NATO matter? The Atlantic

alliance and the process of strategic change. International Affairs 85: 2: 211-226

Stevenson, Jonathan. 2003. How Europe and America Defend Themselves. Foreign Affairs.

Mar/Apr Vol. 82, Iss. 2: 75

Teague, Elizabeth. 1998. Vacuum of State Power-- Russia's Main Weakness. Monitor. The

Jamestown Foundation. February 10. Paper delivered at the National Convention of the

American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies in Boca Raton, Florida, on

September 26, 1998.

Toje, Asle. The 2003 European Union Security Strategy: A Critical Appraisal. European

Foreign Affairs Review. 10: 117-133.

Trenin, Dmitry. 2006. Russia Leaves the West. Foreign Affairs vol.85 no.4 July/August:

87-96.

Trenin, Dmitri. 2009. Russia’s Spheres of Interest, not Influence. The Washington Quarterly •

32:4: 3-22

Trenin, Dmitri, and Alexei Malashenko. 2010. Afghanistan: A View From Moscow. Carnegie

Endowment for International Peace. 30pp.

Tuschhoff, Christian. 2003. Why NATO is Still Relevant. International Politics 40: 101-120.

Waever, Ole. 1996. European Security Identities. Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 34

(1) March: 103-132.

Newspaper and magazine articles, and short reports:

eXile (Moscow). 1999. 101 Reasons Why NATO's War Suck. Issue #07/62, April 8 - 21, 1999.

Friedman, George. 2010. "Geopolitical Journey: part 3: Romania" Stratfor

Friedman, George. 2010."Geopolitical Journey: part 4: Moldava" Stratfor

Friedman, George. 2010."Geopolitical Journey: part 5: Turkey" Stratfor

Friedman, George. "Geopolitical Journey: part 6: Ukraine" Stratfor

Friedman, George. 2010. "Geopolitical Journey: part 2: Borderlands Stratfor

Keating, Dave. 2010. EU, Russia Reach WTO Deal, 'Road Map' On Visa Waiver. Radio Free

Europe/Radio Liberty, December 7.

Krastev, Ivan. 2005. Russia's post-orange empire. Open Democracy. 20 October

www.opendemocracy.net

Economist. 2002. New friends, new opportunities. Economist. Jun 27.

Economist. 2002. The acceptability of American power. Jun 27.

BBC News Europe. 2010. Russia 'to work with Nato on missile defence shield'. November 20.

Lazarová, Daniela. 2008. Czech political scene split over Georgia. Czech Radio 7, Radio

Prague. http://www.radio.cz/en/article/107261

Lukyanov, Fyodor. 2010. Kremlin's Imperial Ambitions Ended in 2010. Moscow Times

December 23.

Martins, Vasco. 2010. Keeping the Germans happy, the Russians in and the Americans out.

IPRIS Viewpoints, November.

Rahr, Alexander. 2010. Ukraine's new vision on European security architecture. RIA-Novosti,

12 March. http://en.rian.ru/valdai_op/20100312/158171542.html

RFE/RL. 2011. Russia's Foreign Minister Praises Better Relations With West. January 13.

RFE/RL. 2010. Afghanistan, Missile Defense On NATO Summit Agenda. Radio Free

Europe/Radio Liberty, November 19.

Rifkin, Jeremy. 2004. The new Europe has its own cultural vision-and it may be better than

ours. The European Dream. October. 5pp.

Trenin, Dmitry. 2010. Russia's New Place in NATO. The Moscow Times, 16 April 2010

Spengler. 2008. Americans play Monopoly, Russians chess. Asia Times. August 19.

Trenin, Dmitry. 2008. Russia's foreign policy: self-affirmation, or a tool for modernization?

open Democracy News Analysis May 13. http://www.opendemocracy.net

Vinocur, John. 2010. Will the U.S. Lose Europe to Russia? New York Times, October 25.

Wald, General Charles. 2004. Keynote Speaker. American Enterprise Institute

http://www.aei.org/docLib/20040414_Wald.pdf

Wesdal, Christopher. 2010. NATO Summit: Making Peace with Russia, Canada

Notwithstanding. Prepared for the Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute. November

2010.

Sylabus - angličtina
Poslední úprava: VYKOUKAL (17.02.2011)

EUROPEAN SECURITY: BETWEEN RUSSIA AND AMERICA

Instructor: Prof. Fred Eidlin

Spring 2011

I. Frozen perceptions and definitions

A. Subconscious habits of thought and perception.

B. Eurocentrism ( Europe as the center of world politics)

C. Russia and Communism as central threats to European security.

D. United States as protector and benefactor.

E. NATO as pillar of European security.

F. Such perceptions not the way things always were, or how they are likely to

be.

II. Genesis of the fault lines in post-World War I Europe

A. Rise of nationalism as sacred principle

B. Erosion and collapse of European empires: threat to European security.

C. Century of total war.

D. Powder-keg of inter-war Europe: National securities and European

insecurity.

E. America and USSR as outsiders on the European scene: Some

retrospective history

F. Hitler and Stalin: Fathers of the European Union?

III. Drivers of European unity

A. Social, Economic, and Political Impact of the Wars: Lessons learned

B. Holy war and the Cold War: Genesis of stability in Europe

C. Escalation ( breakdown of cooperation, Berlin Blockade, FRG and GDR)

D. Marshall Plan: European cooperation encouraged

E. What to do with Germany? Coal and Steel Community as institutional

framework- limited surrender of sovereignty

F. Coal and Steel Community to Common Market to Europen Community to

European Union

G. Detente and stability- stability of opposing blocs

IV. Collapse of the Post-War order

A. Liberalization and softening of the Soviet and East European regimes of the

Soviet type

B. Soviet postwar intentions in retrospect

C. Invasion of Czechoslovakia: Confirmation of stable ( and secure) division

of Europe

D. "Actually-existing Socialism": Death of ideology and stabilization of order

E. "Zastoi": Cynicism, humanism, opportunism, inertia

F. Collapse of Soviet-type Communist regimes, victory of Western-style

democracy

V. Groping towards a new order in Europe and in the World

A. Logic of habit and institutional inertia: Expansion of EU and NATO

B. Russia: No longer foe, but not really friend either

C. Reorientation of Russian foreign policy: Out of the Western Solar System

D. Reorientation of U.S. foreign policy: Europe no longer center of the

Universe

E. New security issues: Terrorism, energy, economics, immigration

F. Differentiation of foreign policies of EU and NATO members

G. Differentiation of Russian relations with European states

H. U.S.-Russia relations not involving Europe

 
Univerzita Karlova | Informační systém UK