|
|
|
||
|
After the fall of the Soviet bloc, former satellite states in Eastern Europe attempted to re-establish their identity through externalizing their Soviet past and distancing from Russia. To that end, framing the Moscow-dominated period in their national histories as colonial experience proved useful. Variegated applications of postcolonial studies on the post-Soviet space gained wide currency in Poland, the Baltic states, and - to a certain extent - Ukraine and Belarus, in the 1990s and 2000s.
However, the accession of the external parts of the Russian/Soviet empire to Euroatlantic structures, most importantly, to the EU and NATO, had twofold consequences for the postcolonial debates: 1) their political instrumentalization lost their urgency due to the perceived mitigation of the Kremlin threat; 2) a new wave of othering from the side of Western partners, as well as intellectual collaboration with the Western Leftists, urged new interpretations of Western colonialism vis-à-vis its East as the main internal Other. Throughout this dynamics, ‘classical’ postcolonial studies – centered around former maritime empires and their overseas possessions – remained largely closed to East European interpretations as ideologically incompatible with the post- and decolonial ‘mainstream’. Russian full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, swiftly qualified as a “colonial war” (Timothy Snyder), produced a new twist in old debates and generated new arguments on the applicability of the postcolonial approach to the post-Soviet space. Russian neo-imperial conquest against the unfolding peripheralization of Europe enables new interpretations, capable of enriching both Area and postcolonial studies, which presents the core objective of the course. Such an endeavour, however, requires a new vocabulary and conceptual refinements as regards the postcolonial condition, anti-colonial struggle, and the decolonization of minds and knowledge in and on the region. The course is open only for students of master's degree programmes. Po pádu sovětského bloku se bývalé satelitní státy ve východní Evropě snažily znovu vybudovat svou identitu prostřednictvím externalizace své sovětské minulosti a distancování se od Ruska. V tomto smyslu se ukázalo jako užitečné rámovat období dominované Moskvou v jejich národních dějinách jako koloniální zkušenost. Různorodé aplikace postkoloniálních studií na postsovětský prostor se v 90. letech a ve 2000s široce uplatnily v Polsku, pobaltských státech a do určité míry také na Ukrajině a v Bělorusku. Avšak přistoupení vnějších částí ruského/sovětského impéria k euroatlantickým strukturám, zejména k EU a NATO, mělo dvojí důsledky pro postkoloniální debaty: 1) jejich politická instrumentalizace ztratila naléhavost kvůli vnímanému zmírnění hrozby Kremlu; 2) nová vlna „otheringu“ ze strany západních partnerů, stejně jako intelektuální spolupráce se západními levicovými kruhy, vyžadovala nové interpretace západního kolonialismu vůči jeho Východu jako hlavního vnitřního „Jiného“. V rámci této dynamiky zůstaly „klasické“ postkoloniální studie – zaměřené na bývalé námořní říše a jejich zámořská území – do značné míry uzavřeny vůči východoevropským interpretacím, jelikož byly ideologicky neslučitelné s post- a dekoloniálním „mainstreamem“. Ruská plnohodnotná invaze na Ukrajinu v roce 2022, rychle kvalifikovaná jako „koloniální válka“ (Timothy Snyder), přinesla nový zvrat do starých debat a vytvořila nové argumenty o aplikovatelnosti postkoloniálního přístupu na postsovětský prostor. Ruský neoirredentistický a neoimperiální útok proti postupující periferizaci Evropy umožňuje nové interpretace, které mohou obohatit jak studia regionů, tak postkoloniální studie, což představuje hlavní cíl kurzu. Takové úsilí však vyžaduje novou slovní zásobu a konceptuální upřesnění týkající se postkoloniálního stavu, antikoloniálního boje a dekolonizace mysli a znalostí v regionu i o něm. Kurz je určen pouze pro studenty magisterských programů. Poslední úprava: Hrubá Kateřina, Mgr. (28.01.2026)
|
|
||
|
The course is aimed at analyzing the existing body of literature, complex conceptual apparatus, and new arguments in the postcolonial studies on Eastern Europe, as well as their efficiency and limitations against the current context of the Russian aggression. The underlying theoretical premise is that the structure of coloniality/oppression in the region is tripartite, where the symbolic West and Russia form two oppressive poles with divergent strategies of domination and resulting scales of difference. Whereas (former) subalterns can adopt various strategies in volatile contemporary settings. The course has an overtly theoretical orientation. It is structured around focused discussions of assigned sources. Upon completion of this course, students should be able to:
Poslední úprava: Korablyova Valeriya, Ph.D. (12.09.2025)
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Course Schedule - please note that the first session is on 8 October 2025.
Poslední úprava: Korablyova Valeriya, Ph.D. (12.09.2025)
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Course Requirements and Assessment
Detailed description of the assignments
· Active Class Participation (20%) Students should participate actively in the course. Mere attendance is not active participation. To take active part in the class means, for instance, to present findings from compulsory readings, to comment on the topic, to discuss with other students, to answer questions raised by the instructor, and to raise one’s own questions. · Presentation (40%) Every student must make one presentation during the semester, which could be either theoretical or practical (relevant to the session topic and built on the assigned theoretical readings). Students can team up for a small group (2-3 members) presentation if there are not enough timeslots and topics for all the enrolled students to present. Theoretical presentation is a broader overview and a deeper analysis of literature, relevant for the class topic. Practical presentation presumes the analysis of some cultural product (a book, a song, a movie, etc), produced in Eastern European region, from the postcolonial perspective. Presentation should take about 15-20 minutes. · Final project (40%) During the semester, every student must conduct a research project, which consists in picking a cultural product (movie, song(s), videos, paintings) or a clusters of products that bear a colonial/imperial imprint and to analyse them from the postcolonial perspective. It could have ethnic, national, or regional relevance / sphere of circulation. The project should be presented and defended in class at the end of the semester (there will be several sessions allocated for that in the end of the course). We adhere to the policy of zero tolerance to plagiarism and AI use. Maximum two absences during the semester could be excused. According to the Dean's provision, the teacher evaluates the student's performance in the percentages assigned to grades A to F (https://fsv.cuni.cz/sites/default/files/uploads/files/S_SO_002_001_Organization_of_examination_dates%2C_assessment_of_study%2C_and_the_use_of_A%E2%80%93F_grading_scale_at_FSV_UK.pdf): 91 % and up => A 81-90 % => B 71-80 % => C 61-70 % => D 51-60 % => E 0-50 % => F A – excellent (outstanding performance with only minor mistakes) B – very good (above average performance with some mistakes) C – good (overall good performance with a number of notable mistakes) D – satisfactory (acceptable performance with significant mistakes) E – sufficient (performance fulfils only minimum criteria) F – insufficient/failed (more effort needs to be made). Poslední úprava: Korablyova Valeriya, Ph.D. (12.09.2025)
|
|
||
|
Weekly mandatory reading will be available on Moodle.
Recommended literature: Annus, Epp (2018) Soviet Postcolonial Studies: A View from the Western Borderlands. Routledge. Bakic-Hayden, Milica (1995). Nesting Orientalisms: The Case of Former Yugoslavia. In: Slavic Review, Vol. 54, No. 4 (Winter): 917-931. Bhambra, Gurminder K. (2022) “A Decolonial Project for Europe“. In Journal of Common Market Studies 60(2). s. 229-244. Biedarieva, Svitlana (2025). Ambicoloniality and War: The Ukrainian-Russian case. Palgrave Macmillan. Danijela Čanji and Aliaksei Kazharski, “When the „subaltern empire” speaks. On recognition, Eurasian integration, and the Russo-Georgian war,” Eurasian Geography and Economics, February 22, 2022, doi: 10.1080/15387216.2022.2040375 David-Fox, Michael (2006). Multiple Modernitites vs. Neo-Traditionalism: On Recent Debates in Russian and Soviet History. In: Jahrbucher fur Geschichte Osteuropas, Neue Folge, Bd. 54, H. 4 (2006): 535-555. Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (1999). Fundamentalism, Sectarianism, and Revolution. The Jacobin Dimension of Modernity. Cambridge University Press: 51-61. Gaonkar, Dilip P. (ed.) (2001). Alternative modernities. Duke University Press. Gerasimov, Ilya; Glebov, Sergey; & Mogilner, Marina (2013). The Postimperial Meets the Postcolonial: Russian Historical Experience and the Postcolonial Moment. In: Ab Imperio, # 2: 97-135. Gerasimov, Ilya. Ukraine 2014: The first post-colonial revolution. In: Ab Imperio, # 3, 2014. Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2007). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference, Princeton Umiversity Press. Chari, Sharad, & Verdery, Katherine (2009). Thinking between the Posts: Postcolonialism, Postsocialism, and Ethnography after the Cold War. In: Comparative Studies in Society and History, 51(1): 6-34. Chernetsky, Vitaly. (2003). Postcolonialism, Russia and Ukraine. In: Ulbandus Review, Vol. 7, Empire, Union, Center, Satellite: The Place of Post-Colonial Theory in Slavic/Central and Eastern European/(Post-)Soviet Studies: 32-62. Kalmar, Ivan (2022) White But Not Quite: Central Europe’s Illiberal Revolt. Bristol University Press. Kaviraj, Sudipta (2000). Modernity and Politics in India. In: Daedalus, Vol. 129, No. 1, Multiple Modernities (Winter): 137-162. Kelertas, Violeta (ed.) (2006) Baltic Postcolonialism: On the Boundary of Two Worlds: Identity, Freedom, and Moral Imagination in the Baltics. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi > Introduction: Baltic Postcolonialism and its Critics. Kiossev, Alexander (2008). The Self-Colonizing Metaphor. In: Atlas of Transformation. Available at: http://monumenttotransformation.org/atlas-of-transformation/html/s/self-colonization/the-self-colonizing-metaphor-alexander-kiossev.html Kołodziejczyk, Dorota, Şandru, Cristina (2017) Postcolonial Perspectives on Postcommunism in Central and Eastern Europe. London: Routledge. Madina Tlostanova, „The Janus-faced Empire Distorting Orientalist Discources: Gender, Race, and Religion in the Russian/(post)Soviet Constructions of the „Orient““, Worlds & Knowledges Otherwise, Spring 2008: 1-11. Manuela Boatca and Anca Parvulescu, “Creolizing Transylvania: Notes on Coloniality and Inter-Imperiality”, History of the Present: A Journal of Critical History, 10:1, April 2020, 9-27, DOI: 10.1215/21599785-8221398 Manuela Boatca and Anca Parvulescu (2022) Creolizing the Modern: Transylvania across Empires. Cornell University Press, 2022. Melegh, Attila (2006). On the East – West slope. Globalization, nationalism, racism and discourses on Central and Eastern Europe, CEU Press, Budapest-New York. Mignolo, Walter D., 2010: “Introduction: Coloniality of Power and Decoloniality of Thinking.“ In Mignolo, Walter D. a Escobar, A. (eds): Globalization and the Decolonial Option. New York: Routledge. Moore, David Chioni (2001) “Is the Post- in Postcolonial the Post- in Post-Soviet? Toward a Global Postcolonial Critique”, PMLA, 116(1): 111-128. Morozov, Viatcheslav (2015). Russia’s Postcolonial Identity: A Subaltern Empire in a Eurocentric World. Palgrave Macmillan. Neumann, Iver B. (1999). Uses of the Other. “The East” in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, Ch. 1, 5: 1-38, 143-160. Owczarzak, Jill, 2009: “Postcolonial Studies and Postsocialism in Eastern Europe“. In Focaal 53(April). s. 3-19. Platt, Kevin M.F. (2013). Occupation versus Colonization: Post-Soviet Latvia and the Provincialization of Europe. In: Blaecker, Uilleam; Etkind, Alexander; & Fedor, Julie (eds.) Memory and Theory in Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan: 125-148. Riabchuk, Mykola (2016). Ukrainians as Russia’s negative óther’: History Comes full circle. In: Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 49: 75-85. Riabchuk, Mykola. (2011). Postkolonialnyj syndrom: sposterezhennja [Postcolonial syndrome: observations]. Yuri Marchenko. Said, Edward (1978) Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. London: Penguin. Said, Edward (1993) Culture and Imperialism. London: Chatto & Windus. Shkandrij, Myroslav (2001). Russia and Ukraine. Literature and Discourse of Empire from Napoleonic to Postcolonial Times. McGill’s University Press. Slacalek, Ondrej (2016). The postcolonial hypothesis. Notes on the Czech “Central European” identity. In: Annual of Language & Politics & Politics of Identity, Special Issue, Vol. 10: 27-44. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, 1988: “Can The Subaltern Speak?“ In Grossberg, L. A Nelson, C. (Ed). Marxism And The Interpretation Of Culture. S. 66-111. Thompson, Ewa M. (2000). Imperial Knowledge: Russian Literature and Colonialism. Praeger. Timothy Snyder, “The War in Ukraine is a Colonial War,” The New Yorker, April 28, 2022, https://www.newyorker.com/news/essay/the-war-in-ukraine-is-a-colonial-war Tlostanova, Madina, 2012: “Postsocialist is not Postcolonial. On Post-Soviet Imaginary and Global Coloniality“. In Journal of Postcolonial Writing 48(2). s. 130-142. Törnquist-Plewa, Barbara; & Yurchuk, Yuliya (2017). Memory politics in contemporary Ukraine: Reflections from the postcolonial perspective. In: Memory Studies, 00(0): 1-22. DOI: 10.1177/1750698017727806 Wallerstein, Immanuel (1991). The modern world-system as a civilization: Geopolitics and geoculture in I. Wallerstein (ed.), Essays on the changing world-system, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991. Wolff, Larry, Inventing Eastern Europe. The Map of Civilization on the Mind of the Enlightenment, Stanford University Press, 1994. Zarycki, Tomacz. (2014). Ideologies of Eastness in Central and Eastern Europe. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.
Online depositories: https://ui.org.ua/sectors/projects/decolonization-selected-articles/ Poslední úprava: Korablyova Valeriya, Ph.D. (12.09.2025)
|
|
||
|
The course is theory-driven: its main objective is to master and develop a proper post- and decolonial vocabulary for analysing the developments and sentiments in the region. Class work is built around focused discussions of assigned sources. Autonomous work with literature and peer learning are implied. All the assigned sources will be provided on Moodle. Some guest lectures are planned in the format "the author meets the audience". The class presentation is a deeper elaboration of the further literature, assigned for the session, backed by PowerPoint slides. The practical project is wired towards the application of the post- and decolonial methodology to the analysis of cultural materials: literary, media, visual sources. Zero tolerance to plagiarism and AI use (may it be more 'rough' in style but present your genuine contribution). Use of generative AI tools: The use and citation of generative AI tools (such as ChatGPT or MS Copilot) in seminar papers and other coursework must comply with the decrees of the IMS Director No. 7/2023 and 9/2023. Generative AI tools may be used unless explicitly prohibited by the instructor. However, they may not be used to generate substantial sections of the text or replace the student’s own intellectual contribution. The student remains fully responsible for any content generated with assistance of AI tools. Presenting AI-generated content, whether verbatim, rephrased, or only slightly modified, as one's own work constitutes plagiarism. Every submitted paper must include a transparent statement specifying which generative AI tools were used, in which stage of the work they were employed, and how they were used, or confirming that no generative AI tools were used. If this statement is missing or incomplete, the instructor is not permitted to accept the paper for evaluation. Unless the instructor explicitly prohibits the use of generative AI tools, the decision to use or not to use them rests fully with the student. The student has the right to request that the instructor does not use AI assistance for evaluating their work.
Poslední úprava: Lochmanová Sára, Mgr. (08.10.2025)
|
|
||
|
This is an MA level course, therefore strong analytical skills and the ability to work with academic literature are requested. Whereas the preexisting experience of work with postcolonial studies is not mandatory, a certain level of attunement to its sophisticated vocabulary would be needed. Sufficient English language skills stand as an entry requirement: discussions in class will be held in English, and most ascribed sources are in English, too. Poslední úprava: Korablyova Valeriya, Ph.D. (12.09.2025)
|