PředmětyPředměty(verze: 983)
Předmět, akademický rok 2025/2026
   
Academic Writing - JSM103
Anglický název: Academic Writing
Český název: Akademické psaní
Zajišťuje: Katedra sociologie (23-KS)
Fakulta: Fakulta sociálních věd
Platnost: od 2019
Semestr: zimní
E-Kredity: 6
Způsob provedení zkoušky: zimní s.:písemná
Rozsah, examinace: zimní s.:0/2, KZ [HT]
Počet míst: neurčen / 30 (neurčen)
Minimální obsazenost: neomezen
4EU+: ne
Virtuální mobilita / počet míst pro virtuální mobilitu: ne
Stav předmětu: vyučován
Jazyk výuky: angličtina
Způsob výuky: prezenční
Poznámka: předmět je možno zapsat mimo plán
povolen pro zápis po webu
při zápisu přednost, je-li ve stud. plánu
Garant: MA et MA Sean Mark Miller
Vyučující: MA et MA Sean Mark Miller
Třída: Courses for incoming students
Anotace - angličtina
The purpose of this course is to help graduate students (MA and PhD candidates) develop skills necessary for setting up an effective research design, writing a proposal, and articulating their research findings in writing. The objectives include both the enhancement of students’ analytical and critical skills and their writing capabilities. This is a hands-on course in which students are expected to put in practice the principles and guidelines they read about in the texts assigned and that we discuss in class.

By the end of the semester students will be able to:

· understand a writing assignment

· draft a literature review

· design research questions

· match research questions to the right method

· design a schedule of research activities

· draft a proposal (this may be an essay, but generally anticipates discussing your own research)

· design the outline of research paper

· evaluate peers’ proposals and research papers



The emphasis will be on qualitative research methods which is usually underfunded.
Poslední úprava: Miller Sean Mark, MA et MA (03.08.2023)
Literatura - angličtina

Compulsory literature

Ellison, C. (2010), McGraw-Hill's concise guide to writing research papers, McGraw-Hill.

Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln (1994), ‘Competing paradigms in qualitative research’, in: Handbook of qualitative research 2, pp. 163-194.

Writing for Sociology (WFS), Department of Sociology, Berkeley.

 

Recommended literature

Castiglione, D. et al. (2008), Handbook of social capital, Oxford University Press; Chapter 13, M. Fennema and J. Tillie, ‘Social Capital in Multicultural Societies’.

Crouch, Colin. Post-Democracy Polity (2004).

Delanty, Gerard. "Conceptions of Europe: a review of recent trends." European journal of social theory 6.4 (2003): 471-488. chapter 'EU Democratic Oversight and Domestic Deviation from the Rule of Law: Sociological Reflections', in: C.Closa and D. Kochenov (eds), Reinforcing the Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union, Cambridge University Press.

Favell, Adrian. Eurostars and Eurocities: Free Moving Urban Professionals in an Integrating Europe. (2008), Wiley.

Fuchs, Dieter, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. "Eastward enlargement of the European Union and the identity of Europe." West European Politics 25.2 (2002): 19-54.

Nash, Kate. "Human rights, movements and law: On not researching legitimacy." Sociology 46.5 (2012): 797-812.

Smith, Joe, Tomáš Kostelecký, and Petr Jehlička (2015), ‘Quietly does it: Questioning assumptions about class, sustainability and consumption’, Geoforum.

Poslední úprava: Miller Sean Mark, MA et MA (03.08.2023)
Požadavky ke zkoušce - angličtina

Final essay:

3000 words + minimum of 5 scholarly references

Topic: any relevant topic in the social sciences, feasible for a short essay

Course Requirements:

·         Attend all classes

·         Complete all (homework) assignments

·         Complete all readings

·         Participate in class discussion

·         Complete a research proposal or a research paper by the end of the exam period

·         Meet with professor at least once during the semester

 

Evaluative scheme final papers

1. Introduction and topic choice

 

- Has an abstract been provided?

- Is the introduction well-written: research question, state-of-the-art, outline paper, new insights, personal views?

- Have the 5 stages been correctly used in the introduction?

- Is the topic relevant for the course; is it a useful topic for further analysis?

 

10

2. Argumentation

 

- Is the argument supported by convincing observations, evidence?

- Is the argument well-structured?

- Is the methodology well-explained?

 

10

3. Conclusions

 

- Do the conclusions reflect the overall argument?

- Are personal views provided?

- What is the social relevance of the argument?

 

10

4. References

 

- Have a sufficient number of relevant scholarly sources (5) been included and used?

- Are the references correct and comprehensive?

 

10

5. Language

 

- Is the paper well-written and readable?

- Is grammar correctly used, does the paper contain typos and similar errors?

 

10

Grade-composition:

>90%: excellent (1)

76 - 89%: very good (2)

62 – 75%: good (3)

< 62%: failed (4)

50*2=

100

 

Use of Generative AI Tools in This Course

In this course, students are expected to write a final argumentative essay on a contemporary topic of their choice. The essay must present and evaluate arguments for and against the chosen position and reflect the complexity of the issue. Given the increasing availability of generative AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude), the following rules apply to their use:

1. Permitted Uses of AI

You may use generative AI tools, with disclosure:

  • to check spelling and grammar correctness (in English), but it should not rephrase your work or introduce vocabulary that you would not otherwise use;
  • as a support tool for understanding key terms or general background.

AI can be used as an aid, but it should not replace your own intellectual work!

2. Prohibited Uses of AI

You must not use AI to:

  • generate ideas or explore potential essay topics; the point of this assignment is to explore and research a topic which you are passionate about;
  • structure or brainstorm your arguments and counterarguments; you should look for “both sides” on your own;
  • generate any part of the essay and claim it as your own work;
  • violate academic integrity, bypassing your responsibility to think and write independently.

Such behavior may be considered plagiarism or academic misconduct and will be addressed in line with Charles University’s academic regulations.

3. Transparency Requirement

If you use generative AI in any stage of writing your essay, you must:

  • include a brief note at the end of your essay (e.g., in a footnote or final paragraph), stating:
     I used generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT) for the following purposes: [...]. All ideas, writing, and arguments presented are my own.”
  • be prepared to defend your essay orally if requested, including all arguments and sources, without the aid of AI.

4. Further Guidance

Violation of these rules may result in the essay not being accepted or in disciplinary proceedings under Charles University’s regulations.

 




Poslední úprava: Miller Sean Mark, MA et MA (01.10.2025)
Sylabus - angličtina

1. Introduction

2. Sociological research paradigms

3. Choosing a project (changes to this are ONLY with teacher's approval, so you should already have an idea at the beginning of the term, based on your own research in the social sciences)

4. Starting to draft

5. Types of research

6. Writing a good paper I

7. Writing a good paper II

8. Literature review

10. Other people’s work and feedback

11. Proper citation and plagiarism

12. Summary and presentations (you present your research to the class in December and then complete the paper in the exam term)

 

Poslední úprava: Miller Sean Mark, MA et MA (03.08.2023)
 
Univerzita Karlova | Informační systém UK