|
|
|
||
|
Kurz je koncipován jako uvedení do různých tradic institucionální analýzy pro magisterské studenty oboru sociologie. Poskytuje vhled do klasických teorií, o které se dnešní institucionální analýza opírá (Durkheim, Veblen, Parsons a Berger s Luckmannem), i do silných a slabých stránek dominantních současných proudů (sociologický institucionalismus, institucionalismus racionální volby, historický institucionalismus a diskursivní institucionalismus). V rámci kurzu budou představeny i tři analyticko-výzkumné programy rozvíjející některé elementy uvedených proudů - výzkum epistemických komunit a institucionální konvergence, institution and development framework a teorie graduální změny. Poslední úprava: Čada Karel, Mgr., Ph.D. (18.02.2014)
|
|
||
|
Cíle kurzu: · zvýšit u studentů citlivost k různým aspektům života institucí a vzbudit zájem o aplikace představených přístupů jak v základním, tak v aplikovaném sociologickém výzkumu;
· rozvíjet analytické dovednosti studentů: k jakým výzkumným otázkám uvedené proudy vybízí a jaké nástroje nabízejí při hledání odpovědí.
Poslední úprava: Čada Karel, Mgr., Ph.D. (18.02.2014)
|
|
||
|
Je očekáván aktivní přístup vycházející z četby textů, studenti před každou lekcí zpracují stručné výpisky četby zaměřené na to, k jakým výzkumným otázkám předkládaný text vybízí a jaké analytické nástroje nabízí. Kurz bude ukončen odevzdáním seminární práce (v rozsahu 2500 slov). Seminární práce by měla být diskusí některého z prezentovaných témat vztaženého k projektu diplomové práce či obecnému sociologickému problému, jež student řeší. Poslední úprava: Čada Karel, Mgr., Ph.D. (18.02.2014)
|
|
||
|
POVINNÁ Berger, Peter, Luckmann, Thomas, 1991 [1967]: The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge, Part II, Society as Objective Reality, 1. Institutionalization. New York: Anchor Books, 65-109 DiMaggio, Paul and Walter W. Powell, 1983: The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, 147-160 Douglas, Mary, 1986: How institutions think. Chapter 1: Institutions cannot have minds of their own, Chapter 4: Institutions are founded on analogy, Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press, 9-19, 45-5 Haas, Peter M., 1992: Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. Knowledge, Power, and International Policy Coordination, Vol. 46, No. 1, 1-35 Mahoney, James and Kathleen Thelen, 2010: A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. In: Mahoney, James and Kathleen Thelen (eds.): Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1-37 North, Douglass, 1999: Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11-35 Ostrom, Elinor. 2007. "Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework." In Sabatier, Paul (ed.). Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 21-64 Parsons, Talcott, 1951: The Social System. Chapter II, The Major Points of Reference and Structural Components of the Social System, New York: The Free Press, 24-67 Pierson, Paul and Theda Skocpol, 2002: Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science: In: Katznelson, Ira and Helen Milner (eds.): Political Science: The State of the Disci-pline. New York etc.: Norton and Company, 693-721 Schmidt, Vivien A., 2010, Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism‘. European political science review, Vol. 2.1. 1-25. Veblen, Thorstein, 2008 [1899]: The Theory of the Leisure Class. Chapter I to III, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 7-47 DOPORUČENÁ: Blyth, Mark, 2013, Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. New Yorl. Oxford University Press DiMaggio, Paul and Walter W. Powell, 1991: Introduction: The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1-38 Durkheim, Emile, 1982 [1895]: The Rules of Sociological Method. Introduction and Selection by Steven Lukes. Chapter I: What is a Social Fact? New York: The Free Press, 50-59
Crawford, Sue E.S. and Elinor Ostrom. 1995. "A Grammar of Institutions." American Political Science Review. 89 (3): 582-600. Fleck, Ludvik, 1979 [1935]: Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, Chapter II, Section 4: Introduction to thought collectives. The social condition of every act of cognition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 38-51 Hall, Peter und Rosemary Taylor, 1996: Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies, Vol. 44, 936-957 Holzinger, Kathrine and Knill Christoph, 2005: Causes and conditions of cross-national policy convergence, Journal of European Public Policy, 12 (5): 775-796 Immergut, Ellen M., and Anderson, Karen M. , 2008: Historical Institutionalism and West European Politics." West European Politics 31(1): 345 - 369. Jones, Bryan D., 1999" Bounded rationality. Annual review of political science, 2(1), 297-321 Mahoney, James, 2000: Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society, Vol. 29, No. 4, 507-548 Mahoney, James, and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (eds.), 2003: Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press Mirowski, Philip, 2009: Postface: Defining Neoliberalism. In Mirowski, Philip and Plehwe, Dieter. The Road from Mont Pelerin: The Making of Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. 417-456 Parsons, Talcott, 1951: The Social System. Chapter X, Social Structure and Dynamic Process: The Case of Modern Medical Practice, New York: The Free Press, 428-79 Pierson, Paul, 2004: Politics in Time. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 133-166 Ostrom, Elinor. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1989. "Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach." Journal of Theoretical Politics (July): 131-49 Schepsle, Kenneth A., Bonchek Mark S., 1997. Analyzing Politics: Rationality, Behavior and Institutions. Part III, Institutions, New York, London: W. W. Norton and Company. 299-460 Schmidt, Vivien A., 2012, Discursive Institutionalism: Scope, Dynamics, and Philosophical Underpinnings. In: Fischer, Frank and Herbert Gottweis (eds.): The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communication Practice. Durham, London: Duke University Press Selznick, Philip, 2011 [1949]: TVA and Grass Roots: A Study of Politics and Organization. Conclusion: Guiding Principles and Interpretation. New Orleans, Louisiana: Quid Pro Books Stinchcombe, Arthur, 1997: On the Virtues of the Old Institutionalism. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 23, 1-18 Streeck, Wolfgang and Kathleen Thelen, 2005: Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. In: Streeck, Wolfgang and Kathleen Thelen (eds.): Beyond Continuity. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1-39 Steinmo, Sven, 2010: The Evolution of Modern States: Sweden, Japan, and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Ch. 1, pp. 1-29 Thelen, Kathleen, 1999: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, Bd. 2, 369-404 Veblen, Thorstein, 2008 [1899]: The Theory of the Leisure Class. Chapter VII, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 111-124 Williamson, Oliver, 2000: The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 38, 595-613 Poslední úprava: Čada Karel, Mgr., Ph.D. (18.02.2014)
|
|
||
|
Kombinace 40 minutové přednášky s řízenou diskusí nad tématy z povinné četby. Poslední úprava: Čada Karel, Mgr., Ph.D. (18.02.2014)
|
|
||
|
A. Úvod 1. Úvod - představení tří hlavních tradic institucionalismu v sociálních vědách DOPORUČENÁ ČETBA: Hall, Peter und Rosemary Taylor, 1996: Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies, Vol. 44, 936-957 B. Klasické teorie instituc
2. Durkheimovské kořeny studia institucí, Fleckovy myšlenkové kolektivy a jejich využití v díle Mary Douglas POVINNÁ ČETBA: Mary Douglas, 1986: How institutions think. Chapter 1: Institutions cannot have minds of their own, Chapter 4: Institutions are founded on analogy, Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press, 9-19, 45-53 DOPORUČENÁ ČETBA: Durkheim, Emile, 1982 [1895]: The Rules of Sociological Method. Introduction and Selection by Steven Lukes. Chapter I: What is a Social Fact? New York: The Free Press, 50-59 Fleck, Ludvik, 1979 [1935]: Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, Chapter II, Section 4: Introduction to thought collectives. The social condition of every act of cognition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 38-51 3. Kořeny americké tradice studie institucí v díle Thorsteina Veblena POVINNÁ ČETBA: Veblen, Thorstein, 2008 [1899]: The Theory of the Leisure Class. Chapter I to III, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 7-47 DOPORUČENÁ ČETBA: Veblen, Thorstein, 2008 [1899]: The Theory of the Leisure Class. Chapter VII, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 111-124 4. Přínos strukturního funkcionalismu ke studiu institucí (Talcott Parsons, Robert K. Merton, Philip Selznick) POVINNÁ ČETBA: Parsons, Talcott, 1951: The Social System. Chapter II, The Major Points of Reference and Structural Components of the Social System, New York: The Free Press, 24-67 DOPORUČENÁ ČETBA: Parsons, Talcott, 1951: The Social System. Chapter X, Social Structure and Dynamic Process: The Case of Modern Medical Practice, New York: The Free Press, 428-79 Selznick, Philip, 2011 [1949]: TVA and Grass Roots: A Study of Politics and Organization. Conclusion: Guiding Principles and Interpretation. New Orleans, Louisiana: Quid Pro Books. 5. Sociálně konstrucionistický přístup ke studiu institucí POVINNÁ ČETBA: Berger, Peter, Luckmann, Thomas, 1991 [1967]: The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge, Part II, Society as Objective Reality, 1. Institutionalization. New York: Anchor Books, 65-109 C. Nové institucionální přístupy 6. Nový sociologický institucionalismus a přístupy k výzkumu politické konvergence POVINNÁ ČETBA: DiMaggio, Paul and Walter W. Powell, 1983: The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, 147-160 DOPORUČENÁ ČETBA: DiMaggio, Paul and Walter W. Powell, 1991: Introduction: The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1-38 Holzinger, Kathrine and Knill Christoph, 2005: Causes and conditions of cross-national policy convergence, Journal of European Public Policy, 12 (5): 775-796. Stinchcombe, Arthur, 1997: On the Virtues of the Old Institutionalism. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 23, 1-18 7. Epistemické komunity a jejich význam při studiu institucí POVINNÁ ČETBA: Haas, Peter M., 1992: Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. Knowledge, Power, and International Policy Coordination, Vol. 46, No. 1, 1-35 DOPORUČENÁ ČETBA: Mirowski, Philip, 2009: Postface: Defining Neoliberalism. In Mirowski, Philip and Plehwe, Dieter. The Road from Mont Pelerin: The Making of Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. 417-456 8. Institucionalismus racionální volby POVINNÁ ČETBA: North, Douglass, 1999: Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11-35 DOPORUČENÁ ČETBA: Jones, Bryan D., 1999" Bounded rationality. Annual review of political science, 2(1), 297-321. Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1989. "Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach." Journal of Theoretical Politics (July): 131-49. Schepsle, Kenneth A., Bonchek Mark S., 1997. Analyzing Politics: Rationality, Behavior and Institutions. Part III, Institutions, New York, London: W. W. Norton and Company. 299-460. Williamson, Oliver, 2000: The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 38, 595-613 9. Institution and Development Framework Elinor Ostromové POVINNÁ ČETBA: Ostrom, Elinor. 2007. "Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework." In Sabatier, Paul (ed.). Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 21-64 DOPORUČENÁ ČETBA: Ostrom, Elinor. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Crawford, Sue E.S. and Elinor Ostrom. 1995. "A Grammar of Institutions." American Political Science Review. 89 (3): 582-600. 10. Historický institucionalismus POVINNÁ ČETBA: Pierson, Paul and Theda Skocpol, 2002: Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science: In: Katznelson, Ira and Helen Milner (eds.): Political Science: The State of the Disci-pline. New York etc.: Norton and Company, 693-721 DOPORUČENÁ ČETBA: Immergut, Ellen M., and Anderson, Karen M. , 2008: Historical Institutionalism and West European Politics." West European Politics 31(1): 345 - 369. Mahoney, James, 2000: Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society, Vol. 29, No. 4, 507-548 Mahoney, James, and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (eds.), 2003: Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Pierson, Paul, 2004: Politics in Time. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 133-166 Thelen, Kathleen, 1999: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, Bd. 2, 369-404 11. Teorie graduální institucionální změny POVINNÁ ČETBA: Mahoney, James and Kathleen Thelen, 2010: A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. In: Mahoney, James and Kathleen Thelen (eds.): Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1- 37 DOPORUČENÁ ČETBA: Streeck, Wolfgang and Kathleen Thelen, 2005: Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. In: Streeck, Wolfgang and Kathleen Thelen (eds.): Beyond Continuity. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1-39 Steinmo, Sven, 2010: The Evolution of Modern States: Sweden, Japan, and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Ch. 1, pp. 1-29 12. Diskursivní institucionalismus POVINNÁ ČETBA: Schmidt, Vivien A., 2010, Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism‘. European political science review, Vol. 2.1. 1-25. DOPORUČENÁ ČETBA: Blyth, Mark, 2013, Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. New Yorl. Oxford University Press. Schmidt, Vivien A., 2012, Discursive Institutionalism: Scope, Dynamics, and Philosophical Underpinnings. In: Fischer, Frank and Herbert Gottweis (eds.): The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communication Practice. Durham, London: Duke University Press Poslední úprava: Čada Karel, Mgr., Ph.D. (18.02.2014)
|
|
||
|
Volitelný kurz rozvíjí některé témata probíraná v povinných kurzech Sociální konstrukce hospodářských a správních institucí (JSM013) či Dilema jednání a struktury v sociologické teorii (JSM002), nicméně nepředpokládá u studentů jejich předchozí absolvování. Poslední úprava: Čada Karel, Mgr., Ph.D. (18.02.2014)
|