|
|
|
||
This unique course is based on cooperation between IES FSS and Robinson College, University of Cambridge. It offers both the inquiry into the newest thematic and methodological development of economic and social history and the teaching practice as is used at the University of Cambridge. For the Cambridge Lectures, Antonie Doležalová was awarded the Arnost of Pardubice Prize 2019 for the most innovative teacher at the Charles University.
CLEH 2025: CAPITALISM AND AFRICAN HISTORY Gareth Austin, King's College, Cambridge This year, the compact course will explore the economic development of Sub-Saharan Africa in the long term. It does so from the perspective of a long-debated question: has Africa had too little, too much, or the wrong sort of capitalism? Individual lectures and seminars will elaborate the following issues: 1. The economic history of Africa from 1450 to the present 2. Slavery and the Market 3. Colonialism and Capitalism in Africa 4. Capitalism in Independent Africa Poslední úprava: Doležalová Antonie, prof. PhDr. Ing., Ph.D. (14.02.2025)
|
|
||
With the exception of the first lecture of 02.20. 15:30-17:00, Opletalova 206 the course will taught as the compact course during the week 04/07. - 04/10 2025: 07.04..2025, 14-15:20, Opletalova 206, 04.08.2025, 18-19:20 Hollar H014, 04.09.2025, 14-15:20 Opletalova 206 04.10.2025, 15:30-17, Opletalova 206 Poslední úprava: Doležalová Antonie, prof. PhDr. Ing., Ph.D. (14.02.2025)
|
|
||
Grading policy: A…...100-91 B…... 90-81 C…... 80-71 D…... 70-61 E….... 60-51 F… .....50 - 0
Total grade will depend on: 1) Activity and engagement in discussion during the lectures and seminars. The discussion will be based on compulsory reading (24 points max ) 2) Two papers, 1500-2000 words each (2x38 points max) The minimal amount of points required to pass the subject: 51 A minimal number of 51 points to successfully pass the subject is divided as follows: 9 points activity in lectures and seminars 21 x 2 points papers
Paper will be evaluated by points as follows: A (38–33) very well written, highly structured and focused, extensive range of sources used and applied, comprehensive understanding of key facts, an ability to formulate own ideas in analysis, critical judgment B (32-27) clear style, well structured and focused, a full range of relevant sources, good understanding of key facts, critical evaluation in the discussion C (26-21) descriptive style, coherently structured and focused, minimal but relevant literature, a partial understanding of the key facts, evaluative sought in some areas D (20-15) weak descriptive style, logically structured and focused, inadequate literature, general knowledge demonstrated, poor evaluation E (14-10) partially disorganized style, poorly structured and not focused, some knowledge but the insufficient reference to the literature, some unclear sections, missing evaluation F (9-0) poorly and unclearly written, little knowledge, poor understanding the topic Poslední úprava: Doležalová Antonie, prof. PhDr. Ing., Ph.D. (16.02.2021)
|