PředmětyPředměty(verze: 978)
Předmět, akademický rok 2025/2026
   
Rethinking Genre: Theories, Methods, and the Examples of Recent American Popular Cinema (NMgr. a Dr. seminář) - AFV00195
Anglický název: Rethinking Genre: Theories, Methods, and the Examples of Recent American Popular Cinema
Zajišťuje: Katedra filmových studií (21-KFS)
Fakulta: Filozofická fakulta
Platnost: od 2016
Semestr: letní
Body: 6
E-Kredity: 6
Způsob provedení zkoušky: letní s.:písemná
Rozsah, examinace: letní s.:0/3, Z+Zk [HT]
Počet míst: neurčen / neurčen (15)
Minimální obsazenost: neomezen
4EU+: ne
Virtuální mobilita / počet míst pro virtuální mobilitu: ne
Kompetence:  
Stav předmětu: nevyučován
Jazyk výuky: čeština
Způsob výuky: prezenční
Úroveň:  
Garant: Richard Andrew Nowell, Ph.D.
Mgr. Jindřiška Bláhová, Ph.D.
Rozvrh   Nástěnka   
Anotace
Title: Rethinking Genre: Theories, Methods, and the Example of Recent American Popular Cinema
Coordinator: RICHARD NOWELL, PHD.
Contact: richard_nowell@hotmail.com
Location: 408
Dates: 25.2., 10.3, 24. 3., 7. 4., 21. 4., 5. 5.
Time: 12:05 - 14:10

Course Description and Purpose
Rethinking Genre invites students to radically re-approach the concept of genre. It aims to do so, by furnishing them with cutting-edge conceptual models and methodological frameworks intended to help illuminate genre’s roles in the production, assembly, distribution, and reception of audiovisual texts. The course builds from the position that the sense of structure underpinning a "first generation" of scholarship on genre was as flawed as a "second generation" turn to polysemy. Instead, students will approach the phenomenon of genre - and by extension individual genres - as characterized by a structured polysemy, i.e. by a bounded range of elements, tendencies, and qualities. While drawing examples from recent American popular cinema, Rethinking Genre emphasizes the extent to which genre is an organizing principle traversing audiovisual culture; everything is in some way generic. The insights gleaned across this course therefore promise to be transferable or adaptable to analyses of other historical junctures, territories, and media.

Methods of Instruction
Delivered in the English language, Rethinking Genre is an advanced level course intended for students either actively engaged in or thinking about conducting original research on film or other aspects of audiovisual culture. The course is organized into six three-hour seminars, mainly comprising structured discussions and practical exercises. Where the discussion parts of the seminars weigh up the merits, shortcomings, and limitations of important theoretical contributions to the field, exercises are intended to reinforce the practical dimensions of these approaches. Based on multidirectional dialogue and debate, this learning environment demands students who are confident communicating in English and who are committed to working with (and through) sometimes challenging abstract ideas. A background in the study of film and/or other screen media is an essential prerequisite to this course, as is the drive to confront the complex realities of genre’s operations across audiovisual cultures.

Course Goals and Student Learning Objectives
Rethinking Genre emphasizes the compatibility of genre theory and historical research. And while each seminar centralizes a specific topic under this general rubric, students are encouraged to see these topics as offering complementary tools which can - and at times should - be synthesized within their repertoires of conceptual frameworks and practical skills. By the end of the course, students will be expected to demonstrate a solid understanding of all of the topics listed below and to produce a theoretically-sound and empirically-researched paper showcasing some of them:

• how genre might be conceptualized generally
• how and why perceptions of specific genres might differ and change somewhat
• how and why trends form across output; why they emerge, develop, and decline
• how and why perceptions of genre(s) influence the assembly and content of media texts
• how and why perceptions of genre(s) operate in marketing campaigns and materials
• how and why conceptions of genre shape the repackaging of certain types of text

Poslední úprava: Svatoňová Kateřina, prof. PhDr., Ph.D. (11.02.2016)
Podmínky zakončení předmětu

Texts and Resources

As they are expected actively to contribute to seminar discussions, students are required to study the set readings before class. All readings will be available in PDF form to download from the course webpage before the start of the course. Students are advised to bring hard copies of the relevant readings to class, as the use of electronic devices is not permitted except during exercises. Any films to be viewed in preparation for this class will be made available to students in timely fashion.

 

Assessment

Rethinking Genre is presaged on the notion that theoretically informed perspectives on genre can be practically applied to the study of audiovisual culture, thereby promising to help us shed new light on the production, content, dissemination, and reception of films and other media. Put differently, this course is geared to facilitating the production of cutting-edge research. Students will therefore work toward a research paper of 4,000 words, applying the frameworks and methods examined across the course to their own original research to a genre of their choosing. The case studies centralized in these papers may either focus on a hitherto neglected media genre or radically revise understandings of a genre that has been the subject of scholarly or popular attention. In so doing, students will work towards the production of a genuine contribution to the discipline. Students should submit a proposal in writing at time to be announced spotlighting their research question(s), their methods, and a research plan. Time will provided at the end of the course for students to complete their research and write up this essay.

 

Research Paper Proposal

Students will initially write a proposal of their project. If necessary, this document will be revised until a topic relevant, intellectually viable, and ultimately manageable project has been devised. The green-lighting of this proposal is a mandatory precondition of submitting the research paper upon which this course is assessed. Failure punctually to submit such a document or to formulate an appropriate project will result in a student failing the course. Naturally, minor deviations from the proposal are a perfectly normal part of researching and writing such a paper; the proposal should therefore be seen by all involved as a general roadmap, with no student duty-bound to stick religiously thereto. A final version of the proposal will be formally submitted after the seminars end, again as a precondition of submitting the research paper.

 

Grading/Evaluation:  Grades from 1-4 will be awarded based on the following criteria:

 

Argumentation/Understanding

Sources/Evidence

Communication

1

 

70<

Insightful, vigorous, and demonstrating considerable depth of understanding and a significant amount of original thought; addressing question directly through a wholly coherent synthesis of ideas; demonstrating a degree of mastery over subject; demonstrating a deep and thorough understanding of key concepts.

A wide range of sources consulted; sources employed with significant discrimination and sound judgment; thorough assessment of evidence; use of a broad range of examples.

Near-Faultless typography and layout; near-flawless turns of phrase and expression; sophisticated and precise vocabulary; clear structure; exemplary citation and bibliography.

2

 

 

55-69.9

Perceptive and insightful; some evidence of original thought; for the most part addressing question directly; mainly coherent synthesis of ideas; thorough and somewhat critical understanding of key concepts.

A fairly wide range of sources consulted; solid assessment of evidence; sophisticated use of a fairly broad range of examples.

Very Solid typography and layout; few errors in grammar; mainly sophisticated turns of phrase and expression; mostly clear structure; strong citation and bibliography.

3

 

 

40-54.9

Solid understanding addressed, for the most part, to the question; good synthesis of ideas; reasonably solid understanding of key concepts; evidence of gaps in knowledge and some minor misunderstandings of key concepts.

Several sources consulted; evidence of some assessment of evidence; use of mostly workable examples.

Good typography and layout; comprehensible and largely error-free grammar, turns of phrase, and expression; reasonable clearly structured; some attempt to provide citation and bibliography.

4 (Fail)

 

<40

Barely if it all addressed to question; no real synthesis of ideas; mainly descriptive rather than analytical; weak and patchy understanding of key concepts; significant gaps in knowledge and misunderstanding of key concepts.

Restricted range of sources consulted; superficial understanding of evidence; limited range of examples, many of which are inappropriate.

Poor typography and layout; numerous errors of grammar; limited vocabulary; ambiguous or inaccurate turns of phrase; weak or missing citations and bibliography.

 

Draft Research Paper Proposal Deadline: TBC

 

Formal Research Paper Proposal Deadline: TBC

 

Research Paper Deadline: TBC

 

All Essays are to be submitted in PDF or word format to richard_nowell@hotmail.com.

Students should include their name and the course title in the name of the files they send.

 

Penalties for Late Submission of Work

 Up to 24 hours after the due date - 5 marks out of 100 deducted

Between 24 hours and seven days following the due to date - 10 marks out of 100 deducted

Between seven and thirteen days following the due date - 20 marks out of 100 deducted

After the 14th day following the due date - all marks deducted

 

One-on-One Tutorials

Students are invited to arrange one-on-one tutorials to discuss assignments and/or any issues arising from the course. Meetings can be arranged by email and can take place at a location and time of mutual convenience.

 

Feedback

Students will be emailed with detailed feedback on their papers. Feedback is designed to be constructive. It will therefore spotlight the paper’s strengths and shortcomings, and offer transferable advice on how the paper might have been improved.

Poslední úprava: Svatoňová Kateřina, prof. PhDr., Ph.D. (11.02.2016)
Literatura

 Texts and Resources

As they are expected actively to contribute to seminar discussions, students are required to study the set readings before class. All readings will be available in PDF form to download from the course webpage before the start of the course. Students are advised to bring hard copies of the relevant readings to class, as the use of electronic devices is not permitted except during exercises. Any films to be viewed in preparation for this class will be made available to students in timely fashion.

 

Poslední úprava: Svatoňová Kateřina, prof. PhDr., Ph.D. (11.02.2016)
 
Univerzita Karlova | Informační systém UK