PředmětyPředměty(verze: 837)
Předmět, akademický rok 2018/2019
   Přihlásit přes CAS
Pragmatic Perspectives in Phenomenology - AFSV00294
Anglický název: Pragmatic Perspectives in Phenomenology
Zajišťuje: Ústav filosofie a religionistiky (21-UFAR)
Fakulta: Filozofická fakulta
Platnost: od 2018
Semestr: letní
Body: 0
E-Kredity: 6
Způsob provedení zkoušky: letní s.:
Rozsah, examinace: letní s.:2/0 Zk [hodiny/týden]
Počet míst: neurčen / neurčen (neurčen)
Minimální obsazenost: neomezen
Stav předmětu: nevyučován
Jazyk výuky: angličtina
Způsob výuky: prezenční
Další informace: https://dl1.cuni.cz/course/view.php?id=4329
Poznámka: předmět je možno zapsat mimo plán
povolen pro zápis po webu
Garant: Mgr. Ondřej Švec, Ph.D.
Neslučitelnost : AFS500176, AFS500176E
Rozvrh   Nástěnka   
Anotace - angličtina
Poslední úprava: Mgr. Ondřej Švec, Ph.D. (19.02.2018)
The course "Pragmatic Perspectives in Phenomenology" will start Monday, February 26 !

The aim of this course is to extract and assess the pragmatic theses that are present in the phenomenological works of M. Heidegger, M. Merleau-Ponty and J. Patočka. We will read and critically assess both primary texts and several pragmatic readings of Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty, while focusing on the the following themes as possible justifications for speaking about the pragmatic turn in phenomenology: <br>
- the primacy of the practical over theoretical understanding<br>
- criticism of the representationalist account of perception <br>
- analysis of truth claims within the context of social and cultural practices.<br>
Literatura - angličtina
Poslední úprava: Mgr. Ondřej Švec, Ph.D. (01.02.2018)


Brandom, Robert. 2002a. “Heidegger’s Categories in Sein und Zeit.” In Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 298-323.

Brandom, Robert. 2002b. “Dasein, the Being that Thematizes” In Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 324-347.

Crowell, Steven (2013), Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger, Cambridge University Press

Dreyfus, Hubert (1991), Being-in-the-World, Commentary on Heidegger's "Being and Time," Division I., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Haugeland, John (2013), Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger, ed. by Joseph Rouse, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Heidegger, Martin (1996), Being and Time (translated by Joan Stambaugh). Albany: State University of New York Press

Husserl, H. (1970), The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, (trans. D. Carr) Evanston: Northwestern University Press

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1997), Phénoménologie de la perception, Éditions Gallimard.

Okrent, Mark (1988) Heidegger's Pragmatism: Understanding, Being, and the Critique of Metaphysics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Patočka, Jan (1996) Heretical Essays in the Philosophy of History, La Salle, Ill.: Open Court Publishing.

Patočka, Jan (1998) Body, Community, Language, World, La Salle, Ill.: Open Court Publishing.

Patočka, Jan (2016), Afterword to the first French Translation in Jan Patočka, The Natural World as a Philosophical Problem, Evanston: Northwestern University Press

Rorty, Richard (1991) Heidegger, contingency, and pragmatism. In: R. Rorty, Essays on Heidegger and Others: Philosophical Papers Volume 2 (pp. 27–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Švec, Ondřej & Čapek, Jakub (eds.) (2017), Pragmatic Perspectives in Phenomenology, Routledge, London/New York 

Požadavky ke zkoušce - angličtina
Poslední úprava: Mgr. Ondřej Švec, Ph.D. (01.02.2018)

The credits for the course will be delivered based on two categories of assessment:

(1) Engaged Involvement:

This is generally a matter of preparation, attendance, attention, and participation in the course.


(2a) Oral presentation with critical assessment of two issues:

·        Is the interpretation accurate to the position reported?

·        Is it an accurate analysis of the philosophical problems at stake?


(2b) Written Work:

A paper based on critical assessment of already exiting interpretations of Heidegger,  Merleau-Ponty or Patočka with regards to the primary texts. This means: You must consult primary sources (Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Patočka) and compare or critically assess different interpretations.

Topics for the papers are to be chosen by yourself, but of course it can be in consultation with me. The topic must clearly deal with themes raised during our course.

These papers should be of roughly 6-7 pages (250*7=1750 words) and should be sent to my email address with a proper form of footnotes, endnotes, or references.  The papers will be due on Friday, 15 May 2018.

Univerzita Karlova | Informační systém UK