|
|
|
||
|
To receive credit for the seminar students will be required . . . • to miss no more than two classes; • to give an in-class oral presentation of no longer than 10 minutes, designed to exhibit a thorough understanding of one of the short works on the syllabus, or of one scene in a longer work, viewing it through a feminist critical lens; • to produce a final essay (2500-3000 words, topics to be discussed with instructor) by May 26; • in the case of students wanting to produce a second graded essay for a ZK, they may do so by a date TBA (required length: 2500-3000 words, subjects to be discussed with professor). (Erasmus students may produce the second ZK graded essay if they register for it on the SIS). Email 100-word essay proposals before our final class meeting in May. Poslední úprava: Poncarová Petra Johana, Mgr., Ph.D. (05.02.2022)
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
NOT TAUGHT ANY LONGER - APOLOGIES (part of Fulbright exchange) David Hicks, PhD (American Literature, New York University) Professor of Literature/Director of Creative Writing, Wilkes University david.hicks@wilkes.edu Internet phone #: 570-591-1717 Seminar: Thursdays 12:30-14:05, Faculty of Arts Room 1 Office Hour: Thursdays 11:00-12:00, Faculty of Arts 219C
“America is now wholly given over to a [damned] mob of scribbling women, and I should have no chance of success while the public taste is occupied with their trash—and should be ashamed of myself if I did succeed.” – Nathaniel Hawthorne, 1855
Objectives: This seminar will focus on the literary origins of feminism in the United States, which asserted itself mostly by way of subterfuge; for in order to be published, women needed to adhere to the standards of white male editors, but in order to make their feminist case, they had to embed radical subtexts within their conventional texts—manifesting a version of the “dual consciousness” that (according to W.E.B. Dubois) was a characteristic of African-American character. Thus they simultaneously played and depicted (while also subverting) what Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar (in Madwoman in the Attic) label as the dual roles of women in literature: those of “angel” and “monster.” The result? Their work simultaneously asserts and undermines the entrenched roles assigned to women, creating rich and disturbing works of literature for us to study.
Among the “scribbling women” that Hawthorne complained about were accomplished authors from whose style and themes Hawthorne “borrowed” for his own work. We will endeavor to appreciate and study some of those works, foremost on their own merits, but also in the context of the times in which they were written and the feminist agenda they consciously and/or unconsciously asserted, as well as the ongoing applicability of their themes to American culture and society today.
Required Texts Catherine Maria Sedgwick, Hope Leslie, Rutgers University Press Showalter, Elaine, ed. Scribbling Women: Short Stories by 19th-Century American Women Fanny Fern (Sara Willis), Ruth Hall and Other Writings, Rutgers University Press, or any edition of RH Harriet Jacobs (Linda Brent), Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, any edition Emily Dickinson, Final Harvest (collected poems), or any edition of her poems Kate Chopin, The Awakening (any edition) In case you cannot find or afford any of these books, .pdfs of all required readings appear below
Secondary Materials: Amireh, Amal. The Factory Girl and the Seamstress: Imagining Gender and Class in Nineteenth- Century American Fiction. New York, Garland, 2000. Braxton, Joanne M. and Sharon Zuber. “Silences in Harriet 'Linda Brent' Jacobs's Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl. Listening to Silences: New Essays in Feminist Criticism. New York: Oxford UP 1994,146-155, Cogan, Frances. All-American Girl: The Ideal of Real Womanhood in Mid-Nineteenth-Century America. Athens, U of Georgia P, 1989. Crosby, Shelby L. “The Body Politic and Cultural Miscegenation in Sedgwick’s Hope Leslie; or, Early Times in the Massachusetts. CLA Journal. Jun2011, Vol. 54 Issue 4, p337-363 Cutter, Martha. Unruly Tongue: Identity and Voice in American Women's Writing, 1850-1930. Jackson: U of Mississippi P, 1989. Doriani, Beth Maclay. “Black Womanhood in Nineteenth-Century America: Subversion and Self-Construction in Two Women’s Autobiographies.” American Quarterly Vol. 43, 199-222 Fetterly, Judith. The Resisting Reader: a Feminist Approach to American Literature. ---. Introduction to Provisions: A Reader from 19th Century American Women. Gilbert and Gubar, Madwoman in the Attic: the Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. Howe, Susan. My Emily Dickinson. New Directions, 1985. Larson, Jennifer. “Converting Passive Womanhood to Active Sisterhood: Agency, Power, and Subversion in Harriet Jacobs’s Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl. Women's Studies, Vol. 35 Issue 8, p739-756 Martin, Wendy. The Cambridge Guide to Emily Dickinson. Cambridge University Press, 2002. Sanchez, Maria. “Re-Possessing Individualism in Fanny Fern's Ruth Hall” Arizona Quarterly Vol. 56.4, 25-56. Temple, Gale. “A Purchase on Goodness: Fanny Fern, Ruth Hall, and Fraught Individualism.” Studies in American Fiction 2003 Vol. 31.2, 131-163. Vasquez, Mark G. “’Your Sister Cannot Speak to You and Understand You As I Do’: Native American Culture and Female Subjectivity in Lydia Maria Child and Catherine Maria Sedgwick.” American Transcendentalist Quarterly, Sept 2001, Vol. 15, Issue 3. SCHEDULE
Poslední úprava: Poncarová Petra Johana, Mgr., Ph.D. (10.02.2023)
|