Word-ending perception in second-language learners of English

• Název práce v češtině: Vnímání konců slov u studentů angličtiny
• Název v anglickém jazyce: Word-ending perception in second-language learners of English
• Klíčová slova: percepce|studenti angličtiny|ohebné koncovky|sublexikon|zpracování slov podle pravidel|zpracování slov jako celku
• Klíčová slova anglicky: perception|second-language learners|verb inflection|sublexicon|rule-based processing|whole-word processing
• Akademický rok vypsání: 2016/2017
• Typ práce: diplomová práce
• Jazyk práce: angličtina
• Ústav: Ústav anglického jazyka a didaktiky (21-UAJD)
• Vedoucí / školitel: doc. Luca Cilibrasi, Ph.D.
• Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno a potvrzeno stud. odd.
• Datum přihlášení: 05.10.2016
• Datum zadání: 05.10.2016
• Schválení administrátorem: zatím neschvalováno
• Datum potvrzení stud. oddělením: 12.10.2016
• Datum a čas obhajoby: 30.05.2017 08:30
• Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby: 04.05.2017
• Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 30.05.2017
• Odevzdaná/finalizovaná: odevzdaná studentem a finalizovaná
• Oponenti: PhDr. Tomáš Gráf, Ph.D.
• Konzultanti: Mgr. Jiřina Popelíková

Zásady pro vypracování

Word final positions are sometimes described as optionally salient, depending on the presence or the absence of bound morphology. In fact, word final positions often incur disruptive phonological processes (such as deletion or assimilation) but these processes are partially blocked in the presence of bound morphology. Some evidence suggests that these effects may also be active in the sublexicon (i.e. with no access to semantics). Investigations of this phenomenon so far focused on monolingual speakers, and little is known about the presence of these effects on speakers of English as L2. This diploma thesis aims at partially filling this gap by focusing on the perceptual salience of word endings as perceived by second-language learners of English having Czech as L1.
The methodology will be based on Cilibrasi (2015). The subjects will be adult second-language learners of English of different language levels (B1, B2 and C1/C2). The subjects will be presented with stimuli recorded at the School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences in Reading by a trained linguist native speaker of English. They will listen to pairs of nonwords and decide if the nonwords are identical or slightly different (i.e. a same/different task) by pressing one of two buttons. There will be three conditions:
Condition 1: nonwords containing potential morphological information
Condition 2: nonwords with no morphological information
Condition 3: control condition
We expect reaction times to reflect the presence of bound morphology, with nonwords containing bound morphology taking longer to be discriminated. Further, we expect proficiency in English to be a co-predictor of reaction times, with proficient speakers showing a larger (native-like) effect of morphology.
The study will also inevitably attempt to find evidence either for the rule-based or for the whole-word processing of words as regards the perceptual decomposition of inflected verbs into stems and affixes. Finally, the study will compare the results of Cilibrasi’s study of word-ending perception in native speakers of English with the results of this thesis and attempt to interpret any potential differences.

Seznam odborné literatury

Berko, J. (1958) The child learning of English morphology. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000) “The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity.“ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26.2: 489.

Brown, J. D., Rodgers, T. S. (2009) Doing Second Language Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988) “Lexical access and inflectional morphology.“ Cognition 28.3: 297-332.

Cilibrasi, Luca (2015) “Word position effects in speech perception.“ University of Reading, PhD. thesis.

Diessel, H. (2013) “Construction grammar and first language acquisition.“ In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Oxford, UK.

Gleason, J. Berko & Ratner, N. B. (Eds.) (2009) The Development of Language, 7th Edition. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.

Guasti, M. T. (2004) Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge: Law & Strange, 2011.

Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T. J., Xu, F., & Clahsen, H. (1992) Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the society for research in child development, i-178.

Maslen, R. J. C., Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., Tomasello, M. (2004) “A dense corpus study of past tense and plural overregularization in English.“ Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, (47-d), 1319-1333.

McClelland, J. L., & Patterson, K. (2002) “Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence rule out?“ Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6.11: 465-472.

Pinker, S. & Ullman, M. T. (2002a) “The past and future of past tense.“ Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6.11: 456-462.

Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2002b) “Combination and structure, not gradedness, is the issue.“ Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6.11: 472-474.

Roach, P. (2000) English Phonetics and phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stemberger, J. P. & MacWhinney, B. (1986) “Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms.“ Memory & Cognition 14.1: 17-26.

Tomasello, M. (2006) “First stepts toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition.“ Cognitive Linguistics 11: 1-2, 61-82.