Patron-Client Relations and Ethnic Cleansing: An Analysis of Third-Party Influence in the First Nagorno-Karabakh War
| Název práce v češtině: | Vztahy mezi mecenáši a klienty a etnické čistky: Analýza vlivu třetích stran v první válce o Náhorní Karabach |
|---|---|
| Název v anglickém jazyce: | Patron-Client Relations and Ethnic Cleansing: An Analysis of Third-Party Influence in the First Nagorno-Karabakh War |
| Klíčová slova: | ethnic cleansing; patron-client relations; international conflict; Armenia; Nagorno-Karabakh |
| Klíčová slova anglicky: | ethnic cleansing; patron-client relations; international conflict; Armenia; Nagorno-Karabakh |
| Akademický rok vypsání: | 2021/2022 |
| Typ práce: | diplomová práce |
| Jazyk práce: | angličtina |
| Ústav: | Katedra bezpečnostních studií (23-KBS) |
| Vedoucí / školitel: | prof. PhDr. Emil Aslan, Ph.D. |
| Řešitel: | skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem |
| Datum přihlášení: | 13.06.2022 |
| Datum zadání: | 13.06.2022 |
| Datum a čas obhajoby: | 20.09.2023 07:00 |
| Místo konání obhajoby: | Jinonice - U Kříže 8, Praha 5 |
| Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby: | 01.08.2023 |
| Datum proběhlé obhajoby: | 20.09.2023 |
| Oponenti: | Mgr. Kledian Myftari |
| Seznam odborné literatury |
| Abrahams, Fred. Under Orders: War Crimes in Kosovo. New York: Human Rights Watch, 2001.
Bell-Fialkoff, Andrew. “A Brief History of Ethnic Cleansing.” Foreign Affairs 72, no. 3 (1993): 110-121. Bulutgil, H. Zeynep. The Roots of Ethnic Cleansing in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. Bulutgil, H. Zeynep. “The State of the Field and Debates on Ethnic Cleasing.” Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity 46, no. 6 (2018): 1136-1145. Downes, Alexander B. Targeting Civilians in War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2008. Fujii, Lee Ann. Killing Neighbors: Webs of Violence in Rwanda. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006. Kalyvas, Stathis and Matthew Adam Kocher. “The Dynamics of Violence in Vietnam: An Analysis of the Hamlet Evaluation System (HET).” Journal of Peace Research 46, no. 3 (2009): 335-355. Kalyvas, Stathis. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Kalyvas, Stathis. “Wanton and Senseless? The Logic of Massacres in Algeria.” Rationality and Society 11, no. 3 (1999): 243-285. Mann, Michael. The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Sémelin, Jacques. Purify and Destroy: The Political Uses of Massacre and Genocide. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009. Straus, Scott. The Order of Genocide: Race, Power, and War in Rwanda. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006. Straus, Scott. “Retreating From the Brink: Theorizing Mass Violence and the Dynamics of Restraint.” Perspectives on Politics 10, no. 2 (2012):343–362. Valentino, Benjamin, Paul Huth, and Dylan Balch-Lindsay. “‘Draining the Sea’: Mass Killing and Guerilla Warfare.” International Organization 58, no. 2 (2004):375–407. |
| Předběžná náplň práce |
| The goal of this research would be to contribute to Michael Mann’s theoretical framework: the “democratic” roots of ethnic cleansing. The existing literature acknowledges the role of third-party states in the onset of ethnic cleansing, but this role is limited to neighboring states that share the ethnic identity of the victimized ethnic group–ethnic cleansing is seen as a strategic decision to counter a potential fifth-column group during periods of armed conflict. What remains under-analyzed is the role of third-party, patron states that provide materiel support and ideological legitimacy to perpetrators of ethnic cleansing. What is especially worth analyzing is how does the call to self-determination from this patron state encourage the violent homogenization by the ethnic cleansing perpetrators? How does the materiel support and international legitimacy from a recognized, sovereign state, contribute to the onset of ethnic cleansing? |
| Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce |
| The goal of this research would be to contribute to Michael Mann’s theoretical framework: the “democratic” roots of ethnic cleansing. The existing literature acknowledges the role of third-party states in the onset of ethnic cleansing, but this role is limited to neighboring states that share the ethnic identity of the victimized ethnic group–ethnic cleansing is seen as a strategic decision to counter a potential fifth-column group during periods of armed conflict. What remains under-analyzed is the role of third-party, patron states that provide materiel support and ideological legitimacy to perpetrators of ethnic cleansing. What is especially worth analyzing is how does the call to self-determination from this patron state encourage the violent homogenization by the ethnic cleansing perpetrators? How does the materiel support and international legitimacy from a recognized, sovereign state, contribute to the onset of ethnic cleansing? |