Europe in transformation: possible scenarios from neorealist and constructivist perspectives
| Název práce v češtině: | Transformace Evropy: aneb možná scenérie Evropy z pohledu neorealismu a konstruktivismu |
|---|---|
| Název v anglickém jazyce: | Europe in transformation: possible scenarios from neorealist and constructivist perspectives |
| Klíčová slova: | budování scénářů, neorealismus, konstruktivismus, budoucnost, teorie |
| Klíčová slova anglicky: | scenario building, neorealism, constructivism, future, theory |
| Akademický rok vypsání: | 2012/2013 |
| Typ práce: | bakalářská práce |
| Jazyk práce: | angličtina |
| Ústav: | Katedra politologie (23-KP) |
| Vedoucí / školitel: | RNDr. Jan Kofroň, Ph.D. |
| Řešitel: | skrytý - zadáno a potvrzeno stud. odd. |
| Datum přihlášení: | 14.06.2013 |
| Datum zadání: | 14.06.2013 |
| Datum a čas obhajoby: | 07.09.2015 00:00 |
| Místo konání obhajoby: | IPS FSV UK, U kříže 8/661 158 00 Praha 5 – Jinonice |
| Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby: | 31.07.2015 |
| Datum proběhlé obhajoby: | 07.09.2015 |
| Oponenti: | doc. PhDr. Ondřej Ditrych, M.Phil., Ph.D. |
| Kontrola URKUND: | |
| Seznam odborné literatury |
| ASHLEY, R.K. (1984): The Poverty of Neorealism, International Organization, vol. 38, no. 2. p 251.
BARNETT, M. (2011): Social Constructivism. In: BAYLIS, J., SMITH, S (eds.): The Globalisation of World Politics – An Introduction to International Relations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 150. COPELAND, D.C. (2000): Review: The constructivist Challenge to Structural Realism: A Review Essay, International Security, vol. 25, no. 2, p. 187-212. DAY, M. (2014): Ukraine crisis: 'World stands on brink of conflict,' warns Polish prime minister, The Telegraph, 02 March 2014, viewed 01 November 2014, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/10670931/Ukraine-crisis-World-stands-on-brink-of-conflict-warns-Polish-prime-minister.html. DITRYCH, O. et al. (2012): Scénáře světové politiky 2012–2013, Praha, Ústav mezinárodních vztahů. DOYLE, W. M., (1983): Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 205-235. FEARON, J. (1999): What is identity (as we now use the word)?, draft, Stanford University, Standford, p. 17) FRIČ, P., VESELÝ, A. (eds., 2010): Riziková budoucnost: Devět scénářů vývoje české společnosti, Matfyzpress, Praha. HADJIAN A. (2014): Ukraine Crisis Could Spark Third World War, Former Communist Party Leader And President Kravchuk Warns, International Business Times, 03 March 2014, viewed 01 November 2014, http://www.ibtimes.com/ukraine-crisis-could-spark-third-world-war-former-communist-party-leader-president-kravchuk-warns. HOLSTI, O.R. (2004): Theories of International Relations, in HOGAN, M.J., PATERSON, T.G. (eds), Explaining the History of American Foreign Relations, Cambridge University Press. INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, (2015): World Economic Outlook: Uneven Growth – Short-and Long-Term Factors, Washington, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/01/pdf/text.pdf. JERVIS, R. (1999): Realism, Liberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate, International Security, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 42. JUNIO T. J., MAHNKEN T. G. (2013): Conceiving of Future War: The Promise of Scenario Analysis for International Relations, International Studies Review, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 374-395. KEOHANE, R. O. (1984): After Hegemony, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. LEGRO, W. J., MORAVCSIK A. (1999): Is Anybody Still Realist?, International Security, vol. 24, no. 2, p. 5–55. LEMPERT, R. (2007): Can Scenarios Help Policymakers Be Both Bold and Careful? in FUKUYAMA, F (eds.), Blindside: How to Anticipate Forcing Events and Wild Cards in Global Politics, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C., p. 112. MEARSHEIMER, J. (2001): Tragedy of Great Power Politics, Norton & company, New York, 555 p. MORAVCSIK, A. (1997): Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics, International Organization, vol. 51, no. 4, p. 513–53. MORAVCSIK, A. PARSONS, C., ROSATO, S. (2013): Europe United, by Sebastian Rosato: A Symposium. Security Studies, vol. 22, č. 4, p. 773-820. POTŮČEK, Martin et al. (2011): Poznávání budoucnosti jako výzva, Karolinum, Praha. ROSATO, S. (2011a): Europe’s Troubles. Power Politics and the State of the European Project, International Security, vol. 35, no. 4, p. 45–86. ROSATO, S. (2011b): Europe United. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 280 p. STUBB, A. (2008): The first post-080808 diagnose, 25 August 2008, viewed 01 November 2014, http://www.formin.fi/public/default.aspx?contentid=135322&contentlan=2&culture=en:-US. UNITED NATIONS, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2015): World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables, working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.241, http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Publications/Files/Key_Findings_WPP_2015.pdf. SCHWARTZ, P. (1996): The Art of the Long View, Doubleday, New York, p. 101-102. WENDT, A. (1992): Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics, International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2, p. 391-425. WENDT, A. (1994): Collective Identity Formation and the International State, The American Political Science Review, vol. 88, no. 2, p. 384-396. WENDT, A. (1995): Constructing International Politics, International Security, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 71-81. WENDT, A. (1999): Social Theory of International Politics. CUP, Cambridge, 447 s. |
| Předběžná náplň práce |
| The aims of this thesis are the following: (i) to explore the applicability of two theories of international relations in building future scenarios: neorealism and constructivism; (ii) to draft probable upcoming scenarios of the European Union's (EU) 1 action as a response to a rise of a possible threat.
My thesis is structured in five chapters. I begin the thesis with an introduction of the theoretical frameworks I have chosen, including their respective criticism. I then proceed by identifying the key elements of scenarios and in the following chapter draft the actual scenarios. In the fourth section I compare the scenarios in order to find similarities and differences in theories and deduce possible implications they might have. Finally, I conclude with a summary of the findings an evaluation of the method. |
| Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce |
| The aims of this thesis are the following: (i) to explore the applicability of two theories of international relations in building future scenarios: neorealism and constructivism; (ii) to draft probable upcoming scenarios of the European Union's (EU) 1 action as a response to a rise of a possible threat.
My thesis is structured in five chapters. I begin the thesis with an introduction of the theoretical frameworks I have chosen, including their respective criticism. I then proceed by identifying the key elements of scenarios and in the following chapter draft the actual scenarios. In the fourth section I compare the scenarios in order to find similarities and differences in theories and deduce possible implications they might have. Finally, I conclude with a summary of the findings an evaluation of the method. |