Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons: Case Study of Norway and the Netherlands

• Název práce v češtině: Smlouva o zákazu jaderných zbraní: případová studie Norska a Nizozemí
• Název v anglickém jazyce: Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons: Case Study of Norway and the Netherlands
• Klíčová slova: Dohoda o zákaze jadrových zbraní, jadrové odzbrojovanie, protiproliferačný režim, jadrové zbrane, Holandsko, Nórsko
• Klíčová slova anglicky: Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, nuclear weapons, non-proliferation regime, the Netherlands, Norway, nuclear disarmament
• Akademický rok vypsání: 2017/2018
• Typ práce: diplomová práce
• Jazyk práce: angličtina
• Ústav: Katedra mezinárodních vztahů (23-KMV)
• Vedoucí / školitel: doc. PhDr. Michal Smetana, Ph.D.
• Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem
• Datum přihlášení: 13.03.2018
• Datum zadání: 13.03.2018
• Datum a čas obhajoby: 17.01.2019 08:30
• Místo konání obhajoby: Jinonice - U Kříže 8, Praha 5, J3093, Jinonice - místn. č. 3093
• Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby: 02.01.2019
• Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 17.01.2019
• Oponenti: Mgr. Jan Ludvík, Ph.D.

Seznam odborné literatury

Blatter, J. – et al. (2012). Congruence Analysis. In: Designing Case Studies (Research Methods Series) (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

Brodie, B. (1958). The Anatomy of Deterrence. RAND Corporation, Research Memorandum (available at https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM2218.html).

Devitt, R. (2011). Liberal Institutionalism: An Alternative IR Theory or Just Maintaining the Status Quo?. E-International Relations Students, (available at https://www.e-ir.info/2011/09/01/liberal-institutionalism-an-alternative-ir-theory-or-just-maintaining-the-status-quo/).

Dunn L.A. – Kahn. H. (1976). Trends in nuclear proliferation, 1975-1995: projections, problems, and policy options (New York: Hudson Institute).

Hughes, C. (2013). Denuclearization: A Models-Based Approach. Clocks and Clouds, Vol. 4, No. 1, (available at http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1599/denuclearization-a-models-based-approach).

ICAN Final Statement To Oslo Conference On Humanitarian Impact Of Nuclear Weapons, March 2013, (available at http://www.acronym.org.uk/old/articles-and-analyses/ican-final-statement-oslo-conference-humanitarian-impact-nuclear-weapons-march-2013).

Jo, D. – Gartzke E. (2007). Determinants of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 51, no. 1.

Krieger, D. (2005). Why Nations Go Nuclear. Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, (available at https://www.wagingpeace.org/why-nations-go-nuclear/).

Lie, F. (2014). Saying no to nukes. ILPI Weapons of Mass Destruction, Background Paper No 10/2014, (available at http://nwp.ilpi.org/?p=2665).

Milner, H. (1997). Interests, Institutions and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press).

“NATO’s nuclear deterrence policy and force,“ nato.int,(available at https://www.nato.int/cps/em/natohq/topics_50068.htm).


Sagan. S.D. (1996-1997). Why Do State Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in Search of a Bomb. International Security, vol. 21, no.3.


Sanders-Zakre, A. (2017). States Hesitate to Sign Nuclear Ban Treaty. Arms Control Association, (available at https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2017-09/news/states-hesitate-sign-nuclear-ban-treaty).


Shirobokova E. (2018). The Netherlands and the prohibition of nuclear weapons. Nonproliferation Review, Vol. 25, Issue 1-2.

Singh S. – Way. Ch. R. (2004). The Correlates of Nuclear Proliferation: A Quantitative Test. Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 48, issue 6.

Solingen, E. (2007). Nuclear Logics Contrasting Paths in East Asia and the Middle East (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

Thies, C.G. (2009). Role Theory and Foreign Policy. International Studies Association Compendium Project - University of Iowa (available at http://myweb.uiowa.edu/bhlai/workshop/role.pdf).

Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, United Nations, July 2017 (available at https://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/2017/07/20170707%2003-42%20PM/Ch_XXVI_9.pdf).

Treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons, the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, un.org, https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/nuclear/tpnw/.


Waltz, K. (1981). The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May Better. Adelphi Papers – International Institute for Strategic Studies, No. 171, (available at http://home.sogang.ac.kr/sites/jaechun/courses/Lists/b6/Attachments/39/5.%20The%20spread%20of%20nuclear%20weapons.pdf).


Wendt, A. (1994). Collective Identity Formation and the International State. American Political Science Review 88.

Williams, H. (2018) A nuclear babel: narratives around the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. Nonproliferation Review, Vol. 25, No. 1-2.

Předběžná náplň práce

Práca má za cieľ preskúmať prístupy krajín k Dohode o zákaze jadrových zbraní. K tomuto účelu by mali byť aplikované teoretické modely, ktoré berú do úvahy potencionálne faktory vplyvu z hľadiska bezpečnosti, vnútropolitickej situácie a noriem.

Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce

Primary goal of the diploma thesis is to examine which factors influenced positions of the selected States on the Treaty on Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. For this purpose, a model-based approach will be applied to analyze both international and domestic factors.