Rekontextualizace nevládních neziskových organizací v diskurzu zpravodajství a publicistiky České televize

• Název práce v češtině: Rekontextualizace nevládních neziskových organizací v diskurzu zpravodajství a publicistiky České televize
• Název v anglickém jazyce: Recontextualization of Non-Governmental Organizations in Discourse of Czech Television's News and Public Affairs
• Klíčová slova: rekontextualizace, nezisková společnost, mediální bias, Česká televize, objektivita, ideologie
• Klíčová slova anglicky: recontextualization, NGO, media bias, Czech television, objectivity, ideology
• Akademický rok vypsání: 2016/2017
• Typ práce: diplomová práce
• Jazyk práce: čeština
• Ústav: Katedra mediálních studií (23-KMS)
• Vedoucí / školitel: prof. PhDr. Jan Jirák, Ph.D.
• Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem
• Datum přihlášení: 14.03.2017
• Datum zadání: 14.03.2017
• Datum a čas obhajoby: 30.01.2018 08:00
• Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby: 04.01.2018
• Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 30.01.2018
• Oponenti: Mgr. Markéta Supa, M.A., Ph.D.

Seznam odborné literatury

AHEARN, M., Laura. Language and Agency, v Annual Review of Anthropology 30, 2001
ARCIDIACONO, Francesco; BOVA, Antonio. Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts, Springer, 2017, 217s
AUER, Peter. Context and Contextualization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub. Co. 1995. ISBN 9027258812
BAKER, B., GRAHAM, T., KAMINSKI, S., How to Identify, Expose & Correct Liberal Media Bias, Media Research Center, 1994, ISBN 0962734829
BAKHTIN, M. M., Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984. ISBN 0-8166-1228-5.
BAKHTIN, M. M., HOLQUIST, Michael. The dialogic imagination: four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press, c1981. ISBN 0-292-71527-7
BAKHTIN, M. M. 2010. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays: A Method for the Human Sciences. University of Texas Press.029278287X cit. v HARDER, Hans. 2017. A few introductory remarks on Bakhtin and Intertextuality. Martin Luther Universität HalleWittenberg. Dostupné z: http://www.scm.unihalle.de/reporting_list/study_days/sektion1/2303855_2303900/
BATYA, Amir; MAZUZ, Keren. 2015. Context, Subtext, Intertextuality: A Tool for Editorial Analysis. Dostupné z: https://21centurytext.wordpress.com/context-subtext-intertextuality-atool-for-editorial-analysis
BAUMAN, Richard.; BRIGGS, L.,Charles. Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on lan-guage and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19. 59–88. 1990
BENYAHIA, Sarah; GARDNER, Abigail; RAYNER, Philip; WALL, Pete. Media studies: the essential resource. Second edition. 2013. ISBN 1136259864
BURTON, Graeme; JIRÁK, Jan. Úvod do studia médií. Brno: Barrister & Principal, 2001. Studium (Barrister & Principal). ISBN 80-85947-67-6
COLE, L., Nicky, What Is Discourse: Sociological Definition. ThoughtCo., 2017, Dostupné z WWW: https://www.thoughtco.com/discourse-definition-3026070
DURANTI, Alessandro. Agency in Language, v A. Duranti (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004
ELDER, Linda; PAUL, Richard. How to Detect Media Bias & Propaganda. The Foundation for Critical Thinking. 2004, Dostupné z www: https://www.criticalthinking.org/TGS_files/SAM-MediaBias.pdf
ELDER, Linda; PAUL, Richard. The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools, Foundation for Critical Thinking Press, 2008, Dostupné z www: https://www.criticalthinking.org/files/Concepts_Tools.pdf
FAIRCLOUGH, Norman. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge, 2003. ISBN 0203697073.
FAIRCLOUGH, Norman. Critical Discourse Analysis the Critical Study of Language. 2. vyd. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 2013. ISBN 1317864654.
FAIRCLOUGH, Norman. Discourse and social change. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, 1992. ISBN 0-7456-0674-1.
FAIRCLOUGH, Norman. Language and power. Pearson Education, 2001. ISBN 9780582414839.
FETZER,Anita; OISHI, Etsuko. Context and contexts: parts meet whole?. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co., 2011. ISBN 9027256136.
FOUCAULT, Michel, YOUNG, Robert. Untying the text: a post-structuralist reader. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981. ISBN 071000804x.
GLASER, Edward. An Experiment in the Development of Critical Thinking, Teacher’s College, Columbia University, 1941.
GUNTER, B., Measuring Bias on Television, University of Luton Press, 186 s., 1997, ISBN 186020526
HALLIDAY, A. K., Michael. An introduction to functional grammar. London:Arnold. 1985, ISBN 0713163658
HARDER, Hans. 2017. A few introductory remarks on Bakhtin and Intertextuality. Martin Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg. Dostupný z WWW: http://www.scm.unihalle.de/reporting_list/study_days/sektion1/2303855_2303900/
HATCHER, Donald; SPENCER, Anne. Reasoning and Writing. From Critical Thinking to Composition. 3. vyd. Boston: American Press. ISBN 978-0-89641-422-8
CHAN, Jasmine. 2011. Preserving the Liberal World Order in an Age of Globalization: Representing the People’s Republic of China in the American Prestige Press. Media@LSE, London School of Economics and Political Science.
CHOULIARAKI, L., FAIRCLOUGH, N. (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, cit. v FAIRCLOUGH, Norman. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge, 2003. ISBN 0203697073.
JIRÁK, Jan; KÖPPLOVÁ, Barbara. Média a společnost. Praha: Portál, 2003. ISBN 80-7178697-7
KHOSRAVINIK, Majid. Discourse, identity and legitimacy: self and other in representations of Iran's nuclear programme. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2015. ISBN 9789027268211.
KODEX České televize. Dostupné z www: http://www.ceskatelevize.cz/vse-o-ct/kodex-ct
KRISTEVA, Julia. 1980. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York: Columbia University Press.
LINELL, Per. Approaching Dialogue Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub. Co, 1998. ISBN 9789027285492
LINELL, Per. What is dialogism - Aspects and elements of a dialogical approach to language, communication and cognition. Linköping University, 2000.
LINELL, Per. Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Pub, 2009. ISBN 1607521989.
MATHESON, Donald. Media Discourses: Analysing Media Texts. Open University Press. 2005. ISBN 0 335 2146
McGREGOR, T. L. Sue. Critical Discourse Analysis: A Primer. Kappa Omicron Nu. 2003. Dostupné z www: https://www.kon.org/archives/forum/15-1/mcgregorcda.html
MCQUAIL, Denis. Media performance: mass communication and the public interest. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1992. ISBN 0-8039-8295-X.
O'KEEFFE, Anna. Media and Discourse Analysis. The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge. s. 441. 2011
OSN. Úmluva o právním postavení uprchlíků. Ženeva: OSN, 1951, 1967
PARK, Sung-Yul, Joseph; BUCHOLTZ, Mary. IntroductionPublic transcripts: entextualization and linguistic representation in institutional contexts. Text & Talk. 29-5, s. 485-502. 2009, Dostupné z www: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/02b8p8jh
PÊCHEUX, Michel. Language, semantics, and ideology. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1982. ISBN 0-312-46915-2.
POSTMAN, Neil cit. v IRWIN O'NEILL, S., Digital Media: Human-Technology Connection, Rowman & Littlefield, s. 31, 2016, ISBN 073918654X
REIFOVÁ, Irena. Slovník mediální komunikace. Praha: Portál, 2004. ISBN 80-7178-926-7.
SALVATO, L., 2014. Herausforderungen an den Übersetzer.: Überlegungen zur Theorie und Praxis, EDUCatt - Ente per il diritto allo studio universitario dell'Università Cattolica, str. 28
SCHNEIDEROVÁ, Soňa. Analýza diskurzu a mediální text. Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze, nakladatelství Karolinum, 2015. ISBN 9788024628844.
SCRIVEN, Michael; PAUL, Richard. 1987, cit. v Defining critical thinking. The Foundation for Critical Thinking. Dostupné z www: http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766
SHEYHOLISLAMI, Jaffer. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. Carleton University, Ottawa, ON. Dostupné z www: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228921006_Critical_discourse_analysis
STALNAKER, Robert. On the Representation of Context. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, roč. 7, s. 3-19, 1998
VAN DIJK, T. A., (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4, 249-283.
VAN DIJK, T. A., (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse and Society, 17, 359-38
VICE, Sue. Introducing Bakhtin. Manchester: Manchester University Press, Distributed exclusively in the USA by St. Martin's Press, c1997. ISBN 071904328x.
VYBÍRAL, Zbyněk. Diskurzivní psychologie versus diskurzivní analýza?. Československá psychologie, roč. 50, č. 6, 2006
WIDDOWSON, Henry. Critical Practices: On Representation and the Interpretation of Text, cit. v S. Sarangi & Malcolm Coulthard (eds.), Discourse and social life. Harlow: Pearson Education. 2000.
WODAK, Ruth. The discourse of historical approach. v Methods of CDA. (ed.) R. Wodak a M. Meyers. London: Sage Publication, 2001
WODAK, Ruth; FAIRCLOUGH, Norman. Recontextualizing European higher education policies: the cases of Austria and Romania. Critical Discourse Studies. roč. 7, č. 1. 2010, Dostupné z www: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17405900903453922
WODAK, Ruth; MEYER, Michael. Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis. SAGE. 2009. ISBN 1446244083
WODAK, Ruth; RICHARDSON, E., John. Analysing fascist discourse: European fascism in talk and text. New York: Routledge, 2012. ISBN 0415899192.

Předběžná náplň práce

Téma se věnuje procesu dekontextualizace a rekontextualizace, který zkoumaný jev, tedy nevládní neziskové organizace a jejich působení, přetváří tím, že ho zbavuje jeho přirozeného kontextu a vsazuje ho do kontextu nového - mediálního. Problematika, kterou mimo média vnímáme určitým způsobem, pak nabývá nových významů a mění se její hodnota. S tímto se úzce pojí kritérium objektivity médií, resp. mediálního bias (zaujatosti), který lze stručně definovat jako selektivní či účelově jednostranné informování.

Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce

This topic is concerned with process of decontextualization and recontextualization, which transforms examined phenomenon, in this case NGOs and its activities, takes it from its original context and puts it in new, media context. Certain way, in which we´re used to perceive this issue outside of media, acquires whole new meanings and its value is changed. That´s in close relation with concept of objectivity and media bias, which we can briefly define as selective or deliberately one-sided reporting.