Využití Rivermead behaviorálního paměťového testu u pacientů po poškození mozku
| Název práce v češtině: | Využití Rivermead behaviorálního paměťového testu u pacientů po poškození mozku |
|---|---|
| Název v anglickém jazyce: | Clinical utility of Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test in Patients after Brain Damage |
| Klíčová slova: | poškození mozku, poruchy paměti, personální ADL, FIM, RBMT-3 |
| Klíčová slova anglicky: | brain damage, memory impairment, personal ADL, FIM, RBMT-3 |
| Akademický rok vypsání: | 2016/2017 |
| Typ práce: | diplomová práce |
| Jazyk práce: | čeština |
| Ústav: | Klinika rehabilitačního lékařství 1. LF UK a VFN (11-00640) |
| Vedoucí / školitel: | Bc. Mária Krivošíková, M.Sc. |
| Řešitel: | skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem |
| Datum přihlášení: | 29.11.2016 |
| Datum zadání: | 24.04.2018 |
| Datum a čas obhajoby: | 22.06.2018 00:00 |
| Místo konání obhajoby: | Praha |
| Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby: | 30.04.2018 |
| Datum proběhlé obhajoby: | 22.06.2018 |
| Předmět: | Obhajoba diplomové práce (B02662) |
| Oponenti: | Mgr. Eva Straková, Ph.D. |
| Seznam odborné literatury |
| SEZNAM POUŽITÉ LITERATURY 1. ABREU, B.C. a J.P. TOGLIA. Cognitive rehabilitation: a model for occupational therapy. The American journal of occupational therapy: official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association [online]. 1987,41(7), 439 - 448 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 02729490. 2. ALVES, F. a A. HURTADO ALBIR. Cognitive approaches to translation. Handbook of Translation Studies. Amsterdam: Gambier, Doorslaer 2010. 28-35. Type of publication: article. Language: English. Authors from TREC: 2010. 3. AMBLER, Z. Základy neurologie. Praha: Galén, 2011. 341 s. ISBN 97-88072-62707-3. 4. BADDELEY, Alan D. Working memory, thought, and action. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. Oxford psychology series, no. 45. 5. BADDELEY, Alan. Review: The episodic buffer. Trends in Cognitive Sciences [online]. 1995, 4(11), 417-423 [cit. 2018-02-27]. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2. ISSN 13646613. 6. BADDELEY, Alan D., Michael D. KOPELMAN a Barbara A. WILSON. The essential handbook of memory disorders for clinicians. Hoboken, NJ, USA: J. Wiley, c2002. 7. BAR, Michal a Irina CHMELOVÁ. Péče o pacienta po cévní mozkové příhodě. In: Neurologie [online]. 2011, s. 11 [cit. 2018-04-28]. Dostupné z: http://www.osu.cz/dokumenty/monitoringmedii/1008.pdf 8. BARBERGER-GATEAU P., et al. Fish, meat, and risk of dementia: cohort study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) [online]. 2002, 325(7370), 932-3 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 17561833. 9. BARKER-COLLO, S., et al. Attention Deficits After Incident Stroke in the Acute Period: Frequency Across Types of Attention and Relationships to Patient Characteristics and Functional Outcomes. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation [online]. 2010, 17(6), 463-476 [cit. 2017-05-05]. ISSN 10749357. 10. BARKER-COLLO, S., et al. Auckland Stroke Outcomes Study Part 2: Cognition and functional outcomes 5 years poststroke. Neurology [online]. 2010, 75(18), 1608-1616 [cit. 2017-05-05]. ISSN 00283878. 11. BART, O., A. SARAH a D. TZAFRIR. Validation of the Israeli Version of the rivermead behavioral memory test for children following acquired brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation [online]. 2013,28(6), 419 - 425 [cit. 2016-11-08]. DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182585d22. ISSN 08859701. 12. BARTOŠ, Aleš a Miloslava RAISOVÁ. Testy a dotazníky pro vyšetřování kognitivních funkcí, nálady a soběstačnosti. Praha: Mladá fronta, 2015. Aeskulap. ISBN 978-80-204-3491-3. 13. BARTOŠ, A. Krátký test slovní paměti pomocí věty u Alzheimerovy nemoci. Česká a slovenská neurologie a neurochirurgie [online]. 2017,80/113(6), 679-684 [cit. 2018-04-28]. Dostupné z: file:///C:/Users/Ji%C5%99%C3%AD/Downloads/1159-7477-1-PB.pdf 14. BARTOŠ, A. Netestuj, ale POBAV – písemné záměrné Pojmenování OBrázků A jejich Vybavení jako krátká kognitivní zkouška. Česká a slovenská neurologie a neurochirurgie [online]. 2016,79/120(6), 671-679 [cit. 2018-04-28]. Dostupné z: http://www.csnn.eu/ceska-slovenska-neurologie-clanek/netestuj-ale-pobav-pisemne-zamerne-pojmenovani-obrazku-a-jejich-vybaveni-jako-kratka-kognitivni-zkouska-59479?confirm_rules=1 15. BEAUCHAMP, T. L., a J. F. CHILDRESS. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5. th. ed. Oxford, New York: Oxfor University Press, Inc., 2001. 454 s. ISBN 0-19- 514332-9. 16. BERG A., et al. Living with stable MCI: experiences among 17 individuals evaluated at a memory clinic. Aging [online]. 2013, 17(3), 293-9 [cit. 2017-04-06]. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2012.751582. ISSN 13646915. 17. BJÖRKDAHL A., et al. Randomized study of computerized working memory training and effects on functioning in everyday life for patients with brain injury. Brain Injury [online]. 2013,27(13-14), 1658-65 [cit. 2016-11-08]. DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2013.830196. ISSN 1362301X. 18. BOLLES, R. C. Species specific defense reactions and avoidance learning. Psychology Review, 1970; 79: 32-48. 19. BOOSMAN, H., et al. Awareness of memory functioning in patients with stroke who have a good functional outcome. Brain Injury [online]. 2014, 28(7), 959 - 964 [cit. 2017-05-05]. DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2014.888763. ISSN 1362301X. 20. BORSA, j. c., et al. Adaptação e validação de instrumentospsicológicos entre culturas: Algumasconsideraçõesadaptación y validación de instrumentospsicológicos entre culturas: Algunasconsideraciones cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychological instruments: Some considerationsPaidéia (RibeirãoPreto),22(53), 2012, 423-432 21. BORSON, S., et al. The mini-cog: A cognitive 'vital signs' measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry [online]. 2000, 15(11), 1021 - 1027 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1002/1099-1166(200011)15:111021::AID-GPS2343.0.CO;2-6. ISSN 08856230. 22. BOYLE, P. A., et al. Cognitive and motor impairments predict functional declines in patients with vascular dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry [online]. 2002, 17(2), 164 - 169 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1002/gps.539. ISSN 08856230. 23. BROE, G.A., et al. Impact of chronic systemic and neurological disorders on disability, depression and life satisfaction. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry [online]. 1998, 13(10), 667 - 673 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(1998100)13:10667::AID-GPS8393.0.CO;2-G. ISSN 08856230. 24. BULIK, O., M. MACHÁLKA a O. LIBERDA. Traumatické poranění mozku a zlomeniny obličejového skeletu. Československá Neurologie [online]. 2008,5(71/104), 559-564 [cit. 2018-04-28]. Dostupné z: http://www.prolekare.cz/pdf?ida=nn_08_05_06.pdf 25. BUSCHKE, H. Screening for dementia with the memory impairment screen. Neurology [online]. 1999, 52(2), 231-238 [cit. 2018-04-29]. Dostupné z: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9932936 26. CAHN-WEINER, D. A., et al. Tests of executive function predict instrumental activities of daily living in community-dwelling older individuals. Applied Neuropsychology [online]. 2002,9(3), 187-91 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 09084282. 27. CAHN-WEINER, D. A., et al. Cognitive and neuroimaging predictors of instrumental activities of daily living. Journal Of The International Neuropsychological Society: JINS [online]. 2007,13(5), 747-57 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 13556177. 28. Cambridge Prospective Memory Test. Emma Merriman Rehabilitation [online]. Bristol, 2018 [cit. 2018-04-28]. Dostupné z: http://www.emrehab.com/assessment-camprompt.htm 29. ÇAKIR, Tuncay, et al. Factors affecting the Functional Independence Measure Gain of Patients with Stroke. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine [online]. 2015, 61(1), 30-35 [cit. 2017-03-06]. ISSN 13020234. 30. CAPRUSO D. a H. S. LEVIN. Cognitive impairment following closed head injury. Neurologic Clinics 1992;10(4):879-93. 31. CASSIDY, D., L. J. CARROLL a P. M. PELOSO. Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the who collaborating centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (Taylor [online]. 2004, 36, 28-60 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 16501977. 32. CEDERFELDT M., et al. Recovery in personal care related to cognitive impairment before and after stroke - a 1-year follow-up. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica [online]. 2010, 122(6), 430-7 [cit. 2017-04-06]. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01337.x. ISSN 16000404 33. CICERONE, K., C. DAHLBERG a D. LANGENBAHM. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation [online]. 2005,86(8), 1681-1692. [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1521/00332747.1998.11024821. Dostupné z: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16084827 34. CHANG L. H. a B. R. HASSELKUS. Occupational therapists' expectations in rehabilitation following stroke: sources of satisfaction and dissatisfaction. The American Journal Of Occupational Therapy: Official Publication Of The American Occupational Therapy Association [online]. 1998, 52(8), 629-37 [cit. 2017-03-06]. ISSN 02729490. 35. CHO S. J., et al. Post-stroke memory impairment among patients with vascular mild cognitive impairment. BMC Neurology [online]. 2014, 14, 244 [cit. 2016-11-08]. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-014-0244-6. ISSN 14712377. 36. CURZEL, Juliane, Luiz Alberto FORGIARINI JUNIOR a Marcelo DE MELLO RIEDER. Evaluation of functional independence after discharge from the intensive care unit. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva [online]. 2013, 25(2), 93-104 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.5935/0103-507X.20130019. ISSN 0103507X. 37. DASELAAR, S. M., et al., Similar network activated by young and old adults during the acquisition of a motor sequence. Neurobiology of Aging [online]. 2003,24(7), 1013-1019 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1016/S0197-4580(03)00030-7. ISSN 01974580. 38. DEHN, Milton J. Working memory and academic learning: assessment and intervention. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley, c2008. ISBN 978-0-470-14419-0. 39. DISMAN, Miroslav. Jak se vyrábí sociologická znalost: příručka pro uživatele. 3. vyd. Praha: Karolinum, 2000. ISBN 978-80-246-0139-7. 40. DOORNHEIN K., a E. DEHAAN . Cognitive training for memory deficits in stroke patients. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1998;8(4):393-400, DOI: 10.1080/713755579 41. DONKERVOORT, M., Dekker JOOST a Deelman BETTO G. Sensitivity of different ADL measures to apraxia and motor impairments. Clinical Rehabilitation [online]. 2002, 16(3), 299-300 [cit. 2018-04-29]. ISSN 02692155. 42. EFKLIDES, Anastasia, et al. Wechsler Memory Scale, Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test, and Everyday Memory Questionnaire in healthy adults and Alzheimer's patients. European Journal of Psychological Assessment[online]. 2002, 18(1), 63-77 [cit. 2016-11-08]. DOI: 10.1027//1015-5759.18.1.63. ISSN 10155759. 43. EHLHARDT et al., Evidence-based practice guidelines for instructing individuals with neurogenic memory impairments: What have we learned in the past 20 years?. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation [online]. 2008,18(3), 300-342 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 09602011. 44. ENGSTAD, T., et al. Impaired motor speed, visuospatial episodic memory and verbal fluency characterize cognition in long-term stroke survivors: the Tromsø Study. Neuroepidemiology [online]. 2003, 22(6), 326-31 [cit. 2017-04-06]. ISSN 02515350. 45. ENGSTAD R. T., et al. Executive function deficits following stroke. Tidsskrift For Den Norske Laegeforening: Tidsskrift For Praktisk Medicin, Ny Raekke [online]. 2013, 133(5), 524-7 [cit. 2017-03-06]. DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.0686. ISSN 08077096. 46. FALLAHPOUR, M., et al. Occupational gaps in everyday life after stroke and the relation to functioning and perceived life satisfaction. OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health [online]. 2011, 31(4), 200 - 208 [cit. 2017-05-05]. DOI: 10.3928/15394492-20110513-01. ISSN 15394492 47. FARIAS, Sarah Tomaszewski, et al. Everyday Cognition in Older Adults: Associations with Neuropsychological Performance and Structural Brain Imaging. Journal Of The International Neuropsychological Society [online]. 2013, 19(4), 430-441 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 13556177. 48. FARIAS, Sarah, et al. The relationship between neuropsychological performance and daily functioning in individuals with Alzheimer's disease: ecological validity of neuropsychological tests. Archives Of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal Of The National Academy Of Neuropsychologists [online]. 2003, 18(6), 655-72 [cit. 2018-04-29]. ISSN 08876177. 49. FAUTH, E.B., et al. Baseline disability in activities of daily living predicts dementia risk even after controlling for baseline global cognitive ability and depressive symptoms. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry [online]. 2013, 28(6), 597 - 606 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1002/gps.3865. ISSN 08856230. 50. FEIGEN, V. Cévní mozková příhoda: prevence a léčba mozkového iktu. Praha: Galén, 2007. 208 s. ISBN 978-80-7262-428-7. 51. FERJENČÍK, Ján. Úvod do metodologie psychologického výzkumu: jak zkoumat lidskou duši. Praha: Portál, 2000. ISBN 80-7178-367-6. 52. FIELDS, J.A., et al. Utility of the drs for predicting problems in day-to-day functioning. Clinical Neuropsychologist [online]. 2010, 24(7), 1167 - 1180 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2010.514865. ISSN 13854046. 53. FONG, J. H., O. S. MITCHELL a B. S. KOH. Disaggregating activities of daily living limitations for predicting nursing home admission. Health Services Research [online]. 2017, 50(2), 560-78 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12235. ISSN 14756773. 54. FREILICH, B.M. a L.A. HYER. Relation of the Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status to measures of daily functioning in dementia. Psychological Reports[online]. 2007, 101(1), 119-129 [cit. 2018-04-28]. Dostupné z: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17958116 55. GILES, G. Cognitive Versus Functional Approaches to Rehabilitation After Traumatic Brain Injury: Commentary on a Randomized Controlled Trial. American Journal of Occupational Therapy [online]. 2010, 64(1), 182-183 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 02729490. 56. GILLEN, Glen. Cognitive and perceptual rehabilitation: optimizing function. St. Louis, Mo.: Mosby/Elsevier, c2009. ISBN 0323046215. 57. GIOVAGNOLI Anna R. a Avanzini GIULIANO. Learning and Memory Impairment in Patients with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Relation to the Presence, Type, and Location of Brain Lesion. Epilepsia [online]. 1999,40(7), 904-905 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 00139580. 58. GLASS, John N. Differential Subtest Scores on the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test (RBMT) in an Elderly Population With Diagnosis of Vascular or Nonvascular Dementia. Applied Neuropsychology [online]. 1998,5(2), 57-64 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 09084282. 59. GONZALEZ, B. Multicontextual occupational therapy intervention: A case study of traumatic brain injury. Occupational Therapy International [online]. 2001,8(1), 49 - 62 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1002/oti.131. ISSN 09667903. 60. GRIEVE, June I. Neuropsychology for occupational therapists: assessment of perception and cognition. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science, 2000. ISBN 0632050675. 61. GRIMBY, G, et al. Cross-diagnostic validity in a generic instrument: an example from the Functional Independence Measure in Scandinavia. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Vol 4, Iss 1, p 55 (2006) [online]. 2006,4(1), 55-55 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-55. ISSN 14777525. 62. GUAIANA, Giuseppe, Philip TYSON a Ann Margaret MORTIMER. The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test can predict social functioning among schizophrenic patients treated with clozapine. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice [online]. 2004,8(4), 245-249 [cit. 2018-04-29]. ISSN 13651501. 63. HALL, J. R., et al. The link between cognitive measures and ADLs and IADL functioning in mild Alzheimer's: What has gender got to do with it?. International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease [online]. 2011 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.4061/2011/276734. ISSN 20900252. 64. HAMBLETON, R., P. MERENDA a C. SPIELBERGER (2005). Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests for Cross-Cultural Assessment. New York: Psychology Press. 65. HANNA-PLADDY, B., et al. Ecological implications of ideomotor apraxia: evidence from physical activities of daily living. Neurology [online]. 2003,60(3), 487-90 [cit. 2018-04-29]. ISSN 1526632X. 66. HANSON, C. S., O. SHECHTMAN a F. JACKSON. Occupational therapy: current practice and training issues in the treatment of cognitive dysfunction. NeuroRehabilitation [online]. 1997,8(1), 31-41 [cit. 2018-04-28]. Dostupné z: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24525942 67. HAŠKOVCOVÁ, H. Informovaný souhlas. Praha: Galén, 2007. 1. vyd. 104 s. ISBN 978-80-7262-497-3. 68. HENDL, Jan. Přehled statistických metod zpracování dat: analýza a metaanalýza dat. Vyd. 2., opr. Praha: Portál, 2006. ISBN 80-7367-123-9. 69. HIRANO, Yoshitake, et al. Prediction of Independent Walking Ability for Severely Hemiplegic Stroke Patients at Discharge from a Rehabilitation Hospital. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases [online]. 2016, 25(8), 1878-1881 [cit. 2018-04-29]. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.12.020. ISSN 10523057. 70. HOCHSTENBACH, J. Rehabilitation is more than functional recovery. Disability and Rehabilitation [online]. 2000,4(22), 201-204 [cit. 2018-04-28]. Dostupné z: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10798311 71. HOFFMANN, T., et al. A Systematic Review of Cognitive Interventions to Improve Functional Ability in People Who Have Cognitive Impairment Following Stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation [online]. 2010,17(2), 99-107 [cit. 2017-05-05]. ISSN 10749357. 72. HOFGREN, C., et al. Recovery after stroke: cognition, ADL function and return to work. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica [online]. 2007,115(2), 73-80 [cit. 2018-04-29]. ISSN 00016314. 73. HOLMQVIST, Kajsa, Ann-Britt IVARSSON a Marie HOLMEFUR. Occupational therapist practice patterns in relation to clients with cognitive impairment following acquired brain injury. Brain Injury [online]. 2014,28(11), 1365-1373 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 02699052. 74. HORT, Jakub a Robert RUSINA. Paměť a její poruchy: paměť z hlediska neurovědního a klinického. Praha: Maxdorf, c2007. Jessenius. ISBN 978-80-7345-121-9. 75. HSIEH, P. C., et al. Intercorrelations Between the Personal and Social Performance Scale, Cognitive Function, and Activities of Daily Living. JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE [online]. 2011, 199(7), 513-515 [cit. 2017-04-06]. ISSN 00223018. 76. HUANG, Jia, Jennifer FLEMING a Nadine L. POMERY. Perceived importance of prospective memory failures in adults with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation [online]. 2014, 24(1), 61-70 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 09602011. 77. HUMMELOVÁ FANFRDLOVÁ, Z., et al. Česká adaptace Addenbrookského kognitivního testu. Československá Psychologie 2009; 53: 376-388. 78. HUTYRA, Martin. Kardioembolizační ischemické cévní mozkové příhody: diagnostika, léčba, prevence. Praha: Grada, 2011. ISBN 978-80-247-3816-1. 79. HYNÉS, S. a A. SHIEL. Validating an Irish-Language Version of the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test-Second Edition. British Journal of Occupational Therapy [online]. 2014, 77(4), 198-204 [cit. 2018-04-28]. Dostupné z: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.4276/030802214X13968769798836 80. IVANOVÁ, K. Etika a organizační kultura ve zdravotnickém managementu. 1. vyd. Brno: NCO NZO, 2006. 240 s. ISBN 80-7013-442-9. 81. JEFFERSON, A.L., et al. Cognitive predictors of functional decline in vascular dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry [online]. 2006,21(8), 752 - 754 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1002/gps.1556. ISSN 08856230. 82. JOHANSSON, Maria a Ewa WRESSLE. Validation of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination and the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test in investigations of dementia. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy [online]. 2012,19(3), 282-287 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.3109/11038128.2010.528789. ISSN 11038128. 83. JONES, Beth, Frances VAUGHAN a W. MILES COX. Traumatic brain injury and substance misuse: A systematic review of prevalence and outcomes research (1994–2004). Neuropsychological Rehabilitation [online]. 2006, 16(5), 537-560 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1080/09602010500231875. ISSN 09602011. 84. JURÁŇ, Vilém, Martin SMRČKA a Vladimír SMRČKA. Poranění nozku [online]. In: . Neurochirurgická klinika FNB - Bohunice, 2011 [cit. 2018-04-28]. Dostupné z: http://www.med.muni.cz/Traumatologie/Neurochirurgie/Medici_traum.htm 85. KALITA, Z. Akutní cévní mozkové příhody: Příručka pro osoby ohrožené CMP, jejich rodinné příslušníky a známé. Praha: Mladá fronta, 2010. 39 s. ISBN 978-80-204-2093-0 86. KALITA, Z. Národní cerebrovaskulární program. Česká a slovenská neurologie a neurochirurgie, 2004, 67, s. 4-7. 87. KALVACH, Zdeněk. Geriatrické syndromy a geriatrický pacient. Praha: Grada, 2008. ISBN 978-80-247-2490-4. 88. KAPUR, Narinder, Elizabeth GLISKY a Barbara WILSON. Technological memory aids for people with memory deficits. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation [online]. 2004,14(1/2), 41-60 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 09602011. 89. KATZ, N. Cognition and Occupation in Rehabilitation: Cognitive Models for Intervention in Occupational Therapy. Bethesda MD: AOTA PRESS, 1998. 90. KLENEROVÁ, V. a S. HYNIE. Paměť a její poruchy. Československá fyziologie [online]. 2010, 59(1), 15-20 [cit. 2018-04-29]. Dostupné z: http://neurofarm.lf1.cuni.cz/teaching/2010/Pamet.pdf 91. KLUCKÁ, Jana a Pavla VOLFOVÁ. Kognitivní trénink v praxi. 2., rozšířené vydání. Praha: Grada, 2016. Psyché (Grada). ISBN 978-80-247-5580-9. 92. KOMENDA, S. Etika výzkumu. In IVANOVÁ, K.; KLOS, R. Vybrané kapitoly z lékařské etiky. 2. upravené a rozšířené vyd. Olomouc: VUP, 2004. s. 97- 109. ISBN 80-244-0892-9. vydání. Praha: Grada, 2016. Psyché (Grada). ISBN 978-80-247-5580-9. 93. KOSKAS, P., et al. The Lawton Instrumental Activities Daily Living/Activities Daily Living Scales: A Sensitive Test to Alzheimer Disease in Community-Dwelling Elderly People? Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology [online]. 2014,27(2), 85-93 [cit. 2018-04-28]. Dostupné z: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24578460 94. KOTLER-COPE, Susan a Cameron J. CAMP. 8 Memory Interventions in Aging Populations.Advances in Psychology [online]. 1990,72, 231-261 [cit. 2018-04-29]. Dostupné z: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016641150860789X 95. KRIVOŠÍKOVÁ, Mária. Úvod do ergoterapie. Praha: Grada, 2011. ISBN 978-80-247-2699-1. 96. KULIŠŤÁK, Petr. Klinická neuropsychologie v praxi. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, nakladatelství Karolinum, 2017. ISBN 978-80-246-3068-7. 97. KULIŠŤÁK, Petr. Neuropsychologie. 2., aktualiz. a přeprac. vyd. Praha: Portál, 2011. ISBN 978-80-7367-891-3. 98. KÜÇÜKDEVECI A. A., et al. Construct validity and reliability of the Rivermead behavioural memory test in the Turkish population. Brain Injury [online]. 2008, 22(1), 75-82 [cit. 2016-11-08]. DOI: 10.1080/02699050701809011. ISSN 02699052. 99. LAM, B., et al. Criterion and Convergent Validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment with Screening and Standardized Neuropsychological Testing. Journal of The American Geriatrics Society [online]. 2013, 61(12), 2181-2185 [cit. 2017-04-06]. ISSN 00028614. 100. LI PEI, et al. Factors associated with activities of daily living among the disabled elders with stroke. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, Vol 3, Iss 1, Pp 29-34 (2016) [online]. 2016, 3(1), 29-34 [cit. 2018-04-29]. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2016.01.002. ISSN 23520132. 101. LOCKHART, Robert a Fergus CRAIK. Levels of processing: A retrospective commentary on a framework for memory research. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie [online]. 1990,44(1), 87-112 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1037/h0084237. ISSN 00084255. 102. LUNDGREN-NILSSON, Åsa, et al. Cross-cultural Validity of Functional Independence Measure Items in Stroke: A Study Using Rasch Analysis. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine [online]. 2005,37(1), 23-31 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 16501977. 103. MAKATURA T. J., et al. Standardized memory tests and the appraisal of everyday memory. Brain Injury [online]. 1999,13(5), 355-67 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 02699052. 104. MANSBACH W. E., E. E. MACDOUGALL a ROSENZWEIG A. S. The Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool (BCAT): a new test emphasizing contextual memory, executive functions, attentional capacity, and the prediction of instrumental activities of daily living. Journal Of Clinical And Experimental Neuropsychology [online]. 2012, 34(2), 183-94 [cit. 2017-04-06]. DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2011.630649. ISSN 1744411X. 105. MARŠÁLEK, P., et al. Doporučení k organizaci systému zdravotně – sociální péče o pacienty po získaném poškození mozku. 1. vydání. Praha: Cerebrum, 2011, ISBN 978- 80-904357-5-9, s. 77. 106. MEYRA [online]. Praha, 2005 [cit. 2018-04-28]. Dostupné z: https://www.meyra.cz/ 107. MLINAC, M. E. a M. C. FENG. Assessment of Activities of Daily Living, Self-Care, and Independence. Archives Of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal Of The National Academy Of Neuropsychologists [online]. 2016, 31(6), 506-16 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acw049. ISSN 18735843. 108. MOORE, Tirin a Marc ZIRNSAC. Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention. Annual Review of Psychology [online]. 2017, 68, 47-72 [cit. 2018-04-29]. Dostupné z: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033400 109. MOSCOVITCH, Morris, et al. Episodic Memory and Beyond: The Hippocampus and Neocortex in Transformation. Annual Review of Psychology [online]. 2016, 67, 105-134 [cit. 2018-04-29]. Dostupné z: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5060006/ 110. MUREN, M. A., M. HUTLER a J. HOOPER. Functional capacity and health-related quality of life in individuals post stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation [online]. 2008,15(1), 51-58 [cit. 2017-05-05]. ISSN 10749357. 111. NADLER, R. T. a L. M. D. ARCHIBALD. The assessment of verbal and visuospatial working memory with school age canadian children. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology [online]. 2014,38(3), 262 - 279 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 1913200X. 112. NASREDDINE, Z.S., et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society [online]. 2005,53(4), 695 - 699 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. ISSN 00028614. 113. NĚMEČEK, Stanislav, Jana NĚMEČKOVÁ a Jaroslav CERMAN. Patomorfologie poranění mozku. Neurologie pro praxi [online]. 2003, (6), 290-295 [cit. 2018-04-28]. Dostupné z: https://www.neurologiepropraxi.cz/pdfs/neu/2003/06/03.pdf 114. NICKEL, R., et al. Upper limb function and functional independence in patients with shoulder pain after stroke. Arquivos De Neuro-Psiquiatria [online]. 2017,75(2), 103-106 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1590/0004-282X20160195. ISSN 16784227. 115. NJEGOVAN, V., et al. The hierarchy of functional loss associated with cognitive decline in older persons. Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences [online]. 2001,56(10), M638 - M643 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/56.10.M638. ISSN 10795006. 116. NORMAN, Donald A. The design of everyday things. Revised and expanded edition. New York, New York: Basic Books, 2013. ISBN 978-0-465-05065-9. 117. OKADA, M. Factors related to independent social living of poststroke patients with mild impairment. Topics In Stroke Rehabilitation [online]. 2007, 14(3), 52-8 [cit. 2017-03-06]. ISSN 10749357. 118. OLECKÁ, Ivana a Kateřina IVANOVÁ. Metodologie vědecko-výzkumné činnosti. Olomouc: Moravská vysoká škola Olomouc, 2010. ISBN 978-80-87240-33-5. 119. PAAS, F., A. RENKL a J. SWELLER. Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science[online]. 2004, 32(1-2), 1 - 8 [cit. 2018-04-29]. ISSN 00204277. 120. PÅHLMAN, U., M. SÄVBORG a E. TARKOWSKI. Cognitive dysfunction and physical activity after stroke: the Gothenburg cognitive stroke study in the elderly. Journal Of Stroke And Cerebrovascular Diseases: The Official Journal Of National Stroke Association [online]. 2012, 21(8), 652-8 [cit. 2017-04-06]. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.02.012. ISSN 15328511. 121. PARK, J., et al. The impact of acute phase domain-specific cognitive function on post-stroke functional recovery. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine [online]. 2016,40(2), 214 - 222 [cit. 2017-05-05]. DOI: 10.5535/arm.2016.40.2.214. ISSN 22340653. 122. PARIKH, P. K., et al. The Impact of Memory Change on Daily Life in Normal Aging and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Gerontologist [online]. 2016, 56(5), 877 - 885 [cit. 2017-05-05]. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnv030. ISSN 17585341. 123. PATEL, M., et al. Natural History of Cognitive Impairment after Stroke and Factors Associated with Its Recovery. Age and Ageing [online]. 2001, 30 Suppl 2, 52-53 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 00020729. 124. PAXTON, J. a N. CHIARAVALLOTI. Rule monitoring ability predicts event-based prospective memory performance in individuals with TBI. Journal Of The International Neuropsychological Society: JINS[online]. 2014,20(7), 673-83 [cit. 2016-11-08]. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617714000575. ISSN 14697661 125. PÉREZ, M. a J. GODOY. Comparison between a "traditional" memory test and a "behavioral" memory battery in Spanish patients. Journal Of Clinical And Experimental Neuropsychology [online]. 1998, 20(4), 496-502 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 13803395. 126. PERRY, R.J. a J.R. HODGES. Relationship between functional and neuropsychological performance in early Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders [online]. 2000, 14(1), 1 - 10 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1097/00002093-200001000-00001. ISSN 08930341. 127. PITTS, R.T. a O. NAUMENKO. The 2014 Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing: What Teachers Initially Need to Know. Working Papers in Education [online]. 2016, 2(1), 1-6 [cit. 2018-04-28]. Dostupné z: file:///C:/Users/Ji%C5%99%C3%AD/Downloads/1316-6299-2-PB.pdf 128. PLHÁKOVÁ, Alena. Učebnice obecné psychologie. Praha: Academia, 2011. ISBN 80-200-1499-3. 129. PLUMMER, R., et al. Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Enviromental Change – Human and Policy Dimensions [online]. 2008, 18(1), 86-98 [cit. 2018-04-29]. ISSN 09593780. 130. PREISS, Marek a Hana PŘIKRYLOVÁ KUČEROVÁ. Neuropsychologie v psychiatrii. Praha: Grada, 2006. Psyché (Grada). ISBN 80-247-1460-4. 131. RAJAN, Kumar, et al. Disability in Basic and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living is Associated with Faster Rate of Decline in Cognitive Function of Older Adults. Journals of Gerontology Series A-biological Sciences and Medical Sciences [online]. 2013, 68(5), 624-630 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 10795006. 132. REKTOROVÁ, Irena. Screeningové škály pro hodnocení demence. Neurologie pro praxi [online]. 2011, (12), 37-45 [cit. 2018-04-28]. Dostupné z:https://www.neurologiepropraxi.cz/pdfs/neu/2011/92/11.pdf 133. RICHMOND, D. P., et al. Genome sequence of the organohalide-respiring Dehalogenimonas alkenigignens type strain (IP3-3T). Standards in Genomic Sciences [online]. 2016, 11(1) [cit. 2018-04-29]. DOI: 10.1186/s40793-016-0165-7. ISSN 19443277. 134. ROBERTSON, I., a A. Wilson. Neuropsychological rehabilitation. In: Fawcett JW, Rosser AE, Dunnett SB editor(s). Brain damage, brain repair. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. 135. ROSE, F. D., et al. A preliminary investigation into the use of virtual environments in memory retraining after vascular brain injury: Indications for future strategy? Disability and Rehabilitation [online]. 1999, 21(12), 548 - 554 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1080/096382899297206. ISSN 09638288. 136. RUDY, Jerry W. The neurobiology of learning and memory. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers, c2008. ISBN 978-0-87893-669-4. 137. RUSKOVÁ, Hana. Neuropsychologická rehabilitace paměti. In: Sborník prací Filozofické fakulty brněnské univerzity [online]. Brno: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství, 1998, s. 83-91 [cit. 2017-12-14]. ISBN 80-210-1994-8. ISSN 0231-7664. Dostupné z: https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/bitstream/handle/11222.digilib/114242/P_Psychologica_02-1998-1_9.pdf?sequence=1 138. SADEK, J. R., et al. Performance-Based Everyday Functioning after Stroke: Relationship with IADL Questionnaire and Neurocognitive Performance. Journal of The InternationalNeuropsychological Society [online]. 2011, 17(5), 832-840 [cit. 2017-05-05]. ISSN 13556177. 139. SHAPIRO, S. S., a M. B. WILK (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3/4), 591–611. 140. SHIMODA, K. a R.G. ROBINSON. The relationship between social impairment and recovery from stroke. Psychiatry (New York) [online]. 1998, 61(2), 101 - 111 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1521/00332747.1998.11024821. ISSN 1943281X. 141. SHUM, David., et al. Prospective Memory and Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review. Brain Impairment [online]. 2002, 3(1), 1-16 [cit. 2018-04-29]. Dostupné z: https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/6843/19865_1.pdf?sequence=1 142. SCHACTER, Daniel L. a Endel. TULVING. Memory systems 1994. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, c1994. ISBN 9780262193504. 143. SCHMITTER-EDGECOMBE, M., E. a D. R. WOOGREELEY. Characterizing Multiple Memory Deficits and Their Relation to Everyday Functioning in Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment. Neuropsychology [online]. 2009,23(2), 168 - 177 [cit. 2017-05-05]. DOI: 10.1037/a0014186. ISSN 08944105. 144. SCHWARTZ, A.S. a T.M. MCMILLAN. Assessment of Everyday Memory After Severe Head Injury. Cortex [online]. 1989,25(4), 665-671 [cit. 2018-04-29]. Dostupné z: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945289800267 145. SPOUSTA, V., et al. Vádemékum autora odborné a vědecké práce: se zaměřením na práce pedagogické. 1. vyd., 2. dotisk. Brno: Masarykova univerzitě, 2003. 158 s. ISBN 80-210-2387-2. 146. STERNBERG, Robert J. a Elena L GRIGORENKO. Dynamic testing: the nature and measurement of learning potential. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002. ISBN 05-217-7814-X. 147. STINEMAN, M. G. a G. MAISLIN. Validity of functional independence measure scores. Scandinavian Journal Of Rehabilitation Medicine [online]. 2000,32(3), 143-144 [cit. 2018-04-28]. Dostupné z: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11028800 148. SVOBODA, Mojmír. Psychologická diagnostika dospělých. Praha: Portál, 1999. ISBN 80-7178-327-7. 149. Statistické informace [online]. 2004. Ústav zdravotnických informací a statistiky České republiky. Dostupné z: www.uzis.cz. 150. STEIBEL, N. M., O. M. ROZENFELD a M. SANCHES. Influence of age and education on the Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test (RBMT) among healthy elderly / Influência da idade e da escolaridade no Teste Comportamental de Memória Rivermead (RBMT) em idosos saudáveis. Dementia[online]. 2016,10(1), 26 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1590/S1980-57642016DN10100005. ISSN 19805764. 151. STERNBERG, Robert J. Kognitivní psychologie. Vyd. 2. Přeložil František KOUKOLÍK. Praha: Portál, 2009. ISBN 9788073676384. 152. SUZUKI, Y., et al. Factors Influencing Outcomes for Stroke Rehabilitation Patient. Rigakuryoho Kagaku [online]. 2009,24(5), 659-663 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 13411667. 153. SVĚCENÁ, Kateřina. Hodnocení soběstačnosti pacientů v neurorehabilitaci. Neurológia pre praxi. 2013, 14(3), 133-135. 154. ŠTEŇOVÁ V. a Z. CSÉFALVAY. Vlyv charakteristík testových položiek na výkon v teste pomenovania obrázkov u slovensky hovoriacich pacientov s rôznou etiológiou mozgovej patológie. Československá psychologie 2011;55(6):486– 98. 155. ŠVESTKOVÁ, Olga a Kateřina SVĚCENÁ. Ergoterapie: skripta pro studenty bakalářského oboru Ergoterapie na 1. lékařské fakultě Univerzity Karlovy. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, 1. lékařská fakulta, 2013. ISBN 978-80-260-4101-6. 156. TARVONEN-SCHRÖDER, S., et al. Concepts of capacity and performance in assessment of functioning amongst stroke survivors: A comparison of the functional independence measure and the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine [online]. 2015, 47(7), 662 - 664 [cit. 2017-03-06]. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1974. ISSN 16501977. 157. TATE, R. L. Beyond one-bun, two-shoe: recent advances in the psychological rehabilitation of memory disorders after acquired brain injury. Brain Injury [online]. 1997, 11(12), 907-18 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 02699052. 158. TATEMICHI, T. K., D. W. DESMOND a Y. STERN. Cognitive impairment after stroke: frequency, patterns and relationship to functional abilities. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1994;57:189-98. Dostupné z: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1435662 159. THORNTON, Allen E. a Naftali RAZ. Memory impairment in multiple sclerosis: A quantitative review. Neuropsychology [online]. 1997,11(3), 357-366 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.11.3.357. ISSN 08944105. 160. TIERNEY, S.M., et al. Retrieval cue and delay interval influence the relationship between prospective memory and activities of daily living in older adults. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology [online]. 2016, 38(5), 572 - 584 [cit. 2017-04-06]. DOI:10.1080/13803395.2016.1141876. ISSN 1744411X. 161. TICHÝ, J., et al. Neurologie. Praha: Karolinum, 1998. 340 s. ISBN 80-7184-750-X. 162. TOGLIA, J. P. Generalization of treatment: a multicontext approach to cognitive perceptual impairment in adults with brain injury. The American Journal Of Occupational Therapy: Official Publication Of The American Occupational Therapy Association [online]. 1991,45(6), 505-16 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 02729490. 163. TOGLIA, J., et al. Application of the multicontextual approach in promoting learning and transfer of strategy use in an individual with TBI and executive dysfunction. OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health [online]. 2011,31(1), S53 - S60 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.3928/15394492-20101108-09. ISSN 15394492. 164. TOWSE, J., C. NELSON a J. HORTON. Task Experience and Childrenʼs Working Memory Performance: A Perspective From Recall Timing. Developmental Psychology [online]. 2008,44(3), 695-696 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.695. ISSN 00121649. 165. TWAMLEY, E., et al. Generalized Cognitive Impairments, Ability to Perform Everyday Tasks, and Level of Independence in Community Living Situations of Older Patients With Psychosis. The American Journal of Psychiatry[online]. 2002, 159(12), 2013-2014 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 0002953X. 166. URBÁNEK, Tomáš, Denisa DENGLEROVÁ a Jan ŠIRŮČEK. Psychometrika: měření v psychologii. Praha: Portál, 2011. ISBN 978-80-7367-836-4. 167. VAN DEN BROEK, M. D., et al. Evaluation of an electronic memory aid in the neuropsychological rehabilitation of prospective memory deficits. Brain Injury [online]. 2000, 14(5), 455-62 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 02699052. 168. VAŇÁSKOVÁ, Eva. Testování v neurorehabilitaci. Neurologie pro praxi [online]. 2005, (6), 311-314 [cit. 2018-04-28]. Dostupné z: https://www.neurologiepropraxi.cz/pdfs/neu/2005/06/06.pdf 169. VISCOGLIOSI, Chantal, Sylvie BELLEVILLE, Johanne DESROSIERS, Chantal D. CARON a Bernadette SKA. Participation after a stroke: Changes over time as a function of cognitive deficits. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics [online]. 2011, 52(3), 336-343 [cit. 2018-02-23]. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2010.04.020. ISSN 01674943. 170. VOJTÍŠEK, Petr. Výzkumné metody a techniky výzkumu a jejich aplikace v absolventských pracích vyšších odborných škol [online]. Praha: Vyšší odborná škola sociálně právní, 2012 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISBN 978-80-905109–3-7. Dostupné z: http://docplayer.cz/629195-Vyzkumne-metody-metody-a-techniky-vyzkumu-a-jejich-aplikace-v-absolventskych-pracich-vyssich-odbornych-skol-phdr-petr-vojtisek.html 171. VOTAVA, Jiří. Rehabilitace osob po cévní mozkové příhodě. Neurologie pro praxi [online]. 2001, (4), 184-189 [cit. 2018-04-28]. Dostupné z: https://www.neurologiepropraxi.cz/pdfs/neu/2001/04/06.pdf 172. WADE, T.K. a J.C. TROY. Mobile phones as a new memory aid: A preliminary investigation using case studies. Brain Injury [online]. 2001,15(4), 305 - 320 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1080/026990501750111256. ISSN 02699052. 173. WALKER, Ian. Výzkumné metody a statistika. Praha: Grada, 2013. Z pohledu psychologie. ISBN 978-80-247-3920-5. 174. WALKER, Marion F., et al. The DRESS trial: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of a neuropsychological approach to dressing therapy for stroke inpatients. Clinical Rehabilitation [online]. 2004,26(8), 675-685 [cit. 2017-05-05]. DOI: 10.1177/0269215511431089. ISSN 0269-2155. Dostupné z: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269215511431089 175. WARD, I. Validity of the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement scale in acute rehabilitation: a comparison with the functional independence measure and stroke impact scale-16. PM [online]. 2011,3(11), 1013-21 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.08.537. ISSN 19341563. 176. WEST, S., et al. Does Memory Predict Decline in Activities of Daily Living in Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease? Neuropsychology [online]. 2010,25(6), 532-532 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 08876177. 177. WESTER, A. J., et al. Applicability of the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test - Third Edition (RBMT-3) in Korsakoff's syndrome and chronic alcoholics. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment [online]. 2013,9, 875-881 [cit. 2016-11-08]. ISSN 11766328. 178. WILLS, Peter, et al. Assessing subtle memory impairments in the everyday memory performance of brain injured people: exploring the potential of the Extended Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. Brain Injury [online]. 2000,14(8), 693-704 [cit. 2016-11-08]. DOI: 10.1080/026990500413713. ISSN 02699052. 179. WILSON, A. Barbara, et al. The Rivermead behavioural memory test. 3rd ed. London: Pearson, 2008. ISBN 9780749134617. 180. WILSON, Barbara. Memory deficits. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 10. Elsevier, 2013, s. 357-363. ISBN 0444529012. 181. WILSON, Barbara. Memory rehabilitation: integrating theory and practice. New York: Guilford Press, c2009. ISBN 1606232878. 182. WILSON, Barbara. Ecological validity of neuropsychological assessment: Do neuropsychological indexes predict performance in everyday activities? Applied and Preventive Psychology [online]. 1993,2(4), 209-215 [cit. 2018-04-29]. Dostupné z: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962184905800915 183. WILSON, Barbara, et al. Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: A randomised control crossover study. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry [online]. 2001,70(4), 477 - 482 [cit. 2018-04-28]. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.70.4.477. ISSN 00223050. 184. WILSON, Barbara a Frances ALDRICH. Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test for Children (RBMT‐C): A preliminary evaluation. British Journal Of Clinical Psychology [online]. 1991,30(2), 161-168 [cit. 2018-04-29]. Dostupné z: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1991.tb00931.x 185. ZHANG, H., et al. Differences in cognitive profiles between traumatic brain injury and stroke: A comparison of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination. Chinese Journal of Traumatology - English Edition[online]. 2016, 19(5), 271 - 274 [cit. 2018-02-23]. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.03.007. ISSN 10081275. 186. ZINN, Sandra, Tara DUDLEY a Hayden BOSWORTH. The effect of poststroke cognitive impairment on rehabilitation process and functional outcome. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation [online]. 2004, 85(7), 1084–1090 [cit. 2018-04-28]. Dostupné z: https://www.archives-pmr.org/article/S0003-9993(04)00022-X/fulltext 187. ZLOTNIK, S., D. SACHS a S.ROSENBLUM. Use of the Dynamic Interactional Model in self-care and motor intervention after traumatic brain injury: explanatory case studies. The American Journal Of Occupational Therapy: Official Publication Of The American Occupational Therapy Association [online]. 2009, 63(5), 549-58 [cit. 2018-04-28]. ISSN 02729490. 188. ZVÁRA, K. a J. ŠTĚPÁN. Pravděpodobnost a matematická statistika. Matfyzpress, MFF UK, Praha, 2002. 189. ZVÁRA, Karel. Regresní analýza. Praha: Academia, 1989. ISBN 80-200-0125-5. 190. ZVÁROVÁ, Jana. Základy statistiky pro biomedicínské obory. 3. vydání. Praha: Karolinum, 2016. Biomedicínská statistika. ISBN 978-80-246-3416-6. |
| Předběžná náplň práce |
| ABSTRAKT DIPLOMOVÉ PRÁCE Jméno a příjmení:Bc. Klára Šimková Vedoucí práce:Mária Krivošíková, M.Sc. Oponent práce: Název diplomové práce:Využití Rivermead behaviorálního paměťového testu u pacientů po poškození mozku Cíl práce:Hlavním cílem diplomové práce bylo sledování vztahu mezi paměťovými funkcemi, měřenými Rivermead Behaviorálním paměťovým testem (RBMT-3), a jejich následným ovlivněním výkonu zaměstnávání v personálních ADL (pADL) u pacientů po poškození mozku. Dílčím cílem bylo zjistit, zda lze soběstačnost v personálních ADL predikovat z výsledků RBMT-3. Posledním dílčím cílem bylo vytvoření pracovní verze testu RBMT-3 a její překlad z originální anglické verze. Metodika: Výzkumný soubor se skládal ze 40 probandů (22 mužů a 18 žen) po prodělaném poškození mozku.Pro sběr dat byla využita pracovní verze Rivermead behaviorálního paměťového testu (RBMT-3) pro hodnocení úrovně paměťových funkcí, a FIM (verze 5.2) hodnotící úroveň výkonu zaměstnávání v personálních ADL (pADL).Verifikace hypotéz byla provedena pomocí korelační analýzy a korigovaným Spearmanovým korelačním koeficientem a p-hodnoty. Pro tento předvýzkum byla zvolena hladina významnosti α1 < 0,05 a α2 < 0,01. Výsledky: Předvýzkum nepotvrdil závislost mezi úrovní paměti měřené RBMT-3 a úrovní soběstačnosti měřené FIMem.P hodnota (p = 0,526) z testu závislosti dvou uvedených parametrů byla vyšší než zvolená hladina významnosti (0,526 > 0,05). Prediktivní validita RBMT-3 také nebyla prokázána, byla zjištěna vyšší p hodnota, než zvolená hladina významnosti. Závěr:Předvýzkum nepotvrdil přímou souvislost mezi úrovní paměťových funkcí a výkonem zaměstnávání v pADL. Předvýzkum dále nepotvrdil prediktivní validitu RBMT-3 ve vztahu k pADL. Pro ergoterapeuty je však zkoumání vztahu mezi úrovní paměťových funkcí a soběstačností nezbytné. Poruchy paměti mohou v různé míře ovlivňovat provádění běžných denních činností, ať už personálních nebo instrumentálních. |
| Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce |
| ABSTRACT OF DIPLOMA THESIS Title of diploma thesis:Clinical Utility of Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test in Patients after Brain Damage Objective:The main goal of this diploma thesis was to monitor the relationship between memory functions measured by the Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test (RBMT-3) and their subsequent influence on occupational performance in ADL (pADL) in patients after brain damage. The partial objective was to determine whether self-sufficiency in ADL can be predicted from RBMT-3 results. The last partial goal was to create a working version of the RBMT-3 and translate it from the original English version. Methods: The research group consisted of 40 probands (22 males and 18 females) after brain damage. For data collection, the Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test (RBMT-3) for assessing the memory function level was used. FIM (version 5.2) was used for evaluating the level of occupational performance in ADL (pADL). Hypothesis verification was performed by correlation analysis and corrected Spearman's correlation coefficient and p-values. For this pre-research, the level of significance α1 < 0.05 and α2 < 0.01 was chosen. Results: The pre-research did not confirm the dependence between the RBMT-3 memory level and the level of self-sufficiency measured by FIM. The P value (p = 0.526) from the test of the two parameters was higher than the chosen significance level (0.526 > 0.05). The predictive validity of RBMT-3 has also not been demonstrated, a higher p value than the chosen significance level was found. Conclusion:The pre-research did not confirm the direct relationship between the memory function level and the level of self-sufficiency. The pre-research did not confirm the predictive validity of RBMT-3. For occupational therapists, however, it is necessary to examine the relationship between the level of memory functions and self-sufficiency. Memory impairments can affect varying degrees of day-to-day performance, whether personal or instrumental. |