Témata prací (Výběr práce)Témata prací (Výběr práce)(verze: 368)
Detail práce
   Přihlásit přes CAS
Kvalitativní studie užití oline seznamovacích serverů v České republice
Název práce v češtině: Kvalitativní studie užití oline seznamovacích serverů v České republice
Název v anglickém jazyce: Qualitative study on the use of online dating servers in the Czech republic
Klíčová slova: Seznamovací servery, Badoo, motivace, užití, sebeprezentace, komunikace, počítačem zprostředkovaná komunikace, stereotypy, vztahy, sociální síť, kvalitativní výzkum
Klíčová slova anglicky: Online dating, dating sites, Badoo, selfpresentation, motivation, usage, communication, computer mediated communication, stereotypes, relationships, social network sites, qualitative research
Akademický rok vypsání: 2013/2014
Typ práce: diplomová práce
Jazyk práce: čeština
Ústav: Katedra mediálních studií (23-KMS)
Vedoucí / školitel: doc. Mgr. et Mgr. Jaroslav Švelch, Ph.D.
Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem
Datum přihlášení: 18.07.2014
Datum zadání: 18.07.2014
Datum a čas obhajoby: 03.02.2016 09:00
Místo konání obhajoby: Hollar
Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby:31.12.2015
Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 03.02.2016
Oponenti: PhDr. Jiřina Šmejkalová, CSc.
Kontrola URKUND:
Seznam odborné literatury
Použitá literatura
Adelman, M. B., & Ahuvia, A. C. (1991). Mediated channels for mate seeking: A solution to involuntary singlehood? Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 8, 273–289.
Ahuvia, A. C., & Adelman, M. B. (1992). Formal intermediaries in the marriage market: A typology and review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 452–463.
Anderson, T. L. (2005). Relationships among Internet attitudes, inter- net use, romantic beliefs, and perceptions of online romantic relationships. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8, 521–531.
Ajzen I and Fishbein M (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bailey, Beth. 1988. From front porch to back seat: Courtship in twentieth-century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bailey, J., & Steeves, V., & Burkell, J. & Regan, P. (2013). Negotiating With Gender Stereotypes on Social Networking Sites: From “Bicycle Face” to Facebook. Journal of Communication Inquiry 37(2) 91–112.
Barraket, J., & Henry-Waring, M. S. (2008). Getting it on(line): Sociological perspectives on e-dating. Journal of Sociology, 4, 149–165.
Dunbar, Robin, Louise Barrett, and John Lycett. Evolutionary psychology: A beginner's guide. Oneworld Publications, 2005.
Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3–26.
Belot, M., & Francesconi, M. (2010). Meeting Opportunities and Partner Selection: A Field Study, 1-40. Dostupné z http://www.tau.ac.il/~weiss/fam_econ/RESTAT-13763-1-manuscript.pdf
Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2004). Love online: Emotions on the Internet. Cam- bridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bianchi, Suzanne, John Robinson, and Melissa Milkie. 2006. Changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Blair, I. V., & Banaji, M. R. (1996). Automatic and controlled pro- cesses in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1142-1163.

Bogle, Kathleen. 2008. Hooking-up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. Masculine domination. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
boyd d and Ellison N (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1): 210–230 (article 11).
Boyd, D. (2004) Friendster and publicly articulated social networks. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM Press, s. 1279–1282.
Bucholtz, M. (2003). Theories of discourse as theories of gender. In Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M (Eds)., The handbook of language and gender (s. 43-68). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Social strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
Buss, D. M. The Evolution of Desire. New York: Basic Books, 1994. Business Wire. (2008). Jupiter research sees steady growth for online personals, despite explosion of socialnetworking. Dostupné z http://www.Businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20080211005037&newsLang=en
Cameron, D. (1992). Feminism and linguistic theory. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

Cate, Rodney, and Sally Lloyd. 1992. Courtship. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Coontz, Stephanie. 2005. Marriage, a history: How love conquered marriage. New York: Penguin.

Darden, D., & Koski, P. R. (1988). Using the personals ads: A deviant activity? Deviant Behavior, 9, 383–400.
Derlega, V., Winstead, B., Wong, P., & Greenspan, M. (1987). Self-disclosure and relationshipdevelopment: An attributional analysis. In M. E. Roloff & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Interpersonal Processes: New Directions in Communication Research (s. 172–187). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Duck, S.W. (2011). Rethinking relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
della Cava, M. R. (2004). Truth in advertising hits Internet dating. USA Today. Dostupné z http://www.usatoday.com/life/lifestyle/2004-04-19-web-dating_x.htm.
Dunning, D., & Sherman, D. A. (1997). Stereotypes and tacit inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 459-471.

Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64, 644-658.

Eaton, Asia, and Suzanna Rose. 2011. Has dating become more egalitarian? A 35 year review using sex roles. Sex Roles 64: 843-62.

Eisenberg, E. M. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 227-242.
Eisenchlas, S. A. (2013). Gender roles and expectations: Any changes online? SAGE Open
October-December 2013: 1–11. DOI: 10.1177/2158244013506446
Ellison, N. B., Heino, R.D., & Gibbs J. L. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 11(2), 415-441.
England, Paula, Emily Fitzgibbons Shafer, and Alison Fogarty. 2008. Hooking up and forming romantic relationships on today’s college campuses. In The gendered society reader, 3rd ed., edited by Michael Kimmel and Amy Aronson. New York: Oxford University Press.
FARQUHAR, L. Performing and interpreting identity through Facebook imagery. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies [online]. 2012, 19(4): 446-471 [cit. 2015-09-23]. DOI: 10.1177/1354856512459838
E. J. FINKEL, P. W. EASTWICK, B. R. KARNEY, H. T. REIS a S. SPRECHER. Online Dating: A Critical Analysis From the Perspective of Psychological Science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest [online]. 2012, 13(1): 3-66 [cit. 2015-10-14]. DOI: 10.1177/1529100612436522.
Fiore, A. T., Taylor, L. S., Zhong, X., Mendelsohn, G. A., & Cheshire, C. (2010). Who’s right and who writes: People, profiles, contacts, and replies in online dating. Staženo z http://www.computer .org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/2010/3869/00/index.html.
Fishman, P. (1978). What Do Couples Talk About When They're Alone? In D. Butturff, & E. Epstein (Eds.), Women's Language and Style (s. 11-22). Akron, Ohio: L & S Books.

Fletcher GJO, Simpson JA, Thomas G, Giles L (1999) J Pers Soc Psychol 76:72–89.
Frazzetto, G. (2010). The science of online dating. EMBO Reports, 11, 25–27.
Frost, J. H., Chance, Z., Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2008). People are experience goods: Improving online dating with virtual dates. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22, 51–61.
Gangestad, S. W., & Scheyd, G. J. (2005). The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 523-548.
Gershberg, M. (2004). Funny odds of online dating. BizReport. Dostupné z http://www.bizreport.com/news/7383/
Gerson, Kathleen. 2002. Moral dilemmas, moral strategies, and the transforma- tion of gender: Lessons from two generations of work and family change. Gender & Society 16: 8-28.
Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 33, 1-26.
Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Lai, C. (2011). First comes love, then comes Google: An investigation of uncertainty reduction strategies and self-disclosure in online dating. Communication Research, 38(1), 70-100.
Gillmor, C. S. (2007). Stanford, the IBM 650, and the first trials of computer date matching. IEEE Annals of the History of Comput- ing, 29, 74–80.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor.
Gonzaga, G. (2011). How you meet your spouse matters. Dostupné z http://advice.eharmony.com/blog/2011/02/10/how-you-meet- your-spouse-matters/
Gwinnell, E. (1998). Online seductions: Falling in love with strangers on the Internet. New York, NY: Kodansha America.
Hamilton, Laura, and Elizabeth Armstrong. 2009. Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: Double binds and flawed options. Gender & Society 23: 589-616.
Hancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2009). Putting your best face forward: The accuracy of online dating photographs. Journal of Communication, 59, 367-386.
Heino, R. D., Ellison, N. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2010). Relationshopping: Investigating the market metaphor in online dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(4), 427-447.
Herring, S. C. (1993). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication, 3. Dostupné z http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/ejc.doc
Herring, S. C. (2000). Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications. CPSR Newsletter, 18. Dostupné z http://cpsr. org/issues/womenintech/herring/
Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated communication and woman’s place. In M. Bucholtz (Ed.), Language and woman’s place: Text and commentaries (s. 216-222). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Higgins ET (1987) Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94: 319–340
Hiltz, S., Johnson, M., and Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
Hitsch, G. J., Hortaçsu, A., & Ariely, D. (2010a). Matching and sorting in online dating. American Economic Review, 100, 130–163.
Hitsch, G. J., Hortaçsu, A., & Ariely, D. (2010b). What makes you click? Mate preferences in online dating. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 8, 393–427.

Hogan, B., Dutton, W., & Li, N. (2011). A global shift in the social relationships of networked individuals: Meeting and dating online comes of age. Dostupné z http://ssrn.com/abstract=176388
Huffaker, D. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2005). Gender, identity, and language use in teenage blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10. Dostupné z http://jcmc.indiana.edu/ vol10/issue12/huffaker.html
Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role
of self-awareness and visual anonymity European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177-192.
Joinson, A. N. (2004). Self-esteem, interpersonal risk, and preference for e-mail to
face-to-face communication CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7 (4), 479-485.
Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498-509.
Kraut, R., Lundmark, V., Patterson, M., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyaya, T., and Scherlis,
W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist 53, 1017–1031.
Laner, Mary Riege, and Nicole Ventrone. 2000. Dating scripts revisited. Journal of Family Issues 21: 488-500.

Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Leary, M.R. (1996). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Liu, H. (2007). Social network profiles as taste performances. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1). Dostupné z http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/ issue1/liu.html
Long, B. L. (2010). Scripts for online dating: A model and theory of online romantic relationship initiation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bowling Green State University, OH.

Lynn, M., & Bolig, R. (1985). Personal advertisements: Sources of data about relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 377-383.
Madden, M. & Lenhart, A. (2006). Online dating. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Dostupné z http://pewinternet.org/∼/media/Files/Reports/2006/PIP_Online_Dating.pdf
Marwick A (2012) The public domain: surveillance in everyday life. Surveillance and Society 9(4): 378–393.
Mead GH (1932) Philosophy of the Present. Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing.
Mead GH (1936) Movements of Thought in the 19th Century. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Merskin, D. L., & Huberlie, M. (1996). Companionship in the classifieds: The adoption of personal advertisements by daily newspapers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 219–229.
McKenna, K. Y.A., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of internet: Identity ‘de-marginalization’ through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 681-694.
O'SULLIVAN, P. B. a A. J. FLANAGIN. Reconceptualizing 'flaming' and other problematic messages. New Media [online]. 2003-03-01, vol. 5, issue 1, s. 69-94 [cit. 2015-03-04]. DOI: 10.1177/1461444803005001908. Dostupné z http://nms.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/1461444803005001908
Phillips, D. (2009). Ubiquitous computing, spatiality, and the construction of identity: Direc- tions for policy response. In I. Kerr, V. Steeves & C. Lucock (Eds.), Lessons from the iden- tity trail: Anonymity, privacy and identity in a networked society (s. 303-318). New York: Oxford University Press.

Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269-281.
Orne MT (1962) Am Psychol 17:776–783.
Riggio, R. E., Widaman, K. F., Tucker, J. S., & Salinas, C. (1991). Beauty is more than skin deep: Components of attractiveness. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 423-469.
Rodino, M. (1997). Breaking out of binaries: Reconceptualizing gender and its relationship to language in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communica- tion, 3. Dostupné z http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue3/ rodino.html
Rosen, L. D., Cheever, N. A., Cummings, C., & Felt, J. (2008). The impact of emotionality and self-disclosure on online dating versus traditional dating. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2124–2157.
Rowatt, W. C., Cunningham, M. R., & Druen, P. B. (1998). Deception to get a date. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(11), 1228-1242.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743-762.
Rudman, Laurie, and Kimberly Fairchild. 2004. Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87: 157-76.
Schaefer, L. J. (2003, February 14). Looking for love, online or on paper. The New York Times, p. A31.
Schlenker, B. R., & Pontari, B. A. (2000). The strategic control of information: Impression management and self-presentation in daily life. In A. Tesser, R. B. Felson, & J. M. Suls (Eds.), Psychological Perspectives on Self and Identity (s. 199–232). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Sautter, J., Tippett, R. M., & Morgan, S. P. (2010). The social demog- raphy of Internet dating in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 554–575.
Sassler, Sharon, and Amanda Miller. 2011. Waiting to be asked: Gender, power, and relationship progression among cohabiting couples. Journal of Family Issues 32: 482-506.
Short, J. A., Williams, E., and Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Siibak A (2009) Constructing the self through the photo selection: visual impression management on social networking websites. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 3(1), article 1.
Silfverberg S, Liikkanen AL and Lampinen A (2011) I’ll press play, but I won’t listen: profile work in a music-focused social network service. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, Hangzhou, China, 19–23 March. New York: ACM Press.
Simenauer, J., & Carroll, D. (1982). Singles: The new Americans. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Singh, D. (2004). Mating strategies of young women: Role of physical attractiveness. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 43-54.
Smaill, B. (2004). Online personals and narratives of the self: Australia’s
RSVP. Convergence: The Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 10, 93 107.
Smith M, and Kollock K (1999) Communities in Cyberspace. London, UK: Routledge.

Spitzberg, B. H., & Hoobler, G. (2002). Cyberstalking and the technologies of interpersonal terrorism. New Media & Society, 4, 71-92.
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 321- 326.
Talbot, M. (2000). “It’s good to talk?” The undermining of feminism in a British telecom advertisement. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4, 108-119.
Thiel, S. (2005). “IM me”—Identity construction and gender negotiation in the world of adolescent girls and instant messaging. In Mazzarella S. R. (Ed.), Girl wide web: Girls, the Internet and the negotiation of identity (s.179-201). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York, NY: Simon
Todd, P. M., Penke, L., Fasolo, B., & Lenton, a. P. (2007). Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(38), 15011-15016. doi:10.1073/pnas.0705290104
Tong, S. T., & Walther, J. B. (2011). Just say ’’no thanks’’: Roman- tic rejection in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 488–506
Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2010). Looks and lies: The role of physical attractiveness in online dating self-presentation and deception. Communication Research, 37(3), 335-351.
Toma, C. L., Hancock, J. T., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023-1036.
Trivers R (2000) Ann NY Acad Sci 907:114–131.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as interaction in society. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (s. 1-35). London, UK: Sage.

Van Zoonen L (2013) From identity to identification: fixating the fragmented self. Media, Culture and Society 35(1): 44–51.
Woll, S. B., & Cosby, P. C. (1987). Videodating and other alternatives to traditional methods of relationship initiation. In W. H. Jones & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in Personal Relationships (Vol. 1, s. 69–108). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538-2557.
Walther JB, Van Der Heide B, Kim SY, and Westerman D (2008) The role of friends’ appearance and beha- vior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research 34(1): 28–49.

Whitty, M. T. and McLaughlin, D. (2007). Online recreation: The relationship between loneliness, internet self-efficacy and the use of the internet for entertainment purposes Computers in Human Behavior, 23 (3), 1435-1446.
Whitty, M. T. (2003a). Cyber-flirting: Playing at love on the Internet Theory and Psychology, 13 (3), 339-357.
Whitty, M. T. (2004). Cyber-flirting: An examination of men's and women's flirting
behaviour both offline and on the Internet Behaviour Change, 21 (2), 115-126.
Whitty, M. T. (2007). The art of selling one’s self on an online dating site: The BAR
Approach. In M. T. Whitty, A. J. Baker, & J. A. Inman (Eds.), Online matchmaking. (s. 57-69). Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Whitty, M. T. and Carr, A. N. (2006a). Cyberspace romance: The psychology of online relationships. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Whitty, M.T. (2008). Liberating or debilitating? An examination of romantic relationships, sexual relationships and friendships on the Net. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1837-1850.
Whitty, M. T. (2007). Introduction. In M. T. Whitty, A. J. Baker, & J. A. Inman (Eds.), Online matchmaking. New York, NY: Pal- grave Macmillan.
Whitty, M. T., & Gavin, J. (2001). Age/sex/location: Uncovering the social cues in the development of online relationships. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, 623–630.

Wiederman, M. W., Dubois, S. L. (1998). Evolution and Sex Differences in Preferences for Short-Term Mates: Results from a Policy Capturing Study. Evolution and Human Behavior 19, 153–170.
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2010). Gender. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (s. 629-667). New York, NY: Wiley.

A nightclub on your smartphone. The Economist [online]. The Economist Newspaper Limited 2015, Sep19th2011 [cit. 2015-10-23]. Dostupné z: http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2011/09/social-networking
Badoo. Badoo [online]. [cit. 2015-10-23]. Dostupné z: https://corp.badoo.com/cs/
Tinder, the Fast-Growing Dating App, Taps an Age-Old Truth. The New York Times [online]. © 2015 The New York Times Company, 2014 [cit. 2015-11-05]. Dostupné z: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/30/fashion/tinder-the-fast-growing-dating-app-taps-an-age-old-truth.html?_r=1
Tinder hookups skyrocketed 300% at Coachella's first weekend. Mashable [online]. 2015 [cit. 2015-11-05]. Dostupné z: http://mashable.com/2015/04/15/coachella-tinder-usage-sky-rockets/#6HQ8ujumzEq
Předběžná náplň práce
Tato diplomová práce si klade za cíl zmapovat a popsat, jak uživatelé online seznamkových serverů užívají toto médium, jakým způsobem si tvoří profil, prezentují se a jaké motivace mají k užívání online seznamkových serverů. Pro sběr dat jsem si zvolila kvalitativní výzkum. Kvalitativní metodou byly hloubkové polostrukturované rozhovory se čtrnácti uživateli seznamkového serveru Badoo.
Práce je rozdělena na dvě části. V první části se soustředím na teoretické koncepty. Podrobněji se věnuji historii online seznamování, sebeprezentaci a motivaci užití online seznamovacích serverů. Dále jsou v teoretické části zmíněny přístupy ke vztahům z hlediska evoluční psychologie a v neposlední řadě také stereotypy. Druhá část práce je empirická. Zabývá se metodologií, výzkumnými otázkami, výzkumnou strategií a především samotnou analýzou rozhovorů. Na základě hloubkových rozhovorů s respondenty jsem si vytvořila několik stěžejních kategorií, které jsou v analytické části podrobněji popisovány.
Tato studie popisuje postoje respondentů ke kategoriím, jako je motivace užití seznamkových serverů, postoje k tomuto typu seznamování, sebeprezentace, komunikace a stereotypy vyskytující se u uživatelů online seznamkových serverů.
Poslední část práce se věnuje shrnutí poznatků a výsledků výzkumu.
Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce
This thesis aims to map and describe how users of online dating servers use this medium. How do they self-present on dating sites and how do they create a profile. What is the motivation to use the online dating sites. For data collection, I chose qualitative research. As a qualitative method were used depth interviews with fourteen users of dating site Badoo.
The work is divided into two parts. The first part will focus on theoretical concepts. Detail is devoted to the history of online dating, self-presentation, motivation to use online dating sites. Furthermore, the theoretical approaches discussed the relations in terms of evolutionary psychology and, ultimately, stereotypes. The second part is empirical. It deals with methodology, research questions, research strategies and especially the analysis of interviews. Based on interviews with respondents, I have developed several key categories, which are described in more detail the analytical part.
This study describes the attitudes/ approach of respondents to categories such as motivation to use dating sites, self-presentation, communication and stereotypes which I have noticed in my research sample.
The last part is devoted to a summary of findings and research results.
Univerzita Karlova | Informační systém UK