Geopolitical Constitutions in New Confucianism: The Case of Qian Mu

• Název práce v češtině: Geopolitické základy nového konfucianismu: Případ Qian Mu
• Název v anglickém jazyce: Geopolitical Constitutions in New Confucianism: The Case of Qian Mu
• Klíčová slova: Qian Mu, New Confucianism, geopolitics, critical geopolitics, post-Chineseness
• Klíčová slova anglicky: Qian Mu, New Confucianism, geopolitics, critical geopolitics, post-Chineseness
• Akademický rok vypsání: 2022/2023
• Typ práce: diplomová práce
• Jazyk práce: angličtina
• Ústav: Katedra politologie (23-KP)
• Vedoucí / školitel: Mgr. Bohumil Doboš, Ph.D.
• Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem
• Datum přihlášení: 29.03.2023
• Datum zadání: 29.03.2023
• Datum a čas obhajoby: 28.06.2024 10:00
• Místo konání obhajoby: Areál Jinonice, B329, 329, seminární místnost IPS
• Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby: 30.04.2024
• Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 28.06.2024
• Oponenti: Mgr. Tomáš Halamka, Ph.D.

Seznam odborné literatury

Chinese Resources

Cai Renhou, 2009, The path opened by contemporary New Confucianism under the impact of Western culture - commemorating the centenary of the birth of Mr. Tang Junyi and Mou Zongsan. Chinese Studies, 28(1), 1-7. (蔡仁厚，2009，在西方文化沖激下當代新儒家開顯的道路－紀念唐君毅牟宗三二先生誕生百周年。漢學研究通訊，28(1)，1-7。)
Chih-yu Shih and Li Huiyi, 2017, From “Chineseness” to “Post-Chineseness” - Notes on Malaysian Chinese Studies, Prospect & Exploration, 15(5), 49-65. (石之瑜、李慧易，2017，從「華人性」到「後華人性」─馬來西亞華人研究劄記，展望與探索月刊，15(5)，49-65。)
Chih-yu Shih, 2005, Overseas Chinese at Home? The Ancestor Discourse in Taiwanese Identity Politics, Review of Global Politics, (10), 141-157. (石之瑜，2005，海內華人？台灣人身份政治中的祖先論述，全球政治評論，(10)，141-157。)
Chih-yu Shih, 2019, Integration of “Relationship Balance” Theory and Chinese and Western Relations Theories - The “Post-Chineseness” Agenda of China’s International Relations, World Politics Studies, 2019(2), 19-40. (石之瑜，2019，「關係均衡」理論與中、西方關係理論之整合－中國國際關係的「後華性」議程，世界政治研究，2019(2)，19-40。)
Chun-chieh Huang, 2000, Qian Bin’s view of “national history” in his four historiographies: connotation, method, and significance, Historical Inquiry, NTU, 26, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.6253%2fntuhistory.2000.26.01 (黃俊傑，2000，錢賓四史學中的“國史”觀：內涵、方法與意義，臺大歷史學報，26，1-37。)
Du Baorui, 2011, Fang Dongmei’s basic position on Chinese Mahayana Buddhism as both religion and philosophy. Journal of Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Language and Literature, 56(2), 1-31. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=20745192-201109-201306110043-201306110043-1-31. Date viewed: April 3, 2024. (杜保瑞，2011，方東美對中國大乘佛教亦宗教亦哲學的基本立場。師大學報：語言與文學類，56(2)，1-31。)
He Xinquan, 1996, Confucianism and Modern Democracy: A Study of Contemporary New Confucian Political Philosophy, Preparatory Office of the Institute of Chinese Literature and Philosophy, Academia Sinica. (何信全，1996，儒學與現代民主：當代新儒家政治哲學研究，中央研究院中國文哲研究所籌備處。)
Hu Chusheng, 2015, Using the History of the Country to Reveal the Soul of the Country — A Closer Look at Qian Mu’s “Outline of National History”, Academic Treatises under the Flames of War — A Closer Look at Ten Literary and Historical works during the Anti-Japanese War, Taipei: Taiwan Student Book Company, 1-29. (胡楚生，2015，以國史昭蘇國魂──錢穆《國史大綱》探微，烽火下的學術論著──抗戰時期十種文史著作探微，臺北：臺灣學生書局，1-29。)
Huo Jinming, 1992, “Opening theory” as I understand it - Impressions on Mr. Yu Yingshi’s “Qian Mu and New Confucianism”, Twenty-first Century, October 1992, 134-138. (霍晉明，1992，我所了解的「開出說」——有感於余英時先生的〈錢穆與新儒家〉，二十一世紀，1992年10月號，134-138。)
Ji Yun (editor-in-chief), 2015, Wenlange Sikuquanshu General Catalog, 1549, Hangzhou: Hangzhou Publishing House. (紀昀主編，2015，文瀾閣欽定四庫全書‧總目，1549，杭州：杭州出版社。)
Jiang Huizhen, 2010, President Ma recalled Qian Mu: Injustice will never happen again, China Times. https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20100831000461-260115 . Date viewed: April 3, 2024. (江慧真，2010，馬憶錢穆：不公不義不再發生，中國時報。https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20100831000461-260115。瀏覽日期：2024年4月3日。)
Jiang Nianfeng, 1991, Postwar Taiwan Experience and Hegel in the Thoughts of Tang Junyi and Mou Zongsan, in Lai Zehan and Chun-chieh Huang (Editors) Taiwan’s Development Experience after the Restoration, 37-100. Taipei: Sun Yat-sen Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica. (蔣年豐，1991，戰後台灣經驗與唐君毅、牟宗三思想中的黑格爾，收於賴澤涵、黃俊傑（主編）光復後台灣地區發展經驗，37-100。臺北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。)
Jiang Qing, 1989, The practical significance of the revival of Confucianism in mainland China and the problems it faces (Part 1), Legein Monthly, (170), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.29652%2fLM.198908.0004 . (蔣慶，1989，中國大陸復興儒學的現實意義及其面臨的問題（上），鵝湖月刊，(170)，29-38。https://doi.org/10.29652%2fLM.198908.0004。)
Jiang Qing, 1989, The practical significance of the revival of Confucianism in mainland China and the problems it faces (Part 2), Legein Monthly, (171), 22-37. https://doi.org/10.29652/LM.198909.0006. (蔣慶，1989，中國大陸復興儒學的現實意義及其面臨的問題（下），鵝湖月刊，(171)，22-37。https://doi.org/10.29652/LM.198909.0006。)
Lin Meiling, 2010, The Historian Consciousness as Reflected in the History Branch of Qinding Siku Quanshu Zongmu, Journal of The Institute of Chinese Literature Shih Hsin University, (6), 69-86. https://doi.org/10.30120%2fJICLSHU.201007.0004. (林美伶，2010，《四庫全書總目》所反映的史家意識，世新中文研究集刊，(6)，69-86。https://doi.org/10.30120%2fJICLSHU.201007.0004。)
Liu Shuxian, 1996, Transcendental Introspection of Contemporary New Confucianism, Contemporary Chinese Philosophy: Issues, New Jersey: Bafang Cultural Corporation. (劉述先，1996，對於當代新儒家的超越內省，當代中國哲學論：問題篇，紐澤西：八方文化事業公司。)
Liu Shuxian, 2002, An examination of modern New Confucian studies, Bulletin of the Institute of Chinese Literature and Philosophy, 20. (劉述先，2002，現代新儒學研究之省察，中國文哲研究集刊，20。)
Liu Shuxian, 2008, On the Three Great Era of Confucian Philosophy, Hong Kong: Chinese University Press. (劉述先，2008，論儒家哲學的三個大時代，香港：中文大學出版社)
Luo Yijun, 1994, Research on contemporary New Confucianism in the past ten years and the so-called sect problem, in Mou Zongsan et al., edited by Yang Zuhan, Confucianism and the Today’s World, 113-146. (羅義俊，1994，近十餘年當代新儒家的研究與所謂門戶問題，收入牟宗三等著，楊祖漢主編，儒學與當今世界，113-146。)
Mao Zedong, 1949, Throw away illusions and prepare for struggle, Chinese Marxist Library, https://www.marxists.org/chinese/maozedong/marxist.org-chinese-mao-19490814.htm. Date viewed: April 3, 2024. (毛澤東，1949，丟掉幻想，準備鬥爭，中文馬克思主義文庫，https://www.marxists.org/chinese/maozedong/marxist.org-chinese-mao-19490814.htm。瀏覽日期：2024年4月3日。)
Mou Zongsan, 1985, Moral Idealism, Taipei: Student Bookstore. (牟宗三，1985，道德的理想主義，臺北：學生書店。)
Mou Zongsan, Xu Fuguan, Zhang Junmai, and Tang Junyi, 1958, A Manifesto on the Reappraisal of Chinese Culture: Our Joint Understanding of Chinese Academic Research and the Future of Chinese Culture and World Culture Outlook. https://6744278.s21i.faiusr.com/61/ABUIABA9GAAg8Kv3tgUorNiu9AI.pdf. Date viewed: April 3, 2024. (牟宗三、徐復觀、張君勱、唐君毅，1958，為中國文化敬告世界人士宣言：我們對中國學術研究及中國文化與世界文化前途之共同認識。https://6744278.s21i.faiusr.com/61/ABUIABA9GAAg8Kv3tgUorNiu9AI.pdf。瀏覽日期：2024年4月3日。)
Qian Mu, 1984, Academic Review of Modern China, Taipei: Dongda Book Company, 21. (錢穆，1984，現代中國學術論衡，臺北：東大圖書公司，21。)
Qian Mu, 1994, Chinese Cultural Spirit, in Complete Works of Mr. Qian Binsi, 38. (錢穆，1994，中國文化精神，收於《錢賓四先生全集》38。)
Qian Mu, 1994, Chinese nationality and Chinese culture from the perspective of Chinese history, in Complete Works of Mr. Qian Binsi, 40, Taipei: Taipei: Linking Books. (錢穆，1994，從中國歷史來看中國民族性及中國文化，收於《錢賓四先生全集》40，臺北：聯經。)
Qian Mu, 1994, Culture and Education, in Complete Works of Mr. Qian Binsi, 41, Taipei: Taipei: Linking Books. (錢穆，1994，文化與教育，收於《錢賓四先生全集》41，臺北：聯經。)
Qian Mu, 1994, Private Words on Politics, in Complete Works of Mr. Qian Binsi, 40, Taipei: Taipei: Linking Books. (錢穆，1994，政學私言，收於《錢賓四先生全集》40，臺北：聯經。)
Qian Mu, 1994, Remembering My Parents at Eighty Years Old & Miscellaneous Memories of Teachers and Friends, in Complete Works of Mr. Qian Binsi, 51, Taipei: Taipei: Linking Books. (錢穆，1994，八十憶雙親師友雜憶，《錢賓四先生全集》51，臺北：聯經。)
Qian Mu, 1994, The Meaning of Culture, in Complete Works of Mr. Qian Binsi, 37, Taipei: Taipei: Linking Books. (錢穆，1994，文化學大義，收於《錢賓四先生全集》37，臺北：聯經。)
Qian Mu, 1994, Twelve Lectures on Chinese Culture, in Complete Works of Mr. Qian Binsi, 38, Taipei: Taipei: Linking Books. (錢穆，1994，中華文化十二講，收於《錢賓四先生全集》38，臺北：聯經。)
Qian Mu, 1994, World Situation and Chinese Culture, in Complete Works of Mr. Qian Binsi, 38, Taipei: Taipei: Linking Books. (錢穆，1994，世界局勢與中國文化，收於《錢賓四先生全集》38，臺北：聯經。)
Qian Mu, 2009, Outline of National History, Beijing: The Commercial Press. (錢穆，2009，國史大綱，北京：商務印書館。)
Qian Mu’s former residence, Chronicle of Mr. Qian Mu’s works. http://chienmu.utaipei.edu.tw/%E9%8C%A2%E7%A9%86%E5%85%88%E7%94%9F%E8%91%97%E4%BD%9C%E5 %A4%A7%E4%BA%8B%E7%B4%80/. Date viewed: April 1, 2024. (錢穆故居，錢穆先生著作大事紀。瀏覽日期：2024年4月1日。)
Qin Xiaoyi, editor-in-chief, 1984, Collection of Thoughts and Speeches of President Chiang Kai-shek, Party History Committee of the Central Committee of Kuomintang. (秦孝儀主編，1984，總統蔣公思想言論總集，中國國民黨中央委員會黨史委員會。)
Shao Xuanlei, 2007, Genealogy as a research method, Taiwanese Journal of Political Science, (34), 151-174. (邵軒磊，2007，作爲研究方法的系譜學，政治科學論叢(34)，151-174。)
Wang Qingjia and Hu Xiaobai, 2017, Metanarrative of Chinese historiography: Examining the meaning of orthodoxy through the theory of "Cultural China", Jianghai Academic Journal, (1), 33-41.
Wang Ruhua, 2012, Three Sages of Modern Confucianism (Part 1): Records of Friendship between Liang Shuming, Xiong Shili, and Ma Yifu, Taipei: Xinrui. (王汝華，2012，現代儒家三聖（上）：梁漱溟、熊十力、馬一浮的交誼紀實，臺北：新銳。)
Wang Wen-jin, 2012, Xi Zaochi and the Construction of Zhuge Liang’s Myth, Bulletin of The Department of Chinese Literature National Taiwan University, 38, 71-120. https://doi.org/10.6281%2fNTUCL.2012.38.03. (王文進，2012，習鑿齒與諸葛亮神話之建構，臺大中文學報，38，71-120。)
Xiao Gongquan, 1982, Constitutionalism and Democracy, Complete Works of Mr. Xiao Gongquan, Taipei: Taipei: Linking Books. (蕭公權，1982，憲政與民主，蕭公權先生全集，臺北：聯經。)
Yan Hongzhong, 2006, Positions and Institutions - Qian Binsi and the Study of Chinese Political History, Historical Inquiry, NTU, 38, 105-158. (閻鴻中，2006，職分與制度──錢賓四與中國政治史研究，臺大歷史學報，38，105-158。)
Yang Jingjing, 2012, Zhu Xi’s theory of Shu-Han orthodoxy, Journal of Yichun University, 34(1), 94-97. (楊靜靜，2012，朱熹蜀漢正統論，宜春學院學報，34(1)，94-97。)
Yang Zuhan, 1994, On Yu Yingshi’s criticism of New Confucianism, in Mou Zongsan et al., edited by Yang Zuhan, Confucianism and the Today’s World, Taipei: Wenjin Publishing House, 147-177. (楊祖漢，1994，論余英時對新儒家的批評，收入牟宗三等著，楊祖漢主編，儒學與當今世界，臺北：文津出版社，147-177。)
Yu Yingshi, 1991, Qian Mu and New Confucianism, Still remembering the wind blowing on the water - Qian Mu and modern Chinese scholarship, Taipei: Sanmin Book Company, 31-98. (余英時，1991，錢穆與新儒家，猶記風吹水上鱗—錢穆與現代中國學術，臺北：三民書局，31-98。)
Yu Yingshi, 2016, “Outline of National History” - From internal structure to external influence, Disquisitions on the Past & Present, 29, 3-16. (余英時，2016，《國史大綱》發微──從內在結構到外在影響，古今論衡，29，3-16。)
Zhai Zhicheng, 2019, Qian Mu’s path to academicianship, Journal of the Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica, Issue 103 (March 108, the Republic of China), 91-126. (翟志成，2019，錢穆的院士之路，中央研究院近代史研究所集刊，第103期（民國108年3月），91-126。)
Zhang Qian, 2024, Hong Kong media: Xi Jinping builds his cultural thought by re-evaluating Qian Mu, Central News Agency. https://www.cna.com.tw/news/acn/202401080026.aspx. Date viewed: April 6, 2024. (張謙，2024，港媒：習近平構建文化思想 重新評價錢穆，中央社。https://www.cna.com.tw/news/acn/202401080026.aspx。瀏覽日期：2024年4月6日。)

English Resources

Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of international political economy, 1(1), 53-80.
Agnew, J. (2017). Globalization and sovereignty: Beyond the territorial trap. Rowman & Littlefield.
Agnew, JA, Mitchell, K., & Toal, G. (Eds.). (2008). A companion to political geography. John Wiley & Sons.
Batt, J. (2001). European identity and national identity in Central and Eastern Europe. In Interlocking Dimensions of European Integration (pp. 247-262). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Bresciani, U. (2023). Reinventing Confucianism: New Confucian Movement. Passerino Editore.
Brzezinski, Z. (2016). The grand chessboard: American primacy and its geostrategic imperatives. Basic books.
Campbell, JR, & Rew, A. (Eds.). (1999). Identity and affect: experiences of identity in a globalizing world. Pluto Press.
Cohen, SB (1963). Geography and politics in a world divided. Naval War College Review, 16(1), 6.
Coleman, M. (2003). The naming of ‘ terrorism’ and evil ‘outlaws’: geopolitical place-making after 11 September. Geopolitics, 8(3), 87-104.
Deepak, JS (2021). India, that is Bharat: Coloniality, civilization, constitution. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Dijink, G. (2002). National identity and geopolitical visions: Maps of pride and pain. Routledge.
Hepple, LW (2002). Géopolitiques de gauche: Yves Lacoste, Hérodote and French radical geopolitics. In Geopolitical Traditions (pp. 284-317). Routledge.
Huntington, SP (2020). The clash of civilizations? In The New Social Theory Reader (pp. 305-313). Routledge.
Kaplan, RD, & Rieff, D. (2000). The coming anarchy. World Policy Journal, 17(2), 95-96.
Koopman, S., Dalby, S., Megoran , N., Sharp, J., Kearns, G., Squire, R., ... & Toal, G. (2021). Critical Geopolitics/Critical Geopolitics 25 years on.
Lacoste, Y. (2012). Hérodote, (34), 14-44.
Pye, LW (1992). The spirit of Chinese politics. Harvard University Press. 235.
Routledge, P. (2003). Anti-geopolitics. A companion to political geography, 236-248.
Rygiel, K. (2002). Stabilizing borders: The geopolitics of national identity construction in Turkey. In Rethinking geopolitics (pp. 118-142). Routledge.
Shih, CY (2022). Post-Chineseness: Cultural politics and international relations. State University of New York Press.
Subcomandante Marcos. The streams, when they descend, have no way of returning to the mountains except beneath the ground. May 28, 1994 [2024-03-25]. http://www.spunk.org/texts/places/mexico /sp000655.txt
Tuathail, GO, & Toal, G. (1994). Problematizing geopolitics: survey, statesmanship and strategy. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 259-272.
Tuathail, G. Ó., & Toal, G. (1996). Critical geopolitics: The politics of writing global space (Vol. 6). U of Minnesota Press.
Watanabe, A. (2018). Greater East Asia Geopolitics and its geopolitical imagination of a borderless world: A neglected tradition? Political Geography, 67, 23-31.
Wei-Ming, T. (1991). Cultural China: The periphery as the center. Daedalus, 1-32.

Předběžná náplň práce

Tato práce zkoumá geopolitickou složku současného nového konfucianismu a používá diskuzi Qian Mu jako hlavní kontext pro novokonfuciánské učence. Studie zjistila, že názory Qian Mu byly ovlivněny geopolitickým prostředím. Před rokem 1949, kdy byl Qian Mu v pevninské Číně, byly jeho politické názory konkrétnější a k výkladu čínské historie používal západní termíny. Poté, co však pevninu v roce 1949 ovládla Čínská komunistická strana a Qian Mu se přestěhoval do Hongkongu a poté na Tchaj-wan, zdůraznil rozdíly mezi čínskou a západní kulturou a omezil svou diskusi o skutečných politikách. Qian Mu považuje Komunistickou stranu Číny a tchajwanské hnutí za nezávislost za deriváty západní kultury a všechny problémy připisuje kulturní úrovni. Proto obhajoval oživení tradiční čínské kultury, aby konfrontovala západní kulturu a vyřešila tyto problémy. Tato práce také cituje koncept „post-čínství“, který navrhl profesor Chih-yu Shih, a zdůrazňuje dopad strategie identity Qian Mu na geopolitiku a současný nový konfucianismus.

Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce

This thesis explores the geopolitical component of Contemporary New Confucianism and uses Qian Mu’s discussion as the main context for New Confucian scholars. The study found that Qian Mu’s views were affected by the geopolitical environment. Before 1949, when Qian Mu was in mainland China, his political views were more concrete and he would use Western terms to interpret Chinese history. However, after the mainland was ruled by the Chinese Communist Party in 1949 and Qian Mu moved to Hong Kong and then to Taiwan, he emphasized the differences between Chinese and Western cultures and reduced his discussion of actual policies. Qian Mu regards the Chinese Communist Party and the Taiwanese independence movement as derivatives of Western culture and attributes all problems to the cultural level. Therefore, he advocated reviving traditional Chinese culture to confront Western culture to solve these problems. This thesis also quotes the concept of “post-Chineseness” proposed by Professor Chih-yu Shih, highlighting the impact of Qian Mu’s identity strategy on geopolitics and Contemporary New Confucianism.