Czech Cross-Border Insolvency Rules in Comparison with the UNCITRAL Model Law
Název práce v češtině: | Czech Cross-Border Insolvency Rules in Comparison with the UNCITRAL Model Law |
---|---|
Název v anglickém jazyce: | Czech Cross-Border Insolvency Rules in Comparison with the UNCITRAL Model Law |
Klíčová slova: | cross-border insolvency law, UNCITRAL Model Law |
Klíčová slova anglicky: | cross-border insolvency law, UNCITRAL Model Law |
Akademický rok vypsání: | 2014/2015 |
Typ práce: | bakalářská práce |
Jazyk práce: | angličtina |
Ústav: | Institut ekonomických studií (23-IES) |
Vedoucí / školitel: | doc. JUDr. Tomáš Richter, LL.M., Ph.D. |
Řešitel: | skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem |
Datum přihlášení: | 16.04.2015 |
Datum zadání: | 17.08.2015 |
Datum a čas obhajoby: | 14.06.2016 08:00 |
Místo konání obhajoby: | IES, m 206 |
Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby: | 13.05.2016 |
Datum proběhlé obhajoby: | 14.06.2016 |
Oponenti: | Olha Khymych, DiS., Ph.D. |
Kontrola URKUND: |
Seznam odborné literatury |
ANDERSON, Kent. The Cross-Border Insolvency Paradigm: A Defense Of The Modified
Universal Approach Considering The Japanese Experience, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 2000, pp. 679 – 779. ARSENAULT, Steven J. Westernization of Chinese Bankruptcy: An Examination of China’s New Corporate Bankruptcy Law through the Lens of the UNCITRAL Legislative Guide to Insolvency Law, Pennsylvania State University International Law Review, 2008 – 2009, pp. 45-88. BERENDS, André J. The UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency: A Comprehensive Overview, Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, 1998, pp. 309 – 399. BĚLOHLÁVEK, Alexander J. Evropské a mezinárodní insolvenční právo: komentář. 1. vyd. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2007, xxxvii, 1550 s. ISBN 978-80-7179-591-9. BOSHKOFF, Douglass G. Some Gloomy Thoughts Concerning Cross-Border Insolvencies, Washnigton University Law Quarterly, 1994, pp. 931 – 941. FRANKEN, Sefa M. Cross-Border Insolvency Law: A Comparative Institutional Analysis, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2014, pp. 97 – 131. GUZMAN, Andrew T. International Bankruptcy: In Defense of Universalism, Michigan Law Review, 1999 – 2000, pp. 2177 – 2215. HO, Look Chan. The Revised UNCITRAL Model Law Enactment Guide – A Welcome Product?, Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation, 2014, pp. 325 – 340. KISLINGEROVÁ, Eva, Tomáš RICHTER a Luboš SMRČKA. Insolvenční praxe v České republice: v období 2008–2013. Vyd. 1. V Praze: C.H. Beck, 2013, xv, 143 s. Beckova edice ekonomie. ISBN 978-807-4004-971. LEONARD, Bruce. Managing Default by a Multinational Venture: Cooperation in Cross- Border Insolvencies, Texas International Law Journal, 1998, pp. 543 – 556. LOPUCKI Lynn M. Cooperation in International Bankruptcy: A Post-Universalist Approach, Cornell Law Review, 1998 – 1999, pp. 696 – 762. MAJUMDAR, Arjya B. The UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, India Law Journal, 2009, pp 1 – 19. MOONEY, Charles W. Harmonizing Choice-of-Law Rules for International Insolvency Cases: Virtual Territoriality, Virtual Universalism, and the Problem of Local Interests, University of Pennsylvania Law School, Research Paper no. 14-32, 2014. RICHTER, Tomáš. Insolvenční právo. Vyd. 1. Praha: ASPI, 2008, 471 s. ISBN 978-807- 3573-294. SEXTON, Anthony V. Current Problems and Trends in the Administration of Transnational Insolvencies involving Enterprise Groups: The Mixed Record of Protocols, the UNCITRAL Model Insolvency Law, and EU Insolvency Regulation, Chicago Journal of International Law, 2011 – 2012, pp. 811 – 840. TRAUTMAN, Donald T., WESTBROOK, Jay L., GAILLARD, Emanuel. Four Models for International Bankruptcy, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 1993, pp. 573 – 625. TRITCHARDT, Anton. The UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, Flinders Journal of Law Reform, 2002, pp. 95 – 128. UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, 1997 UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, Guide to Enactment and Interpretation, 2013 WEI, Chuyi. Chinese Bankruptcy Law in its Eight Year: An Evaluation in Theory and Practice, International Company and Commercial Law Review, 2014, pp. 309 – 317. WESTBROOK, Jay L. Priority Conflicts as a Barrier to Cooperation in Multinational Insolvencies, Pennsylvania State University International Law Review, 2008 – 2009, pp. 869 – 878. WESTBROOK, Jay L. Universalism and Choice of Law, Pennsylvania State University International Law Review, 2004 – 2005, pp. 625 – 637. |
Předběžná náplň práce |
The thesis will focus on the new Czech cross-border insolvency rules that are a
part of the new International Private Law Act (91/2012 Sb.), which was adopted in 2012. Specifically, it will provide a comparison of the UNCITRAL Model Law and the current Czech legislation regarding general cross-border insolvencies (par 111, 91/2012 Sb. Act). On the contrary, the thesis will inquire neither into specific rules on international insolvencies of special regulated financial bankrupts (paras 112 – 114, 91/2012 Sb. Act), nor into the EU cross-border insolvency rules. The aim of the work is to evaluate the development of Czech cross-border insolvency rules with regard to the development of international standards in this area, and to identify the impact of the Czech legislation on the domestic economy. |
Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce |
The thesis will focus on the new Czech cross-border insolvency rules that are a
part of the new International Private Law Act (91/2012 Sb.), which was adopted in 2012. Specifically, it will provide a comparison of the UNCITRAL Model Law and the current Czech legislation regarding general cross-border insolvencies (par 111, 91/2012 Sb. Act). On the contrary, the thesis will inquire neither into specific rules on international insolvencies of special regulated financial bankrupts (paras 112 – 114, 91/2012 Sb. Act), nor into the EU cross-border insolvency rules. The aim of the work is to evaluate the development of Czech cross-border insolvency rules with regard to the development of international standards in this area, and to identify the impact of the Czech legislation on the domestic economy. |