Choice Judgment DIscrepancy and Inequality Aversion in Earnings: Evidence from the Republic of Moldova

• Název v anglickém jazyce: Choice Judgment DIscrepancy and Inequality Aversion in Earnings: Evidence from the Republic of Moldova
• Klíčová slova anglicky: Behavioural Economics Choice Judgment Discrepancy, Inequality Aversion
• Akademický rok vypsání: 2010/2011
• Typ práce: diplomová práce
• Jazyk práce: angličtina
• Ústav: Institut ekonomických studií (23-IES)
• Vedoucí / školitel: doc. PhDr. Michal Bauer, Ph.D.
• Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem
• Datum přihlášení: 10.11.2010
• Datum zadání: 10.11.2010
• Datum a čas obhajoby: 02.02.2011 00:00
• Místo konání obhajoby: IES
• Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby: 13.01.2011
• Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 02.02.2011
• Oponenti: PhDr. Pavel Štika

Seznam odborné literatury

1) Loewenstein, Sicherman “Do Workers Prefer Increasing Wage Profiles?”, Journal of Labour Economics, vol. 9, The University of Chicago (1991)
2) Morris, A. (2006). Handbook of Contemporary Behavioural Economics. Foundations and Developments”, M.E. Sharpe.
3) Argyle, M. (1999). Causes and correlates of happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, and N. Schwarz (Eds), Well-being: The Foundation of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russel Sage.
4) Smith, A. (1759/1892). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. New York: Prometheus.
5) Edgetworth, F.Y. (1881). Mathematical Psychics. London: Kegan Paul.
6) Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., and Thaler, R.H. (1986). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. American Economic Review, 76(4), 728-41.
7) Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K.M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817-68.
8) Bolton, G.E. and Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity and competition. American Economic Review, 90, 166-93.
9) Agell, J. and Lundborg, P. (1995). Theories of pay and unemployment: Survey evidence from Swedish manufacturing firms. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97, 295-50.
10) Tversky, A. and Griffin, D. (2000). Endowments and Contrasts in Judgment of well-being. In d. Kahneman and A. Tversky (Eds), Choices, Values and Frames. New York: Cambridge university Press and the Russel Sage Foundation
11) Bewley, T. (1998). Why not cut pay? European Economic Review, 42, 459-90.
12) Wilkinson, N. (2008). An Introduction to Behavioral Economics. Richmond, The American International University in London.
13) Camerer, C.F., Lowenstein, G. and Rabin M. (2004). Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 287-5.
14) Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-58.
15) Simon, H.A. (1957). Models of Man: Social and Rational. New York: Wiley.
16) Shafir, E., Diamond, P. and Tversky, A. (1997). Money Illusion. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (2), 341-74.
17) Gul, F., and Psendorfer, W. (2005). The case of “mindless economics”. Working Paper, Princeton University, November.
18) Blinder, A.S. and Choi, D.H, (1990). A Shred of Evidence on Theories of Wage Stickiness. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 105(4), pages 1003-15, November.
19) Campbell, C. and Kamlani K. (1997). The Reasons for Wage Rigidity: Evidence from a Survey of Firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 789-759.
20) Camerer, C. and Thaler, R.H. Anomalies: Ultimatums, Dictators and Manners. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9, No. 2.
21) Groves, M.R., Fowler, F.J., Couper, M.P., Lepkowski, J.M., Singer, E. and Tourangeau R. (2009). Survey Methodology. Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
22) Mischel, W. and Metzner, R. (1962). Preference for delayed reward as a function of age, intelligence and length of delay interval. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 64(6), 425-31.
23) Harrison, G., Lau, M.I. and Williams, M.B. (2002). Estimating individual discount rates in Denmark: A field experiment. American Economic Review, 92, 5, 1606-17.
24) Hogarth, R.M. and Reder, M.W. (1987). Rational Choice: The contrast between Economics and Psychology. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago and London, 127-101.
25) Bruni, L. and Porta P.L. (2005). Economics and Happiness: framing the analysis. Oxford University Press. 45-14.
26) Akerlof, G.A. and Yellen, J.L. (1990). The fair wage-effort hypothesis and unemployment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. CV, Issue 2, pages 283-255, May.
27) International Monetary Fund (2010). World Economic Outlook Database. October edition.
28) Transparency International (2010). Corruption Perceptions Index 2010.

Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce

The current thesis tests for the presence of choice judgment discrepancy and of inequality aversion among the population of the Republic of Moldova. This is done via a survey where 300 people from Chisinau, the capital city of Moldova, are being asked to provide answers to two types of questionnaires. The first type of questionnaires reflects choice, while the second type judgment; the answers provided are being compared and a final conclusion is being reached. There is also being tested whether people’s judgments can influence their choices as much as to lead to reversals in their preferences and thus to changes in their revealed choices. The hypothesis about people’s inequality aversion also contains an analysis of certain factors which could influence the level of inequality aversion exhibited by respondents. These factors are: age, education, income and gender; their influence is being measured via the Ordered Probit model from Stata.