European Union’s Migration Policy: Offshore Asylum Processing solution
| Název práce v češtině: | European Union’s Migration Policy: Offshore Asylum Processing solution |
|---|---|
| Název v anglickém jazyce: | European Union’s Migration Policy: Offshore Asylum Processing solution |
| Klíčová slova: | EU, migrace, migrační politika, hranice, Dublinské nařízení |
| Klíčová slova anglicky: | EU, migration, migration policy, border, Dublin regulation |
| Akademický rok vypsání: | 2018/2019 |
| Typ práce: | diplomová práce |
| Jazyk práce: | angličtina |
| Ústav: | Katedra politologie (23-KP) |
| Vedoucí / školitel: | doc. Martin Riegl, Ph.D. |
| Řešitel: | skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem |
| Datum přihlášení: | 16.10.2018 |
| Datum zadání: | 16.10.2018 |
| Zásady pro vypracování |
| Topic Characteristics / Research Question(s):
After the demise of Dublin Regulation, EU is in desperate need for a unified migration policy. Offshore asylum processing has been effective in Australia, Can it be implemented in EU? How offshore asylum process can address the need of a unified migration policy of Europe? Working hypotheses: 1. European Union’s current migration policy (Dublin regulation) has not been able to address the refugee crisis to European borders, leading towards a divide among member states. Thus, deemed ineffective. 2. Australia’s current asylum policy have been effective in controlling the borders from illegal migrants but also providing asylum seekers needed shelter using offshore asylum processing. Offshore asylum policy can relieve burden (primary concern of disagreement) from individual European member states. 3. Adaptation of off shore asylum processing can address the need of an overall acceptable migration policy for all EU member states and lead the path towards a unified EU policy. Methodology: • Most EU member states respond to Migration as a securitization perspective rather than a humanitarian perspective and this has been on the overall scope of migration to Europe. • An issue is a security issue once referred by elites of the society and it requires political measures to be out of bounds and not usual anymore, leading it towards special political measures. (Public policy being put aside by politicization of the issue) • In the first part of the thesis, intention is to explore the background of the 2014 refugee crisis initially and analyze the Dublin Regulation that how it was unable to respond to higher number of the refugees entering the region. For which a research analysis will be provided that how certain factors of European Migration law hindered the process by initiating a widespread refugee crisis. Even though there was a recent, third revision of Dublin Regulation imposed, in order to improve the process. (Fratzke, 2015) In the second part, the motive is to explain the salient features of Australian migration policy and how it has been effective in resolving the issue of illegal migrants entering the Australia but also providing them an offshore shelter in nearby locations until their asylum-seeking process is completed, so they can enter Australia legally. (Farida Fozdar, 2008) (Stevens, 2002) In the final part, I intend to propose a roadmap of offshore asylum processing system adaptation for EU by providing the research data of entry points of refugees and illegal migrants to Europe, how those land and sea borders of Europe can be contained and which nearby locations could be used as an offshore asylum processing shelters. Leading to explain how this could be a solution acceptable by all the member states, sharing equal burden without affecting their national policies. (Meyers, 2000) |
| Seznam odborné literatury |
| References.
Asylum policy: the EU’s ‘crises’ and the looming policy regime failure2016Journal of European Integration311-325 Asylum Seeking in Australia 2002 The International Migration Review 864-893 Australian Refugee Protection in the wake of Tampa2002The American Journal of International Law661-676 Discriminations & Well Being: Perceptions of Refugees in Western Australia2008The International Migration Review30-63 Exploring Economism in Migration Policy and ResearchProceedings of the Australian Sociological Association Annual Conference1-14 Immigration Policies & Refugees in Australia1981The International Migration Review99-108 2015 Not Adding Up: The Fading Promise of Europe's Dublin System BrusslesMigration Policy Institute Europe 2014 The Two-Step Australian Immigration Policy and its Impact on Immigrant Employment OutcomesCanberraIZA Research Network Theories of International Immigration Policy - A Comparative Analysis2000International Migration Review1245-1282 |
| Předběžná náplň práce |
|
Outline: Introduction Subject matter & Methodology (Meyers, 2000) 1: Evaluation of EU Migration law & Road to the Crisis • Analysis of Dublin Regulation (Trauner, 2016) • Inefficiency of Dublin Regulation (Fratzke, 2015) 2: Offshore Asylum Processing & Australia’s Migration Policy • Offshore asylum processing system & Australia (Price, 1981) (Mathew, 2002) • Effectiveness & Efficiency of offshore asylum processing (Gregory, 2014) (Boese, 2009) 3: Offshore Asylum Processing as a Solution to Europe’s Refugee Crisis • Adaptation of Offshore Asylum Processing in Europe (Meyers, 2000) • EU Member states burden & outcomes (Fratzke, 2015) Conclusions |
| Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce |
| Outline:
Introduction Subject matter & Methodology (Meyers, 2000) 1: Evaluation of EU Migration law & Road to the Crisis • Analysis of Dublin Regulation (Trauner, 2016) • Inefficiency of Dublin Regulation (Fratzke, 2015) 2: Offshore Asylum Processing & Australia’s Migration Policy • Offshore asylum processing system & Australia (Price, 1981) (Mathew, 2002) • Effectiveness & Efficiency of offshore asylum processing (Gregory, 2014) (Boese, 2009) 3: Offshore Asylum Processing as a Solution to Europe’s Refugee Crisis • Adaptation of Offshore Asylum Processing in Europe (Meyers, 2000) • EU Member states burden & outcomes (Fratzke, 2015) Conclusions |