Témata prací (Výběr práce)Témata prací (Výběr práce)(verze: 368)
Detail práce
   Přihlásit přes CAS
Corruption Distance and Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from European Transition Economies
Název práce v češtině: Distance vůči korupci a přímé zahraniční investice: případ evropských tranzitivních ekonomik
Název v anglickém jazyce: Corruption Distance and Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from European Transition Economies
Klíčová slova: Korupční vzdálenost, PZI, Gravitační Model, Heterogenní Firmy, Evropské Transformační Ekonomiky
Klíčová slova anglicky: Corruption Distance, FDI, Gravity Model, Heterogeneous Firms, European Transition Economies
Akademický rok vypsání: 2017/2018
Typ práce: diplomová práce
Jazyk práce: angličtina
Ústav: Katedra ruských a východoevropských studií (23-KRVS)
Vedoucí / školitel: Mgr. Michal Paulus
Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem
Datum přihlášení: 22.05.2018
Datum zadání: 22.05.2018
Datum a čas obhajoby: 17.06.2019 09:30
Místo konání obhajoby: Jinonice - U Kříže 8, Praha 5, J2066, Jinonice - místn. č. 2066
Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby:17.05.2019
Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 17.06.2019
Oponenti: Randolph Luca Bruno, Ph.D.
  Ing. Vilém Semerák, M.A., Ph.D.
 
 
Kontrola URKUND:
Seznam odborné literatury
Anderson, E. and Gatignon, H., 1986. Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), pp.1-26.
Anderson, J.E. and Van Wincoop, E., 2003. Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1), pp.170-192.
Aisbett E. 2009. Bilateral Investment Treaties and Foreign Direct Investment: Correlation Versus Causation. eds. Karl Sauvant, and Lisa Sachs. In the Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties and Investment Flows, pp. 395–437. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bailey, N., 2018. Exploring the relationship between institutional factors and FDI attractiveness: A meta-analytic review. International Business Review, 27(1), pp.139-148.
Baldwin, R. and Taglioni, D., 2007. Trade effects of the euro: A comparison of estimators. Journal of Economic Integration, 22(4), pp.780-818.
Bellos, S. and Subasat, T., 2012. Corruption and foreign direct investment: A panel gravity model approach. Bulletin of Economic Research, 64(4), pp.565-574.
Bénassy‐Quéré, A., Coupet, M. and Mayer, T., 2007. Institutional determinants of foreign direct investment. World Economy, 30(5), pp.764-782.
Bevan, A.A. and Estrin, S., 2004. The determinants of foreign direct investment into European transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(4), pp.775-787.
Bergstrand, J.H. and Egger, P., 2007. A knowledge-and-physical-capital model of international trade flows, foreign direct investment, and multinational enterprises. Journal of International Economics, 73(2), pp.278-308.
Bevan, A., Estrin, S. and Meyer, K., 2004. Foreign investment location and institutional development in transition economies. International Business Review, 13(1), pp.43-64.
Brouthers, K.D. and Brouthers, L.E., 2001. Explaining the national cultural distance paradox. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), pp.177-189.
Brun, J.F., Carrère, C., Guillaumont, P. and De Melo, J., 2005. Has distance died? Evidence from a panel gravity model. World Bank Economic Review, 19(1), pp.99-120.
Brada, J.C., Drabek, Z. and Perez, M.F., 2012. The effect of home‐country and host‐country corruption on foreign direct investment. Review of Development Economics, 16(4), pp.640-663.
Brada, J. C., Drabek, Z., Mendez, J. A. and Perez, M. F., 2017. A Model of Corruption and Foreign Direct Investment à la John Dunning. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2938370 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2938370.
Buckley, P.J. and M. Casson, 1976. The Future of the Multinational Enterprise. London: Macmillan.
Buckley, P.J. and Casson, M.C., 1998. Analyzing foreign market entry strategies: Extending the internalization approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3), pp.539-561.
Buehn, A. and Schneider, F., 2012. Shadow economies around the world: novel insights, accepted knowledge, and new estimates. International Tax and Public Finance, 19(1), pp.139-171.
Cave, R.E., 1974. Economic Analysis and Multinational Enterprise. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Cezar, R. and Escobar, O.R., 2015. Institutional distance and foreign direct investment. Review of World Economics, 151(4), pp.713-733.
Centre d'Études Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales, 2019. Gravity. [online] Available through: CEPII <http://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/en/bdd_modele/presentation.asp?id=8> [Accessed 22 March 2019].
Chaney, T., 2008. Distorted gravity: the intensive and extensive margins of international trade. American Economic Review, 98(4), pp.1707-21.
Charbonneau, K.B., 2017. Multiple fixed effects in binary response panel data models. The Econometrics Journal, 20(3), pp.1-13.
Choudhury, R.N., Nayak, D.N., 2014. A selective review of foreign direct investment theories, ARTNeT Working Paper Series, No. 143, Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade (ARTNeT), Bangkok.
Cohen, B., 1975. Multinational Firms and Asian Exports. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Crozet, M., Head, K. and Mayer, T., 2011. Quality sorting and trade: Firm-level evidence for French wine. Review of Economic Studies, 79(2), pp.609-644.
Cuervo-Cazurra, A., 2006. Who cares about corruption? Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), pp.807-822.
Cuervo-Cazurra, A. and Genc, M., 2008. Transforming disadvantages into advantages: developing-country MNEs in the least developed countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), pp.957-979.
Cruz-Gonzalez, M., Fernández-Val, I. and Weidner, M., 2017. Bias corrections for probit and logit models with two-way fixed effects. The Stata Journal, 17(3), pp.517-545.
Daude, C. and Stein, E., 2007. The quality of institutions and foreign direct investment. Economics & Politics, 19(3), pp.317-344.
Deardorff, A.V., 1984. Testing trade theories and predicting trade flows. Handbook of International Economics, 1, pp.467-517.
De Soto, H., 1989. The other path: The invisible revolution in the third world. New York: Harper.
De Sousa, J. and Lochard, J., 2011. Does the single currency affect foreign direct investment? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113(3), pp.553-578.
Driffield, N., Mickiewicz, T., Pal, S. and Temouri, Y., 2010. Bridging the gap? Corruption, knowledge and foreign ownership. CEDI Discussion Paper 10(1).
Dunning, J.H., 1977. Trade, Location of Economic Activity and the MNE: A Search for an Eclectic Approach. In the International Allocation of Economic Activity, pp. 395-418. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dunning, J.H., 1980. Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), pp.9-31.
Dunning, J.H. and Lundan, S.M., 2008. Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(4), pp.573-593.
Dunning, J.H., 2015. The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: a Restatement and Some Possible Extensions. In the Eclectic Paradigm, pp. 50-84. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Eaton, J. and Tamura, A., 1995, Bilateralism and Regionalism in Japanese and U.S. Trade and Direct Foreign Investment Patterns, NBER Working Paper No. 4758. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Eaton, J. and Kortum, S., 2002. Technology, geography, and trade. Econometrica, 70(5), pp.1741-1779.
Eichengreen, B. and Irwin, D.A., 1995. Trade blocs, currency blocs and the reorientation of world trade in the 1930s. Journal of International Economics, 38(1-2), pp.1-24.
Egger, P. and Pfaffermayr, M., 2004. The impact of bilateral investment treaties on foreign direct investment. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(4), pp.788-804.
Gastanaga, V.M., Nugent, J.B. and Pashamova, B., 1998. Host country reforms and FDI inflows: How much difference do they make? World Development, 26(7), pp.1299-1314.
Globerman, S. and Shapiro, D., 2002. Global foreign direct investment flows: The role of governance infrastructure. World Development, 30(11), pp.1899-1919.
Globerman, S. and Shapiro, D., 2003. Governance infrastructure and US foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), pp.19-39.
Godinez, J.R. and Liu, L., 2015. Corruption distance and FDI flows into Latin America. International Business Review, 24(1), pp.33-42.
Grosse, R. and Trevino, L.J., 1996. Foreign direct investment in the United States: An analysis by country of origin. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(1), pp.139-155.
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. and Zingales, L., 2009. Cultural biases in economic exchange? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), pp.1095-1131.
Hymer, S.H., 1976. The International Operation of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habib, M. and Zurawicki, L., 2002. Corruption and foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), pp.291-307.
Hakkala, K.N., Norbäck, P.J. and Svaleryd, H., 2008. Asymmetric effects of corruption on FDI: Evidence from Swedish multinational firms. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(4), pp.627-642.
Hansen, H. and Rand, J., 2006. On the causal links between FDI and growth in developing countries. World Economy, 29(1), pp.21-41.
Heckman, J.J., 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, pp.153-161.
Head, K. and Ries, J., 2008. FDI as an Outcome of the Market for Corporate Control: Theory and Evidence. Journal of International Economics, 74(1), pp.2-20.
Head, K. and Mayer, T., 2014. Gravity equations: Workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook. In Handbook of International Economics, 4, pp.131-195.
Helpman, E., 1984. A simple theory of international trade with multinational corporations. Journal of Political Economy, 92(3), pp.451-471.
Helpman, E., Melitz, M.J. and Yeaple, S.R., 2004. Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review, 94(1), pp.300-316.
Helpman, E., Melitz, M. and Rubinstein, Y., 2008. Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), pp.441-487.
Huntington, S.P., 2006. Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), 2019. Database of Bilateral Investment Treaties. [online]Available through: ICSID <https://icsid.worldbank.org/en/Pages/resources/Bilateral-Investment-Treaties-Database.aspx> [Accessed 22 March 2019].
International Country Risk Guide (ICRG), 2019. The ICRG Researcher's Dataset. [online]Available through: University College University Library <https://www.ucl.ac.uk/library> [Accessed 22 March 2019].
Javorcik, B.S. and Wei, S.J., 2009. Corruption and cross-border investment in emerging markets: Firm-level evidence. Journal of International Money and Finance, 28(4), pp.605-624.
Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.E., 1977. The internationalization process of the firm—a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), pp.23-32.
Jaklic, A., Svetlicic, M., 2003. Enhanced Transition Through Outward Internationalization. London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315190952
Kemp, M.C., 1964. The Theory of International Trade. London: Prentice Hall.
Khanna, T. and Palepu, K.G., 2010. Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. MA: Harvard Business Press.
Kindleberger, C.P., 1969. American Business Abroad. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kleinert, J. and Toubal, F., 2013. Production versus distribution-oriented FDI. Review of World Economics, 149(3), pp.423-442.
Knickerbocker, F.T., 1973. Oligopolistic reaction and multinational enterprise. Division of Research, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Kojima, K., 1973. A macroeconomic approach to foreign direct investment. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 14(1), pp.1-21.90-207.
Kojima, K., 1975. International trade and foreign investment: substitutes or complements. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 16(1), pp.1-12.
Kojima, K. and Ozawa, T., 1985. Toward a theory of industrial restructuring and dynamic comparative advantage, 26(2), Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, pp.135-145.
Krugman, P., 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), pp.483-499.
Kwok, C.C. and Tadesse, S., 2006. The MNC as an agent of change for host-country institutions: FDI and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), pp.767-785.
Lavigne, M., 1999. The economics of transition: from socialist economy to market economy. London: Higher Macmillan International Education.
Leff, N.H., 1964. Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioural Scientist, 8(3), pp.8-14.
Lemfalussy, A., 1961. Investment and Growth in Mature Economies. Oxford: Basil Blackwell and Mott.
Lancaster, T., 2000. The incidental parameter problem since 1948. Journal of Econometrics, 95(2), pp.391-413.
Lambsdorff, J.G., 2003. How corruption affects persistent capital flows. Economics of Governance, 4(3), pp.229-243.
Lambsdorff, J.G., 2003. How corruption affects productivity. Kyklos, 56(4), pp.457-474.
Ledyaeva, S., 2009. Spatial econometric analysis of foreign direct investment determinants in Russian regions. World Economy, 32(4), pp.643-666.
MacDougall, G.D.A., 1960. The benefits and cost of private foreign investment abroad: A theoretical approach. Economic Record, 36(1), pp13-35.
Markusen, J.R., 1995. The boundaries of multinational enterprises and the theory of international trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), pp.169-189.
Martin, W. J.; Pham, C. S., 2015. Estimating the gravity model when zero trade flows are frequent and economically determined, Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS 7308. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. <http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/695631467998785933/Estimating-the-gravity-model-when-zero-trade-flows-are-frequent-and-economically-determined>[Accessed 10 March 2019].
Mauro, P., 1995. Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), pp.681-712.
McCallum, J., 1995. National borders matter: Canada-US regional trade patterns. American Economic Review, 85(3), pp.615-623.
Mehic, E., Silajdzic, S. and Babic-Hodovic, V., 2013. The impact of FDI on economic growth: Some evidence from Southeast Europe. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 49(1), pp.5-20.
Melitz, M.J. and Ottaviano, G.I., 2008. Market size, trade, and productivity. Review of Economic Studies, 75(1), pp.295-316.
Méon, P.G. and Weill, L., 2010. Is corruption an efficient grease? World Development, 38(3), pp.244-259.
Navaretti, G.B., Venables, A.J. and Barry, F., 2006. Multinational Firms in the World Economy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
North, D.C., 1990. A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(4), pp.355-367.
Novy, D., 2013. Gravity redux: measuring international trade costs with panel data. Economic Inquiry, 51(1), pp.101-121.
Okawa, Y. and Van Wincoop, E., 2012. Gravity in International Finance. Journal of International Economics, 87(2), pp.205-215.
Peng, M.W., Wang, D.Y. and Jiang, Y., 2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), pp.920-936.
Qian, X. and Sandoval-Hernandez, J., 2016. Corruption distance and foreign direct investment. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 52(2), pp.400-419.
Radlo, M.J. and Sass, M., 2012. Outward foreign direct investments and emerging multinational companies from Central and Eastern Europe: The case of Visegrád countries. Eastern European Economics, 50(2), pp.5-21.
Resmini, L., 2000. The determinants of foreign direct investment in the CEECs: New evidence from sectoral patterns. Economics of Transition, 8(3), pp.665-689.
Robock, S.H. and Simmonds, K., 1983. International Business and Multinational Enterprises. Illinois: Richard D. Irwin.
Robertson, C.J. and Watson, A., 2004. Corruption and change: The impact of foreign direct investment. Strategic Management Journal, 25(4), pp.385-396.
Rose-Ackerman, S., 1975. The economics of corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 4(2), pp.187-203.
Schwens, C., Eiche, J. and Kabst, R., 2011. The moderating impact of informal institutional distance and formal institutional risk on SME entry mode choice. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), pp.330-351.
Seldadyo, H. and De Haan, J., 2011. Is corruption really persistent? Pacific Economic Review, 16(2), pp.192-206.
Shenkar, O., 2001. Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), pp.519-535.
Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W., 1993. Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), pp.599-617.
Santos Silva, J.M.C. and Tenreyro, S., 2006. The log of gravity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), pp.641-658.
Santos Silva, J.M.C. and Tenreyro, S., 2010. On the existence of the maximum likelihood estimates in Poisson regression. Economics Letters, 107(2), pp.310-312.
Santos Silva, J.M.C. and Tenreyro, S., 2015. Trading partners and trading volumes: implementing the Helpman–Melitz–Rubinstein model empirically. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 77(1), pp.93-105.
Svensson, J., 2005. Eight questions about corruption. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), pp.19-42.
Tihanyi, L., Griffith, D.A. and Russell, C.J., 2005. The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3), pp.270-283.
Tinbergen, J., 1962. Shaping the World Economy; Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund. [online] Retrieved from <http://hdl.handle.net/1765/16826>[Accessed 10 March 2019].
Transparency International. 2019. Corruption Perception Index. [online] Available through: Transparency International <http://www.transparency.org/research/cpi> [Accessed 10 March 2019].
Trefler, D., 1995. The case of the missing trade and other mysteries. American Economic Review, pp.1029-1046.
Tokunaga, M. and Iwasaki, I., 2017. The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Transition Economies: A Meta‐analysis. The World Economy, 40(12), pp.2771-2831.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), 2014. Bilateral FDI Statistics. [online] Available through: UNCTAD <https://unctad.org/en/Pages/DIAE/FDI%20Statistics/FDI-Statistics-Bilateral.aspx> [Accessed 10 March 2019].
Vernon, R., 1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2), pp.1
Vernon, R., 1979. The product cycle hypothesis in a new international environment. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41(4), pp.255-267.
Voyer, P.A. and Beamish, P.W., 2004. The effect of corruption on Japanese foreign direct investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(3), pp.211-224.
Wei, S.J., 1997. Why is corruption so much more taxing than tax? Arbitrariness kills (No. w6255). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Wei, S.J., 2000. How taxing is corruption on international investors? Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(1), pp.1-11.
Wheeler, D. and Mody, A., 1992. International investment location decisions: The case of US firms. Journal of International Economics, 33(1-2), pp.57-76.
Williamson, O.E., 1993. Opportunism and its critics. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14(2), pp.97-107.
Williamson, O., 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press.
Wooldridge, J. M., 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
World Bank, 2019. World Development Indicators. [online] Available through: World Bank <https://databank.worldbank.org/data/source/world-development-indicators> [Accessed 10 March 2019].
Yeaple, S.R., 2009. Firm heterogeneity and the structure of US multinational activity. Journal of International Economics, 78(2), pp.206-215.
Yotov, Y.V., Piermartini, R., Monteiro, J.A. and Larch, M., 2016. An advanced guide to trade policy analysis: The structural gravity model. Geneva, Switzerland: World Trade Organization.
Předběžná náplň práce
Tato disertační práce navazuje na studii Cezara a Escobara (2015) o vztahu mezi institucionální vzdáleností a přímými zahraničními investicemi (PZI), ale místo toho se zaměřuje na spojitost mezi korupční vzdáleností a přímými zahraničními investicemi. Tato disertační práce v rámci své studie využívá dvoustupňového gravitačního modelu odvozeného z rámce heterogenních firem k empirickému odhadu dopadu korupční vzdálenosti na vnitřní a vnější přímé zahraniční investice evropských transformujících se ekonomik. Tato práce přispívá k dosud existující literature v několika aspektech. Nejprve navrhuje novou metodu měření vzdálenosti korupce s ohledem na důležitost předchozích zkušeností firem s rozvojem potřebných dovedností pro orientaci v zahraničním podnikatelském prostředí. Za druhé, empirická studie odlišila dopad korupční vzdálenosti na rozsáhlé a intenzivní rozpětí pomocí bohaté datové sady se třemi různými indexy korupce, což se liší od většiny předchozích studií na toto téma. Je to také jeden z mála článků, které toto téma konkrétně studují v kontextu evropských transformujících se ekonomik. Výsledky ukazují, že jak konvenční, tak upravená vzdálenost korupce založená na kontrole indexu nadměrných investic korupce snižuje pouze rozsáhlé rozpětí přímých zahraničních investic tranzitivních ekonomik; a že velikost okrajových efektů u vzorku je menší při použití upravené verze. Na druhé straně jsou výsledky také závislé na původním zdroji indexu korupce, který slouží k určení vzdálenosti korupce. Tato disertační práce proto ukazuje, že stávající empirické studie na toto téma nejsou zdaleka robustní, pokud uvažujeme o zdroji a měření vzdálenosti korupce v literatuře.
Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce
This dissertation builds on Cezar and Escobar’s (2015) study of the relationship between institutional distance and foreign direct investment (FDI), but focuses instead on the nexus between corruption distance and FDI. Along the lines of their study, this dissertation uses a two-stage gravity model derived from the framework of heterogeneous firms to empirically estimate the impact of corruption distance on the inward and outward FDI of European transition economies. This dissertation contributes to the literature in several aspects. First, it proposes a new method for measuring corruption distance, considering the importance of firms’ previous experience to the development of necessary skills for navigating a foreign business environment. Second, the empirical study distinguished the impact of corruption distance on the extensive and intensive margin by using a rich dataset with three different corruption indices, which thereby differs from most previous studies on this topic. This is also one of the few papers that specifically study this topic in the context of European transition economies. The results show that both conventional and adjusted corruption distance based on the control-of-corruption index only reduces the extensive margin of transition economies’ FDI; and that the magnitude of marginal effects at the sample means is smaller when using the adjusted version. On the other hand, the results are also dependent on the original source of the corruption index used to determine corruption distance. Therefore, this dissertation indicates that the existing empirical studies on this topic are far from robust when considering the source and measurement of corruption distance in the literature.
 
Univerzita Karlova | Informační systém UK