Při výběru garanta předmětu se zobrazují připomínky jak k němu, tak ke všem vyučujícím daného předmětu. Při výběru vyučujícího, který garantem není, se zobrazují připomínky vztažené pouze k němu.
Christoph Allolio, Ph.D. [32-MUUK], Aplikovaná matematika I [NCHF071, cvičení]
Dr. Průša was always excellently prepared and ready to answer each possible question. The exercises had a clear structure, corresponded to the lecture, and moreover broadened it. So, we (practically) went through the main concepts and also through selected associated topics.
I really appreciate the approach and passion in the subject. Also the tolerance and I can’t forget to mention the beautiful notes and the nicely cleaned blackboard
Připomínka k předmětu, Aplikovaná matematika I [NCHF071, cvičení]
The exercises had a clear structure, corresponded to the lecture, and moreover broadened it. So, we (practically) went through the main concepts and also through selected associated topics.
One thing I see as a bit unfortunate is the lack of counting. I don't think there should be more time during the exercise for this, and quite certainly, homework shouldn't be "inflated" by other calculations. However, it might be worth considering the creation of a voluntary seminar on calculations (and perhaps use of Mathematica as well?).
I really enjoyed this course, and it has also moved me forward a lot. From my point of view, the lectures were relatively comprehensive and well-arranged. Also, the likenings were great (what a pity I do not have a bulldozer to push Jupiter).
Another thing to appreciate is the unrelenting enthusiasm of the lecturer and the approach to the students – the possibility to go for the tutorials and the willingness to elucidate misunderstood concepts.
What I find fabulous are the study materials – comprehensive hand-written notes (sometimes even highlighted).
One thing I would consider is the ratio theoretical x computational part during the evaluation of the exam (perhaps 3:4 would be more convenient than 1:2).
