SubjectsSubjects(version: 945)
Course, academic year 2023/2024
   Login via CAS
New developments in astrophysics and theoretical physics - NTMF101
Title: New developments in astrophysics and theoretical physics
Guaranteed by: Institute of Theoretical Physics (32-UTF)
Faculty: Faculty of Mathematics and Physics
Actual: from 2020
Semester: both
E-Credits: 2
Hours per week, examination: 0/1, C [HT]
Capacity: unlimited
Min. number of students: unlimited
4EU+: no
Virtual mobility / capacity: no
State of the course: taught
Language: English
Teaching methods: full-time
Teaching methods: full-time
Additional information: http://utf.mff.cuni.cz/vyuka/NTMF101
Note: you can enroll for the course repeatedly
you can enroll for the course in winter and in summer semester
Guarantor: doc. Mgr. Ondřej Pejcha, Ph.D.
Classification: Physics > Astronomy and Astrophysics, Theoretical and Math. Physics
Comes under: Doporučené přednášky 2/2
Annotation -
Last update: doc. RNDr. Karel Houfek, Ph.D. (11.05.2018)
The goal of the class colloquially known as “science coffee” is to simultaneously learn how to read, understand, and discuss scientific papers, to stay in touch with developments in the world of theoretical physics and astrophysics, and to develop and maintain cohesion between the students and the faculty. “Science coffee” meets twice per week for 30 minutes. Every meeting typically covers 2-3 items such as new paper from arxiv.org, nature.com or sciencemag.com, new paper by local authors, review of conference participation, or a recent event of general scientific interest.
Course completion requirements
Last update: doc. RNDr. Karel Houfek, Ph.D. (11.05.2018)

Credit is awarded for attending more than half of meetings and presentation of two papers in the semester.

Literature
Last update: doc. Mgr. Ondřej Pejcha, Ph.D. (04.03.2021)

"Science coffee at Charles University" at https://www.benty-fields.com/manage_jc?groupid=380

Teaching methods
Last update: doc. Mgr. Ondřej Pejcha, Ph.D. (04.03.2021)

The format of the meeting is different from a more traditional Journal Club in the sense that more emphasis is placed on discussion rather than presentation. When discussing a paper, the point is to give broader context and convey the main argument of a paper, including the discussion of 1-2 main figures. The paper should be critically evaluated to reveal possible inadequacies (incorrect assumptions, missing physical effects, selections effects, misintepretation of the data, etc.).

We are meeting on Zoom at https://cuni-cz.zoom.us/j/97505053866?pwd=a01sWVU0YjlVNkVhK3E4TkZQY1VHZz09

 
Charles University | Information system of Charles University | http://www.cuni.cz/UKEN-329.html