|
|
|
||
Last update: Ludmila Maria Wladyniak, M.A., Ph.D. (15.09.2021)
|
|
||
Last update: Ludmila Maria Wladyniak, M.A., Ph.D. (17.09.2019)
Objectives: · to present the basic assumptions and main currents of the subdiscipline · to help to understand the visual culture – offline and online · to let students explore the field themselves · to involve students into the practical exercises and activities · to show the usability of sociological approach outside the academic environment |
|
||
Last update: Ludmila Maria Wladyniak, M.A., Ph.D. (15.09.2021)
Requirements & assessment: · active participation in classes – 40% · project – 60% · attendance - students may skip two classes (no excuse needed)
Grading: 91 - 100 points: A - excellent (outstanding performance with only minor mistakes)
81 - 90 points: B - very good (above average performance with some mistakes)
71 - 80 points: C - good (overall good performance with a number of notable mistakes)
61 - 70 points: D - satisfactory (acceptable performance with significant mistakes)
51 - 60 points: E - sufficient (performance fulfils only minimum criteria)
less than 51 points: F - insufficient/failed (more effort needs to be made)
|
|
||
Last update: Ludmila Maria Wladyniak, M.A., Ph.D. (15.09.2021)
John Grady (2001) Becoming a Visual Sociologist. Sociological Imagination, no 1/2, vol. 38, p. 83-106. Susan Sontag (2005) ‘On Photography’. New York: Rosetta Books, p. 1-20. Judith Butler (2009) Torture and the Ethics of Photography: Thinking with Sontag, in: ‘Frames of War’. New York: Verso, p. 63-101. Erving Goffman (1986) Gender commercials, in: ‘Gender Advertisement’. New York: Harper Torchbooks, p. 24-27. Marcus Banks (2001) “Making images”, in: “Visual methods in social research”, SAGE publications, p. 111-132. Douglas Harper (2012) Photo elicitation, in ‘Visual Sociology’, London and New York: Routledge, p. 155-188. Clark-Ibánez, Marisol (2004) Framing the Social World With Photo-Elicitation Interviews. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 47, No. 12, pp. 1507-1527. |