SubjectsSubjects(version: 945)
Course, academic year 2023/2024
   Login via CAS
Democratic backsliding - JPM812
Title: Democratic backsliding
Guaranteed by: Department of Political Science (23-KP)
Faculty: Faculty of Social Sciences
Actual: from 2022
Semester: winter
E-Credits: 6
Examination process: winter s.:
Hours per week, examination: winter s.:1/2, Ex [HT]
Capacity: unknown / unknown (20)
Min. number of students: unlimited
4EU+: no
Virtual mobility / capacity: no
State of the course: not taught
Language: English
Teaching methods: full-time
Teaching methods: full-time
Note: course can be enrolled in outside the study plan
enabled for web enrollment
priority enrollment if the course is part of the study plan
Guarantor: doc. Michel Perottino, Ph.D.
Class: Courses for incoming students
Examination dates   Schedule   Noticeboard   
Annotation
Last update: PhDr. Gabriela Baranyaiová (09.03.2020)
Session 1 Introduction
Session 2 Linkages, Institutions, State Capacity
Session 3 Institutions and the Death of Democracy
Session 4 Populism and Revolt against the Institutions
Session 5 Fluid Institutions and Volatility
Session 6 Authoritarian Institutions
Session 7 Bureaucratic Authoritarianism, Technocracy, Rule of Experts


Requirements:

o One short opinion piece + presentation (2-3 pages), focus on A list mostly but feel free to use B list and C list readings

o Active class participation

o Large research paper, 8 pages + bibliography, double-spaced, font 12.



Please circulate your opinion pieces via email.



Final Grade

o One short opinion piece – 30%

o Active class participation – 10%

o Research paper – 60%
Literature
Last update: PhDr. Gabriela Baranyaiová (09.03.2020)

Linkages, Institutions, State Capacity

A-list

o   Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. Linkages between Citizens and Politicians. Comparative Political Studies, 33, 6-7: 845-79.

o   Keefer, Philip. 2007. Clientelism, Credibility, and the Policy Choices of Young Democracies, American Journal of Political Science, 51, 4, 804-821.

o   Lenka Bustikova and Cristina Corduneanu-Huci. 2017. "Patronage, Trust and State Capacity: The Historical Trajectories of Clientelism," World Politics 69:2, 277-326.

 

B-list

o   Kitschelt, Herbert and Steven Wilkinson. Patrons, Clients and Policies. Chapter 1, Theory. Cambridge University Press.

o   The Political Economist Newsletter, Spring 2015, APSA, State Capacity, Institutions, and Development. (on BB)

o   Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson. 2001. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development.” American Economic Review, 91:5 1369-1401.

o   Michael Mann on State Capacity (on BB)

o   Doner, Richard and Ben Ross Schneider. 2016. The Middle Income Trap: More Politics than Economics, World Politics, 68, 4: 608-644.

o   Levitsky, Steven and Maria Victoria Murillo. 2009. Variation in Institutional Strength. Annual Review of Political Science 12: 115-33.

o   Anna Grzymala Busse. 2003. Political Competition and the Politicization of the State, Comparative Political Studies, December.  

C-list

o   Max Weber on Bureaucracy (on BB)

o   Hicken, Allen. 2011. Clientelism. Annual Review of Political Science 14: 289-310.

o   Besley, Timothy and Persson, Torsten. 2009. The Origins of State Capacity: Property Rights, Taxation, and Politics. American Economic Review 99, no. 4: 1218-44.

o   Charron, Nicholas and Victor Lapunte. 2013. Why Do Some Regions in Europe Have a Higher Quality of Government. The Journal of Politics 75, no. 3: 567-582.

o   Kitschelt, Herbert. 2011. Do Institutions Matter for Parties’ Electoral Linkage Strategies?, manuscript. (on BB)

o   O’Dwyer, Conor. 2006. Runaway State-Building: Patronage Politics and Democratic Development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

o   Anna Grzymala Busse. Rebuilding Leviathan. Cambridge.

 

Institutions and the Death of Democracy

A-list

o   Bermeo, Nancy. 2016. On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19.

o   Daniel Ziblatt and Steven Levitsky. 2018. How Democracies Die.  New York: Crown Publishing.  Focus on Chapter 1 (Fateful Alliances), Ch2, Ch3 to Chapter 4 (Subverting Democracy). (on BB)

o   Special Issue Perspectives on Politics on Ziblatt, Levitsky. Review Symposium - 23 November 2018, pp. 1092-1104. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/latest-issue

o   Lenka Bustikova and Petra Guasti. 2017. The Illiberal Turn or Swerve in Central Europe? Politics and Governance, 5:4, 166-176.

  

B-list

o   Guasti, Petra. “Democracy under Stress. Changing Perspectives on Democracy, Governance and their Measurement. In: Petra Guasti and Zdenka Mansfeldova.  Democracy under Stress. Institute of Sociology, Czech Academy of Sciences, pp. 9-27 (on BB).

o   Hannah Arendt. The Origins of Totalitarianism. Chapter 9 to Chapter 12 (pp. 267-460). https://www.azioniparallele.it/images/materiali/Totalitarianism.pdf , Ch 9: The Decline of the Nation-State and the End of the Rights of Man, Ch 10: A Classless Society, Ch 11: The Totalitarian Movement, Ch 12: Totalitarian in Power.

o   Giovanni Capoccia. 2001. Defending democracy: Reactions to Political Extremism in Inter-War Europe. European Journal of Political Research 39: 431 - 460.

o   How Democracy Ends -  David Runciman – podcast (2018) https://play.acast.com/s/talkingpolitics/howdemocracyends Talking Points: Democracy Ends: https://www.acast.com/talkingpolitics/howdemocracyends

o   Zalan, E. 2016, January 8. How to build an illiberal democracy in the EU. EU observer. Retrieved from: https://euobserver.com/political/131723

C-list

o   Rupnik, J. 2016. Surging Illiberalism in the East. Journal of Democracy, 27, 4: 77–87.

o   Takis S. Pappas. 2016. The Specter Haunting Europe: Distinguishing Liberal Democracy’s Challengers. Journal of Democracy 27, 4: 22-36.

o   Debate between Foa and Mounk and Welzel (Journal of Democracy) ->
Roberto Stefan Foa and Yascha Mounk. 2017.  The Signs of Deconsolidation. Journal of Democracy 28, 1: 5-16.

o   Criticism of Foa and Mounk:  Amy C. Alexander and Christian Welzel. The Myth of Deconsolidation: Rising Liberalism and the Populist Reaction. 2017.  Online Exchange on “Democratic Deconsolidation” in the Journal of Democracy.

o   Dyke, J. (2017, November 6). In Poland last month, an act of self-sacrifice on a par with Jan Palach. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/nov/06/in-poland-last-month-anact-of-self-sacrifice-on-a-par-with-jan-palach

o   Levitz, P., & Pop-Eleches, G. (2010). Why no backsliding? The European Union’s impact on democracy and governance before and after accession. Comparative Political Studies 43, 4: 457–485.

o   Dawson, J., and Hanley, S. 2016. The fading mirage of the “liberal consensus”. Journal of Democracy 27, 1: 20–34.

o   Licia Cianetti, James Dawson & Seán Hanley. 2018. Introduction: Rethinking “democratic backsliding” in Central and Eastern Europe – looking beyond Hungary and Poland. East European Politics.  Volume 34, Issue 3, pp. 243-256.

o   Schlipphak, B., & Treib, O. 2017. Playing the blame game on Brussels: The domestic political effects of EU interventions against democratic backsliding. Journal of European Public Policy 24, 3: 352–365.

o   Greskovits, B. 2015. The hollowing and backsliding of democracy in East Central Europe. Global Policy 6 (S1), 28–37.

o   Grzymala-Busse, A. 2017. Global populisms and their impact. Slavic Review 76 (S1), S3–S8.

o   Jasiewicz, K. 2007. Is Central Europe backsliding? The political-party landscape. Journal of Democracy 18, 4: 26–33.

o   Snyder, Timothy. 2017. On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons From the Twentieth Century. Duggan Books, New York.

o   Levitsky, Steven and Daniel Ziblatt. 2018. Opinion: This is how democracies die: Defending our constitution requires more than outrage. The Guardian.  Jan 21, Sunday. 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/commentisfree/2018/jan/21/this-is-how-democracies-die?CMP=share_btn_tw

o   Edward Luce. The Retreat of Western Liberalism. (2017)

 

Populism and Revolt against the Institutions, Far Right

A-list

o   Mudde and Kaltwasser. 2013. Inclusionary and Exclusionary Populism. Government and Opposition.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/government-and-opposition/article/exclusionary-vs-inclusionary-populism-comparing-contemporary-europe-and-latin-america/AAB33C1316BE16B8E4DE229519362E27

o   Ignazi, Pierro. 1992. “The silent counter-revolution. Hypotheses on the emergence of extreme right-wing parties in Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 22(1): 3-34.

o   Bustikova, Lenka. 2019. Extreme Reactions. Cambridge University Press (selections).

 

B-list

o   Matt Golder. 2016. Far right parties in Europe.  American Review of Political Science 19, 477-97.

o   Kirk Hawkins. 2018. Introductory Chapter. Oxford Handbook of Populism.

o   Nadia Urbinati. 2019. Political Theory of Populism. Annual Review of Political Science. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070753

o   Mudde, Cas. 2016, The Study of Populist Radical Right Parties: Towards a Fourth Wave. C-Rex Working Paper Series. No. 1. Comparative Political Studies. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0010414018789490?casa_token=eVo4q549EpUAAAAA:GwZuRl4I_m9M1p26xcODuexpxX_HjwpQjYbYeMZ2TbCU8u0MDuil4o-uECPWe74SrnFiUaV-74B-yw   (newest version)

o    Lenka Bustikova. 2014. "Revenge of the Radical Right," Comparative Political Studies, 47:12, 1738-1765.

o   Golder M. 2003. Explaining variation in the electoral success of extreme right parties in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies 36:432–66.

o   Roger Eatwell. 2003.  Ten Theories of the Extreme Right. Right-Wing Extremism in the Twenty-First Century, Peter H. Merkl and Leonard  Weinberg  (eds.),  London:  Frank  Cass, pp.  47-73. (on BB)

o   Matt Golder and Sona N Golder (eds.). 2016. "Symposium: Populism in Comparative Politics." CP: Newsletter of the Comparative Politics Organized Section of the American Political Science Association, 26:1. APSA Comparative Section, Newsletter on Populism, Fall.

o   Eatwell, Roger. 2017. Populism and Fascism. Oxford Handbook of Populism. Edited by Taggart, Rovira Kaltwasser and Ochoa Espejo. Oxford University Press.

o   Meguid, Bonnie. 2005. Competition between Unequals: The role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success. American Political Science Review, 99, 347-359.

C-list

o   Zygmunt Bauman. 2000. Liquid Modernity, pp. 168-200.

o   Arzheimer, Kai. 2017. “Explanations for RR voting.” The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right, (ed. Jens Rydgren). New York: Oxford University Press.

o   Eatwell, R. 2003. “Ten theories of the extreme right,” in Merkl, P. and Weinberg, L., ed. Right-Wing Extremism in the Twenty First Century. Portland, Oregon: Frank Cass.

o   Kitschelt, H. (2007). Growth and persistence of the radical right in postindustrial democracies: Advances and challenges in comparative research. West European Politics, 30, 1176-1206.

o   Mudde, C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

o   Arzheimer, K. 2009. “Contextual factors and the extreme right vote in Western Europe, 1980-2002.” American Journal of Political Science 53(2): 259-275.

o   Pop-Eleches, G. 2010. “Throwing out the bums: Protest voting and unorthodox parties after communism.” World Politics 62(2): 221-260.

o   Rydgren, J. 2008. “Immigration sceptics, xenophobes or racists? Radical right-wing voting in six west European countries.” European Journal of Political Research 47(6): 737-765.

o   Rydgren, J. 2007. “The sociology of the radical right.” Annual Review of Sociology 33: 241-262.

o   Givens, T. (2004). The radical right gender gap. Comparative Political Studies, 37, 30-54.

o   Dancygier, R. 2010. Immigration and Conflict in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

o   Kedar, O. (2005). When moderate voters prefer extreme parties: Policy balancing in parliamentary elections. American Political Science Review, 99, 185-199.

o   Meguid, B. 2008. Party Competition Between Unequals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

o   Gidron, Noam and Bart Bonikowski. 2013. “Varieties of Populism: Literature Review and research agenda.” Working Paper Series 13-0004, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs. Harvard University.

o   Lenka Bustikova. 2017. "The Radical Right in Eastern Europe," in: The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right, (ed. Jens Rydgren). New York: Oxford University Press.

o   Look Who's Back is a 2015 German comedy film directed by David Wendt, based on the bestselling satirical novel of the same name about Adolf Hitler by Timur Vermes.

o   Berman, Sheri. 1997. ‘Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic.’ World Politics

49(3): 401-429, compare to: Putnam et al. Making Democracy Work.

o   Capoccia., G. (2001). Defending democracy: Reactions to political extremism in inter- war Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 39, 431-460.

o   Inglehart, R. and Norris, P. 2016. "Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash." HKS Working Paper No. RWP16-026. APSA paper.

o   Roger Eatwell. 2003.  Ten Theories of the Extreme Right. Right-Wing Extremism in the Twenty-First Century, Peter H. Merkl and Leonard  Weinberg  (eds.),  London:  Frank  Cass, pp.  47-73. (on BB)

o   Roger Eatwell. 2017. Populism and Fascism. Edited by Taggart, Rovira Kaltwasser and Ochoa Espejo. Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford University Press. (on BB)

o   Karl Polanyi. 1944. Satanic Mill. In: The Great Transformation. (on BB)

o   Goldmann, Matthias. 2017. The Great Recurrence: Karl Polanyi and the Crisis of the European Union.  European Law Journal 23: 272-289.

o   Canovan, Margaret. 1999. Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies XLVII, 2-16.

o   Hawkins, Kirk A., Madeleine Read, and Teun Pauwels. 2018. Populism and Its Causes. Chapter 14. Edited by Taggart, Rovira Kaltwasser and Ochoa Espejo. Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford University Press.

o   Rydgren, Jens. 2017.  Radical right-wing parties in Europe. What’s populism got to do with it? Journal of Language and Politics, June: 1-12. 

o   Takis S. Pappas. 2018.  How to Tell Nativists from Populists. Journal of Democracy 29, 1: 148-152.

o   Golder, Matt and Sona N. Golder (eds.).  2016. Symposium: Populism in Comparative Politics. CP: Newsletter of the Comparative Politics Organized Section of the American Political Science Association, 26:1.

o   Mudde, Cas. 2017. Why nativism, not populism should be declared word of the year. Thursday, December 7. The Guardian.

o   Brubaker, Rogers. 2017. Why populism? Theory and Society 46, 5: 357–385. 

o   Gidron N, and Bonikowski B. 2013. Varieties of Populism: Literature Review and Research Agenda, in Weatherhead Working Paper Series, No. 13-0004.

o   Caramani, Daniele. 2017. Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government. American Political Science Association 111, 1: 54-67.

o   Radical Right Research Robot (Kai Arzheimer) - https://twitter.com/rrresrobot?lang=en   @RRResRobot

 

Fluid Institutions and Volatility

A-list

o   Lupu, Noam, and Rachel Beatty Riedl. 2013. Political Parties and Uncertainty in Developing

Democracies. Comparative Political Studies 46(11): 1339–65

o   Wilkinson, Steven. 2015. Where’s the Party? The Decline of Party Institutionalization and What (if Anything) that Means for Democracy. Government and Opposition 50(3): 420–45.

o   Haughton, Tim, and Kevin Deegan-Krause. 2015. Hurricane Season Systems of Instability in Central and East European Party Politics. East European Politics and Societies 29(1): 61–80.

o   Bernhard, Michael. 2015. Chronic Instability and the Limits of Path Dependence. Perspectives on Politics, 13,4: 976-991.

 

B-list

o   Padgett, Ansell. 1993. Robust Action and the Rise of Medici, 1400-1434. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 6, May, 1259-1319.

o   Jennifer Gandhi. 2015. Elections and Political Regimes. Government and Opposition, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2015. Special Issue. The Future of Democracy.

o   Tavits, Margit. 2008. On the Linkage between Electoral Volatility and Party System Instability in Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research 47(5): 537-555.

o   Bernhard, Michael. 2015. Chronic Instability and the Limits of Path Dependence. Perspectives on Politics, 13,4: 976-991.

C-list

o   William H Sewell. 1992. A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98(1): 1–29.

o   Tavits, Margit. 2007. Party Systems in the Making: The Emergence and Success of New Parties in New Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 38, 113–133.

o   Tavits, Margit. 2005. The Development of Stable Party Support: Electoral Dynamics in Post-Communist Europe. American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 283-98.

o   L Hooghe, G Marks. Cleavage Theory Meets Europe's Crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage. Forthcoming. http://hooghe.web.unc.edu/files/2016/09/Hooghe_Marks_2017_-Cleavage-Theory-Meets-Europe-Crises.pdf

o   Lenka Bustikova and Elizabeth Zechmeister. 2017. "Voting in New(er) Democracies," in: The SAGE Handbook of Electoral Behaviour, (eds. Kai Arzheimer, Jocelyn Evans and Michael Lewis-Beck), 92-133.

 

Authoritarian Institutions

A-list

o   Pepinsky. 2014. “The Institutional Turn in Comparative Authoritarianism.” British Journal of Political Science 44, no. 3 (July), 631 – 653.

o   Jennifer Gandhi and Ellen Lust-Okar. 2009. Elections under Authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science 12: 403-422.

o   David Art. 2012. What do we know about authoritarianism after 10 years. (Review Article).  Comparative Politics, April.

o   Steven Levitsky and Lucan A. Way. 2002. The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 13, 2.

B-list

o   Dan Slater. 2013. Democratic Careening. Review Article. World Politics 65,4, 729-63.

o   Malesky, E. and Schuler, P. 2010. Nodding or Needling: Analyzing Delegate Responsiveness in an Authoritarian Parliament, American Political Science Review, 104(3), pp. 482–502.

o   Beatriz Magaloni and Ruth Kricheli. 2010. Political Order and One-Party Rule. Annual Review of Political Science, 13: 123-43

o   Newsletter – Comparative Democratization

C-list

o   Gandhi, Jennifer. 2008. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

o   Bhavnani, Rikhil R. 2009. Do Electoral Quotas Work After They Are Withdrawn? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in India. American Political Science Review 103 (1): 23-35.

o   Beatriz Magaloni. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.

o   Lisa Blaydes. 2011. Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak's Egypt. Cambridge University Press.

o   Svolik, Milan. 2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 

o   Malesky, Edumund and Paul Schuler. 2010. Nodding or Needling: Analyzing Delegate Responsiveness in an Authoritarian Parliament. American Political Science Review. 104(3): 482-502.

o   Ruchan Kaya and Michael Bernhard. 2013. Are Elections Mechanisms of Authoritarian Stability or Democratization? Evidence from Postcommunist Eurasia. Perspectives on Politics. Volume 11, Issue 3, pp. 734-752.

o   http://scottgehlbach.net/whats-next-for-the-study-of-nondemocracy/

o   Berman, Sheri. 1997. Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Politics 49(3): 401-429.

o   Bunce, Valerie and Sharon Wolchik. 2010. Defeating Dictators: Electoral Change and Stability in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes. World Politics 62: 43-86.

o   McFaul, Michael. 2002. The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship: Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World. World Politics 54 (January), 212-44.

o   Chambers, Simone and Jeffrey Kopstein. 2001. Bad Civil Society. Political Theory, 29(6): 837-865.

 

Bureaucratic Authoritarianism, Technocracy, Rule of Experts

A-list

o   D. Caramani, “Will vs. Reason”: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation

and Their Critique to Party Government,” American Political Science Review 111 (2017): 54–67,

o   Calvert W. Jones . 2019. Adviser to The King: Experts, Rationalization, and Legitimacy. World Politics 71 (1): 1-43.  https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/world-politics/article/adviser-to-the-king/D5F7E821B7362DCE049610D272DB99A7

o   Lenka Bustikova and Petra Guasti. 2019. The State as a Firm: Understanding the Autocratic Roots of Technocratic Populism. East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures 33 (2): 302-330.

 

B-list

o   C. Bickerton and C. I. Accetti, “Populism and Technocracy: Opposites or Complements?” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (2015): 186–206.

o   Guillermo A. O'Donnell. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics.

o   Karen Remmer and Gilbert Merkx. Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism Revisited. Latin American Research Review. Vol. 17, No. 2 (1982), pp. 3-40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2503143?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

C-list

o   F. Marangoni and L. Verzichelli, “From a Technocratic Solution to a Fragile Grand Coalition: The Impact of the Economic Crisis on Parliamentary Government in Italy,” The Journal of Legislative Studies 21 (2015): 35–53.

o   Juliet Johnson. 2017. Priests of Prosperity.

o   Collier. Bureaucratic Authoritarianism. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234113379_Bureaucratic_Authoritarianism

Requirements to the exam
Last update: PhDr. Gabriela Baranyaiová (09.03.2020)

Requirements:

o   One short opinion piece + presentation (2-3 pages), focus on A list mostly but feel free to use B list and C list readings

o   Active class participation

o   Large research paper, 8 pages + bibliography, double-spaced, font 12.

 

Please circulate your opinion pieces via email.

 

Final Grade

o   One short opinion piece – 30%

o   Active class participation – 10%

o   Research paper – 60%

 
Charles University | Information system of Charles University | http://www.cuni.cz/UKEN-329.html