SubjectsSubjects(version: 945)
Course, academic year 2014/2015
   Login via CAS
ERASMUS - Medical Ethics and Humanities V. - CERA5P0074
Title: ERASMUS - Etika a humanitní základy medicíny V.
Guaranteed by: Department of Medical Ethics and Humanities 3FM CU (12-UET)
Faculty: Third Faculty of Medicine
Actual: from 2013 to 2014
Semester: both
Points: 2
E-Credits: 2
Examination process:
Hours per week, examination: 10/12, C(+Ex) [HS]
Capacity: winter:unknown / unknown (unknown)
summer:unknown / unknown (unknown)
Min. number of students: unlimited
4EU+: no
Virtual mobility / capacity: no
Key competences:  
State of the course: taught
Language: Czech
Teaching methods: full-time
Teaching methods: full-time
Level:  
Note: you can enroll for the course in winter and in summer semester
Guarantor: Mgr. et Mgr. Marek Vácha, Ph.D.
Examination dates   Schedule   
Annotation
Last update: Ondřej Kubánek (10.10.2013)
The specific problems of contemporary medical ethics are discussed in this course, with special attention to the issues taught in parallel modules of the fourth year. The seminaries are focused on case reports and consequent discussion, where students can prove their ability to think and argue.
Aim of the course
Last update: Ondřej Kubánek (10.10.2013)

The students learn about some ethically controversial case reports and in the seminaries try to find acceptable solutions. These solutions are stemming from a theoretical knowledge received in the course of lectures. 

Literature
Last update: Ondřej Kubánek (10.10.2013)

Basic Study Literature

 

Fourth Year

 

Dorff, E.N., (2003) Matters of Life and Death. The Jewish Publication Society, Philadelphia.

Edge, R.S., Groves, J.R., (2006) Ethics of Health Care. Thomson Delmar Reading, New York.

Elliot, C., (2010) White Coat Black Hat. Beacon Press, Boston.

Mepham, B., (2008) Bioethics. An Introduction for the Biosciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Healy, D., (2004) The Creation of Psychopharmacology. Harvard University Press

Healy, D., (2012) Pharmageddon. University of California Press. Berkeley and Los Angeles.

Pierce, J., Randels, G., (2010) Contemporary Bioethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Plomin, R., (2001) Behavioral Genetics. Worth Publishers and W.H. Freeman and Company.

Pozgar, G.D., (2005) Legal and Ethical Issues for Health Professionals. Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

Richerson, P.J., Boyd, R., (2006) Not By Genes Alone. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

Singer, P.A., Viens, A.M., (2008) The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Steinbock, B., (2009) The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press. Oxford

Tauber, A.I., (2005) Patient Autonomy and the Ethics of Responsibility. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

Teaching methods
Last update: Ondřej Kubánek (10.10.2013)

Lecture and seminaries. The topics of the lectures correspond with topics of paralle modules. The theoretical knowledge received in the course of lectures is used in seminaries in attempts to solve some highly questionable or problematic cases and with the help of the teachers are further reflected.

Requirements to the exam
Last update: MUDr. Mgr. Lukáš Malý (10.01.2023)

Conditions for credit:

1. Obligatory active participation at 7 seminar of 11 scheduled.

2. Presentation of the case in seminar

Case will be chosen from this textbook http://www.bioethicscasebook.sg/

Each case will be prepared by 6 or 7 students from groups 1 and 2. Participation at preparation of the presentation and presentation itself is indispensable condition for credit.

Cases for term 7th January 2019.

8.00 – 9.30 am – Baby Arun

9.45 – 11.15 am – Lina

11:30 am – 1.00 pm – Mr. Lim

 

Cases for term 8th January 2019

8.00 – 9.30 am – Mrs. Khoo

9.45 – 11.15 am – Mdm. Lee

11:30 am – 1.00 pm – Mr. Yung

 

Presentation should have structure followed:

1. Presentation of the case

2. Describe ethical problem

3. Who are the players of the ethical problem?

4. What are/could be their inner interests in this case?

5. How these interests are to be defended?

6.  How is the case commented by comments in bioethicscasebook.sg?

7. What is take-home message? What have we learnt

 

 

 

 
Charles University | Information system of Charles University | http://www.cuni.cz/UKEN-329.html