SubjectsSubjects(version: 945)
Course, academic year 2023/2024
   Login via CAS
Insights on Current Society - ASGV01005
Title: Insights on Current Society
Guaranteed by: Department of Sociology (21-KSOC)
Faculty: Faculty of Arts
Actual: from 2023 to 2023
Semester: winter
Points: 0
E-Credits: 5
Examination process: winter s.:
Hours per week, examination: winter s.:2/0, Ex [HT]
Capacity: unknown / unknown (unknown)
Min. number of students: unlimited
4EU+: no
Virtual mobility / capacity: no
Key competences:  
State of the course: not taught
Language: English
Teaching methods: full-time
Teaching methods: full-time
Level:  
Additional information: https://dl1.cuni.cz/course/view.php?id=13224
Note: course can be enrolled in outside the study plan
enabled for web enrollment
Guarantor: Mgr. Eva Richter, Ph.D.
Class: Exchange - 14.2 Sociology
Exchange - 14.9 Others-Social Sciences
Schedule   Noticeboard   
Annotation -
Last update: Mgr. Iveta Pastyříková (13.11.2023)
Beginner sociology and sociology for students of other disciplines both Czech and from abroad.

The course offers an introduction to some more specific areas of sociological thought and research. The goal of the course is to develop sociological imagination and relate key sociological concepts, theories, and expertise to specific and relatable topics. Thus, the course is also very well suited to Czech students of sociology as well to sharpen their analytical skills and continue with their introductory courses in a different setting. To students of other disciplines, this course offers a non-traditional introduction to sociology through specific examples of sociological research.
Each semester, four to five topics are covered within the course, showcasing the sociological research and theory. Each topic is first introduced in a lecture. Students are then given a reading (one article or chapter) to prepare for a seminar next week which explores the topic in greater depth. Therefore, students are not passively introduced to topics, but are invited to actively engage with them.
Since the course invites students from abroad as well as Czech students, each topic covered can be approached through comparative cross-national perspective. Students are invited to do so, especially in the group work (see Course requirements).
Course completion requirements
Last update: Mgr. Eva Richter, Ph.D. (03.10.2022)

Course requirements and examination:

Students are required to:

A)   attendance: maximum of 3 absences (attendance tracked by signatures on the attendance sheet). If you feel ill – let us know, these absences will not be counted;

B)   preparation: such preparation may include reading a provided text, reflecting upon it in a short written answer and/or answering some questions – this is for reflection and getting in the mood for the lecture – 3 (out of 5) preparations per semester are required

SUBMISSION of preparation work before each seminar class until Tuesday 23:59 in Moodle (check the calendar);

C)    prepare a team presentation:

a)     each team (4-5 students) will prepare and submit a video presentation on a selected topic (app. 10-15 minutes long)

b)    submission in Moodle due 12th of January

c)     each presentation will be evaluated by the lecturers (max. of 28 points, 16 points as a minimum to pass) and by the peers (students) (max. of 12 points).

The goal of the TEAM PRESENTATION TASK (instructions here!) is to

             i.    formulate a specific (= narrow, well defined, tangible!) research question aimed at comparing two or more cultures/societies in a specific area, topic or issue;

           ii.     find and analyse scientific literature on which the team will base the comparison of the selected cultures/societies and the conclusions of this comparison (i.e., the answer to the selected question);

         iii.     illustrate the comparison with own experiences or experiences of others (e.g. through media, narratives etc.);

          iv.    present the results of analysing, comparing/contrasting, and illustrating (as to the points above).

Examples of relevant research questions:

·       How do the inhabitants of countries x and y relate to natural landscape and nature in general and what may be some causes of observed differences in how they relate to nature?

·       What attitudes do the inhabitants of countries x and y have about prison sentences and why?

·       How media in countries x and y present issue z and why?

Students may improve their grading by:

submitting a short essay (2-3 norm pages) on the topic of their team presentation but using their own individual perspective and using additional sources, i.e. the essay is a standalone individual work which is by no means a copy of the presentation or purely derivative of the presentation.

Requirements to the exam
Last update: Mgr. Eva Richter, Ph.D. (20.09.2022)

Grading:

Final grade is based on points received throughout the course for student work. Regular attendance is required as a condition for receiving a grade.

Requirement:

Maximum points:

Minimum required points:

Preparation (5 points each)

25

15

Presentation

40

16

Essay

30

0

Final grade:

Points:

Final grade:

65+

1

50-64

2

35-49

3

less than 35

4 (FAIL)

 

Evaluation criteria used in lecturer evaluation of the presentation:

This rubric may serve for peer-evaluation as well.

Criteria:

Rubric evaluation:

Weak

Satisfactory

Strong

Evaluation points rewarded per criteria:

1

4

7

Research question

Goal/question is unclear, too broad, ambiguous

Goal/question is clear and specific, but the presentation does not adhere to it/does not present relevant answers

Goal/question is clear and specific and the presentation adheres to it

Literature and sources

Inadequate sources and bad use / citation

Adequate and quality sources but bad use / citation

Adequate and quality sources well used and correctly cited

Argumentation and structure

No clear structure, parts of the presentation are irrelevant to the stated goal

Structure seems logical but could be improved

Well structured – does not contain irrelevant information and no information is missing

Presentation

Hard to follow, disorienting, difficulty to understand

Could use some polishing

Well presented, easy to follow and understand, nicely done

Maximum total score:

4x7=28

 

Syllabus
Last update: Mgr. Eva Richter, Ph.D. (27.09.2022)

Lectures:

6. 10.

Welcome & Introduction

Eva Richter

13. 10.

Work Stress Lecture

Martina Veverková

20. 10.

Work Stress Seminar

27. 10.

Body and Society Lecture

Petra Poncarová

3. 11.

Body and Society Seminar

10. 11.

Group Work Session

Eva Richter

17. 11.

State holiday

24. 11.

TBA: Education/Housing

Hana Bílková

1. 12.

TBA: Education/Housing

8. 12.

Measuring happiness Lecture

Radka Hanzlová

15. 12.

Measuring happiness Seminar

22. 12.

Holiday special: The Meaning of Holidays in Everyday Life

Eva Richter

5. 1.

Wrap-up

Eva Richter

 
Charles University | Information system of Charles University | http://www.cuni.cz/UKEN-329.html