Last update: doc. PhDr. Zdeněk Uherek, CSc. (05.02.2024)
The course is about the history of nationalism’s anthropological research (the 1960s - present), the theory of the cultural and ethnic groups - Anthropological View, changes in the nation’s, ethnicities and minorities historical meanings. Students will explore Ernest Gellner’s theory, Benedict Anderson’s theory (European and non-European approaches), and examples of the nationalists‘ constructions in Europe (Czechs, Slovaks, Poles, Scots);, West Europe and the USA before 1989. They will also follow present discussions about the theory of nationalism and its place in social theory in general. Students will also deal with nationalist rhetoric and poetics, and their meanings in the 19th century, during the cold war and after. We then approach post-modern critics of ethnicity, concepts of groups „without ethnicity, “culture / ethnic groups in the diaspora (Czechs abroad, Romanies, Jews - Israelies). Finally, the course works with Bosnians and with regard to the constructions of nations outside Europe on the example of Indoneasia.
Last update: doc. PhDr. Zdeněk Uherek, CSc. (14.02.2021)
Studenti se zúčastní přednášek a seminářů, budou diskutovat o přednášených tématech a literatuře a psát a diskutovat studii nejméně na čtyřech stranách (7200 znaků).
Malá studie bude zahrnovat krátký úvod, podkapitolu o stavu, metodologii, prezentaci výsledků a závěry a seznam odkazů. Pokud je to možné, bude tato malá studie diskutována na semináři. Lhůta pro předložení studie je 19. května.
Last update: doc. PhDr. Zdeněk Uherek, CSc. (14.02.2021)
Students will attend lectures and seminars, discuss lectured topics and literature, and write and discuss a study on at least four pages (7,200 characters). The small study will include a brief introduction, a subchapter on the status, methodology, presentation of results and conclusions, and a list of references. If possible, this small study will be discussed in a seminar. The deadline for submitting the study is May 19.
The final test will verify the knowledge of individual topics.
The final test will verify the knowledge of individual topics. Students can earn up to - 50 points for the study - 50 points for the test
Classification of students for fulfilled duties is as follows: Evaluation criteria:
The marking criteria will be based on the following percentage system:
100 - 91: A (excellent, with minor lapses)
81 - 90: B (very good, above-average achievement, with a few mistakes)
71 - 80: C (good, overall good performance with some significant mistakes)
61 - 70: D (satisfactory, acceptable performance with substantial mistakes)
51 - 60: E (sufficient, performance fulfils minimum requirements)
50 - 0: F (failed)
Last update: doc. PhDr. Zdeněk Uherek, CSc. (05.02.2021)
Studenti mohou získat až - 50 bodů za studii - 50 bodů za test
Klasifikace studentů pro splnění povinností je následující: Hodnotící kritéria:
Kritéria pro označení budou založena na následujícím procentním systému:
100 - 91: A (vynikající, s malými výpadky)
81 - 90: B (velmi dobrý, nadprůměrný úspěch, s několika chybami)
71 - 80: C (dobrý, celkově dobrý výkon s některými významnými chybami)
61 - 70: D (uspokojivý, přijatelný výkon s podstatnými chybami)
51 - 60: E (dostatečný, výkon splňuje minimální požadavky)
50 - 0: F (neúspěšné)
Literature -
Last update: doc. Mgr. Martin Hájek, Ph.D. (03.12.2019)
Literature:
Compulsory:
Anderson, B. (2016). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism . London: Verso.
Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and Nationalism . Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
Brubaker, R. (2011). Religion and nationalism: Four approaches *. Nations and Nationalism, 18 (1), 2-20. doi: 10.1111 / j.1469-8129.2011.00486.
Brubaker, R. (2011). Religion and nationalism: Four approaches *. Nations and Nationalism, 18 (1), 2-20. doi: 10.1111 / j.1469-8129.2011.00486.
Holy, L. (nd). Nation against state. The Little Czech and the Great Czech Nation, 16-54. doi: 10.1017 / cbo9780511621727.002
Recommended:
Haas, EB (1986). What is nationalism and why should we study it? International Organization, 40 (03), 707. doi: 10.1017 / s0020818300027326
Waldron, AN (1985). Theories of Nationalism and Historical Explanation. World Politics, 37 (03), 416-433. doi: 10.2307 / 2010250
Fortes, M. & Evans-Pritchard, EE 1940. Introduction. In: M. Fortes & EE Evans-Pritchard (eds) African Political Systems. London: Oxford University Press: 1-23.
Freedman, M., & Barth, F. (1970). Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: Difference. The British Journal of Sociology, 21 (2), 231. doi: 10.2307 / 588416
Beyer, P. (nd). Globalization and Glocalization. The Sage Handbook of Sociology of Religion, 98-118. doi: 10.4135 / 9781848607965.n6
Wimmer, A. & Schiller, NG (2003). Methodological Nationalism, Social Sciences, and Study of Migration: An Essay in Historical Epistemology. International Migration Review, 37 (3), 576-610. doi: 10.1111 / j.1747-7379.2003.tb00151.
Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity . Cambridge: Polity Press: 63-78
Uherek , Z . Not only moving bodies : conceived and transforming concepts in migration studies . Slovak Ethnography. Roč. 65 , No. 2 ( 2017 ), s. 222-233
Nodia, G. (2016). Nationalism and Democracy. Democracy . doi: 10.7312 / blau17412-094
Wariavwalla, B. (2000) Religion and Nationalism in India Ram The Hindu Nation, 89: 357, 593-605, DOI: 10.1080 / 003585300225223
Mukta, P. (1995). The Politics of Religious Nationalism and New Indian Historiography: Lessons for the Indian Diaspora.
DeHanas, D. N. & Shterin, M. (2018) Religion and the rise of populism. Religion, State & Society, 46:3, 177-185, DOI: 10.1080/09637494.2018.1502911
Eriksen, TH (2006, March 27). Nations in Cyberspace . Lecture presented by Ernest Gellner Lecture, London School of Economics, London.
Meinhof, UH (2018). Living (with) borders: East-West borders in Europe . Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Lewellen, Ted C. (2003) Political Anthropology: An Introduction. 3rd ed. Westport, Conn: Praeger.
Last update: doc. Mgr. Martin Hájek, Ph.D. (03.12.2019)
Literatura:
Povinná
Anderson, B. (2016). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism . London: Verso.
Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and Nationalism . Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
Brubaker, R. (2011). Religion and nationalism: Four approaches *. Nations and Nationalism, 18 (1), 2-20. doi: 10.1111 / j.1469-8129.2011.00486.
Brubaker, R. (2011). Religion and nationalism: Four approaches *. Nations and Nationalism, 18 (1), 2-20. doi: 10.1111 / j.1469-8129.2011.00486.
Holy, L. (nd). Nation against state. The Little Czech and the Great Czech Nation, 16-54. doi: 10.1017 / cbo9780511621727.002
Doporučená
Haas, EB (1986). What is nationalism and why should we study it? International Organization, 40 (03), 707. doi: 10.1017 / s0020818300027326
Waldron, AN (1985). Theories of Nationalism and Historical Explanation. World Politics, 37 (03), 416-433. doi: 10.2307 / 2010250
Fortes, M. & Evans-Pritchard, EE 1940. Introduction. In: M. Fortes & EE Evans-Pritchard (eds) African Political Systems. London: Oxford University Press: 1-23.
Freedman, M., & Barth, F. (1970). Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: Difference. The British Journal of Sociology, 21 (2), 231. doi: 10.2307 / 588416
Beyer, P. (nd). Globalization and Glocalization. The Sage Handbook of Sociology of Religion, 98-118. doi: 10.4135 / 9781848607965.n6
Wimmer, A. & Schiller, NG (2003). Methodological Nationalism, Social Sciences, and Study of Migration: An Essay in Historical Epistemology. International Migration Review, 37 (3), 576-610. doi: 10.1111 / j.1747-7379.2003.tb00151.
Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity . Cambridge: Polity Press: 63-78
Uherek , Z . Not only moving bodies : conceived and transforming concepts in migration studies . Slovak Ethnography. Roč. 65 , No. 2 ( 2017 ), s. 222-233
Nodia, G. (2016). Nationalism and Democracy. Democracy . doi: 10.7312 / blau17412-094
Svítí Brubaker, R. (2011). Náboženství a nacionalismus: Čtyři přístupy *. Národy a nacionalismus, 18 (1), 2-20. doi: 10,1111 / j.1469-8129.2011.00486. Wariavwalla, B. (2000) Náboženství a nacionalismus v Indii Ram The Hindu Nation, 89: 357, 593-605, DOI: 10.1080 / 003585300225223
DeHanas, D. N. & Shterin, M. (2018) Náboženství a vzestup populismu. Religion, State & Society, 46: 3, 177-185, DOI: 10.1080 / 09637494.2018.1502911
7. Sport
III. Případové studie
8. Bosna a Hercegovina
9. Antropologie naděje: Polsko
10. Budování komunity (Indonésie, USA)
IV. Závěr
11. Změny sociálních vztahů v éře intenzivní globalizace