SubjectsSubjects(version: 964)
Course, academic year 2024/2025
   Login via CAS
Reading Europe from its East - AVES01035
Title: Reading Europe from its East
Guaranteed by: Institute of East European Studies (21-UVES)
Faculty: Faculty of Arts
Actual: from 2022
Semester: summer
Points: 0
E-Credits: 6
Examination process: summer s.:
Hours per week, examination: summer s.:2/0, Ex [HT]
Capacity: unknown / unknown (unknown)
Min. number of students: unlimited
4EU+: no
Virtual mobility / capacity: yes / 30
Key competences: critical thinking, 4EU+ Flagship 2
State of the course: not taught
Language: English
Teaching methods: distance
Level:  
Note: course can be enrolled in outside the study plan
enabled for web enrollment
Guarantor: Valeriya Korablyova, Ph.D.
Schedule   Noticeboard   
Annotation
The full title: Reading Europe from Its East: re-framing the poly-crisis from the Eastern European perspective<br>
<br>
The course examines the project of united Europe through its underlying, and at times dueling, social and political imaginaries. The suggested optics goes beyond the focus on the EU institutions and procedures, on the one hand, and counter to “nichification” of East European studies, on the other. Bringing East European takes on European integration into the general discussion aims to expose how the inclusion of former Soviet countries changed and challenged the European project. Several nodal points define the architecture of the course: 1) symbolic geography and persistent internal othering, where the European East stands as the major internal Other; 2) complex imperial/colonial legacy that plays out when the former maritime metropoles and the wrecks of former land empires are unified under the common EU umbrella; 3) socioeconomic inequality between people, nations, and polities, and symbolic hierarchies deriving from it; 4) the cascade of the EU crises – how they reverberated on the West – East cleavage and on the fragile European unity, where the turmoil in Ukraine, the refugee crisis, the rise of populism, and the recent pandemic are the main foci of attention.

Sessions will be held in Zoom: https://cuni-cz.zoom.us/j/91351806736

The course materials are available on Moodle: https://dl1.cuni.cz/course/view.php?id=13321
Last update: Korablyova Valeriya, Ph.D. (09.03.2022)
Aim of the course

Through the course students will learn to:

·       Assess the EU as a heterogenous and problematic transnational unity that advances through crises;

·       Engage in well-informed debates on the idea of Europe that underpins European integration and defines its perspectives and limits;

·       Understand the role of Eastern Enlargement in establishing the EU as a geopolitical actor, as well as the challenges that arose from that fact;

·       Critically address internal cleavages and power hierarchies within Europe;

·       Recognize the root causes and the consequences of the recent crises framed as a “poly-crisis”, with a special focus on the East European region.

Last update: Korablyova Valeriya, Ph.D. (03.12.2021)
Descriptors

Weekly schedule

Week 1

Introduction: the idea of Europe.

Week 2

Europe’s colonial legacy: peripherialising Europe?

Week 3

Troubling symbolic geography and name-changing. Eastern Europe as the internal Other.

Week 4

Big Bang of the Eastern Enlargement: expectations and frustrations.

Week 5

Socioeconomic inequality and its discontents.

Week 6

Neopatrimonialism and the lasting Soviet legacy.

Week 7

Social movements and the popular momentum.

Week 8

Russia, China, and the unfolding information war(s).

Week 9

The refugee crisis and its imagined reverberations in Eastern Europe.

Week 10

The populist moment I: the rise of ethnopopulism.

Week 11

The populist moment II: the emergence of technopopulism.

Week 12

The global pandemic as an ultimate disruption: quo vadis?

 

Last update: Korablyova Valeriya, Ph.D. (03.12.2021)
Course completion requirements

Course Requirements and Assessment

 

Assignment

Weight in Final Grade

Evaluated Student Learning Outcomes

Active Class Participation

20%

Engagement in class discussion, demonstrating the knowledge gained from assigned weekly reading and other sources; making own point, asking and answering questions.

Presentation

30%

Ability to comprehend academic texts and to formulate their main ideas; present them in a well-structured and clear way; prepare visual materials to the presentation (power-point presentation and/or handouts); ability to assess the source critically.

Final Paper

50%

Ability to understand the main ideas, concepts and case studies covered; define a problem and look for answers; write in a clear, academic style; use cohesive argument.

TOTAL

100%

 

 

Detailed description of the assignments

 

  • Active Class Participation

Students should participate actively in the course. Mere attendance is not active participation. To take active part in the class means, for instance, to present findings from compulsory readings, to comment on the topic, to discuss with other students, to answer questions raised by the instructor, and to ask own questions.    

·       Presentation

Presentation should be based on one of the additional readings which are indicated to every class session. Selection is up to students. Presentation should take about 15-20 minutes.

·       Final Paper

Final paper should be based on a chosen topic approved by the instructor beforehand. It must be related to some of the topics presented in the course. At least some of the literature listed in the syllabus should be used. The length of the paper should be 2 000 words. The final paper is due to May 1, 2022.

 

Grading Scale

 

Letter Grade

Percentage

Description

A

90-100

Excellent performance. The student has shown originality and displayed an exceptional grasp of the material and a deep analytical understanding of the subject.

 

B

80-89

Good performance. The student has mastered the material, understands the subject well and has shown some originality of thought and/or considerable effort.

 

C

70-79

Fair performance. The student has acquired an acceptable understanding of the material and essential subject matter of the course, but has not succeeded in translating this understanding into consistently creative or original work.

 

D

60-69

Poor. The student has shown some understanding of the material and subject matter covered during the course. The student’s work, however, has not shown enough effort or understanding to allow for a passing grade in School Required Courses. It does qualify as a passing mark for the General College Courses and Electives.

 

F

0-59

Fail. The student has not succeeded in mastering the subject matter covered in the course.

Last update: Korablyova Valeriya, Ph.D. (03.12.2021)
Literature

Literature:

Beck, Ulrich (2017). The Metamorphosis of the World: How Climate Change is Transforming Our Concept of the World. Polity.

Bickerton, Christopher J.; & Invernizzi Acetti, Carlo (2021). Technopopulism. The New Logic of Democratic Politics. Oxford University Press.

Brown, Wendy (2017). Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism´s Stealth Revolution. The MIT Press.

Chari, Sharad, & Verdery, Katherine. (2009). Thinking between the Posts: Postcolonialism, Postsocialism, and Ethnography after the Cold War. In: Comparative Studies in Society and History, 51(1): 6-34.

Fukuyama, Francis (1989). End of History? In: The National Interest, Summer: 3-18.

Gerbaudo, Paolo (2017). The Mask and the Flag. Populism, Citizenism, and Global Protest. Oxford University Press.

Gerbaudo, Paolo (2019). The Digital Party. Political Organisation and Online Democracy. Pluto Press.

Hale, H. E. (2015). Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Jowitt, Kenneth (1991). The New World Disorder. In: Journal of Democracy, Volume 2, Number 1, Winter: 11-20.

Kiossev, Alexander (2008). The Self-Colonizing Metaphor. In: Atlas of Transformation. Available at: http://monumenttotransformation.org/atlas-of-transformation/html/s/self-colonization/the-self-colonizing-metaphor-alexander-kiossev.html

Korablyova, Valeria (2015). Pariahs and parvenus? Refugees and new divisions in Europe. In: Eurozine, November 26, 2015. https://www.eurozine.com/pariahs-and-parvenus/

Korablyova, Valeria (2016). The EU project of Europe: the 'inclusion – exclusion' game? In: The Power of the Norm. Fragile rules and significant exceptions, ed. E. Betti, K. Miller, Vienna: IWM Junior Visiting Fellows' Conferences, Vol. 35. https://www.iwm.at/publications/5-junior-visiting-fellows-conferences/vol-xxxv/the-eu-project-of-europe/

Korablyova, Valeria (2019). EuroMaidan and the 1989 legacy: solidarity in action? In: The Long 1989: Decades of Global Revolution / Piotr H. Kosicki, Kyrill Kunakhovich, (eds), CEU Press, Ch. 9, 231-252.

Korablyova, Valeria (2020). Еurope as an Object of Desire: Ukraine between “Psychological Europe” and the “Soviet Mentality”. In: Topos, 2020, # 2, 79-99. http://journals.ehu.lt/index.php/topos/article/view/1023

Krastev, Ivan (2020). Is It Tomorrow, Yet? Paradoxes of the Pandemic. Penguin Books.

Krastev, Ivan. (2017) After Europe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Kundera, Milan. (1984). The Stolen West, or The Tragedy of Central Europe. In: The New York Review of Books, 31, 7, 26 April.

Melegh, Attila, On the East – West slope. Globalization, nationalism, racism and discourses on Central and Eastern Europe, CEU Press, Budapest-New York, 2006.

Moisi, Dominique (2010). The Geopolitics of Emotions. How Cultures of Fear, Humiliation, and Hope Are Reshaping the World. Doubleday.

Neumann, Iver B. (1999). Uses of the Other. “The East” in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, Ch. 1, 5: 1-38, 143-160.

Popescu, Nicu, & Wilson, Andrew. (2009) The limits of Enlargement-lite: European and Russian power in the troubled neighbourhood. Policy report. London: ECFR.

Runciman, David (2018). How Democracy Ends. Profile Books Ltd.

Schell, Jonathan (2009). The End of the Age of Empire. In: International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 22, no. 4: 422.

Slačálek, Ondřej. (2016) The postcolonial hypothesis: Notes on the Czech “Central European” identity. In: Annual of Language & Politics & Politics of Identity, Vol. 10, p. 27–44.

Snyder, Timothy (2015). Integration and Disintegration: Europe, Ukraine, and the World. In: Slavic Review, Vol. 74, No. 4 (WINTER 2015), pp. 695-707.

Urbinati, Nadia (2014). Democracy Disfigured. Opinion, Truth, and the People. Harvard University Press

Van Middeelaar, Luuk (2019). Alarums & Excursions. Improvising Politics on the European Stage. Agenda Publishing.

Wilson, Andrew (2005). Virtual Politics: Faking Democracy in the Post-Soviet World. Yale University Press.

Wolff, Larry (1994), Inventing Eastern Europe. The Map of Civilization on the Mind of the Enlightenment, Stanford University Press.

Zakaria, Fareed (2020). Ten Lessons for a Post-Pandemic World. W.W. Norton & Company.

Zarycki, Tomacz. (2014). Ideologies of Eastness in Central and Eastern Europe. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.

Last update: Korablyova Valeriya, Ph.D. (03.12.2021)
Teaching methods

The main teaching methods of this course are peer learning and focused discussions. Therefore, the instructor gives only introductory mini-lectures to open the topic of the week, while the main attention and the learning medium are debates on the assigned reading. Thus, every class starts with an introductory micro-lecture by the instructor, then we proceed with a presentation by one or couple of students followed by a general discussion of the literature on the topic. Whereas every enrolled student is obliged to do the mandatory reading for every class (2-3 papers), a presenter should pick a source from further reading and elaborate on it in her presentation (around 15 mins long, in a format of her choice). The course has a strong theoretical emphasis, where facts and empirical evidence are used to illustrate a certain framing of ongoing developments.

Last update: Korablyova Valeriya, Ph.D. (03.12.2021)
Requirements to the exam

Final paper should be based on a chosen topic approved by the instructor beforehand. It must be related to some of the topics presented in the course. At least some of the literature listed in the syllabus should be used. The length of the paper should be 2 000 words. The final paper is due to May 1, 2022.

Assignment

Weight in Final Grade

Evaluated Student Learning Outcomes

Active Class Participation

20%

Engagement in class discussion, demonstrating the knowledge gained from assigned weekly reading and other sources; making own point, asking and answering questions.

Presentation

30%

Ability to comprehend academic texts and to formulate their main ideas; present them in a well-structured and clear way; prepare visual materials to the presentation (power-point presentation and/or handouts); ability to assess the source critically.

Final Paper

50%

Ability to understand the main ideas, concepts and case studies covered; define a problem and look for answers; write in a clear, academic style; use cohesive argument.

TOTAL

100%

 

 

Detailed description of the assignments

 

  • Active Class Participation

Students should participate actively in the course. Mere attendance is not active participation. To take active part in the class means, for instance, to present findings from compulsory readings, to comment on the topic, to discuss with other students, to answer questions raised by the instructor, and to ask own questions.    

·       Presentation

Presentation should be based on one of the additional readings which are indicated to every class session. Selection is up to students. Presentation should take about 15-20 minutes.

·       Final Paper

Final paper should be based on a chosen topic approved by the instructor beforehand. It must be related to some of the topics presented in the course. At least some of the literature listed in the syllabus should be used. The length of the paper should be 2 000 words. The final paper is due to May 1, 2022.

 

Last update: Korablyova Valeriya, Ph.D. (03.12.2021)
Requisites for virtual mobility

Proficiency in English is required, as all the materials, and class discussions are to be held in English.

The ability to formulate and express one's thoughts in class is requested, as well as certain skills in analysing and critically addressing the assigned literature.

Last update: Korablyova Valeriya, Ph.D. (03.12.2021)
Entry requirements

No fixed criteria for selection, as students of all levels of studies are accepted. The ability to critically address the suggested literature and engage in well-informed discussions in class are required. Basic knowledge on East Central Europe would be a plus, although not a requirement. A certain proclivity to theoretical debate would help you feel more at ease in class.

Last update: Korablyova Valeriya, Ph.D. (03.12.2021)
Registration requirements

No fixed criteria for selection, as students of all levels of studies are accepted. The ability to critically address the suggested literature and engage in well-informed discussions in class are required. Basic knowledge on East Central Europe would be a plus, although not a requirement. A certain proclivity to theoretical debate would help you feel more at ease in class.

Last update: Korablyova Valeriya, Ph.D. (03.12.2021)
 
Charles University | Information system of Charles University | http://www.cuni.cz/UKEN-329.html