Thesis (Selection of subject)Thesis (Selection of subject)(version: 368)
Thesis details
   Login via CAS
We Are All Metamoderns: An Introduction to Metamodernism
Thesis title in Czech: Všichni jsme metamoderní: Úvod do metamodernismu
Thesis title in English: We Are All Metamoderns: An Introduction to Metamodernism
Key words: Metamodernismus|Teorie sítí aktérů|Postmodernismus|Nordická škola|Holandská škola|Ironie
English key words: Metamodernism|Actor-network theory|Post-modernism|Nordic school|Dutch school|Irony
Academic year of topic announcement: 2022/2023
Thesis type: diploma thesis
Thesis language: angličtina
Department: Department of Anglophone Literatures and Cultures (21-UALK)
Supervisor: Filip Vostal, D.Phil.
Author: hidden - assigned and confirmed by the Study Dept.
Date of registration: 08.03.2023
Date of assignment: 08.03.2023
Administrator's approval: approved
Confirmed by Study dept. on: 08.03.2023
Date and time of defence: 08.02.2024 00:00
Date of electronic submission:10.01.2024
Date of proceeded defence: 08.02.2024
Submitted/finalized: committed by student and finalized
Opponents: doc. Erik Sherman Roraback, D.Phil.
 
 
 
Guidelines
This work will provide a genealogy of the metamodern condition. The postmodern sentiment is by no means gone, but it has transformed so much at this point that the vague postmodern label has become obsolete. Indeed, the cultural sphere is now dealing with a whole set of urgent social, political and economic realities, spurred on by climatic, financial and geopolitical crises, that postmodernism could never seriously handle. In the course of this paper, I will examine the modernist and post-modernist streams of thought that have resulted in the emergence of metamodernism, which somehow counter-intuitively combines modernist sincerity with post-postmodernist irony. Moreover, I will assess this stream of thought through the lens of Actor-network theory, as outlined by Bruno Latour. In the end, I hope to demonstrate that metamodernism offers something that postmodernism, disappointed from the failure of modernist projects, never could: hope.
References
Sekundární literatura:

Andersen, L. R. (2019). Metamodernity: Meaning and hope in a complex world. Copenhagen: Nordic Bildung.

Eve, M. (2012). Thomas Pynchon, David Foster Wallace and the problems of “metamodernism”: post-millennial post-postmodernism? C21 Literature. 1(1), 7-25.

Freinacht, H. (2017). The Listening Society. Frederikssund, Metamoderna

Lashomb, D. (2021). Warhol/Chris Chan: The Lifespan of American Pop Culture, or The Suppression of Reality.

Latour, B. (1991). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Luke, T.W. (1997). At the End of Nature: Cyborgs, ‚Humachines‘, and Environments in Postmodernity. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 29(8), 1367-1380.
Storm, J. A. J. (2021). Metamodernism: The Future of Theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

van den Akker, R., Gibbons, A., & Vermeulen, T. (2017). Metamodernism: Historicity, Affect, and Depth After Postmodernism. London: Rowman & Littlefield
 
Charles University | Information system of Charles University | http://www.cuni.cz/UKEN-329.html