Selhání konsociačního modelu v Libanonu
Thesis title in Czech: | Selhání konsociačního modelu v Libanonu |
---|---|
Thesis title in English: | The Failure of the Consociational Model in Lebanon |
Key words: | Lijphart|konsociační demokracie|konfesionalismus|Libanon|volební systém|politické strany |
English key words: | Lijphart|consociational democracy|confessionalism|Lebanon|electoral system|political parties |
Academic year of topic announcement: | 2022/2023 |
Thesis type: | Bachelor's thesis |
Thesis language: | čeština |
Department: | Institute of Political Science (21-UPOL) |
Supervisor: | Mgr. Martin Štefek, Ph.D. |
Author: | hidden - assigned and confirmed by the Study Dept. |
Date of registration: | 27.10.2022 |
Date of assignment: | 02.11.2022 |
Administrator's approval: | approved |
Confirmed by Study dept. on: | 28.04.2023 |
Date and time of defence: | 08.09.2023 08:00 |
Date of electronic submission: | 26.07.2023 |
Date of proceeded defence: | 08.09.2023 |
Submitted/finalized: | committed by student and finalized |
Opponents: | Zora Hesová, M.A., Ph.D. |
Guidelines |
Práce jednak pojedná o aspektech konsociačního modelu demokracie, jedna se zaměří na aplikaci konsociačních prvků v Libanonu. Autor bude podrobně analyzovat dynamiku Libanonského režimu a dokumentovat jeho krizové momenty na pozací zvoleného teoretického rámce. Zvláštní pozornost bude věnována volebnímu systému a jeho účinkům. |
References |
1. Berti, B. (2017). The Lebanese Political Arena, 2006-2016: A Turbulent Decade. In U. Dekel, G. Siboni, & O. Einav (Eds.), The Quiet Decade: In the Aftermath of the Second Lebanon War, 2006-2016 (pp. 107–114). 2. Bogaards M. (2019). Formal and Informal Consociational Institutions: A Comparison of the National Pact and the Taif Agreement in Lebanon, Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 25:1, 27-42, 3. Bourhrous, A., Fazil, S., Maddah, M., & O’driscoll, D. (2021). Understanding The Governance Systems. In Reform Within The System: Governance In Iraq and Lebanon (pp. 5–11). 4. Dekmejian, R. H. (1978). Consociational Democracy in Crisis: The Case of Lebanon. Comparative Politics, 10(2), 251–265. 5. Fakhoury, T. (2014). Debating Lebanon’s Power-Sharing Model: An Opportunity or an Impasse For Democratization Studies In The Middle East? The Arab Studies Journal, 22(1), 230–255. 6. Hanna, E. (2014). The Case Of Lebanon. In A. Filippidou (Ed.), The Role Of Leadership In Transitional States: The Cases Of Lebanon, Israel-Palestine (pp. 85–140). 7. Lijphart, A. (1969). Consociational Democracy. World Politics, 21(2), 207–225. 8. Lijphart, A. Patterns of Democracy, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012 9. Salloukh, B. F. (2006). The Limits of Electoral Engineering in Divided Societies: Elections in Postwar Lebanon. Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 39(3), 635–655. 10. Trzciński, K. (2018). Hybrid Power Sharing: On How To Stabilize The Political Situation In Multi-Segmental Societies. Politeja, 56, 85–108. 11. Vaughan, K. Who Benefits from Consociationalism? Religious Disparities in Lebanon’s Political System. Religions 2018, 9, 51 12. Zákon číslo 44/2017, Parliamentary Elections, Election Of The Members Of The Parliament [přijato 17. 6. 2017] |