Thesis (Selection of subject)Thesis (Selection of subject)(version: 368)
Thesis details
   Login via CAS
A Variety of Perspectives: The Role of the Narrator in Selected British Dystopian Novels
Thesis title in Czech: Rozmanitost hledisek: role vypravěče ve vybraných britských dystopiích
Thesis title in English: A Variety of Perspectives: The Role of the Narrator in Selected British Dystopian Novels
Key words: Dystopie|narativní situace|fokalizace|Aldous Huxley|George Orwell|Kazuo Ishiguro|vypravěč.
English key words: Dystopia|narrative situation|focalization|Aldous Huxley|George Orwell|Kazuo Ishiguro|narrator.
Academic year of topic announcement: 2020/2021
Thesis type: Bachelor's thesis
Thesis language: angličtina
Department: Department of Anglophone Literatures and Cultures (21-UALK)
Supervisor: Mgr. Petra Johana Poncarová, Ph.D.
Author: hidden - assigned and confirmed by the Study Dept.
Date of registration: 09.12.2020
Date of assignment: 09.12.2020
Administrator's approval: not processed yet
Confirmed by Study dept. on: 15.12.2020
Date and time of defence: 08.09.2021 09:00
Date of electronic submission:16.08.2021
Date of proceeded defence: 08.09.2021
Submitted/finalized: committed by student and finalized
Opponents: Mgr. Miroslava Horová, Ph.D.
 
 
 
Guidelines
The objective of the present study is to analyse the narrative techniques utilized in such prominent works of dystopian literature as George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, and Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go. The thesis will strive to identify and interpret the role of the narrator in the forenamed novels, with a special emphasis on the point of view from which the novels are narrated and on the different voices present in them. The study will also aim to compare the narrative situation in the texts and determine how or whether it augments the depiction of the fictional worlds, thus making the novels more effective ― or otherwise. As for the choice of the primary texts, the selection is meant to allow for analysing three distinct narrative situations as each of the texts features a different narrative voice. While both Nineteen Eighty-Four and Brave New World are written in the third person, the latter presents the reader with an omniscient point of view that enables switching between several characters’ perspectives. Orwell’s novel, on the other hand, is limited solely to the protagonist’s viewpoint, establishing an entirely different narrative situation. Never Let Me Go features a first-person limited perspective where one character acts as both protagonist and narrator, potentially unreliable. The thesis, therefore, will focus on the differences in the novels’ narrative situations and determine the effects that the choice of a specific perspective produces. In terms of theoretical material, it will work with relevant texts from the field of narratology, such as the concepts and terminology established by Gérard Genette and others.
References
Bibliography
Bizzini, Silvia Caporale. “Recollecting Memories, Reconstructing Identities: Narrators as Storytellers in Kazuo Ishiguro's ‘When We Were Orphans’ and ‘Never Let Me Go’ / La Recuperación De La Memoria En La Redefinición De La Identidad: La Narración Como Estrategia Literaria En ‘When We Were Orphans y Never Let Me Go’, De Kazuo Ishiguro.” Atlantis 35.2 (2013): 65-80. JSTOR .
Clayes, Gregory. “News from Somewhere: Enhanced Sociability and the Composite Definition of Utopia and Dystopia.” History 98.2 (2013): 145-173. JSTOR .
Drag, Wojcieh. Revisiting Loss: Memory, Trauma and Nostalgia in the Novels of Kazuo Ishiguro. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2014.
Elsbree, Langdon. “The Structured Nightmare of 1984.” Twentieth Century Literature 5.3 (1959): 135-141. JSTOR .
Fokkema, Douwe. “Utopias, Dystopias, and Their Hybrid Variants in Europe and America since World War I.” Perfect Worlds: Utopian Fiction in China and the West. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2011. 345-398. JSTOR .
Fludernik, Monika. An Introduction to Narratology. New York: Routledge, 2009.
Genette, Gérard. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. New York: Cornell University Press, 1983.
Heise-von der Lippe, Anya. “Aldous Huxley, Brave New World (1932).” Handbook of the English Novel of the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries. Ed. Christoph Reinfandt. Boston: De Gruyter, 2017.
Matter, William W. “The Utopian Tradition and Aldous Huxley.” Science Fiction Studies 2.2 (1975): 146-151. JSTOR .
McDonald, Keith. “Days of Past Futures: Kazuo Ishiguro’s ‘Never Let Me Go’ as ‘Speculative Memoir.’” Biography 30.1 (2007): 74-83. JSTOR .
Reinfandt, Christoph (ed). Handbook of the English Novel of the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries. Boston: De Gruyter, 2017.
Rodden, John, and John Rossi. The Cambridge Introduction to George Orwell. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Sanderson, Richard K. “The Two Narrators and Happy Ending of ‘Nineteen Eighty-Four.’” Modern Fiction Studies 34.4 (1988): 587-595. JSTOR .
Schmeink, Lars. “Dystopia, Science Fiction, Posthumanism, and Liquid Modernity.” Biopunk Dystopias: Genetic Engineering, Society and Science Fiction. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2016. 18-70. JSTOR .
Shaddox, Karl. “Generic Considerations in Ishiguro's ‘Never Let Me Go.’” Human Rights Quarterly 35.2 (2013): 448-469. JSTOR .
Whitehead, Anne. “Writing with Care: Kazuo Ishiguro's ‘Never Let Me Go.’” Contemporary Literature 52.1 (2011): 54-83. JSTOR .
Woiak, Joanne. “Designing a Brave New World: Eugenics, Politics, and Fiction.” The Public
 
Charles University | Information system of Charles University | http://www.cuni.cz/UKEN-329.html