Semi-prezidencialismus na Ukrajině

• Thesis title in Czech: Semi-prezidencialismus na Ukrajině
• Thesis title in English: Semi-presidential system in Ukraine
• Key words: Ukrajina|Semi-presidencialismus|Komparativní politologie
• English key words: Ukraine|Semi-presidentialism|Comparative Politics
• Academic year of topic announcement: 2018/2019
• Thesis type: Bachelor's thesis
• Thesis language: čeština
• Department: Institute of Political Science (21-UPOL)
• Supervisor: Mgr. Martin Štefek, Ph.D.
• Author: hidden - assigned and confirmed by the Study Dept.
• Date of registration: 12.08.2019
• Date of assignment: 13.12.2019
• Administrator's approval: not processed yet
• Confirmed by Study dept. on: 12.05.2020
• Date and time of defence: 17.06.2020 08:00
• Date of electronic submission: 12.05.2020
• Date of proceeded defence: 17.06.2020
• Submitted/finalized: committed by student and finalized
• Opponents: Mgr. Tereza Soušková

Guidelines

Bakalářská práce se zaměří na dynamiku ukrajinského politického režimu. Autor bude zkoumat proměny režimu; zejména se zaměří na roli prezidenta a vztah mezi exekutivou a legislativou. Čerpat bude jak ze současné angloamerické produkce o poloprezidenstkých režimich, tak i z ukrajinských primárních pramenů.

References

1) Birch, Sarah (2008), ‘Ukraine: Presidential Power, Veto Strategies and Democratisation’, in Robert Elgie and Sophia Moestrup (eds.), Semi-Presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 219–38.
2) Cheibub, José Antonio (2007), Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3) Svitlana Chernykh (2007), ‘Constitutions and Democratic Performance in Semi- Presidential Democracies’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 269–303.
4) Svitlana Chernykh (2009), ‘Are Semi-Presidential Constitutions Bad for Democratic Performance?’, Constitutional Political Economy, vol. 20, nos. 3–4, pp. 202–29.
5) Elgie, Robert (2007), ‘Varieties of Semi-Presidentialism and Their Impact on Nascent Democracies’, Taiwan Journal of Democracy, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 53–71.
—— (2010a), ‘Semi-Presidentialism: An Increasingly Common Constitutional Choice’, in Robert Elgie, Sophia Moestrup, and Yu-Shan Wu (eds.), Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy, London: Palgrave.
—— (2010b), ‘Semi-Presidentialism, Cohabitation and the Collapse of Electoral Democracies, 1990–2008’, Government and Opposition, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 29–49.
—— Petra Schleiter (2011), ‘Variation in the Durability of Semi-Presidential Democracies’, in Robert Elgie, Sophia Moestrup, and Yu-Shan Wu (eds.), Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 42–60.
—— Sophia Moestrup (2008), ‘Semi-Presidentialism: A Common Regime Type, But One That Should Be Avoided?’, in Robert Elgie and Sophia Moestrup (eds.), Semi- Presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 1–13.
6) Freeman, Mark (2000), ‘Constitutional Frameworks and Fragile Democracies: Choosing Between Parliamentarism, Presidentialism and Semi-Presidentialism’, Pace International Law Review, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 253–82.

7) Gerring, John, Strom C. Thacker, and Carola Moreno (2009), ‘Are Parliamentary Systems Better?’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 327–59.
8) Horowitz, Donald L. (1993), ‘Democracy in Divided Societies’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 18–38.
9) Lin, Jih-Wen (2011), ‘The Rules of Electoral Competition and the Accountability of Semi-Presidential Governments’, in Robert Elgie, Sophia Moestrup, and Yu-Shan Wu (eds.), Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy, London: Palgrave, pp. 61–80.

10) Matsuzato, Kimitaka (2005), ‘Semipresidentialism in Ukraine: Institutionalist Centrism in Rampant Clan Politics’, Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 45–60.
11) Moestrup, Sophia (2007), ‘Semi-Presidentialism in Young Democracies. Help or Hindrance?’, in Robert Elgie and Sophia Moestrup (eds.), Semi-Presidentialism Outside Europe, London: Routledge, pp. 30–55.

12) Pasquino, Gianfranco (2007), ‘The Advantages and Disadvantages of Semi- Presidentialism: A West European Perspective’, in Robert Elgie and Sophia Moestrup (eds.), Semi-Presidentialism Outside Europe, London: Routledge, pp. 14–29.
13) Protsyk, Oleh (2003), ‘Troubled Semi-Presidentialism: Stability of the Constitutional System and Cabinet in Ukraine’, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1077–95.
—— (2004), ‘Ruling with Decrees: Presidential Decree Making in Russia and Ukraine’, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 637–60.
—— (2005), ‘Prime Ministers’ Identity in Semi-Presidential Regimes: Constitutional Norms and Cabinet Formation Outcomes’, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 44, pp. 721–48.
—— (2006), ‘Intra-Executive Competition between President and Prime Minister: Patterns of Institutional Conflict and Cooperation under Semi-presidentialism’, Political Studies, vol. 54, pp. 219–44.
14) Roper, Steven D. (2002), ‘Are All Semipresidential Regimes the Same? A Comparison of Premier Presidential Comparison Regimes’, Comparative Politics, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 253–72.

15) Sartori, Giovanni (1994), ‘Neither Presidentialism Nor Parliamentarism’, in Juan J. Linz and Arturo Valenzuela (eds.), The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Comparative Perspectives, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 106–18.

16) Shugart, Matthew Soberg (1993), ‘Of Presidents and Parliaments’, East European Constitutional Review, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 30–2.
—— (2005), ‘Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive and Mixed Authority Patterns’, French Politics, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 323–51.
—— John M. Carey (1992), Presidents and Assemblies. Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.