Naivní a instruovaný popis hlasu

• Thesis title in Czech: Naivní a instruovaný popis hlasu
• Thesis title in English: Naive and instructed description of voices
• Key words: forenzní fonetika|popis hlasu|výslechový protokol
• English key words: forensic phonetics|voice description|interrogation protocol
• Academic year of topic announcement: 2016/2017
• Thesis type: diploma thesis
• Thesis language: čeština
• Department: Institute of Phonetics (21-FU)
• Supervisor: doc. Mgr. Radek Skarnitzl, Ph.D.
• Author: hidden - assigned and confirmed by the Study Dept.
• Date of registration: 02.08.2017
• Date of assignment: 02.08.2017
• Administrator's approval: not processed yet
• Confirmed by Study dept. on: 10.08.2017
• Date and time of defence: 03.09.2018 10:00
• Date of electronic submission: 07.08.2018
• Date of proceeded defence: 03.09.2018
• Submitted/finalized: committed by student and finalized
• Opponents: Mgr. Martina Černá

Guidelines

- prostudovat relevantní literaturu a vypracovat přehled dosavadních nálezů o sluchové identifikaci naivními posluchači
- vybrat z databáze Fonetického ústavu nahrávky spontánní řeči 4 mluvčích
- provést detailní poslechovou analýzu mluvčích podle analytického protokolu
- nechat 12 posluchačů jeden hlas popsat bez návodu a následně systematicky podle protokolu
- kvalitativně a kvantitativně porovnat naivní a instruovaný popis
- na základě sjednoceného popisu nechat jiné posluchače identifikovat cílový hlas ze tří hlasů
- porovnat obecné i individuální tendence a vyvodit závěry

References

Hollien a Hollien (1995). Improving aural-perceptual speaker identification techniques. Studies in Forensic Phonetics, BEIPHOL 64, 87-97.
Köster, Hess, Schiller a Künzel (1998). The correlation between auditory speech sensitivity and speaker recognition ability. Forensic Linguistics, 5, 22-32.
Köster, Jessen, Khairi a Eckert (2007). Auditory-perceptual identification of voice quality by expert and non-expert listeners. Proceedings of 16th ICPhS, 1845-1848.
Künzel (1994). On the problem of speaker identification by victims and witnesses. Forensic Linguistics, 1, 45-57.
Mullennix, Ross, Smith, Kuykendall, Conrad a Barb (2011). Typicality effects on memory for voice: Implications for earwitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 29-34.
Papcun, Kreiman a Davis (1989). Long‐term memory for unfamiliar voices. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 913-925.
Philippon, Cherryman, Bull a Vrij (2007). Earwitness Identification Performance: The Effect of Language, Target, Deliberate Strategies and Indirect Measures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 539-550.
Philippon, Cherryman, Vrij a Bull (2008). Why is my Voice so Easily Recognized in Identity Parades? Influence of First Impressions on Voice Identification. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 15, 70-77.
Schiller a Köster (1998). The ability of expert witnesses to identify voices: a comparison between trained and untrained listeners. Forensic Linguistics, 5, 1-9.
Smith a Baguley (2014). Unfamiliar voice identification: Effect of post-event information on accuracy and voice ratings. Journal of European Psychology Students, 5, 59-68.
Weirich a Lancia (2011). Perceived auditory similarity and its acoustic correlates in twins and unrelated speakers. Proceedings of 17th ICPhS, 2118-2121.
Yarmey (2013). The psychology of speaker identification and earwitness memory. In: Lindsay, Ross, Read a Toglia (Eds.), The Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology, Volume II, 101-136. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Yarmey (2001). Earwitness descriptions and speaker identification. Forensic Linguistics, 8, 113-122.