Thesis (Selection of subject)Thesis (Selection of subject)(version: 379)
Thesis details
   Login via CAS
US lobbyists in the EU: significance of home country regulation for lobbying behaviour in a less regulated environment
Thesis title in Czech: Americký lobbying v EU: význam regulace lobbyingu země původu pro chování v méně regulovaném prostředí
Thesis title in English: US lobbyists in the EU: significance of home country regulation for lobbying behaviour in a less regulated environment
Key words: lobbing, regulace, transparentnost, Evropská unie, Spojené státy americké, byznys, chování
English key words: lobbying, regulations, transparency, European Union, United States of America, business, behaviour
Academic year of topic announcement: 2017/2018
Thesis type: diploma thesis
Thesis language: angličtina
Department: Department of International Relations (23-KMV)
Supervisor: Mgr. Viera Martinková, Ph.D.
Author: hidden - assigned by the advisor
Date of registration: 01.07.2018
Date of assignment: 01.07.2018
Date and time of defence: 28.01.2020 08:00
Venue of defence: Jinonice - U Kříže 8, Praha 5, J4019, Jinonice - místn. č. 4019
Date of electronic submission:06.01.2020
Date of proceeded defence: 28.01.2020
Opponents: doc. PhDr. Běla Plechanovová, CSc.
 
 
 
Advisors: PhDr. Irah Kučerová, Ph.D.
URKUND check:
References
Monographies
DRULÁK, P. Teorie mezinárodních vztahů. Praha: Portál. 2003. 220 p. ISBN: 80-7178-725-6
GRAZIANO, L. Lobbying, pluralism, and democracy. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2001. 248 p. ISBN: 978-0-333-92056-5
HREBENAR, R.; MORGAN, B. Lobbying in America: A Reference Handbook. California, ABC-Clio, Inc. 2009. 288 p. ISBN 978-1-59884-113-8.
JOOS, K. Lobbying in the new Europe: Successful representation of interests after the Treaty of Lisbon. Weinheim: John Wiley&Sons, 2011, 244 p. ISBN-13: 978-3527505975
LABOUTKOVÁ, Š.; MÜLLER, K.B.; VYMĚTAL, P. Lobbing v moderních demokraciích. Praha: Grada, 2010. 256 p. ISBN: 978-80-247-3165-0
THOMAS, C. S. Research Guide to U.S. and International Interest Groups. Westport: Praeger, 2004. 544 p. ISBN-13: 978-0313295430
WALKER, E. Grassroots for Hire: Public Affairs Consultants In American Democracy. Cambridge University Press, 2014. 298 p. ISBN: 1107619017
WIENER, J.; SCHRIRE, R.A. International Relations: Volume II. Oxford, UK: Eolss Publishers Co, Ltd. 2009. p. 19. ISBN 978-1-84826-063-4

publications
Beyers, J.; Binderkrantz, A.; Pedersen, H. H. ‘What is access? A discussion of the definition and measurement of interest group access’, European Political Science, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2017, p. 306-321. doi: 10.1057/eps.2016.17.
Beyers, J., Eising, R. and Maloney, W. Researching interest group politics in Europe and elsewhere: Much we study, little we know? 2008, West European Politics 31(6): 1103–28.
BOUWEN, P. Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions. 2004. European Journal of Political Research, 43(3), 337-369.
COEN, D. The evolution of the large firm as a political actor in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 4(1): 91-108, 1997.
MULCAHY, S. Lobbying in Europe: Hidden influence, privileged access. Berlin: Transparency International. 2015. p. 54. ISBN: 978-3-943497-80-9
COHEN, B.J. International Political Economy. The Library of Essays in International Relations. Series Editor: David A. Deese. USA: Ashgate Publishing. 2005. p 11-18. ISBN 9780754624660
EISING, Rainer. studying interest groups: methodological challenges and tools. Bochum, Ruhr-University Bochum. European Consortium for Political Research. European Political Science, 16, 2017.
CHARI, R; MURPHY, G.; HOGAN, J. 2007. Regulating Lobbyists: a Comparative Analysis of the USA, Canada, Germany and the European Union. The Political Quarterly, Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 422-438.
LABOUTKOVÁ, Š., VYMĚTAL, P. Transparency in Economic and Political Decision-Making: The Identification of Sunshine Rules for Transparent Lobbying. Danube: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO. issue 3, pages 157-171.
SNIDAL, Duncan. Rational Choice and International Relations [online]. Handbook of International Relations, Chapter 4, London: SAGE Publications, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446247587.n4 [2019-12-12] Accessible from: https://sk.sagepub.com/reference/hdbk_interntlrelations/n4.xml
STIGLER, G.J. The Theory of Economic Regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol. 2, No. 1 (Spring, 1971), pp. 3-21.

Thomas, C.S.; Hrebenar, R.J.; Boyer, M.L. American Interest Groups Operating in the European Union: A Study in Transnational Lobbying. American Political Science Association, Annual Meeting, presented paper, 2001.
online
AbbVie Inc. 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K [online]. Abbvie, 2018. [2019-10-12] Accessible from: https://investors.abbvie.com/static-files/8f8ea49f-4735-404c-be08-2f963441b74d
American Chamber of Commerce in the EU. Annual Report 2017 [online]. American Chamber of Commerce in the EU, 2018. [2019-10-12] Accessible from: http://www.amchameu.eu/sites/default/files/publications/files/amchameu-annual-report-2017.pdf
ANTYPAS, I. How non-EU actors are lobbying Brussels [online]. Deutsche Welle. 2018. [cit 2019-5-29]. Accessible from: https://www.dw.com/en/how-non-eu-actors-are-lobbying-brussels/a-46182626
Apple Inc. Political Contributions - January 1, 2012 to date [online]. Apple Inc, 2019. [2019-12-1] Accessible from: https://s2.q4cdn.com/470004039/files/doc_downloads/advocacy/2014.04.03_Political_Contributions.pdf
BAIRD, Austin. Alaska gets C grade in 2015 state integrity investigation [online]. The centre for public integrity, 2015. [2019-9-20] Accessible from: https://publicintegrity.org/politics/state-politics/state-integrity-investigation/alaska-gets-c-grade-in-2015-state-integrity-investigation/
Bayer AG. Annual Report 2017 [online]. Bayer AG, Investors, Reports, 2018. [2019-10-12] p. 190. Accessible from: https://www.investor.bayer.de/en/reports/annual-reports/overview/
Bayer AG. Contact [online]. Bayer AG, Contact, updated 2018. [2019-10-12]. Accessible from: https://www.bayer.com/en/contact.aspx
BBC News. Big protests in Brazil demand President Rousseff's impeachment [online]. BBC, 2015. [2019-7-20] Accessible from: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-31899507
BBC News. History of Political Lobbying Scandals [online]. BBC, 2013. [2019-12-15] Accessible from: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-22754297?fbclid=IwAR0nyglIwi2bIXQOgeWjjXT-OlqoMchuR1JEhPKSaxLt9xnUD-R4cLxQ4aE
BOGARDUS, Kevin. 'Scarlet L' for K Street returns as Obama sharpens 2012 rhetoric on lobbyists. [online] The Hill, 2012. [2019-6-10] Accessible from: https://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/186975-scarlet-l-for-lobbyists-returns-as-obama-sharpens-rhetoric-for-2011
Business Dictionary. Lobbying: definition. [online] WebFinance Inc. 2019 [2019-5-27] Accessible from: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/lobbying.html
Cambridge Dictionary. Meaning of lobbying in English. [online] Cambridge University Press 2019. [2019-5-27] Accessible from: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/lobbying
Caplin & Drysdale. An Informational Resource in a New Era of Foreign Agents Registration Act Enforcement [online]. Caplin & Drysdale 2019. [2019-10-5] Accessible from: https://fara.us/
Center for Responsive Politics. Facebook Inc. [online] OpenSecrets.org, Influence & Lobbying, Organisations, 2019. [2019-11-20] Accessible from: https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/totals.php?id=D000033563&cycle=2016
Center for responsive politics. Koch Industries [online]. OpenSecrets.org, 2018 cycle. [2019-12-10] Accessible from: https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.php?id=D000000186&cycle=2018
Center for Responsive Politics. Top Lobbying Firms [online] OpenSecrets.org, Influence & Lobbying, Top Firms, 2018. [2019-11-20] Accessible from: https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/top-lobbying-firms
Center for Responsive Politics. Top Lobbying Spenders [online] OpenSecrets.org, Influence & Lobbying, Top Spenders, 2018. [2019-11-20] Accessible from: https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/top-spenders
Center for Responsive Politics. Methodology [online]. OpenSecrets.org. [2019-7-18] Accessible from: https://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/methodology.php

Center for Responsive Politics. Lobbying [online] OpenSecrets.org, Influence & Lobbying, Top Spenders and Top Firms, 2018. [2019-11-20] Accessible from: https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/
COEN, D. Lobbying in the European Union. Briefing paper, European Parliament's Committee on constitutional affairs. 2017. [28-5-2019] p. 1-18. Accessible from www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/doc/1211469722_lobbying_eu.pdf
Corporate Europe Observatory and LobbyControl. Search Database. [online] Lobbyfacts.eu, 2019. [2019-10-15] Accessible from: https://lobbyfacts.eu/
Corporate Europe Observatory and LobbyControl. Statistics. [online] Lobbyfacts.eu, 2019. [2019-10-15] Accessible from: https://lobbyfacts.eu/reports/lobby-costs/all
ERWIN, P. Corporate Codes of Conduct: The Effects of Code Content and Quality on Ethical Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 99, 535–548 (2011) doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0667-y https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-010-0667-y
Ethics and Compliance Initiative. Why Have a Code of Conduct [online]. Ethics.org, Resources, Code of Conduct, 2019. [2019-10-12] Accessible from: https://www.ethics.org/resources/free-toolkit/code-of-conduct/
European Parliament. Briefing Paper: Lobbying in the European Union [online]. Directorate-General Internal Policies, Policy Department C, Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs. November 2007, PE 393.266. [2019-7-16] Accessible from: http://www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/doc/1211469722_lobbying_eu.pdf
European Parliament. Party financing and referendum campaigns in EU member states [online]. DG Internal Policies, Policy Department C, 2015. [2019-10-10] Accessible from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/519217/IPOL_STU(2015)519217_EN.pdf
European Parliament. Protecting whistle-blowers: new EU-wide rules approved [online]. European Parliament News, 2019. [2019-9-23] Accessible from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20190410IPR37529/protecting-whistle-blowers-new-eu-wide-rules-approved
European Parliament. REPORT on amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure affecting Chapters 1 and 4 of Title I; Chapter 3 of Title V; Chapters 4 and 5 of Title VII; Chapter 1 of Title VIII; Title XII; Title XIV and Annex II (2018/2170 (REG)) [online]. European Parliament, Plenary Sitting, A8-0462/2018. [2019-9-23] Accessible from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0462_EN.pdf
European Parliament. Transparency: key MEPs to declare meetings with lobbyists [online]. European Parliament News, 2019. [2019-9-23] Accessible from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/eu-affairs/20190124STO24226/transparency-key-meps-to-declare-meetings-with-lobbyists
European Parliament. Working Paper: Lobbying in the European Union - Current Rules and Practices [online]. Constitutional Affairs Series, AFCO 104 EN. 2003. [2019-7-15]. Accessible from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2003/329438/DG-4-AFCO_ET(2003)329438_EN.pdf
European Parliamentary Research Service. Transparency of lobbying in Member States. [online] Transparency Unit, 2016. PE 579.314. [2019-9-23] Accessible from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/EPRS/Transparency_of_lobbying_in_Member_States.pdf
European Union. Consolidated version of Treaty of the European Union [online]. Official Journal of the European Union, C 115/15, 2008. [2019-7-12] Accessible from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2008:115:0013:0045:EN:PDF
European Union. Agreement between the European Parliament and the European Commission on the transparency register for organisations and self-employed individuals engaged in EU policy-making and policy implementation [online]. Official Journal of the European Union, L 277/11, 2014. [2019-7-12] Accessible from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32014Q0919(01)&from=en
The EU. Who is expected to register? [online] Transparency Register, updated 2019. [2019-9-20] Accessible from: http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/staticPage/displayStaticPage.do?locale=en&reference=WHOS_IS_EXPECTED_TO_REGISTER
The EU. Contact us [online] Transparency Register, updated 2019. [2019-9-22] Accessible from: http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/staticPage/displayStaticPage.do?locale=en&reference=CONTACT_US
The EU. Transparency and the EU [online] Transparency Register, updated 2019. [2019-9-22] Accessible from: http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/homePage.do?redir=false&locale=en#en
The EU. Negotiations 2018 [online] Transparency Register, updated 2019. [2019-9-23] Accessible from:http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/staticPage/displayStaticPage.do?locale=en&reference=REFORM_NEGO
The EU. Inter-institutional negotiations on the Transparency Register [online] European Parliament, Inter-institutional negotiations on the Transparency Register, 2019. [2019-9-23] Accessible from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/tr-negotiations/en/home/welcome-page.html
The EU. Agreement between the European Parliament and the European Commission on the establishment of a transparency register for organisations and self-employed individuals engaged in EU policy-making and policy implementation [online]. EUR-LEX, 2014, 32011Q0722(01) - EN. Official Journal of the European Union, L 191/29. [2019-9-20] Accessible from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/cs/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2011.191.01.0029.01.ENG
The EU. Agreement between the European Parliament and the European Commission on the transparency register for organisations and self-employed individuals engaged in EU policy-making and policy implementation [online]. Official Journal of the European Union, L 277/11, 2014. EUR-lex.Europa.eu. [2019-7-15] Accessible from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2014.277.01.0011.01.ENG
Federal Election Commission. FACEBOOK INC. PAC [online]. FEC, Campaign Finance data, Committee profiles, ID: C00502906, 2019. [2019-11-20] Accessible from: https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00502906/
Federal Election Commission. Federal Election Campaign Laws [online]. Washington: FEC, 2019. [2019-10-5] Accessible from: https://www.fec.gov/resources/cms-content/documents/feca.pdf
Federal Election Commission. Guides: Political action committees (PACs) [online]. Washington: FEC, 2019. [2019-10-5] Accessible from: https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/guides/?tab=political-action-committees
Federal Election Commission. Receipts: Search - DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC. (C00580100) [online]. Washington: FEC, 2019. [2019-10-5] Accessible from: https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/?committee_id=C00580100&two_year_transaction_period=2020&two_year_transaction_period=2018&line_number=F3P-18&data_type=processed
FREUND, D.; BENDEL, Y. Access All Areas: When EU politicians become lobbyists. Brussels, Transparency International EU, 2017. 36 p.
GIBSON, Ginger. Loopholes in U.S. lobbying laws undercut reforms, two watchdog groups argue. [online] Thomson Reuters, 2017. [2019-7-15] Accessible from: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-lobbying-idUSKBN15E2FW
Google. U.S. Public Policy [online]. Google.com, Transparency, 2019. [2019-10-20] Accessible from: https://www.google.com/publicpolicy/transparency/
Google. Non-federal political contributions [online]. Google.com, Transparency, 2019. [2019-10-20] Accessible from: https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/nonfederal_political_contributions_for_google.pdf
Group of the progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats. Report by the Group of the progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats [online]. Financial Year 2017, Budget Item 400. [2019-10-10] Accessible from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/groups/pdf/2017/annual-accounts-sd.pdf
IGAN, D.; MISHRA, P.; TRESSEL, T. A Fistful of Dollars: Lobbying and the Financial Crisis [online]. IMF Working Paper, WP/09/287, 2009. [2019-7-20] Accessible from: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2009/wp09287.pdf
International Public Relations Association. Code of Brussels [online]. IPRA, 2007, amended 2009. [2019-9-20] Accessible from: https://www.ipra.org/static/media/uploads/pdfs/ipra_code_of_brussels.pdf
International Public Relations Association. Code of Venice [online]. IPRA, 1961, amended 2009. [2019-9-20] Accessible from: https://www.ipra.org/static/media/uploads/pdfs/ipra_code_of_venice.pdf
JEONG, S.; LIAO, S. Here’s how much Facebook donated to every lawmaker questioning Mark Zuckerberg this week [online]. The Verge, 2018. [2019-11-20] Accessible from: https://www.theverge.com/2018/4/11/17219930/facebook-campaign-contributions-mark-zuckerberg-congress-donations
KENTON, Will. Annual Report Definition. [online] Investopedia, updated 2019. [2019-10-15] Accessible from: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/annualreport.asp
KERGUENO, Raphäel. The Über-Lobbyists: how Silicon Valley is changing Brussels lobbying [online]. Transparency International EU, 2017. [2019-5-28]. Accessible from: https://transparency.eu/uber-lobbyists/
LEVINTHAL, Dave. American League of Lobbyists changes name. [online] The Centre for Public Integrity, 2013. [2019-6-11] Accessible from: https://publicintegrity.org/federal-politics/american-league-of-lobbyists-changes-name/
LINCOLN, E.; ZUBAK-SKEES, C.; QIU, Y. How does your state rank for integrity [online]. The centre for public integrity, 2015, updated 2018. [2019-9-20] Accessible from: https://publicintegrity.org/accountability/how-does-your-state-rank-for-integrity/
Lobbying Institute. What is Lobbying? [online] The National Institute for Lobbying & Ethics, 2017. [2019-6-9] Accessible from: https://lobbyinginstitute.com/what-is-lobbying/
MCCAMY, Laura. Companies donate millions to political causes to have a say in the government — here are 10 that have given the most in 2018 [online]. Business Insider, 2018. [2019-12-10] Accessible from: https://www.businessinsider.com/companies-are-influencing-politics-by-donating-millions-to-politicians-2018-9#koch-industries-9
Merck & Co. Corporate Responsibility Report [online]. Merck, MSD Responsibility, 2019. [2019-10-20] Accessible from: https://www.msdresponsibility.com/our-purpose/our-business/public-policy/
Microsoft. Public Policy Advocacy Spending [online]. Microsoft, Corporate Responsibility, Reports Hub, 2019. [2019-10-16] Accessible from: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility/reports-hub
MONKS, Keiron. The lucrative business of crowds for hire [online]. CNN, 2018. [2019-9-20] Accessible from: https://edition.cnn.com/2015/10/16/business/crowds-for-hire/index.html
NEWLIN CARNEY, Eliza. When Super PACs Go Dark: LLCs Fuel Secret Spending [online]. The American Prospect, 2016. [2019-10-5] Accessible from: https://prospect.org/power/super-pacs-go-dark-llcs-fuel-secret-spending/
Novartis. Annual Report 2017 [online]. Novartis, 2018. [2019-10-12] p. 114. Accessible from: https://www.novartis.com/sites/www.novartis.com/files/novartis-annual-report-2017-en.pdf
Novartis. Public Policy & Advocacy [online]. Novartis, Our Company, Corporate Responsibility, 2019. [2019-10-12] Accessible from: https://www.novartis.com/our-company/corporate-responsibility/reporting-disclosure/transparency-disclosure/public-policy-advocacy
Office of the Clerk, US House of Representatives. Lobbying Disclosure Act Guidance [online]. Effective January 1, 2008. [2019-6-10] Accessible from: https://lobbyingdisclosure.house.gov/amended_lda_guide.html#section3
Open Knowledge Foundation, Transparency International, Sunlight Foundation, Access Info Europe. International Standards for Lobbying Regulation [online]. Lobbyingtransparency.org. [2019-8-5] Accessible from: http://lobbyingtransparency.net/standards/
Pfizer. Pfizer Pharma Political Contributions for Global Public Health [online]. Pfizer.com, Our Purpose, Contributions & Partnerships, 2019. [2019-10-12] Accessible from: https://www.pfizer.com/purpose/contributions-partnerships/political-partnerships
RODRIGUEZ, Juan-Carlos. Reagan adviser Nofziger dies [online]. Hearst Newspapers, LLC. Associated Press, 2006. [2019-6-11] Accessible from: https://www.chron.com/news/nation-world/article/Reagan-adviser-Nofziger-dies-1856588.php
Sanofi. Contact [online]. Sanofi, Investors, 2019. [2019-10-20] Accessible from: https://www.sanofi.com/en/investors/contact
Sanofi. Lobbying Factsheet [online]. Sanofi, 2018. [2019-10-20] Accessible from: https://www.sanofi.com/-/media/project/one-sanofi-web/websites/global/sanofi-com/home/common/docs/download-center/lobbying_2018.pdf/
SCHNEIDER, Dan. 1-800-HIRE-A-CROWD [online]. The Atlantic, 2015. [2019-9-20] Accessible from: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/07/crowd-hiring-politics-campaign-2016/399002/
SHEIDLOWER, Jesse. A Lobbyist by Any Other Name? [online] Weekend Edition Sunday, NPR, 2006. [2019-7-12] Accessible from: https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5167187?storyId=5167187&t=1576424024070
SMITH, Warwick. Political donations corrupt democracy in ways you might not realise [online]. The Guardian, 2014. [2019-10-10] Accessible from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/11/political-donations-corrupt-democracy-in-ways-you-might-not-realise
SRNKA, Vojtěch. Letní jarmark na Hradě: další trhy pro sponzory Zemanovců [online]. Respekt, 2019. [2019-12-15] Accessible from: https://www.respekt.cz/politika/letni-jarmark-na-hrade-dalsi-trhy-pro-sponzora-zemanovcu
STOECKEL, Florian. The Exeter EU Misperceptions Survey 2019 [online]. FlorianStoeckelWeebly.com, 2019. [2019-9-27] Accessible from: http://florianstoeckel.weebly.com/eu-misperceptions-survey.html
Supreme Court of the United States. Citizens United vs. Federal Election Committee [online]. Supreme Court of the United States, 2010. [2019-10-5] Accessible from: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-205.pdf
THOMAS, S.C.; HREBENAR, R.J.; NOWNES, A.J. Interest Group Politics in the States: Four Decades of Developments—the 1960s to the Present [online]. The Book of the States, 2008. [2019-6-11] Accessible from: https://knowledgecenter.csg.org/kc/system/files/Thomas_Hrebenar_Nownes_2008.pdf
Transparency International. Anti-corruption Glossary: Shell Company [online]. Transparency International, 2018. [2019-10-5] Accessible from: https://www.transparency.org/glossary/term/shell_company
Transparency International. What is Corruption? [online] Transparency International, 2018. [2019-7-15] Accessible from: https://www.transparency.org/what-is-corruption
Transparency International UK. Defence Companies Anti-corruption Index [online]. London: Transparency International UK, 2015. [2019-10-10] Accessible from: http://companies.defenceindex.org/
United Technologies. Public Activities [online]. United technologies, Our Company, Corporate Governance, 2019. [2019-10-16] Accessible from: https://www.utc.com/en/Our-Company/corporate-governance/public-activities
US Department of Justice. Foreign Agents Registration Act [online]. 1938. [2019-7-15] Accessed from: https://www.justice.gov/nsd-fara
U.S. Department of Justice. Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election [online]. Washington DC, Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller, III, 2019. [2019-10-20] Accessible from: https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf
US Senate. Lobbying Disclosure Act [online]. Senate.gov, LDA, Section 3. [2019-6-10] Accessible from: https://www.senate.gov/legislative/Lobbying/Lobby_Disclosure_Act/3_Definitions.htm
US Senate. Lobbying Disclosure Electronic Filing System [online]. Senate.gov. [2019-9-20] Accessible from: https://soprweb.senate.gov/
US Securities and Exchange Commission. Annual Report. US Securities and Exchange Commission, 2014. [2019-11-20] Accessible from: https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/answers-annrephtm.html
The USA. H.R.2316 - Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007 [online]. Congress.gov, 110th Congress (2007-2008). [2019-7-15]. Accessible from: https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/house-bill/2316/text
The USA. 2-U.S. Code Chapter 26 - Disclosure of Lobbying Activities, Pub. L. 104–65, § 2, Dec. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 691. [online]. Cornell Law School: Legal Information Institute. [2019-7-15]. Accessible from: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/2/chapter-26
The USA. 26 U.S. Code § 527.Political organizations [online]. Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute. [2019-10-5] Accessible from: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/527
The USA. 26 U.S. Code § 501.Exemption from tax on corporations, certain trusts, etc. [online]. Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute. [2019-10-5] Accessible from: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/501
The USA. S.301 - Physician Payments Sunshine Act of 2009.[online] Congress.gov, 2009. [2019-10-12] Accessible from: https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/senate-bill/301
VICTOR, Daniel. Prominent Political Donors Charged in Campaign Finance Scheme. The New York Times, 2019. [2019-12-15] Accessible from: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/04/us/politics/george-nader-ahmad-khawaja.html
VILIMOVSKÁ, Lucia. Data on Lobbying Disclosure [e-mail]. Message to: Luc.Gyselen@arnoldporter.com. 9. 7. 2019 11:47. [2019-7-22] Personal Communication.
VILIMOVSKÁ, Lucia. Data on Lobbying Disclosure [e-mail]. Message to: pbogaert@cov.com. 9. 7. 2019 11:35. [2019-7-22] Personal Communication.
Verizon. Political Engagement [online]. Verizon, 2019. [2019-12-1] Accessible from: https://www.verizon.com/about/sites/default/files
WATSON, Libby. Influence Abroad: The state of global lobbying disclosure [online]. Sunlight Foundation, 2016. [2019-8-5] Accessible from: https://sunlightfoundation.com/2016/11/30/influence-abroad-the-state-of-global-lobbying-disclosure/
Preliminary scope of work
Diplomová práce “Američtí lobbisté v EU: význam regulace v lobbistickém chování v méně regulovaném prostředí” pojednává o tématu lobbingu z hlediska komparace dvou různě regulovaných prostředí a chování lobbistů v těchto prostředích. V úvodu práce analyzuje momentální definice a teoretické ukotvení expertní debaty o lobbingu, pokouší se o vymezení tohoto pojmu a stanovení si základních výzkumných charakteristik. Práce se pokouší popsat, proč by měl být lobbing regulován a jak ovlivňuje politika transparentnosti lobbování. Následně práce popisuje a srovnává nastavení regulace lobbingu ve Spojených státech amerických a v Evropské unii, zároveň zohledňuje i mezinárodní standarty. V empirické části práce vychází z dat poskytnutými americkým výzkumným centrem „Centre for Responsive Politics“. Z tohoto základního datasetu pak následně na základě stanovených kritérií je prováděn výzkum firem a asociací, které lobbují ve Spojených státech amerických i v Evropské unii, především pak jejich základních dokumentů a webových stránek. Cílem práce je analyzovat, zda si firmy a asociace lobbující v regulovanějším prostředí Spojených států amerických přenášejí „naučené“ chování do méně regulovaného prostředí Evropské unie. Výzkum má za cíl naznačit úroveň, jakou společnosti informují veřejnost o svých lobbistických aktivitách.
Preliminary scope of work in English
Diploma thesis "US lobbyists in the EU: significance of home country regulation for lobbying behaviour in a less regulated environment" tackles the topic of lobbying in terms of comparing two differently regulated environments and the behaviour of lobbyists in these environments. In the introduction, the thesis analyses the current definitions and theoretical anchoring of the expert debate on lobbying, attempts to define this concept and to determine the basic research characteristics. The thesis attempts to describe why lobbying should be regulated and how is affected by lobbying transparency enhancement debate. Subsequently, the thesis describes and compares the regulation of lobbying in the United States and the European Union, while also taking into account international standards. The empirical part of the thesis is based on data provided by the American research center "Center for Responsive Politics". From this basic dataset, the companies and associations that lobby in the United States and the European Union, in particular, their basic documents and websites, are then researched based on established criteria. The aim of the thesis is to analyse whether companies and associations lobbying in a more regulated environment of the United States of America are transferring their ‘taught’ behaviour to a less regulated environment of the European Union. The research aims to indicate the level at which companies inform the public of their lobbying activities.
 
Charles University | Information system of Charles University | http://www.cuni.cz/UKEN-329.html