Thesis (Selection of subject)Thesis (Selection of subject)(version: 368)
Thesis details
   Login via CAS
American Ways of War and Strategic Culture: A Reflection in Domestic and Foreign Cinematography
Thesis title in Czech: Americké způsoby válčení a strategická kultura: reflexe v domácí a zahraniční kinematografii
Thesis title in English: American Ways of War and Strategic Culture: A Reflection in Domestic and Foreign Cinematography
Key words: Strategická kultura, způsob válčení, kinematografie, filmy, Spojené státy americké, Válka ve Vietnamu, Válka v Afghánistánu
English key words: Strategic culture, way of war, cinematography, movies, USA, Vietnam War, War in Afghanistan
Academic year of topic announcement: 2017/2018
Thesis type: diploma thesis
Thesis language: angličtina
Department: Department of Security Studies (23-KBS)
Supervisor: PhDr. JUDr. Tomáš Karásek, Ph.D.
Author: hidden - assigned by the advisor
Date of registration: 28.06.2018
Date of assignment: 28.06.2018
Date and time of defence: 23.01.2020 09:00
Venue of defence: Jinonice - U Kříže 8, Praha 5, J3093, Jinonice - místn. č. 3093
Date of electronic submission:26.12.2019
Date of proceeded defence: 23.01.2020
Opponents: Mgr. Petr Špelda, Ph.D.
 
 
 
Advisors: Mgr. Kamil Christoph Klosek, M.A., Ph.D.
URKUND check:
References
Adkins, T. & Castle, J. J. (2013). Moving Pictures? Experimental Evidence of Cinematic Influence on Political Attitudes. Social Science Quarterly 95(5), 1230–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12070.
Bakshi, G.D. (2002). The Indian Art of War: The Mahabharata Paradigm (Quest for an Indian Strategic Culture). Delhi: Sharada.
Barmak, S. (Director). (2008). Opium War [Motion picture]. Afghanistan: Finecut.
Baxter, W.P. (1986). The Soviet Way of Warfare. London: Brassey’s.
Berg, P. (Director). (2013). Lone Survivor [Motion picture]. USA: Universal Pictures.
Berger, S. R. & Scowcroft, B. (2005). The Right Tools to Build Nations. The Washington Post. Retrieved November 5, 2019, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/2005/07/27/the-right-tools-to-build-nations/d1ba90ee-576a-438e-b46b-2000a1b919bb/.
Berlet C. (2008) The United States: Messianism, Apocalypticism, and Political Religion. In: Griffin R., Mallett R., Tortorice J. (eds) The Sacred in Twentieth-Century Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Blaker. J. R. (2007). Transforming Military Force: The Legacy of Arthur Cebrowski and Network Centric Warfare. Westport, Conn: Praeger Security International.
Bloomfield, A. (2012). Time to Move On: Reconceptualizing the Strategic Culture Debate, Contemporary Security Policy, 33(3), 437-461, doi: 10.1080/13523260.2012.727679.
Booth, K. (1979). Strategy and Ethnocentrism. New York: Holmes & Meier.
Booth, K. (1990) “The Concept of Strategic Culture Affirmed,” in Jacobsen, C.G. (ed.) Strategic Power: USA/USSR. New York: St Martin’s Press, 121–128.
Bright, J. M. (2001). A Failure in Strategy: America and The Vietnam War 1965-1968. Retrieved October 5, 2019, from https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a401184.pdf.
Buley, B. (2014). The new American way of war: Military culture and the political utility of force. London: Routledge.
Cohen, M. A. (2009). The Powell Doctrine's Enduring Relevance. Retrieved October 15, 2019, from https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/insights/4100/the-powell-doctrines-enduring-relevance.
Coppola, F. F. (Director). (1979). Apocalypse Now [Motion picture]. USA: American Zoetrope.
Daddis, G. A. (2015). American Military Strategy in the Vietnam War, 1965–1973. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.013.239.
Davidson, P. B. (1988). Vietnam at War: The History: 1946–1975. Novato, CA: Presidio.
Davis, D., & Davenport, C. (1997). The Political and Social Relevancy of Malcolm X: The Stability of African American Political Attitudes. The Journal of Politics, 59(2), 550-564. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2998177.
Dillard, J. (2012). Cultural Intelligence and Counterinsurgency Lessons from Vietnam, 1967-1971. American Intelligence Journal, 30(1), 60-67. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/26201985.
Dorani, S. (2019a). America in Afghanistan: Foreign Policy and Decision Making from Bush to Obama to Trump. London: I.B. Tauris & Co and Bloomsbury.
Dorani, S. (2019b). America in Afghanistan: Foreign Policy and Decision Making From Bush to Obama to Trump. Political Reflection, 5(1), 33-36. Retrieved October 15, 2019, from http://politicalreflectionmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/PR_18thIssue_A5.pdf
Dow, B. J. (1996). Prime-time feminism: television, media culture, and the women’s movement since 1970. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Drezner, D. W. (2015). Theories of international politics and zombies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (2016). International relations theories: Discipline and diversity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, J. M. (2006). Poststructuralism in IR: An Assessment and Critique. Retrieved August 1, 2019, from http://polisciprof.blogspot.com/2006/03/some-thoughts-on-poststructuralism-in.html.
Engert, S., & Spencer, A. (2009). International Relations at the Movies: Teaching and Learning about International Politics through Film. Perspectives, 17(1), 83-103. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23616105.
Enloe, C. (1996). Margins, silences and bottom rungs: How to overcome the underestimation of power in the study of international relations. In S. Smith, K. Booth, & M. Zalewski (Eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, 186-202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511660054.010.
Feldman, S., & Sigelman, L. (1985). The Political Impact of Prime-Time Television: "The Day After". The Journal of Politics, 47(2), 556-578. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2130896.
Gaeck, C. M. (1994). The Logic of Force: The Dilemma of Limited War in American Foreign Policy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Germany, K. (n.d.). Lyndon B. Johnson: Foreign Affairs. Retrieved October 10, 2019, from https://millercenter.org/president/lbjohnson/foreign-affairs.
Gray, C. S. (1986). Nuclear strategy and national style. Lanham, MD: Hamilton Press.
Greenspan, J. (2019). How the Vietnam War Ratcheted Up Under 5 U.S. Presidents. Retrieved October 10, 2019, from https://www.history.com/news/us-presidents-vietnam-war-escalation.
Gregg, R. W. (1998). International relations on film. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner Pub.
Hamenstädt, U. (2019). The interplay between political theory and movies: Bridging two worlds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Happer, C. & Philo, G. (2013). The Role of the Media in the Construction of Public Belief and Social Change. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1). doi:10.5964/jspp.v1i1.96.
Holbrook, A.R. & Hill, T. G. (2005). Agenda-Setting and Priming in Prime Time Television: Crime Dramas as Political Cues, Political Communication, 22(3), 277-295, doi: 10.1080/10584600591006519.
Huntington, S. P. (1983). American Politics: The Promise of Disharmony. Harvard University Press.
Johnston, A. I. (1995). Thinking about strategic culture. International Security, 19(4), 32-64.
Jones, C. W., & Paris, C. (2018). It’s the End of the World and They Know It: How Dystopian Fiction Shapes Political Attitudes. Perspectives on Politics,16(4), 969-989. doi:10.1017/s1537592718002153.
Jones, S. G. (2018). The U.S. Strategy in Afghanistan: The Perils of Withdrawal. Center for Strategic and International Studies. Retrieved October 25, 2019, from https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-strategy-afghanistan-perils-withdrawal.
Kierman, F.A., Jr & Fairbank, J.K. (eds). (1974). Chinese Ways in Warfare. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kiersey, N. & Neumann, I. B. (2013). Battlestar Galactica and International Relations. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203070055.
Krauthammer, C. (1990). The Unipolar Moment. Foreign Affairs, 70(1), 23-33. doi:10.2307/20044692
Kubrick, S. (Director). (1987). Full Metal Jacket [Motion picture]. USA: Warner Bros. Pictures.
Layton, P. (2003). The New Arab Way of War. US Naval Institute Proceedings, 129(3), 62–5.
Lee, O. M. (2008). The Geopolitics of America's Strategic Culture. Comparative Strategy, 27(3), 267-286. doi: 10.1080/01495930802185627.
Lehmannová, Z., et al. (2010). Paradigma kultur. [English: The paradigm of cultures]. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk.
Linn, B. M. (2009). Echo of Battle: The Army’s Way of War. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lock-Puller, R. (2006). US intervention policy and army innovation: from Vietnam to Iraq. London: Routledge.
Macmillan, A. & Booth, K. (1996). Appendix: Strategic Culture—Framework for Analysis. In Booth, K. & Trood, R. (eds.), Strategic Cultures in the Asia-Pacific Region. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999.
Mahnken, T. G. (2008). Technology and the American way of war since 1945. New York: Columbia University Press.
Marshall, T. (2016). Prisoners of geography: ten maps that explain everything about the world. New York, NY: Scribner.
McIntosh, C. (2015). Counterterrorism as War: Identifying the Dangers, Risks, and Opportunity Costs of U.S. Strategy Toward Al Qaeda and Its Affiliates. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 38(1), 23-38. doi: 10.1080/1057610X.2014.974408.
McMorrow, A. (2018). Introducing Poststructuralism in International Relations Theory. Retrieved May 18, 2019, from https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/13/introducing-poststructuralism-in-international-relations-theory/.
McNamara, R. S. (1995). In Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam. New York: Times Books.
Mease, J. J. (2017). Postmodern/Poststructural Approaches. In Scott, C. R., & Lewis, L. (2017). The international encyclopedia of organizational communication. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Morowat, H. (Director). (2010). An Apple from Paradise. [Motion picture]. Afghanistan.
Muoi, N. H. (Director). (2012). Mùi cỏ cháy (The Scent of Burning Grass) [Motion picture]. Vietnam.
Neumann, I. B., & Heikka, H. (2005). Grand Strategy, Strategic Culture, Practice. Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, 40(1), 5–23. doi: 10.1177/0010836705049731.
Nexon, D. H., & Neumann, I. B. (2006). Harry Potter and international relations. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Nguyen, H. S. (Director). (1979). Cánh đồng hoang (The Abandoned Field: Free Fire Zone) [Motion picture]. Vietnam.
Pereira-Ayuso, W. M. (2015). Why Post-Structuralism is Central to the Study of International Relations. Retrieved June 6, 2019, from https://www.e-ir.info/2015/07/19/why-poststructuralism-is-central-to-the-study-of-international-relations/.
Phillips, T. (Director). (2016). War Dogs [Motion picture]. USA: Warner Bros. Pictures.
PUBLIC LAW 107–40—SEPT. 18, 2001. 115 STAT. 224. Retrieved October 20, 2019, from https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ40/PLAW-107publ40.pdf.
Rapell, C. (2013). Reviewing the Movies: Audiences vs. Critics. The New York Times. Retrieved on December 5, 2019, from https://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/14/reviewing-the-movies-audiences-vs-critics/.
Ruane, A. E., & James, P. (2012). The international relations of Middle-Earth: Learning from the lord of the rings. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Samuels, R. J. (2016). Nixon Doctrine. Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved October 12, 2019, from https://www.britannica.com/event/Nixon-Doctrine.
Shapiro, M. J. (2008). Cinematic geopolitics. London: Routledge.
Sondhaus, L. (2010). Strategic culture and ways of war. London: Routledge.
Tomes, R. R. (2007). US defence strategy from Vietnam to operation Iraqi freedom: Military, innovation and the new American way of war, 1973-2003. London: Routledge.
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Weber, C. (2007). Imagining America at war: Morality, politics and film. London: Routledge.
Weigley, R. F. (1973). The American Way of War: A History of United States Military Strategy and Policy. Indiana University Press.
Weldes, J. (2003). To seek out new worlds: Science fiction and world politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Young, R. (1982). Post-Structuralism: The End of Theory. Oxford Literary Review, 5(1/2), 3-20. Retrieved July 26, 2019, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43973639.
Preliminary scope of work
Tato práce se zabývá zobrazením americké strategické kultury ve filmech ze Spojených států amerických a dvou zemí, s nimiž byly v konfliktu - Vietnam a Afghánistán. Výzkum se zaměřuje na jejich porovnání s oficiálními americkými strategiemi a na srovnání těchto národních zobrazení mezi sebou. Cílem je zjistit, jak jsou Spojené státy a jejich způsob válčení zachycen doma i v zahraničí prostřednictvím filmů - populárního média se schopností utvářet vnímání. Výzkum je zakotven v teorii poststrukturalismu a v koncepcích strategické kultury a národních způsobů válčení, které slouží jako vodítko pro analýzu filmů.
Preliminary scope of work in English
This thesis examines the portrayal of American strategic culture in movies from the USA and two countries with which the USA has been in conflict with - Vietnam and Afghanistan. The research focuses on comparing them with official US strategies and contrasting the different national portrayals among themselves. The aim is to discover how the USA and its way of war is depicted at home and abroad through movies - a popular medium with the power to shape perceptions. The research is anchored in the international relations theory of post-structuralism and the concepts of strategic culture and national ways of war, which serve as the lens for movie analysis.
 
Charles University | Information system of Charles University | http://www.cuni.cz/UKEN-329.html