Thesis (Selection of subject)Thesis (Selection of subject)(version: 368)
Thesis details
   Login via CAS
Agresivní chování u myšovitých (Muridae): Srovnání komenzálních, nekomenzálních a laboratorních populací rodu Mus
Thesis title in Czech: Agresivní chování u myšovitých (Muridae): Srovnání komenzálních,
nekomenzálních a laboratorních populací rodu Mus
Thesis title in English: Agressive Behaviour in Muridae: The comparison of commensal,
non-commensal and laboratoy populations of the genus Mus
Academic year of topic announcement: 2006/2007
Thesis type: Bachelor's thesis
Thesis language: čeština
Department: Department of Zoology (31-170)
Supervisor: prof. RNDr. Daniel Frynta, Ph.D.
Author: hidden - assigned and confirmed by the Study Dept.
Date of registration: 28.11.2006
Date of assignment: 28.11.2006
Date of electronic submission:13.09.2007
Date of proceeded defence: 13.09.2007
Opponents: MUDr. Karel Blahna, Ph.D.
 
 
 
Guidelines
Review z novějších prací s IF
References
1) KENNETH SANDNABBA, N., 1997. The effect of blood signals on agressive behaviour in mice. Behavioural Processes, 41: 51 – 56.

2) FRYNTA, D., MUNCLINGER, P., SLÁBOVÁ, M., TŘEŠTÍKOVÁ, H. & VOLFOVÁ, R., 2005. Agression and Commensalism in House Mouse: a Comparative Study Across Europe ant the Near East. Agressive Behaviour, 00: 1 – 11.

3) VOLFOVÁ, R., MUNCLINGER, P. & FRYNTA, D., 2001. Agression in reciprocal crosses of two subspecies of wild house mouse. Folia Zoologica, 51 (1): 17 – 22.

4) PARMIGIANI, S., PALANZA, P. & BRAIN, P. F., 1989. Intraspecific maternal agression in the house mouse (Mus domesticus): a counterstrategy to infanticide by male? Ethology, Ecology & Evolution, 1: 341 – 352.

5) CROWCROFT, P. & ROWE, F. P., 1963. Social organization and territorial behaviour in the wild house mice (Mus musculus L.). Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 140: 517 – 531.

6) PALANZA, P., DELLA SETA, D., FERRARI, P. F. & PARMIGIANI, S., 2005. Female competition in wild house mice depends upon timing of female/male settlement and kinship between females. Animal Behaviour, 69 (6): 1259 – 1271.

7) AUGUSTSSON, H., DAHLBORN, K. & MEYERSON, B. J., 2005. Exploration and risk assessment in female wild house mice (Mus musculus musculus) and two laboratory strains. Physiology & Behavior, 84 (2): 265 – 277.

8) CUCCHI, T., ORTH, A., AUFFRAY, J. – C., RENAUD, S., FABRE, L., CATALAN, J., HADJISTERKOTIS, E., BONHOMME, F. & VIGNE, J. – D., 2006. A new endemic species of the subgenus Mus (Rodentia, Mammalia) on the Island of Cyprus. Zootaxa, 1241: 1 – 36.
Preliminary scope of work
Snaha podívat se na agresivní chování z etologického hlediska. Prostudovat možné výhody a nevýhody agresivity pro jejího nositele a její vliv na ostatní jedince. Souvislost agresivního chování s kompeticí, teritoriálním chováním či rozmnožováním.
Preliminary scope of work in English
I would like to study an agressive behaviour from the point of wiev of ethology; to read up eventual advantages and disadvantages of agressivity for its carrier and its effect on the other individuals. Connection of the agressive behaviour with competition, territorial behaviour or reproduction.
 
Charles University | Information system of Charles University | http://www.cuni.cz/UKEN-329.html