Konceptuální historie pojmu Antropocén

• Thesis title in Czech: Konceptuální historie pojmu Antropocén
• Thesis title in English: Conceptual History of the term Anthropocene
• Key words: Antropocén; koceptuální historie; Reinhart Koselleck; jazykový styl; kontext; veřejný prostor; Newton Media Search; Global Factiva
• English key words: Anthropocene; conceptual history; Reinhart Koselleck; style of language; meaning; public sphere; Newton Media Search; Global Factiva
• Academic year of topic announcement: 2018/2019
• Thesis type: diploma thesis
• Thesis language: čeština
• Department: Department of European Studies (23-KZS)
• Supervisor: PhDr. Ondřej Matějka, Ph.D.
• Author: hidden - assigned by the advisor
• Date of registration: 29.07.2019
• Date of assignment: 29.07.2019
• Date and time of defence: 15.09.2020 10:15
• Venue of defence: Pekařská 16, JPEK106, 106, Malá učebna, 1.patro
• Date of electronic submission: 31.07.2020
• Date of proceeded defence: 15.09.2020
• Opponents: Dr. Paul Bauer

References

Anderson, Victor (2014): „Anthropocene: Journey of a Concept“, September 2014 (http://planetaryboundariesinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Victor-Anderson-Anthropocene-Journey-of-a-Concept-September14.pdf), 30. 1. 2019, s. 1-12.


Baskin, Jeremy (2015): "Paradigm Dressed as Epoch: The Ideology of the Anthropocene", Environmental Values 24 (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270648796_Paradigm_Dressed_as_Epoch_The_Ideology_of_the_Anthropocene, 9. 10. 2018), s. 9–29.

Braudel, Fernand. The Wheels of Commerce: Civilization and Capitalism 15th–18th Century, Harper and Row, 1979.


Bryman, Alan (2012). "Social Research Method", 4th Edition (Oxford University Press).


Clark, Stuart, ed. (1999). "The Annales School: Critical Assessments" (London: Routledge).


Concepta (nedatováno). "The History of Concept Group - Home". https://www.historyofconcepts.net/, přístup dne 23. 7. 2019.
Crutzen, Paul. J. (2002): „Geology of Mankind”, Nature, Vol. 415, Januar 2002 (http://www.geo.utexas.edu/courses/387H/PAPERS/Crutzen2002.pdf), 30. 1. 2019.

Crutzen, Paul. J.- Stoermer, Eugen, F. (2000). "The Anthropocene”. Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17. https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1294525, přístup 21. 6. 2020.

Dürbeck, Gabriele (2018): "Narrative des Anthropozän – Systematisierung eines interdisziplinären Diskurses", Kwg-2018-0001 - 2. Jahrgang 2018, Heft (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326349811_Narrative_des_Anthropozan_-_Systematisierung_eines_interdisziplinaren_Diskurses, 9. 10. 2018).


Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe : historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland / herausgegeben von Otto Brunner, Werner Conze, Reinhart Koselleck Stuttgart : Klett-Cotta, 1972-1997.


Grepl, Miroslav (2011). Jak dál v syntaxi (Brno: Host).


Guelen, Christian (2012): „Reply“, Contribution to the History of Concepts, Vol. 7, No. 2 Winter 2012 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/24573115?read-now=1&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents), 26. 2. 2019, str.118-128.


Hickmann, Thomas a kol. (2018): „The Anthropocene Debate and Political Science“ (London: Routledge).
Chernilo, Daniel (2017): "The question of the human in the Anthropocene debate", European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 20(1) 44–60 (http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1368431016651874, 9. 10. 2017).


James, Paul - Steger, Manfred B. (2014). "A Genealogy of Globalization: The Career of a Concept". Globalizations. 11 (4): 418-419.


Koselleck, R. (1979). "Futures Past. On the Semantics of Historical Time" (New York: Columbia University Press).


Koselleck, R. (2006). "Begriffsgeschichten - Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen und sozialen Sprache" (Suhrkamp Verlag).


Koselleck, Reinhart (1996): „A Response to Comments on the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe“. In Lehmann,Hartmut; Richer, Melvin (eds.), The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte (http://www.ghi-dc.org/fileadmin/user_upload/GHI_Washington/PDFs/Occasional_Papers/THE_MEANING_OF_historical_terms.pdf), 30. 1. 2019, s. 65.



Koselleck, Reinhart (1997): „The Temporalisation of Concepts“. In Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought 1997 Vol. 1 (editorial board), SoPhi 10 (https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/48139/SoPhi10_978-951-39-6469-6.pdf), 30. 1. 2019, s. 16-25.



Krämer, Anna, Kalina (2016): "Das „Anthropozän“ als Wendepunkt zu einem neuen wissenschaftlichen Bewusstsein?", Kölner Ethnologische Beitrage, Heft 45 (https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/7521/1/Heft45_Kraemer.pdf, 9. 10. 2018).


Krippendorff, Klaus (1989). "Content Analysis", In E. Barnouw, G. Gerbner, W. Schramm, T. L. Worth, & L. Gross (Eds.), International encyclopedia of communication Vol. 1, pp. 403-407, (New York, NY: Oxford University Press).


Latour, Bruno (2014). "Agency at the time of the Anthropocene", New Literary History Vol. 45, pp. 1-18. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/128-FELSKI-HOLBERG-NLH-FINAL.pdf, přístup 26. 7. 2019.

Lee, Philip (2017). "Political Order in the Anthropocene", Lunds universitet Statsvetenskapliga institutionen. https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/8907547


Li, Hansong (2016). "Ideas in Context: Conversation with Quentin Skinner-Interview conducted by Hansong Li". Chicago Journal of History, 9. September 2016. http://cjh.uchicago.edu/issues/fall16/7.12.pdf, přístup 23. 7. 2019.

Malhi, Yadvinder (2017). "The Concept of the Anthropocene", Annual Review of Environment and Resources, October 2017,Volume 42: 77-104. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060854, přístup 21. 6. 2020.

Motzkin, Gabriel (1996): „On Koselleck's Intuition of Time in History“, In Lehmann,Hartmut; Richer, Melvin (eds.): The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte (http://www.ghi-dc.org/fileadmin/user_upload/GHI_Washington/PDFs/Occasional_Papers/THE_MEANING_OF_historical_terms.pdf), 30. 1. 2019, s. 41-47.


Munro, Anrdé (nedatováno). Quentin Skinner. Encyklopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Quentin-Skinner, přístup 23. 7. 2019.

Newmark, P. (1988). "A Textbook of Translation" (New York: Prentice Hall), Online verze. https://www.docdroid.net/9ahf/a-textbook-of-translation-by-peter-newmark-pdf, přístup 21. 6. 2020.

Newton Media (2019): “Mediasearch-mediální archiv” (https://mediasearch-newtonmedia-eu.ezproxy.is.cuni.cz/search.php?qt=&qsmpl=Antropoc%C3%A9n&qsr=&qsc=&qa=&ob=releasedasc&gb=&slt=fl&dt=5y&ps=100&dtf=&dtt=&asq=0&source=&k[0]=CRDaily&k[1]=CREconomy&k[2]=CRPublic&k[3]=CRTelevision&k[4]=CRRadio&k[5]=CRInternet&k[6]=CRForeign&k[7]=CRRegionalTelevision&k[8]=CRRegionalRadio&rd=1&ii=&es2=), 30. 1. 2019.


Palonen, Kari (1997): „An Application of Conceptual History to Itself - From Method to Theory in Reinhart Koselleck’sBegriffsgeschift. In Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought 1997 vol. 1 (editorial board), SoPhi 10 (https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/48139/SoPhi10_978-951-39-6469-6.pdf), 30. 1. 2019, s. 39-70.


Palonen, Kari (2002): „The History of Concepts as a Style of Political TheorizingQuentin Skinner's and Reinhart Koselleck's Subversion of Normative Political Theory„, European Journal of Political Theory 1(1), July 2002 ( https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249633634_The_History_of_Concepts_as_a_Style_of_Political_TheorizingQuentin_Skinner's_and_Reinhart_Koselleck's_Subversion_of_Normative_Political_Theory), 30. 1. 2019, s. 91-106.


Pankakoski, Timo (2010). "Conflict, Context, Concreteness: Koselleck and Schmitt on Concepts", Journal of Political Theory. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0090591710378572, přístup dne 23. 7. 2019.

Richter, Melvin (1995): „The History of Political and Social Concepts-A Critical Introduction (New York: Oxford University Press), https://epdf.tips/the-history-of-political-and-social-concepts-a-critical-introduction.html, 26. 2. 2019, str. 36-9.


Richter, Melvin (1996): „Appreciating a Contemporary Classic: The Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe and Future Scholarship“. In Lehmann,Hartmut; Richer, Melvin (eds.): The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte (http://www.ghi-dc.org/fileadmin/user_upload/GHI_Washington/PDFs/Occasional_Papers/THE_MEANING_OF_historical_terms.pdf), 30. 1. 2019, s. 7-21.


Rončáková, Terezie (2017). "Contemporary short-form genres in weekly print media". Informatol 50/3-4, s. 151-161. https://www.academia.edu/40746172/Contemporary_Short form_Genres_
in_Weekly_Print_Media, přístup 21. 6. 2020.


Sheehan, James (1978). "Begriffsgeschichte: Theory and Praxis". The Journal of Modern History, Vol. 50, No. 2 (Jun., 1978), 312-319. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1877424?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contentspp. přístup 23. 7. 2019.


Steffen, Will a kol. (2015): “The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration”, The Anthropocene Review, First Published January 16, 2015 (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2053019614564785), 30. 1. 2019.


Stonbely, Sarah, nedatováno. "Content Analysis". https://www.academia.edu/1974455/Content_A 200nalysis, přístup 27. 7. 2019.


Šedová, Klára - Švaříček, Roman (2013). "Jak psát kvalitativně orientované výzkumné studie. Kvalita v kvalitativním výzkumu". https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269652825_Jak_psat_kvalitativne_orientovane_vyzkumne_studie_Kvalita_v_kvalitativnim_vyzkumu, přístup 4. 10. 2019.

Štorchová, Lucie a kol. (2014). "Koncepty a dějiny" (Praha: Scriptirium).


Teichert, Dieter (2009): „Von der Metapher zum Begriff“. In Mueller, Ernst; Schmieder: Begriffsgeschichte der Naturwissenschaften: Zur historischen und kulturellen Dimension naturwissenschaftlicher Konzepte (https://books.google.cz/books?id=hkiVTkFigOoC&pg=PA106&lpg=PA106&dq=aus+Metaphor+bestehen+die+Begriffen+%22+Dieter+Teichert+%22&source=bl&ots=ZSWFK9HgfG&sig=ACfU3U34j3vzgC-GuAw8SLxpYa1yGzoltw&hl=cs&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi477nCsZXgAhUqx4UKHbQyD_gQ6AEwA3oECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=aus%20Metaphor%20bestehen%20die%20Begriffen%20%22%20Dieter%20Teichert%20%22&f=false), 30. 1. 2019, s. 99-110.

Walberg, Herbert (2003). "What is Capitalism?". Education and Capitalism. Hoover Institution Press. pp. 87–89.

Zalasiewicz, Jan; & al. (2008). "Are we now living in the Anthropocene? ", GSA Today. 18 (2): 4–8. http://www.tcfawcett.com/uwgeo/geo_time/Anthropocene_GSA.pdf, přístup 23. 6. 2020.

Preliminary scope of work

Slovo Antropocén se v poslední dekádě skloňuje na akademické půdě v mnoha pádech. Geologové a stratigrafové se domnívají, že člověk svou činností natolik zasahuje do přírody, že navrhují nazvat tímto pojmem celou novou geologickou éru. To by mělo pro vědu z pohledu interdisciplinarity dalekosáhlé důsledky. Vzhledem k aktuálnosti tématu si práce klade za cíl sledovat průnik termínu Antropocén pomocí konceptuální teorie Reinharta Kosellecka, a tím zjistit, zda a jakým způsobem se slovo šíří do veřejného prostoru.
První teoretický díl představuje prameny, mapuje reflexi termínu v literatuře společenských věd a zasazuje práci do teoreticko-metodologického rámce z pohledu dějin konceptů. Seznamuje s teorií přechodových fází Kosellecka a vysvětluje její aplikaci na výzkumný terén pomocí modifikovaných kritérií. Metodologickým designem práce je komparativní případové studie, heuristicky uchopena obsahovou (textuální) analýzou mediálního textu.
Druhý praktický díl pozoruje textové prostředí ze dvou vybraných databází (české a britské) a prezentuje výsledky s cílem postihnout významy a kontexty okolo termínu Antropocén. Poslední část porovnává oba geografické prostory a shrnuje poznatky vedoucí k odpovědi na tři výzkumné otázky.

Preliminary scope of work in English

The word Anthropocene has been used in academia in many cases in the last decade. Geologists and stratigraphers believe that man's influence intervents so much with nature that they propose to call by the term a whole new geological era. This would have far-reaching consequences for (social) science in terms of interdisciplinarity. Due to the topicality of the theme, the diploma thesis aims to monitor the intersection of the term Anthropocene using the conceptual theory of Reinhart Koselleck, and thus find out whether and how the word spreads to public sphere.
The first theoretical part presents the sources, maps the reflection of the term in the literature of social sciences and puts the work into a theoretical and methodological framework from the perspective of the history of concepts. It introduces Koselleck´s theory of transition phases and explanes its application to the research field using modified criteria. The methodological character of the work is a comparative case study, heuristically grasped by content (textual) analysis of a media text.
The second practical part observes texts from two selected databases (Czech and British) and presents the results in order to find out the meanings the contexts around the term Anthropocene. The last part compares both geographical areas and summarizes the findings leading to the answer to three research questions.