Prezidentské klany v Kazachstánu a Uzbekistánu: postavení a vývoj

• Thesis title in Czech: Prezidentské klany v Kazachstánu a Uzbekistánu: postavení a vývoj
• Thesis title in English: Presidential Clans in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan: status and development
• Key words: Klan, Kazachstán, neopatrimonialismus, patronalismus, politické režimy, střední Asie, Uzbekistán
• English key words: Central Asia, clan, Kazakhstan, neopatrimonialism, patronalism, political regimes, Uzbekistan
• Academic year of topic announcement: 2018/2019
• Thesis type: diploma thesis
• Thesis language: čeština
• Department: Department of Russian and East European Studies (23-KRVS)
• Supervisor: doc. PhDr. Slavomír Horák, Ph.D.
• Author: hidden - assigned by the advisor
• Date of registration: 31.05.2019
• Date of assignment: 31.05.2019
• Date and time of defence: 04.02.2021 08:45
• Venue of defence: Pekařská 16, JPEK107, 107, Malá učebna, 1.patro
• Date of electronic submission: 05.01.2021
• Date of proceeded defence: 04.02.2021
• Opponents: PhDr. Jan Šír, Ph.D.

References

AMBROSIO, Thomas. Leadership Succession in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan: Regime Survival after Nazarbayev and Karimov. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies [online]. 2012, 6.12.2014, 17(1), 49-67 [cit. 2020-10-21]. Dostupné z: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19448953.2014.986381
BALÍK, Stanislav a Michal KUBÁT. Teorie a praxe nedemokratických režimů. Praha: Dokořán, 2012. ISBN 978-80-7363-266-3.
BROWNLEE, Jason. Hereditary Succession in Modern Autocracies. World Politics [online]. Cambridge University Press, 2007, Červenec 2007, 59(4), 595-628 [cit. 2020-10-20]. Dostupné z: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40060174.
COLLINS, Kathleen. Clan Politics and Regime Transition in Central Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. ISBN 9780511510014.
CUMMINGS, Sally Nikoline. He political elite in Kazakhstan since independence (1991-1998): origins, structure and policies. [online]. The London School of Economics and Political Science, 1999 [cit. 2020-12-22]. Dostupné z: https://bit.ly/38vG8hq
DU BOULAY, Sofya a Rico ISAACS. Legitimacy and Legitimation in Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan. In: ISAACS, Rico a Alessandro FRIGERIO. Theorizing Central Asian Politics: The State, Ideology and Power. Londýn: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, s. 17-41.
ERDMANN, Gero a Ulf ENGEL. Neopatrimonialism Revisited: Beyond a Catch-All Concept. GIGA Working Paper [online]. German Institute of Global and Area Studies, 1.2.2006, (16), 39 str. [cit. 2020-05-27]. Dostupné z: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=909183
HALE, Henry. Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. ISBN 9781139683524.
ISAACS, Rico a Frigerio ALESSANDRO. Theorizing Central Asian Politics: The State, Ideology and Power. Londýn: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. ISBN 978-3-319-97355-5.
ISAACS, Rico. Russia–Kazakhstan Relations and the Tokayev–Nazarbayev Tandem. Russian Analytical Digest [online]. 2020, (248), 2-5 [cit. 2020-10-21]. Dostupné z: https://css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/RAD_248.pdf
ISAACS, Rico. Charismatic Routinization and Problems of Post-Charisma Succession in Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. Studies of Transition States and Societies [online]. 2015, Červenec 2015, 7(1), 58-76 [cit. 2020-10-20]. Dostupné z: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282299747_Charismatic_Routinization_and_Problems_of_Post-Charisma_Succession_in_Kazakhstan_Turkmenistan_and_Uzbekistan
JUNISBAI, Barbara a Azamat JUNISBAI. Regime type versus patronal politics: a comparison of “ardent democrats” in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Post-Soviet Affairs [online]. 2018, 35(3), 240-257 [cit. 2020-12-22]. Dostupné z: https://bit.ly/2WyFham
LARUELLE, Marlene. Discussing neopatrimonialism and patronal presidentialism in the central asian context. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization [online]. 2012, 20(4), 301-324 [cit. 2020-10-20]. Dostupné z: https://demokratizatsiya.pub/archives/20_4_G72315847L7L64R0.pdf
MCGLINCHEY, Eric. Chaos, Violence, Dynasty: Politics and Islam in Central Asia [online]. University of Pittsburgh Press, 2011 [cit. 2020-12-31]. ISBN 9780822961680. Dostupné z: EBSCO database
PEYROUSE, Sebastien. The Kazakh Neopatrimonial regime: Balancing Uncertainties among The “Family,” oligarchs and technocrats. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization [online]. 2012, 20(4) [cit. 2020-10-21]. Dostupné z: https://demokratizatsiya.pub/archives/20_4_115R0286T7381151.pdf
SCHATZ, Edward. Modern Clan Politics: The Power of "Blood" in Kazakhstan and Beyond. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 2004.
VAN DER BOSCH, Jeroen. Personalism: A type or characteristic of authoritarian regimes? Politologická revue: Czech Political Science Review [online]. 2015, (1), 11-30 [cit. 2020-12-21]. Dostupné z: https://bit.ly/2WB80LO
VON SOEST, Christian a Julia GRAUVOGEL. How Do Non-Democratic Regimes Claim Legitimacy?: Comparative Insights from Post-Soviet Countries. GIGA Research Programme: Legitimacy and Efficiency of Political Systems [online]. German Institut of Global and Area Studies, 2012, August 2015, (277) [cit. 2020-10-20]. Dostupné z: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/193127/wp-277-online.pdf

Preliminary scope of work

Práce zkoumá postavení příslušníků klanů prezidentů Uzbekistánu a Kazachstánu, zejména pokrevních příbuzných. Popisuje, jakou roli hrají v politických a ekonomických systémech svých zemí, a jaké významné faktory k tomu vedly, a to v kontextu specifik konkrétních režimů. Pro tento účel byla analýza postavena na teoretických koncepcích personalismu a neopatrimonialismu v klanově orientovaných společnostech.
Součástí práce je také krátký přehledový exkurz do moderní historie obou zemí, a to zejména v těch oblastech a obdobích, které jsou pro samotnou otázku nejvíce relevantní.

Preliminary scope of work in English

The thesis deals with the topic of the status and the development of presidential political clans in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, especially the closest relatives. Which roles have they played in various sectors of the state and within the clan as such? Which factors affected their positions? How do their perspectives for the future look like?
The theoretical concepts of neo-patrimonialism and patronalism within clan-based societies were primarily used for the analysis.
A brief excursion to the most recent history of both states is also a part of the thesis.