Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons: Case Study of Norway and the Netherlands

• Thesis title in Czech: Smlouva o zákazu jaderných zbraní: případová studie Norska a Nizozemí
• Thesis title in English: Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons: Case Study of Norway and the Netherlands
• Key words: Dohoda o zákaze jadrových zbraní, jadrové odzbrojovanie, protiproliferačný režim, jadrové zbrane, Holandsko, Nórsko
• English key words: Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, nuclear weapons, non-proliferation regime, the Netherlands, Norway, nuclear disarmament
• Academic year of topic announcement: 2017/2018
• Thesis type: diploma thesis
• Thesis language: angličtina
• Department: Department of International Relations (23-KMV)
• Supervisor: doc. PhDr. Michal Smetana, Ph.D.
• Author: hidden - assigned by the advisor
• Date of registration: 13.03.2018
• Date of assignment: 13.03.2018
• Date and time of defence: 17.01.2019 08:30
• Venue of defence: Jinonice - U Kříže 8, Praha 5, J3093, Jinonice - místn. č. 3093
• Date of electronic submission: 02.01.2019
• Date of proceeded defence: 17.01.2019
• Opponents: Mgr. Jan Ludvík, Ph.D.

References

Blatter, J. – et al. (2012). Congruence Analysis. In: Designing Case Studies (Research Methods Series) (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

Brodie, B. (1958). The Anatomy of Deterrence. RAND Corporation, Research Memorandum (available at https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM2218.html).

Devitt, R. (2011). Liberal Institutionalism: An Alternative IR Theory or Just Maintaining the Status Quo?. E-International Relations Students, (available at https://www.e-ir.info/2011/09/01/liberal-institutionalism-an-alternative-ir-theory-or-just-maintaining-the-status-quo/).

Dunn L.A. – Kahn. H. (1976). Trends in nuclear proliferation, 1975-1995: projections, problems, and policy options (New York: Hudson Institute).

Hughes, C. (2013). Denuclearization: A Models-Based Approach. Clocks and Clouds, Vol. 4, No. 1, (available at http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1599/denuclearization-a-models-based-approach).

ICAN Final Statement To Oslo Conference On Humanitarian Impact Of Nuclear Weapons, March 2013, (available at http://www.acronym.org.uk/old/articles-and-analyses/ican-final-statement-oslo-conference-humanitarian-impact-nuclear-weapons-march-2013).

Jo, D. – Gartzke E. (2007). Determinants of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 51, no. 1.

Krieger, D. (2005). Why Nations Go Nuclear. Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, (available at https://www.wagingpeace.org/why-nations-go-nuclear/).

Lie, F. (2014). Saying no to nukes. ILPI Weapons of Mass Destruction, Background Paper No 10/2014, (available at http://nwp.ilpi.org/?p=2665).

Milner, H. (1997). Interests, Institutions and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press).

“NATO’s nuclear deterrence policy and force,“ nato.int,(available at https://www.nato.int/cps/em/natohq/topics_50068.htm).


Sagan. S.D. (1996-1997). Why Do State Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in Search of a Bomb. International Security, vol. 21, no.3.


Sanders-Zakre, A. (2017). States Hesitate to Sign Nuclear Ban Treaty. Arms Control Association, (available at https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2017-09/news/states-hesitate-sign-nuclear-ban-treaty).


Shirobokova E. (2018). The Netherlands and the prohibition of nuclear weapons. Nonproliferation Review, Vol. 25, Issue 1-2.

Singh S. – Way. Ch. R. (2004). The Correlates of Nuclear Proliferation: A Quantitative Test. Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 48, issue 6.

Solingen, E. (2007). Nuclear Logics Contrasting Paths in East Asia and the Middle East (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

Thies, C.G. (2009). Role Theory and Foreign Policy. International Studies Association Compendium Project - University of Iowa (available at http://myweb.uiowa.edu/bhlai/workshop/role.pdf).

Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, United Nations, July 2017 (available at https://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/2017/07/20170707%2003-42%20PM/Ch_XXVI_9.pdf).

Treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons, the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, un.org, https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/nuclear/tpnw/.


Waltz, K. (1981). The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May Better. Adelphi Papers – International Institute for Strategic Studies, No. 171, (available at http://home.sogang.ac.kr/sites/jaechun/courses/Lists/b6/Attachments/39/5.%20The%20spread%20of%20nuclear%20weapons.pdf).


Wendt, A. (1994). Collective Identity Formation and the International State. American Political Science Review 88.

Williams, H. (2018) A nuclear babel: narratives around the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. Nonproliferation Review, Vol. 25, No. 1-2.

Preliminary scope of work

Práca má za cieľ preskúmať prístupy krajín k Dohode o zákaze jadrových zbraní. K tomuto účelu by mali byť aplikované teoretické modely, ktoré berú do úvahy potencionálne faktory vplyvu z hľadiska bezpečnosti, vnútropolitickej situácie a noriem.

Preliminary scope of work in English

Primary goal of the diploma thesis is to examine which factors influenced positions of the selected States on the Treaty on Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. For this purpose, a model-based approach will be applied to analyze both international and domestic factors.