Thesis (Selection of subject)Thesis (Selection of subject)(version: 368)
Thesis details
   Login via CAS
Influence of German Bundestag Elections on the Stock Market Performance in Visegrad Group Countries
Thesis title in Czech: Efekt německých voleb na vývoj akciových trhů Visegradských zemí
Thesis title in English: Influence of German Bundestag Elections on the Stock Market Performance in Visegrad Group Countries
Key words: Spolkový sněm, volby, studie událostí, výnosy, akciové trhy
English key words: Bundestag, elections, event study, returns, stock markets
Academic year of topic announcement: 2012/2013
Thesis type: diploma thesis
Thesis language: angličtina
Department: Institute of Economic Studies (23-IES)
Supervisor: prof. Roman Horváth, Ph.D.
Author: hidden - assigned by the advisor
Date of registration: 18.06.2013
Date of assignment: 18.06.2013
Date and time of defence: 23.09.2015 00:00
Venue of defence: IES
Date of electronic submission:31.07.2015
Date of proceeded defence: 23.09.2015
Opponents: doc. PhDr. Julie Chytilová, Ph.D.
 
 
 
URKUND check:
Preliminary scope of work in English
Topic Characteristics:
This thesis will deal with the behaviour of stock market during the period of election process. I will focus on the influence of elections to the German Bundestag on stock market performance of the countries allied in Visegrad Group. Germany is a major export partner for all members of Visegrad group - the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. In context of literature giving evidence that there is an abnormal return around domestic political election dates I will examine if there is also an abnormal return on stock markets of countries with strong relationship to the voting country. I will also compare the influence of domestic elections to influence of elections to German Bundestag on domestic stock market. For analyzing stock market performance I will use daily stock return data for individual country indices prior and after to the Bundestag elections during the sample period 1994-2013. The main goal of this work is thus to answer the question whether the fact that Germany is the biggest export partner for each Visegrad Group country and performance of German economy is therefore important for performance of economies of countries allied in Visegrad Group means that Bundestag election influences their stock markets. Contribution of this thesis will be by providing important insight into the links between stock market performance and political issues for countries in Central Europe. To my knowledge similar research has not been carried out yet.

Hypotheses:
1. There are abnormal returns on stock markets in Visegrad Group countries around the date of German Bundestag elections.
a. Are there higher abnormal returns on the stock market in Visegrad Group countries with higher share of export of goods and services on GDP around the date of German Bundestag elections?
b. Are there higher abnormal returns on the stock market in Visegrad Group countries with higher share of export of goods and services to Germany around the date of German Bundestag elections?
2. There are abnormal returns on stock markets in Germany around the date of German Bundestag elections.

Methodology:
I am going to employ the event study methodology. Using event study methodology I will measure the effect of elections to the German Bundestag on the stock market in Visegrad Group countries (in the reference period were held six elections: 1994, 1998, 2002, 2005, 2009 and 2013). The aim of a researcher in event study methodology is to deduce the significance of an event. In our case it means, whether an abnormal return on stock markets of countries allied in Visegrad Group is associated with the elections to the Bundestag. By measuring the abnormal returns (and also cumulative abnormal returns) I will estimate the influence of the event. I follow Cambell, Lo & MacKinlay (1997) where event study methods are lucidly reviewed and summarized. For each election I will analyze AR and CAR for pre-event window, event window and post-event window. I will use the mean-adjusted return model to measure normal returns.
I will use daily data on these stock indices: PX for the Czech Republic, BUX for Hungary, DAX for Germany, WIG for Poland and SAX for Slovakia.

Outline:
1. Introduction
2. Literature review
3. Hypotheses
4. Methodology
a. Event study methodology
b. Outline
c. Robustness check
d. Methodological issues
5. Data
a. Bundestag Elections
b. Stock Exchanges
6. Empirical results
7. Conclusion

Core Bibliography:
1. Allvine, F.C. & O’Neill, D.E., 1980. Stock market returns and the presidential election cycle: Implications for market efficiency. Financial Analysts Journal, 36(5), s. 49–56.
2. Białkowski, J., Gottschalk, K. & Wisniewski, T.P., 2007. Political orientation of government and stock market returns. Applied Financial Economics Letters, 3(4), s. 269–273.
3. Białkowski, J., Gottschalk, K. & Wisniewski, T.P., 2008. Stock market volatility around national elections. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), s.1941–1953.
4. Bláhovec, T., 2012. Parliamentary Elections and the Stock Markets: Evidence from CEE Countries. Master thesis. Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, s. 101.
5. Bohl, M.T. & Gottschalk, K., 2006. International evidence on the Democrat premium and the presidential cycle effect. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 17(2), s.107–120.
6. Brown, S.J. & Warner, J. B., 1985. Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics. 14(1), s. 3-31.
7. Campbell, S.D. & Li, C., 2004. Alternative Estimates of the Presidential Premium. FEDS Working Paper 2004-69, s. 41.
8. Döpke, J. & Pierdzioch, C., 2006. Politics and the stock market: Evidence from Germany. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(4), s. 925–943.
9. Foerster, S.R. & Schmitz, J.J., 1997. The Transmission of U.S. Election Cycles to International Stock Returns. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(1), s.1–27.
10. Hibbs, D.A.J., 1977. Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy. American Political Science Review, 71(04), s.1467–1487.
11. Huang, R.D., 1985. Common stock returns and presidential elections. Financial Analysts Journal, 41(2), s. 58–61.
12. Liu, L.F., 2007. An Empirical Study of the Presidential Elections Effect on Stock Market in Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore, Philippine, and Indonesia. University of Nottingham, s. 84
13. MacKinlay, C.A., 1997. Event Study in Economics and Finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), s. 13-39.
14. Niederhoffer, V., Gibbs, S. & Bullock, J., 1970. Presidential elections and the stock market. Financial Analysts Journal, 26(2), s.111–113.
15. Nordhaus, W.D., 1975. The Political Business Cycle. The Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), s.169.
16. Pantzalis, C., Stangeland, D.A. & Turtle, H.J., 2000. Political elections and the resolution of uncertainty: The international evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 24(10), s.1575–1604.
17. Paul, T., Sedlář, J., Skála, J., 2012. Influence of German Bundestag Elections on the Stock Market Performance in Visegrad Group Countries. Thesis Proposal, Financial Markets course, IES, 2012, s. 13.
18. Riley, W.B. & Luksetich, W.A., 1980. The Market Prefers Republicans: Myth or Reality. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 15(03), s. 541–560.
19. Santa-Clara, P. & Valkanov, R., 2003. The Presidential Puzzle: Political Cycles and the Stock Market. The Journal of Finance, 58(5), s.1841–1872.

 
Charles University | Information system of Charles University | http://www.cuni.cz/UKEN-329.html