No Way, You Will Not Make Australia Home! Comparative analysis of immigration policies: case of Australia and New Zealand

• Název práce v češtině: Ne, Austrálie se nikdy nestane vaším domovem! Komparativní analýza imigračních politik: případ Austrálie a Nového Zélandu
• Název v anglickém jazyce: No Way, You Will Not Make Australia Home! Comparative analysis of immigration policies: case of Australia and New Zealand
• Klíčová slova: Imigrační politika, scapegoating, žadatelé o azyl, Pacifické řešení, Nový Zéland, Austrálie
• Klíčová slova anglicky: Immigration policies, scapegoating, asylum seekers, Pacific Solution, New Zealand, Australia
• Akademický rok vypsání: 2014/2015
• Typ práce: bakalářská práce
• Jazyk práce: angličtina
• Ústav: Katedra politologie (23-KP)
• Vedoucí / školitel: RNDr. Jan Kofroň, Ph.D.
• Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem
• Datum přihlášení: 25.02.2015
• Datum zadání: 31.03.2016
• Datum a čas obhajoby: 13.06.2016 08:30
• Místo konání obhajoby: Jinonice - U Kříže 8
• Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby: 13.05.2016
• Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 13.06.2016
• Oponenti: doc. PhDr. Miloš Brunclík, Ph.D.

Seznam odborné literatury

AKBARI, Ather H. a Martha MACDONALD. Immigration Policy in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: An Overview of Recent Trends. International Migration Review. 2014, vol. 48, issue 3, pp. 801-822. DOI: 10.1111/imre.12128. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/imre.12128
BEDFORD, Richard a Paul SPOONLEY. Competing for Talent: Diffusion of An Innovation in New Zealand's Immigration Policy. International Migration Review. 2014, vol. 48, issue 3, pp. 891-911. DOI: 10.1111/imre.12123. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/imre.12123
CITRIN, Jack, Donald P. GREEN, Christopher MUSTE a Cara WONG. Public Opinion Toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations. The Journal of Politics. 1997, vol. 59, issue 03, pp. 858-. DOI: 10.2307/2998640. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2998640
COHEN, Robin. Theories of migration. Brookfield, Vt., US: E. Elgar, c1996, xvii, 512 p. ISBN 18-589-8001-1.
EILAENDER, Peter C. Toward a theory of immigration [online]. 1st ed. New York: Palgrave, 2001, x, 259 p. cm. [cit. 2015-02-21]. ISBN 03-122-4034-1. Available from: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/natl/reader.action?docID=10022984
HAMER, P. 'Unsophisticated and unsuited': Australian barriers to Pacific Islander immigration from New Zealand. Political Science. 2014-12-04, vol. 66, issue 2, pp. 93-118. DOI: 10.1177/0032318714554495. Available from: http://pnz.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/00323187145544
HOLLIFIELD, James Frank, Philip L MARTIN a Pia M ORRENIUS. Controlling immigration: a global perspective. Third edition. UK: Amazon, 2014, xxi, 486 pages. ISBN 978-080-4786-270.
HUGO, Graeme. Change and Continuity in Australian International Migration Policy. International Migration Review. 2014, vol. 48, issue 3, pp. 868-890. DOI: 10.1111/imre.12120. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/imre.12120
RUSH, Mark E. The Face of the Nation: Immigration, the State and National Identity Keith Fitzgerald Stanford. Canadian Journal of Political Science. 1997, vol. 30, issue 01, pp. 167-. DOI: 10.1017/S0008423900015122. Available from: http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0008423900015122
ROBINSON, K. Voices from the Front Line: Social Work with Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Australia and the UK. British Journal of Social Work. 2014-09-25, vol. 44, issue 6, pp. 1602-1620. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bct040. Available from: http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1093/bjsw/bct040
SIMMONS, Beth A. International Law and State Behavior: Commitment and Compliance in International Monetary Affairs.The American Political Science Review. 2000, vol. 94, issue 4, pp. 819-. DOI: 10.2307/2586210. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2586210?origin=crossref
STATS, Katrina. Welcome to Australia? A reappraisal of the Fraser government's approach to refugees, 1975–83. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 2014-12-10, vol. 69, issue 1, pp. 69-87. DOI: 10.1080/10357718.2014.952707. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10357718.2014.952707
TSAI, Ming-Chang a Rueyling TZENG. Beyond Economic Interests: Attitudes Toward Foreign Workers in Australia, the United States and East Asian Countries. Sociological Research Online. 2014, vol. 19, issue 3, pp. -. DOI: 10.5153/sro.3434. Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/19/3/15.html
UNITED NATIONS. International Migrations [online]. 2013 [cit. 2015-02-21]. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publications/wallchart/index.shtml
WALSH, J. From nations of immigrants to states of transience: Temporary migration in Canada and Australia. International Sociology. 2014-10-24, vol. 29, issue 6, pp. 584-606. DOI: 10.1177/0268580914538682. Available from: http://iss.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0268580914538682
YU, Nilan G. Ableism and economic rationalism in Australian immigration. International Journal of Social Welfare. 2014, vol. 23, issue 3, pp. 254-261. DOI: 10.1111/ijsw.12058. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/ijsw.12058
Plus the documents provided by Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, Human Rights Council Periodic Review and local daily press…

Předběžná náplň práce

Institut politologických studií
Projekt bakalářské práce

Title: No Way, You Will Not Make Australia Home!
Topic: The thesis deals with different approaches towards immigrants, especially asylum seekers, in Australia and New Zealand. This topic was chosen with concern to current situation in Australia. The country violates international law and promotes very problematic policy of denying access to right of asylum and other rights of asylum seekers . Its immigration policy prima facie seems to be defensive, negative, results-oriented and sometimes abusive to immigrants. This attitude is supposed to be substantially different from New Zealand, which is considered to be one of the most responsible, open and welcoming countries for immigrants . This raises question about reasons of such a distinct approach. We need to ask urgently, because asylum seekers are seriously suffering in detention camps of the country, which is generally considered to be respectful to human rights and international law .
Theory: Theory of scapegoating will be applied. According to this theory society inclines to falsely blame a certain group for some social problems during tense periods. The aim is to get rid of the frustration and keep its moral value, while simultaneously increase the power over these out-groups.
Goals of the thesis: The goal of the thesis is to establish the causes of distinct attitudes toward immigrants in Australia and New Zealand.
Key question: What is the cause of the very different attitude toward immigration in New Zealand and Australia?
Hypotheses:
H1 Given that Australia experienced much stronger economic decrease than New Zealand since the beginning of the new millennium, Australia should show stronger tendency toward scapegoating.
H2 Upon condition that Australia has recently undergone an increase in number of unemployed, Australia should incline to scapegoating more than New Zealand.
H3 On account of more equal distribution of wealth in New Zealand, tension in society is lower and tendency toward scapegoating should be weaker.
H4 Provided that there is long tradition of racism, religious intolerance or particular negative events/experiences connected with immigrants in Australia, the country inclines to be less open to immigrants than New Zealand, where such things did not happen.
Methodology: The theoretical framework will be established in the first chapter. The method of comparative case study will be used for the research. Therefore, reasonably deep case studies about Australia and New Zealand will be separately carried out to analyse the situation in both countries. Then the hypotheses will be evaluated, their results will be compared and a conclusion will be drawn.

Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce

Institut politologických studií
Projekt bakalářské práce

Title: No Way, You Will Not Make Australia Home!
Topic: The thesis deals with different approaches towards immigrants, especially asylum seekers, in Australia and New Zealand. This topic was chosen with concern to current situation in Australia. The country violates international law and promotes very problematic policy of denying access to right of asylum and other rights of asylum seekers . Its immigration policy prima facie seems to be defensive, negative, results-oriented and sometimes abusive to immigrants. This attitude is supposed to be substantially different from New Zealand, which is considered to be one of the most responsible, open and welcoming countries for immigrants . This raises question about reasons of such a distinct approach. We need to ask urgently, because asylum seekers are seriously suffering in detention camps of the country, which is generally considered to be respectful to human rights and international law .
Theory: Theory of scapegoating will be applied. According to this theory society inclines to falsely blame a certain group for some social problems during tense periods. The aim is to get rid of the frustration and keep its moral value, while simultaneously increase the power over these out-groups.
Goals of the thesis: The goal of the thesis is to establish the causes of distinct attitudes toward immigrants in Australia and New Zealand.
Key question: What is the cause of the very different attitude toward immigration in New Zealand and Australia?
Hypotheses:
H1 Given that Australia experienced much stronger economic decrease than New Zealand since the beginning of the new millennium, Australia should show stronger tendency toward scapegoating.
H2 Upon condition that Australia has recently undergone an increase in number of unemployed, Australia should incline to scapegoating more than New Zealand.
H3 On account of more equal distribution of wealth in New Zealand, tension in society is lower and tendency toward scapegoating should be weaker.
H4 Provided that there is long tradition of racism, religious intolerance or particular negative events/experiences connected with immigrants in Australia, the country inclines to be less open to immigrants than New Zealand, where such things did not happen.
Methodology: The theoretical framework will be established in the first chapter. The method of comparative case study will be used for the research. Therefore, reasonably deep case studies about Australia and New Zealand will be separately carried out to analyse the situation in both countries. Then the hypotheses will be evaluated, their results will be compared and a conclusion will be drawn.