European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) - problematic issues and reform

• Název práce v češtině: Evropská sousedská politika (ENP) - prolematické okruhy a reforma
• Název v anglickém jazyce: European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) - problematic issues and reform
• Klíčová slova: Európska Susedská Politika, Európska Únia, spravodlivosť, vnútorné záležitosti, liberalizácia obchodu, spolupráca, analýza
• Klíčová slova anglicky: European Neighbourhood Policy, European Union, justice, home affairs, trade liberalisation, cooperation, analysis
• Akademický rok vypsání: 2010/2011
• Typ práce: bakalářská práce
• Jazyk práce: angličtina
• Ústav: Katedra mezinárodních vztahů (23-KMV)
• Vedoucí / školitel: doc. PhDr. Jan Karlas, Ph.D., M.A.
• Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem
• Datum přihlášení: 15.10.2010
• Datum zadání: 15.10.2010
• Datum a čas obhajoby: 16.06.2011 00:00
• Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby: 20.05.2011
• Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 16.06.2011
• Oponenti: PhDr. JUDr. Tomáš Karásek, Ph.D.

Seznam odborné literatury

Primary sources
• Barcelona declaration (1995). Adopted at Euro-Mediterranean Conference. Barcelona. Available at: <http://eeas.europa.eu/euromed/docs/bd_en.pdf>[accessed on 20.2.2011].
• CASE, Center for Social and Economic Research (2006). Countries Bordering the EU and Enhanced Economic Integration. Final report for the Ministerie van Economische Zaken. (Ref: EP/EIS 5048195). Available at: <http://www.istanbul-ekonomi.com/en/yayinlar/Countries%20Bordering%20the%20EU%20and%20Economic%20Integration.pdf> [accessed on 4.3.2011].
• COMMISSION, European Commission(2003) Wider Europe-Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours. Brussels. Available at: <http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/pdf/com03_104_en.pdf> [accessed on 15.3.2011].
• COMMISSION, European Commission (2004). Strategy Paper: European Neighbourhood Policy. Brussels (COM(2004) 373 final). Available at: <http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/pdf/strategy/strategy_paper_en.pdf> [accessed on 18.3.2011].
• COMMISSION, European Commission (2006a). On Strengthening the European Neighbourhood Policy. Brussels (COM (2006) 72) . Available at: <http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/pdf/com06_726_en.pdf > [accessed on 26.2.2011].
• COMMISSION, European Commission (2006c). Progress report on the implementation of the Strategy for the External Dimension of JHA: Global Freedom, Security and Justice. Brussels. (SEC(2006) 1498). Available at: <http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/06/st15/st15363.en06.pdf>[accessed on 26.3.2011].
• COMMISSION, European Commission(2006d) ENP – a path towards further economic integration. Expanding on the proposals contained in the communication to the European parliament and the council on “Strengthening the ENP”.Brussels. Available at: <http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/pdf/non-paper_economic-integration_en.pdf>[accessed on 21.3.2011].
• COMMISSION, European Commission (2006e).Communication from the commission to the council and to the european parliament on the general approach to enable ENP partner countries to participate in Community agencies and Community programmes. Brussels (COM(2006) 724 final). Available at: < http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/pdf/com06_724_en.pdf> >[accessed on 1.2.2011].
• COMMISSION, European Commission(2007). TAIEX Activity report. Available at: <http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/taiex/pdf/report-2007/taiex-activity-report-07_en.pdf> [accessed on 20.2.2011].
• COMMISSION, European Commission (2008a). Principles For The Implementation Of A Governance Facility Under ENPI. Available at : <http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/pdf/governance_facility_en.pdf> [accessed on 20.3.2011].
• COMMISSION, European Commission(2008b). TAIEX Activity Report 2008. Available at: <http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/taiex/pdf/report-2008/tar08_en.pdf>[accessed on 3.3.2011].
• COMMISSION, European Commission (2009). Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2008. Brussels (COM(2009) 188/3). Available at: <http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/pdf/progress2009/com09_188_en.pdf>[accessed on 16.2.2011].
• COMMISSION, European Commission (2010a). Sectoral Progress report: Implementation of the European Neibourhood Policy in 2009. Brussels (SEC(2010)513). Available at: <http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/pdf/progress2010/sec10_513_en.pdf>>[accessed on 24.2.2011].
• COMMISSION, European Commission (2010b). Taking stock of the European Neighbourhood Policy. Brussels (COM(2010)207). Available at: <http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/pdf/progress2010/sec10_513_en.pdf> >[accessed on 10.2.2011].
• COMMISSION, European Commission (2010c). Regional Indicative Programme (2011-2013) for the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership. European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument. Available at: <http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/where/neighbourhood/regional-cooperation/enpisouth/documents/regional_indicative_programme_2011-2013_en.pdf>[accessed on 18.3.2011].
• COMMISSION, European Commission (2010d). Implementation of the Eastern Partnership: Report to the meeting of Foreign Affairs Ministers. Meeting doc. 335/10 REV 2.Available at: <http://eeas.europa.eu/eastern/docs/eap_meeting_foreign_affairs_131210_en.pdf>[accessed on 22.2.2011].
• COUNCIL , Council of European Union(2003). European Security Strategy: A Secure Europe In A Better World. Brussels. Available at: < http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/78367.pdf> [accessed on 20.3.2011].
• COUNCIL, Council of European Union (2005). A Strategy for the External Dimension of JHA : Global Freedom, Security and Justice. Brussels (14366/3/05 REV 3). Available at: <http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/05/st14/st14366-re03.en05.pdf> [accessed on 20.3.2011].
• DG FOR ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS, European Commission (2008). European Neighbourhood Policy : Economic Review of European Neighbourhood Countries. European Economy : Occasional Papers 40. Available at: <http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication13087_en.pdf>[accessed on 16.2.2011].
• FULE, S. (2010). Five years of European Neighbourhood Policy: more trade, more aid, more people-to-people contacts. Press release IP/10/566. Available at: <http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/10/566>[accessed on 16.3.2011].
• EUROPOL (2005). Organised Illegal Immigration into the European Union.
• Human Rights Watch (2006). European Union. Managing Migration Means Potential EU Complicity in Neighbouring States’ Abuse of Migrants and Refugees. Available at: <http://www.hrw.org/legacy/backgrounder/eca/eu1006/> [accessed on 22.2.2011].
• Joint Declaration of the Paris Summit for the Mediterranean (2008).Paris. Available at: <http://www.ufmsecretariat.org/wpcontent/uploads/2010/11/ufm_paris_declaration1.pdf> [accessed on 20.2.2011].
• PRODI, R. (2002). A Wider Europe - A Proximity Policy as the key to stability. Press release SPEECH/02/619. Available at : <http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/02/619> [accessed on 22.2.2011].

Online localities
• Barcelona process <http://eeas.europa.eu/euromed/barcelona_en.htm>.
• Eastern Partnership Org <http://www.easternpartnership.org/>
• ENPI <http://www.enpi-info.eu>
• EUBAM< http://www.eubam.org/en
• European Commission <http://ec.europa.eu/>
• European External Action Service < http://eeas.europa.eu/>
• SIGMA < http://www.sigmaweb.org/>
• UNHCR <http://www.unhcr.org>
• Union for Mediterranean <http://www.ufmsecretariat.org/en/>
• United Nations Treaty Collection <http://treaties.un.org/>
• World Trade Organisation <http://www.wto.org/>
Secondary sources
• ALBIONI, R. (2005). The Geopolitical Implications of the European Neighbourhood Policy. European Foreign Affairs Review .10, pp.1-16.
• Anon., 2011. Dead man talking: Ten years of trade talks have sharpened divisions, not smoothed them. The Economist. Available at : <http://www.economist.com/node/18620814?story_id=18620814> > [accessed on 16.3.2011].
• BALAZ et.al. (2010). Medzinarodne podnikanie: Na vlne globalizujucej sa svetovej ekonomiky. Bratislava: Sprint Dva.
• BARBÉ, E. & Johansson-Nogués, E., 2008. The EU as a modest ‘force for good’:The European Neighbourhood Policy. International Affairs, 84(1), p.81–96.
• BENDIEK, A. (2007). The ENP in a Regime-analytical Perspective-Proposition for a Research Design. In K.O. Lang & J. Varwick, eds. The European Neighbourhood Policy: Challenges for the EU-Policy Towards the New Neighbours. Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrish Publishers. pp.25-39.
• BROWNING, C. & Joenniemi, P. (2007). Geostrategies of the European Neighbourhood Policy. DIIS Working Paper 2007:9. Available at: < http://www.diis.dk/sw37184.asp> [accessed on 12.3.2011].
• CARRERA, S. (2007). The EU Border Management Strategy FRONTEX and the Challenges of Irregular Immigration in the Canary Islands. CEPS Working Document No. 261. Available at: <http://www.ceps.eu/> [accessed on 1.3.2011].
• DANNREUTHER, R. (2006). Developing the Alternative to Enlargement: The European Neighbourhood Policy. European Foreign Affairs Review, 11, pp.183-201.
• DODINI, M. & Fantini, M. (2006). The EU Neighbourhood Policy : Implications for Economic Growth and Stability. Journal of Common Marker Studies, 44(3), pp.507-32.
• DONELLY, B. (2008). Justice and Home Affairs in the Lisbon Treaty: A Constitutionalising Clarification. EIPASCOPE, 1, pp.19-23. Available at: < http://aei.pitt.edu/11043/> [accessed on 17.3.2011].
• EMERSON, M. (2003). Institutionalising the Wider Europe. CEPS Policy Brief No. 42. Available at: < http://aei.pitt.edu/1945/> [accessed on 10.3.2011].
• EMERSON, M. & Noutcheva, G. (2005). From Barcelona Process to Neighbourhood Policy: Assessment and Open Issues. CEPS Working Document No. 220. Available at: <www.ceps.eu/ceps/download/1107> [accessed on 5.2.2011].
• EMERSON, M. & Noutcheva, G. (2007). Economic and social development. In K. Weber, M.E. Smith & M. Baun, eds. Governing Europe’s Neighbourhood: Partners or Periphery?. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press. pp.77-95.
• EMERSON, M., Noutcheva, G. & Popescu, N., 2007. European Neighbourhood Policy Two Years on: Time indeed for an 'ENP Plus'. CEPS Policy Brief No.126. Available at: <http://aei.pitt.edu/7363/>[accessed on 13.1.2011].
• FRANCOIS, J.F., McQueen, M. & Wignaraja, G.(2005). European Union–developing country FTAs:overview and analysis. World Development, 33(10), pp.1545-65.
• GHONEIM, A.F. (2009). From EU Association Agreements to EU Neighbourhood Policy and Union for the Mediterranean: Does Egypt Need This Change in EU Regional Trade Policy? In M. Comelli, E. Atila & Ç. Üstün, eds. The European Neighbourhood policy and the Southern Mediterranean Drawing from the Lessons of Enlargement. Ankara: Midde East Technical University Press. pp.79-99.
• GSTOHL, S.(2008). Blurring Economic Boundaries? Trade and Aid in the EU's Near Abroad. In S. Gstohl & D. Mahncke, eds. Europe's Near Abroad: Promises and Prospects of the EU's neighbourhood policy. Brussels: Peter Lang. pp.135-64.
• KAHRAMAN, S. (2005). The Euroropean Neighbouhood Policy: The European Union's New Engagement Towards Wider Europe. Perceptions, pp.1-28. Available at: <http://www.sam.gov.tr/perceptions/Volume10/winter2005/SevilayKahraman.pdf>[accessed on 18.2.2011].
• KEMPE, I.(2006). Nachbarschaftspolitik: Russland, Ukraine, Belarus, die Republik Moldau. In W. Weidenfeld & W. Wessels, eds. Jahrbuch der Europaischen Integration 2006. Baden-Baden: Nomos. pp.267-72.
• KHASSON, V., Vasilyan, S. & Vos, H. (2008). Everybody needs good neighbours: The EU and its neighbours. In J. Orbie, ed. Europe's Global Role : External Policies of the EU. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing. pp.217-38.
• KNELANGEN, W. (2007). A Neighbourhood of Freedom, Security and Justice ?. Osteuropa, 2-3, pp.257-72.
• Kral, D., 2009. The Czech republic and The Eastern Partnership- From a By-Product to a Beloved Child. In I. Albrycht, ed. The Eastern Partnership in the Context of the European Neighbouhood Policy and V4 Agenda. Krakow/Bruxelles: The Kosciuszko Institut. pp.5-19.
• LANNON, E. & Van Elsuwege, P. (2004). The EU's Northern Dimension and the EMP-ENP: Institutional Frameworks and Decision-Making Processes Compared. In P. Xuereb, ed. European Union and the Mediterranean, The Mediterranean's European Challenge. University of Malta: European Union Documentation and Research Centre. pp.4-70.
• LAVENEX, S. & Schimmelfennig, F.(2009). EU rules beyond EU borders: theorizing external governance in European politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(6), p.791–812.
• LAVENEX, S. & Wallace, W. (2005). Justice and Home Affairs. Towards a European Public Order? In W.a.M.P. Helen Wallace, ed. Policy-Making in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p.457–480.
• LAVENEX, S. & Wichmann, N. (2009). The External Governance of EU Internal Security. European Integration, 11(1), pp.83-102.
• LIPPERT, B. (2007). The EU Neighbourhood Policy - Profile, Potential, Perspective. The Intereconomics, pp.180-204.
• MILCHER, S. & Slay, B. (2005). The economics of the ‘European Neighbourhood Policy’ : An Initial Assessment. Europe After the Enlargement : Conference Paper.Warsaw:CASE. Available at: < http://www.case.com.pl/dyn/plik--4592639.pdf>[accessed on 18.2.2011].
• OCCHIPINTI, J.D. (2007). Justice and Home Affairs: immigration and policing. In Smith, Weber & Baun, eds. Governing Europe’s Neighbourhood: Partners or Pherifery. Manchester: Manchester University Press pp.115-33.
• O'CONNEL, K. (2008). EU visa policy: Squaring the Circle of Neighbourhood and JHA objectives. In D. Mahncke & S. Gstohl, eds. EU's Near Abroad: Promises and Prospects of the EU's Neighbourhood Policy. Brussels:Peter Lang. pp.115-33.
• RIJPMA, J. & Cremona, M. (2007). The Extra-Territorialisation of EU Migration Policies and the Rule of Law. EUI Working Paper Law. Available at: < http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/6690>[accessed on 18.2.2011].
• SMITH, K. (2005). The outsiders: the European neighbourhood policy. International Affairs, 81(4), pp.757-73.
• TRAUNER, F. & Kruse, I. (2008). The EU Visa Facilitation and the Readmission Agreements: Implementing a New Security Approach in the Neighbourhood. CEPS Policy brief No. 290. Available at: <http://www.ceps.eu/book/ec-visa-facilitation-and-readmission-agreements-implementing-new-eu-security-approach-neighbour> [accessed on 10.2.2011].
• Tulmets, E. (2006). Adapting the Experience of Enlargement to the Neighbourhood Policy: The ENP as a substitute for Enlargement?. In P. Kratochvil, ed. The European Union and Its Neighbours : Policies, Problems and Priorities. Prague: Institute of International Relations. pp.29-57.
• VAHL, M. (2006). International agreements in EU neighbourhood policy. [Online] Swedish Institue for European Policy Studies .Available at [Accessed February 2011].
• WALTERS, W. (2004). The Frontiers of the European Union: Geostrategic Perspective. Geopolitics, 9(3), pp.674-98.
• WICHMAN, N. (2007). The Intersection between Justice and Home Affairs and European Neighbourhood Policy: Taking Stock of the Logic, Objectives and Practices. CEPS Working Document No. 275. Available at: < http://aei.pitt.edu/7576/> [accessed on 20.1.2011].
• WOLFF, S. (2006). The Externalisation of Justice and Home Affairs to the Southern Neighbours: the EU's dilemma in the fight against terrorism. In Path to democracy and inclusion within diversity. EuroMesCo 2006 Annual Conference, Conference Paper. Available at: < www.euromesco.net/images/wg5_swolff_paper_en_for.doc>[accessed on 29.1.2011].

Předběžná náplň práce

Konečným výsledkom mojej analýzy by mala byť istá množina akútnych problémov jednotlivých inštitúcií pri súčasnej alebo budúce realizácii ich účelu a cieľa. Vyhodnotenie týchto problémových oblastí ,a poprípade nájdenie pre nich spoločných znakov ,by v konečnom dôsledku malo viesť k nájdeniu možných riešení týchto problematických okruhov ENP , ktoré by mohli viesť k jej reforme a vylepšeniu jej fungovania , lepšie zodpovedajúcim riešeniam problémov, novému pohľadu na vec a v neposlednom rade pozitívnej aj myšlienkovej reforme ENP. Nájdenie prienikov jednotlivých problematických okruhov totiž umožní prakticky zamerať sa na neuralgické body tejto politiky odstrániť ich a nahradiť novými a lepšie zodpovedajúcimi aktuálnej situácii a budúcim cieľom ,respektíve reformovať ich správnym spôsobom.

Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce

The aim of my analysis is to identify certain set of issues of the particular institutions following their present and prospective goal-achievement. The assessment of these problematic areas and possible identification of their common characteristics should eventually lead to creation of possible solutions, to a new point of view and to actual reform of ENP. Identification of the cross cutting issues will practically make possible overall improvement of functioning and structure of the policy in a way reflecting current developments in the region.