Jazyková relativita a gramatický rod v češtině

• Název práce v češtině: Jazyková relativita a gramatický rod v češtině
• Název v anglickém jazyce: Language Relativity and Grammatical Gender in Czech
• Klíčová slova: jazyková relativita, gramatický rod podstatných jmen, konceptualizace, rodové varianty podstatných jmen, Sapir-Whorfova hypotéza
• Klíčová slova anglicky: linguistic relativity, grammatical gender of nouns, conceptualization, gender variants of nouns, Sapir-Whorf hypothesis
• Akademický rok vypsání: 2009/2010
• Typ práce: diplomová práce
• Jazyk práce: čeština
• Ústav: Ústav českého jazyka a teorie komunikace (21-UCJTK)
• Vedoucí / školitel: doc. Mgr. Jan Chromý, Ph.D.
• Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem
• Datum přihlášení: 10.06.2010
• Datum zadání: 30.07.2011
• Schválení administrátorem: zatím neschvalováno
• Datum a čas obhajoby: 17.09.2012 00:00
• Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby: 01.08.2012
• Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 17.09.2012
• Odevzdaná/finalizovaná: odevzdaná pracovníkem v zastoupení a finalizovaná
• Oponenti: doc. PhDr. Irena Vaňková, CSc., Ph.D.

Zásady pro vypracování

Diplomová práce bude složena ze dvou částí. První část se bude zabývat obecně problematikou zkoumání vztahu jazyka a myšlení a bude kriticky reflektovat nejdůležitější přístupy k těmto otázkám (Whorf, Roschová, Lucy, Slobin, Boroditsky, Schmiedtová atd.). Cílem druhé části bude na českém materiálu načrtnout vliv gramatického rodu na myšlení. Východiskem zde budou výzkumy Lery Boroditské, realizované na mluvčích angličtiny, němčiny a španělštiny.

Seznam odborné literatury

Seznam použité literatury


ABARBANELL, L., MONTANA, R., LI, P. (2011): Revisiting plasticity in human spatial cognition: cross-linguistic comparisons. Spatial Information Theory, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series, 6899, s. 245–263.
ANDONOVA, E., GOSHEVA, A., JANYAN, A., SCHAFFAI, J. S. (2007): Second language gender system affects first language gender classification. In: KECSKES, I. – ALBERTAZZI, L. (eds.), Cognitive Aspects of Bilingualism. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, s. 271–299.
BALHAR, J. et al. (1992–2002): Český jazykový atlas 1–4. Praha: Academia.
BASSETTI, B. (2007): Grammatical gender and concepts of objects in Italian-German bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11, 3, s. 251–273.
BASSETTI, B. (2011): The grammatical and conceptual gender of animals in second language users. In: COOK, V. J. – BASSETTI, B. (eds.), Language and Bilingual Cognition. Hove, UK: Psychology Press, s. 357–384.
BERLIN, B. – KAY, P. (1969): Basic color terms: their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
BORODITSKY, L. (2001): Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, s. 1–22.
BORODITSKY, L., SCHMIDT, L. A., PHILLIPS, W. (2003): Sex, syntax, and semantics.In: GENTNER, D. – GOLDIN-MEADOW, S. (eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, s. 61–79.
BORODITSKY, L., FUHRMAN, O., McCORMICK, K. (2010): Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently?. Cognition [online],doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.010,s. 1–7.Cit. 2012-07-20. <http://psychology.stanford.edu/~lera/papers/mandarin-time-2010.pdf>.
BOWERMAN, M. – CHOI, S. (2001): Shaping meanings for language: universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. In: BOWERMAN, M. – LEVINSON, S. C. (eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 475–511.
BROWN, R. W. – LENNEBERG, E. H. (1954): A study in language and cognition. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, s. 454–462.
BROWN, R. W. (1976): Reference: In memorial tribute to Eric Lenneberg. Cognition,4, s. 125–153.
BROWN, P. – LEVINSON, S. C. (2009):Language as mind tools: Learning how to think through speaking. In: GUO, J., LIEVEN, E. V., BUDWIG, N., ERVIN-TRIPP, S., NAKAMURA, K., OZCALISKAN, S. (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the traditions of Dan Slobin. New York: Psychology Press, s. 451–464.
CLARKE, M. A., LOSOFF, A., McCRACKEN, M. D.,STILL, J. A. (1981): Gender perception in Arabic and English. Language Learning, 31(1), s. 159–169.
ČECHOVÁ, M. etal.(2000): Čeština – řeč a jazyk. Praha: ISV.
ERVIN, S. M. (1962): The connotations of gender. Word, 18, s. 249–261.
FEIST, M. I. – GENTNER, D. (2007): Spatial language influences memory for spatial scenes. Memory & Cognition, 35 (2), s. 283–296.
FLAHERTY, M. (2001):How a language gender system creeps into perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(1), s. 18–31.
FORBES, J. N., POULIN-DUBOIS, D., RIVERO, M. R., SERA, M. D. (2008): Grammatical gender affects bilinguals’ conceptual gender: Implications for linguistic relativity and decision making. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1, s. 68–76.
FRANKLIN, A., CLIFFORD, A., WILLIAMSON, E., DAVIES, I. (2004): Color term knowledge does not affect categorical perception of color in toddlers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology [online], doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2004.10.001, s. 1–28. Cit. 2012-07-20. <http://www3.surrey.ac.uk/babylab/downloads/Jecp.pdf>.
GENNARI, S., SLOMAN, S. A., MALT, B. C., FITCH, W. T. (2002): Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83, s. 49–79.
GORDON, P. (2004): Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306, s. 496–499.
GOTTARDO, A. – GRANT, A. (2008): Defining bilingualism. In: Encyclopedia of Language and Literacy Development [online]. London, ON: Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network. Cit. 2012-07-25. <http://www.literacyencyclopedia.ca/pdfs/topic.php?topId=236>.
GREPL, M. et al. (1996): Příruční mluvnice češtiny. Praha: Nakladatelství lidové noviny.
GUIORA, A. Z. – SAGI, A. (1978): A cross-cultural study of symbolic meaning–developmental aspects. Language Learning,28(2), s. 381–386.
HARDIN, C. – BANAJI, M. R. (1993): The influence of language on thought. Social Cognition, 11, s. 277–308.
HAUN, D. B. M., RAPOLD, C. J., JANZEN, G., LEVINSON, S. C. (2011):Plasticity of human spatial memory: Spatial language and cognition covary across cultures.Cognition,119, s. 70–80.
HEIDER, E. R. (1972): Universals in color naming and memory. Journal of Experimental psychology, 93(1), s. 10–20.
HENDL, J. (2009): Přehled statistických metod: analýza a metaanalýza dat. Praha: Portál.
HILL, J. H. – MANNHEIM, B. (1992): Language and world view. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, s. 381–406.
HUETTIG, F., CHEN, J., BOWERMAN, M., MAJID, A. (2010):Do language-specific categories shape conceptual processing? Mandarin classifier distinctions influence eye gaze behavior, but only during linguistic processing.Journal of Cognition and Culture,10, s. 39–58.
IMAI, M. – GENTNER, D. (1997):A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition,62, s. 169–200.
IMAI, M. – MAZUKA, R. (2007): Language-relative construal of individuation constrained by universal ontology: revisiting language universals and linguistic relativity. Cognitive Science, 31(3), s. 385–413.
JAKOBSON, R. (1966[1959]): On linguistic aspects of translation. In: BROWER, R. A. (ed.), On translation. New York: Oxford University Press, s. 232–239.
JANUARY, D. – KAKO, E. (2007): Re-evaluating evidence for the linguistic relativity: Response to Boroditsky (2001). Cognition, 104(2), s. 417–426.
KAY, P. – KEMPTON, W. (1984): What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis? American Anthropologist, New Series, 86, s. 65–79.
KAY, P. – REGIER, T. (2003): Resolving the question of color naming universals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, s. 9085–9089.
KAY, P. – REGIER, T. (2006):Language, thought, and color: recent developments. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences [online], s. 1–3. Cit. 2012-07-20. <http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/~regier/papers/tics-color05.pdf>.
KOERNER, E. F. K. (2002): Toward a history of American linguistics. London: Routledge.
KONISHI, T. (1993): The semantics of grammatical gender: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,22, s. 519–534.
KOUSTA, S.-T., VINSON, D. P., VIGLIOCCO, G. (2008): Investigating linguistic relativity through bilingualism: The case of grammatical gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, s. 843–858.
LEVINSON, S. C. (1996):Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Cross-linguistic evidence. In: BLOOM, P., PETERSON, M., NADEL, L., GARRETT, M. (eds.), Language and space. Cambridge, MA: MIT press, s. 109–169.
LEVINSON, S. C., KITA, S., HAUN, D. B. M., RASCH, B. H. (2002):Returning the tables: Language affects spatial reasoning.Cognition,84(2), s. 155–188.
LEVINSON, S. C. (2003):Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LI, P. – GLEITMAN, P. (2000): Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. University of Pennsylvania Institute for Research in Cognitive Science Technical Report [online],s. 1–38. Cit. 2012-07-20. <http://repository.upenn.edu/ircs_reports/34/>.
LI, P., ABARBANELL, L., GLEITMAN, L., PAPAFRAGOU, A. (2011): Spatial reasoning in Tenejapan Mayans. Cognition, 120, s. 33–53.
LUCY, J. A. – SHWEDER, R. A. (1979): Whorf and his critics: Linguistic and nonlinguistic influences on color memory. American Anthropologist, New Series, 81(3), s. 581–615.
LUCY, J. A. (1992a): Language diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LUCY, J. A. (1992b): Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LUCY, J. A. (1996): The scope of linguistic relativity: An analysis and review of empirical research. In: GUMPERZ, J. J. – LEVINSON, S. C. (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, s. 37–69.
LUCY, J. A.(1997): Linguistic relativity. Annual Review of Anthropology,26, s. 291–312.
MAJID, A., BOWERMAN, M., KITA, S., HAUN, D. B. M., LEVINSON, S. C. (2004): Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 8, s. 108–114.
MALT, B. C., SLOMAN, S. A., GENNARI, S., SHI, M., WANG, Y. (1999): Knowing versus naming: Similarity and the linguistic categorization of artifacts. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, s. 230–262.
MALT, B. C., SLOMAN, S. A., GENNARI, S. (2003): Universality and language specificity in object naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, s. 20–42.
MILLS, A. E. (1986): The acquisition of gender: A study of English and German. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
MULLEN, M. K. (1990): Children's classifications of nature and artifact pictures into female and male categories, Sex Roles, 23, s. 577–587.
MUNNICH, E., LANDAU, B., DOSHER, B. A. (2001): Spatial language and spatial representation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cognition, 81, s. 171–207.
OSGOOD, C. E., SUCI, G., TANNENBAUM, P. (1957): The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
PEDERSON, E., DANZIGER, E., WILKINS, D. G., LEVINSON, S. C., KITA, S., SENFT, G. (1998):Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization.Language,74(3), s. 557–589.
PHILLIPS, W. – BORODITSKY, L. (2003): Can quirks of grammar affect the wayyou think? Grammatical gender and object concepts. In: ALTERMAN, R. – KIRSH, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston: Cognitive Science Society, s. 928–933.
POKORNÝ, J. (2010): Lingvistická antropologie: jazyk, mysl a kultura. Praha: Grada Publishing.
RAMOS, S. – ROBERSON, D. (2010): What constrains grammatical gender effects on semantic judgements? Evidence from Portuguese. Journal of Cognitive Psychology[online], doi:10.1080/09541441003662734, s. 1–16.Cit. 2012-07-20.<http://www.google.cz/url?q=http://www.essex.ac.uk/psychology/department/people/Roberson_files/Ramos%2520%2526%2520Roberson,%25202010.pdf&sa=U&ei=vaMJUMqjFIfh4QS-3-TwCg&ved=0CC0QFjAJ&usg=AFQjCNHyHhteAzVlWYRTFMxrPM97g7KBmA>.
ROBERSON, D., DAVIES, I., DAVIDOFF, J. (2000): Colour categories are not universal: Replications and new evidence from a Stone-age culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 129, s. 369–398.
ROBERSON, D., DAVIDOFF, J., DAVIES, I., SHAPIRO (2005): Color categories: Evidence for the cultural relativity hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 50 (4), s. 378–411.
SAALBACH, H. – IMAI, M. (2007): Scope of linguistic influence: Does a classifier system alter object concepts? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, s. 485–501.
SAALBACH, H. – IMAI, M. (2011):The Relation between Linguistic Categories and Cognition: The Case of Numeral Classifiers. Language and Cognitive Processes [online], doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.546585, s. 1–48.Cit. 2012-07-20. <http://cogpsy.sfc.keio.ac.jp/publication/LCP2011.pdf>.
SAALBACH, H., IMAI, M., SCHALK, L. (2012): Grammatical gender and inferences about biological properties in German-speaking children. Cognitive Science [online], doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01251.x, s. 1–17. Cit. 2012-07-26 <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01251.x/full >.
SAPIR, E. (1949[1929]): The status of linguistics as a science. In: MANDELBAUM, D. G. (ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture and personality. Berkeley: University of California Press, s. 160–166.
SERA, M. D., BERGE, C. A. H., DEL CASTILLO PINTADO, J. (1994): Grammatical and conceptual forces in the attribution of gender by English and Spanish speakers. Cognitive Development,9(3), s. 261–292.
SERA, M. D., ELIEFF, C., FORBES, J., BURCH, M. C., RODRÍGUEZ, W., POULIN-DUBOIS, D. (2002): When language affects cognition and when it does not: An analysis of grammatical gender and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,131(3), s. 377–397.
SLOBIN, D. I. (1996): From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In: GUMPERZ, J. J. – LEVINSON, S. C. (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, s.70–96.
SLOBIN, D. I. (2003): Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In: GENTNER, D. – GOLDIN-MEADOW, S. (eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, s.157–192.
SWOYER, C. (Winter 2010 Edition): The linguistic relativity hypothesis (Supplement to Relativism). In: ZALTA, E. N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [online]. Cit. 2012-07-21. <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/relativism/supplement2.html>.
TIGHT, D. G. (2006): The Relationship between perceived gender in L1 English and grammatical gender in L2 Spanish. In: KLEE, C. A. – FACE, T. L. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, s. 149–160.
VANDEWYNCKEL, L. (2008): The weak Whorfian hypothesis with regard to gender categorisation. Universiteit Gent: Faculteit Letteren En Wijsbegeerte Vakgroep Algemene Taal Wetenschap.[online] Cit.2012-07-20.<http://www.scriptiebank.be/sites/default/files/36c5c90e17e65c79570ee754d90d6b5e.doc>.
VIGLIOCCO, G., VINSON, D. P., PAGANELLI, F.(2004a): Grammatical gender and meaning. Proceedings of the 26th Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society [online]. s. 1–6.Cit. 2012-07-20.<http://www.psychol.ucl.ac.uk/language/papers/vvp_cogsci.pdf>.
VIGLIOCCO, G., VINSON, D. P., INDEFREY, P., LEVELT, W. J. M., HELLWIG, F. (2004b): Role of grammatical gender and semantics in German word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 30, s. 483–497.
VIGLIOCCO, G., VINSON, D. P., PAGANELLI, F., DWORZYNSKI, K. (2005): Grammatical gender effects on cognition: Implications for language learning and language use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), s. 501–520.
WHORF, B. L. (1956[1939]): Gestalt technique of stem composition in Shawnee. In: CARROLL, J. B. (ed.), Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge: MIT Press, s. 160–172.
WHORF, B. L. (1956a[1940]): Science and linguistics. In: CARROLL, J. B. (ed.), Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge: MIT Press, s. 207–219.
WHORF, B. L. (1956b[1940]): Linguistics as an exact science. In: CARROLL, J. B. (ed.), Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge: MIT Press, s. 220–232.
WHORF, B. L. (1956[1941]): Languages and logic. In: CARROLL, J. B. (ed.), Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge: MIT Press, s. 233–245.
WHORF, B. L. (2009[1939]): Vztah habituálního myšlení a chování k jazyku [přel. JEHLIČKA, J.]. Praha:Ústav českého jazyka a teorie komunikace FF UK [online], s. 1–16.Cit. 2012-07-17. <http://lingvistika.cz/download/preklady/preklad_Whorf.pdf>.
WOLFF, P. – HOLMES, K. J. (2010): Linguistic Relativity. WIREs Cognitive Science [online],doi: 10.1002/wcs.104, s. 1–13. Cit. 2012-07-20. <http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~pwolff/Papersheavy/WolffHolmes2010WIREs.pdf>.
ZUBIN, D. A. – KÖPCKE, K.-M. (1984): Affect classification in the German gender system. Lingua,63, s. 41–96.