Periferie pod tlakem zelené transformace. Těžba lithia v Chile perspektivou ekologického imperialismu a periferizace

• Název práce v češtině: Periferie pod tlakem zelené transformace. Těžba lithia v Chile perspektivou ekologického imperialismu a periferizace
• Název v anglickém jazyce: Peripheries under pressure from green transformation. Lithium mining in Chile from the perspective of ecological imperialism and peripheralization
• Klíčová slova: Lithium, Chile, ekologický imperialismus, periferizace, zelená transformace, strategické suroviny, socio- ekologické nerovnosti, těžba surovin, politická ekologie, nerůst, ekomodernismus, surovinový nacionalismus
• Klíčová slova anglicky: Lithium, Chile, ecological imperialism, peripheralization, green transition, strategic raw materials, socio- ecological inequalities, resource extraction, political ecology, degrowth, ecomodernism, resource nationalism
• Akademický rok vypsání: 2023/2024
• Typ práce: diplomová práce
• Jazyk práce: čeština
• Ústav: Katedra mezinárodních vztahů (23-KMV)
• Vedoucí / školitel: Mgr. Jakub Tesař, Ph.D.
• Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem
• Datum přihlášení: 27.09.2024
• Datum zadání: 27.09.2024
• Datum a čas obhajoby: 16.09.2025 08:00
• Místo konání obhajoby: Areál Jinonice, B316, 316, seminární místnost IPS
• Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby: 29.07.2025
• Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 16.09.2025
• Oponenti: Mgr. Eliška Pohnerová

Seznam odborné literatury

Acosta, A. 2013. “Extractivism and Neoextractivism: Two Sides of the Same Curse.” Beyond Development: Alternative Visions from Latin America 1: 61–86.
Agusdinata, D. B., W. Liu, H. Eakin, & H. Romero. 2018. “Socio-Environmental Impacts of Lithium Mineral Extraction: Towards a Research Agenda.” Environmental Research Letters 13 (12): 123001.
Ahlborg, H., & J. Nightingale. 2016. “Theorizing Power in Political Ecology: The ‘Where’ of Power in Resource Governance Projects.” Journal of Political Ecology 23: 1– 29.
Alessia, A., A. Bardi, M. V. Giordani, C. V. Aranda, & F. Burchi. 2021. “Challenges for Sustainable Lithium Supply: A Critical Review.” Journal of Cleaner Production 300: 126954.
Anlauf, A. 2016. “Greening the Imperial Mode of Living? Socio-Ecological (In)Justice, Electromobility, and Lithium Mining in Argentina.” In Fairness and Justice in Natural Resource Politics, 176–192. Abingdon: Routledge.
Arboleda, M. 2020. Planetary Mine: Territories of Extraction under Late Capitalism. London: Verso Books.
Asafu-Adjaye, J., L. Blomqvist, S. Brand, B. Brook, R. DeFries, E. C. Ellis, C. Foreman, D. Keith, M. Lewis, M. Lynas, T. Nordhaus, R. A. Pielke Jr., R. Pritzker, J. Roy, M. Sagoff, M. Shellenberger, R. Stone, & P. Teague. 2015. An Ecomodernist Manifesto. Citováno dne 3. července 2025. http://www.ecomodernism.org/.
Azevedo, M., M. Baczyńska, K. Hoffman, & A. Krauze. 2022. “Lithium Mining: How New Production Technologies Could Fuel the Global EV Revolution.” McKinsey & Company, 12. března. Citováno dne 1. června 2025. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/metals-and-mining/our-insights/lithium-mining- how-new-production-technologies-could-fuel-the-global-ev-revolution.
Badia-Miró, M., & C. Ducoing. 2015. “The Long Run Development of Chile and the Natural Resource Curse.” In Natural Resources and Economic Growth: Learning from History, edited by M. Badia-Miró, V. Pinilla, & H. Willebald. New York: Routledge.
Banco Central de Chile. 2023. “Base de Datos Estadísticos (BDE).” Banco Central de Chile. Citováno dne 2. června 2025. https://si3.bcentral.cl/Siete/ES/Siete/Cuadro/CAP_CCNN/MN_CCNN76/CCNN2018_P 2/637801.
Barandiarán, J. 2019. “Lithium and Development Imaginaries in Chile, Argentina, and Bolivia.” World Development 113: 381–391.
74
BBC. 2011. “Chile Recognizes 9,800 More Victims of Pinochet’s Rule.” BBC News, 18. srpna. Citováno dne 5. května 2025. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america- 14584095.
Bebbington, A., D. H. Bebbington, J. Bury, J. Lingan, J. Muñoz, & M. Scurrah. 2008. Institutional Pathways to Equity: Addressing Inequality Traps. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
Bobba, S., S. Carrara, J. Huisman, F. Mathieux, & C. Pavel. 2020. Critical Raw Materials for Strategic Technologies and Sectors in the EU: A Foresight Study. European Commission.
Boelens, R. 2014. “Cultural Politics and the Hydrosocial Cycle: Water, Power and Identity in the Andean Highlands.” Geoforum 57: 234–247.
Bos, V., & M. Forget. 2021. “Global Production Networks and the lithium industry: A Bolivian perspective.” Geoforum, 125: 168–180.
Brand, U., & M. Wissen. 2021. The Imperial Mode of Living: Everyday Life and the Ecological Crisis of Capitalism. London: Verso Books.
Bridge, G. 2001. “Resource Triumphalism: Postindustrial Narratives of Primary Commodity Production.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 33 (12): 2149–2173.
Bridge, G. 2008. “Global Production Networks and the Extractive Sector: Governing Resource-Based Development.” Journal of Economic Geography 8 (3): 389–419.
Bustos-Gallardo, B., G. Bridge, & M. Prieto. 2021. “Harvesting Lithium: Water, Brine, and the Industrial Dynamics of Production in the Salar de Atacama.” Geoforum 119: 177– 189.
Cámara de Diputados. 2004. Informe de la Comisión Privatizaciones. Santiago de Chile.
Canelas, J., & A. Carvalho. 2023. “The Dark Side of the Energy Transition: Extractivist Violence, Energy (In)Justice and Lithium Mining in Portugal.” Energy Research and Social Science 100: 103096.
Carrasco, S., J. Hernández, & V. Cariaga. 2023. “The Temporalities of Natural Resource Extraction: Imagined Futures and the Spatialization of the Lithium Industry in Chile.” The Extractive Industries and Society 15: 101310.
CEIC. 2024. “Chile: Household Debt.” CEIC. Citováno dne 3. července 2025. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/chile/household-debt--of-nominal-gdp.
Chagnon, C. W., et al. 2022. “From Extractivism to Global Extractivism: The Evolution of an Organizing Concept.” The Journal of Peasant Studies: 1–34.
75
Chew, S. C. 2001. World Ecological Degradation: Accumulation, Urbanization, and Deforestation, 3000 BC–AD 2000. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
Christophers, B. 2019. “Environmental Beta or How Institutional Investors Think about Climate Change and Fossil Fuel Risk.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (3): 754–774.
Ciccantell, P. S., & O. S. Salihu. 2024. “Ecological Unequal Exchange and Geopolitics.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Geopolitics, 939–956. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Comisión Chilena del Cobre (Cochilco). 2024. Proyección de la Producción de Cobre en Chile 2023–2034. Ministerio de Minería. Citováno dne 5. června 2025. https://www.cochilco.cl/web/otros-estudios-del-cobre/.
Comisión Nacional del Litio. 2015. Informe Final. Litio: Una Fuente de Energía, Una Oportunidad Para Chile. Ministerio de Minería. Citováno dne 23. července 2025. https://ciperchile.cl/pdfs/2015/06/sqm/INFORME_COMISION_LITIO_FINAL.pdf.
D’Alisa, G., F. Demaria, & G. Kallis, eds. 2014. Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a New Era. New York: Routledge.
Datawheel. 2025. “Chile (CHL) Exports, Imports, and Trade Partners.” The Observatory of Economic Complexity. Citováno dne 5. června 2025. https://oec.world/en/profile/country/chl.
De la Cadena, M. 2010. “Indigenous Cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual Reflections beyond ‘Politics.’” Cultural Anthropology 25 (2): 334–370.
Del Mármol, C., & I. Vaccaro. 2020. “New Extractivism in European Rural Areas: How Twentieth First Century Mining Returned to Disturb the Rural Transition.” Geoforum 116: 42–49.
Demaria, F., F. Schneider, F. Sekulova, & J. Martinez-Alier. 2013. “What Is Degrowth? From an Activist Slogan to a Social Movement.” Environmental Values 22 (2): 191–215.
Djukanović, N. 2023. “Lithiové Dilema: Jak Může Zelená Tranzice Vést k Ekologické Katastrofě.” Voxpot, 6. února. Citováno dne 5. června 2025. https://www.voxpot.cz/lithiove-dilema-jak-muze-zelena-tranzice-vest-k-ekologicke- katastrofe/.
Doe, J., & J. Smith. 2024. “Economic Reform in Eastern Europe.” Policy Studies Working Papers 42: 1–25.
Dorn, F. M. 2021. “Inequalities in Resource-Based Global Production Networks: Resistance to Lithium Mining in Argentina (Jujuy) and Portugal (Região Norte).” Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 37 (4): 70–91.
76
Dorn, F. M., & H. Gundermann. 2022. “Mining Companies, Indigenous Communities, and the State: The Political Ecology of Lithium in Chile (Salar de Atacama) and Argentina (Salar de Olaroz-Cauchari).” Journal of Political Ecology 29 (1).
Dunlap, A., & J. Jakobsen. 2020. The Violent Technologies of Extraction. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Dutta, T., K. H. Kim, M. Uchimiya, E. E. Kwon, B. H. Jeon, A. Deep, & S. T. Yun. 2016. “Global Demand for Rare Earth Resources and Strategies for Green Mining.” Environmental Research 150: 182–190.
Dymitrow, M. 2020. “Begrepp Som Skadar: Exempel Från Inre Periferier i Polen, Nordmakedonien och Sverige.” Ymer 140 (1): 49–72.
Escobar, A. 2015. Territories of Difference: Place, Movements, Life, Redes. Durham: Duke University Press.
ESPON. 2018. Inner Peripheries in Europe: Possible Development Strategies to Overcome Their Marginalising Effects. Policy Brief. Citováno dne 5. června 2025. https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/ESPON-Policy-Brief-Inner- Peripheries.pdf.
European Commission. 2023. Critical Raw Materials Act.
European Parliament. 2025. “Just Transition Fund: Fact Sheets on the European Union.” European Parliament. Citováno dne 2. června 2025. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/214/just-transition-fund.
Fischer-Tahir, A., & M. Naumann. 2013. “Introduction: Peripheralization as the Social Production of Spatial Dependencies and Injustice.” In Peripheralization: The Making of Spatial Dependencies and Social Injustice, 9–26. Springer.
Forbes. 2008. “Where the Money Is.” Forbes, 24. listopadu. Citováno dne 6. června 2025. https://www.forbes.com/forbes/2008/1124/034.html.
Foster, J. B., B. Clark, & R. York. 2011. The Ecological Rift: Capitalism’s War on the Earth. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Foster, J. B., & B. Clark. 2004. “Ecological Imperialism: The Curse of Capitalism.” Socialist Register 40.
Frame, M. L., 2022. “Ecological Imperialism: A World-Systems Approach.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 81 (3): 503–534.
Frank, A. G. 1977. Kapitalism och Underutveckling i Latinamerika: Historiska Studier över Chile och Brasilien. Lund: Zenit.
77
Füllgraf, F. 2019. “Chile–Sebastián Piñera, die Ein-Prozent-Elite und die Militärs Teil 1: Zwischen Absturz in den Untergrund und autoritärem Abenteuer.” NachDenkSeiten. Citováno dne 23. července 2025. https://www.nachdenkseiten.de/?tag=chile.
Garcia, D., & J. F. Gutiérrez. 2023. “Chile’s New Mining Royalty Tax Lacks Clarity That Investors Need.” Bloomberg Tax, 8. listopadu.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/tax-insights-and-commentary/chiles-new-mining- royalty-tax-lacks-clarity-that-investors-need.
Golubchikov, O., & K. O’Sullivan. 2020. “Energy Periphery: Uneven Development and the Precarious Geographies of Low-Carbon Transition.”
Gruber, P. W., P. A. Medina, G. A. Keoleian, S. E. Kesler, M. P. Everson, & T. J. Wallington. 2011. “Global Lithium Availability: A Constraint for Electric Vehicles?” Journal of Industrial Ecology 15 (5): 760–775.
Gudynas, E. 2009. “Climate Change and Capitalism’s Ecological Fix in Latin America.” Critical Currents 6: 36–41.
Gutiérrez, J. S., J. N. Moore, J. P. Donnelly, C. Dorador, J. G. Navedo, & N. R. Senner. 2022. “Climate Change and Lithium Mining Influence Flamingo Abundance in the Lithium Triangle.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 289 (1970): 20212388.
Harvey, D. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Haslam, P. A., & P. Heidrich, eds. 2016. The Political Economy of Natural Resources
and Development: From Neoliberalism to Resource Nationalism. London: Routledge. Hernandez, D. S. 2025. Lithium Extraction in Chile: Ontological, Ecological and
Economic Dimensions. London: Taylor and Francis.
Hernandez, D. S., & P. Newell. 2023. “Oro Blanco: Assembling Extractivism in the Lithium Triangle.” In Climate Change and Critical Agrarian Studies, 248–271. London: Routledge.
Hickel, J., Ch. Dorninger, H. Wieland, & I. Suwandi. 2022. “Imperialist Appropriation in the World Economy: Drain from the Global South through Unequal Exchange, 1990– 2015.” Global Environmental Change 73.
Holman, J., & E. Ribeiro. 2021. “Commodities 2022: Global Lithium Market to Remain Tight.” S&P Global. Citováno dne 5. června 2025. https://www.spglobal.com/platts/en/market-insights/latest-news/energy- transition/121421-Commodities-2022-global-lithium-market-to-remain-tight-into-2022.
Hornborg, A. 2011. Global Ecology and Unequal Exchange: Fetishism in a Zero-Sum World. New York: Routledge.
78
IEA (International Energy Agency). 2024. Global Critical Minerals Outlook. Paris: IEA. Citováno dne 3. července 2025. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-critical-minerals- outlook-2024/market-review.
IEA (International Energy Agency). 2021. Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. Paris: IEA. Citováno dne 3. července 2025. https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050.
Jerez, B., I. Garcés, & R. Torres. 2021. “Lithium Extractivism and Water Injustices in the Salar de Atacama, Chile: The Colonial Shadow of Green Electromobility.” Political Geography 87: 102382.
Jovine, R. F., & M. J. Paz. 2025. “Models of Lithium Exploitation in Latin America: Is History Repeating Itself?” The Extractive Industries and Society 22: 101581.
Kallis, G. 2018. Degrowth. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agenda Publishing.
Kallis, G., J. Hickel, D. W. O’Neill, T. Jackson, P. A. Victor, K. Raworth, ... & D. Ürge- Vorsatz. 2025. “Post-Growth: The Science of Wellbeing within Planetary Boundaries.” The Lancet Planetary Health 9 (1).
Kingsbury, D. V. 2023. “Energy Transitions in the Shadow of a Dictator: Decarbonizing Neoliberalism and Lithium Extraction in Chile.” The Anthropocene Review 10 (2): 556– 572.
Kroepsch, A. C. 2018. “Groundwater Modeling and Governance: Contesting and Building (Sub)Surface Worlds in Colorado’s Northern San Juan Basin.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 4: 43–66.
Kühn, M. 2015. “Peripheralization: Theoretical Concepts Explaining Socio-Spatial Inequalities.” European Planning Studies 23 (2): 367–378.
Landherr, A., & J. Graf. 2017. “Neoliberale Kontinuität im politischen Wechselwind. Die Macht der besitzenden Klasse Chiles über die extraktivistische Ausrichtung des Landes.” PROKLA 47 (189): 569–585.
Landherr, A., J. Graf, & C. Puk. 2019. “Das Modell Chile.” In Extraktivismus in Lateinamerika, edited by M. Ramírez, & S. Schmalz. München.
Law, J. 2015. “What’s Wrong with a One-World World?” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 16 (1): 126–139.
Leader, A., & G. Gaustad. 2019. “Critical Material Applications and Intensities in Clean Energy Technologies.” Clean Technologies 1 (1): 164–184.
Leifker, M., S. Lincoln, K. Saenger, S. Hilbig, & A. Müller. 2018. “Das weiße Gold: Umwelt- und Sozialkonflikte um den Zukunftsrohstoff Lithium.” Analyse. Berlin.
79
Leiva, F. I. 2024. “Chile and the Contemporary Power of Capital: Peripheral Predatory Rentier Capitalism and the Political Practices of Business Elites.” In The Political Economy of Elites in Latin America, edited by J. Santiso, & A. López, 103–124. London: Routledge.
Lepič, L. 2025. “Bateriové kovy pod tlakem: Goldman Sachs předpovídá další pokles cen.” O Energetice.cz, 12. března. Citováno dne 3. července 2025. https://oenergetice.cz/komoditni-trhy/bateriove-kovy-pod-tlakem-goldman-sachs- predpovida-dalsi-pokles-cen.
Luong, J. H., C. Tran, & D. Ton-That. 2022. “A paradox over electric vehicles, mining of lithium for car batteries.” Energies 15 (21): 7997.
Magdoff, H. 2003. Imperialism without Colonies. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Manrique, P. L. P., J. Brun, A. Gonzalez-Martinez, & J. Martinez-Alier. 2013. “The Biophysical Performance of Argentina: 1970–2009.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 17 (4): 590–604.
McMichael, P. 2017. Development and Social Change: A Global Perspective. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Ministerio de Desarrollo Social y Familia (MIDESOF). 2017. Pueblos indígenas: Síntesis de resultados CASEN 2017. Santiago de Chile. Citováno dne 3. června 2025.
Monckeberg, M. O. 2001. El saqueo de los grupos económicos al Estado de Chile. Santiago: Ediciones B.
Moore, J. W. 2000. “Environmental Crises and the Metabolic Rift in World—Historical Perspective.” Organization and Environment 13 (2): 124.
Moore, J. W. 2010. “Cheap Food and Bad Money: Food, Frontiers, and Financialization in the Rise and Demise of Neoliberalism.” Review (Fernand Braudel Center): 225–61.
Morales Morgado, H. 2016. “Etnopolítica atacameña: Ejes de la diversidad.” Estudios Atacameños Arqueología y Antropología Surandinas 53: 185–203.
Morales Ruvalcaba, D., & A. Rocha V alencia. 2024. “The National Power of Semiperipheral States.” In National Power and International Geostructure, 157–81. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Mura, M., I. Castillo, D. Torres, F. M. Galleguillos Madrid, E. Gálvez, S. Gallegos, ... & N. Toro. 2025. “Global Overview of the Lithium Market and Opportunities for Chile.” Resources 14 (2): 33.
Matamala, D. 2015. Poderoso caballero: El peso del dinero en la política chilena.
Editorial Catalonia.
80
Museo Histórico Nacional (Chile). 2017. Catálogo Artesanías de Chile (Archivo Michelle Bachelet Jeria, Administración 2014–2018, Serie Publicaciones, Unidad Documental Simple 01). Santiago: Servicio Nacional del Patrimonio Cultural, Biblioteca del Museo Histórico Nacional. Citováno dne 3. června 2025. https://observatorio.ministeriodesarrollosocial.gob.cl/storage/docs/casen/2017/Casen_20 17_Pueblos_Indigenas.pdf.
Nordhaus, T., & M. Shellenberger. 2007. Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Núñez, A., M. C. Benwell, & E. Aliste. 2020. “Interrogating Green Discourses in Patagonia-Aysén (Chile): Green Grabbing and eco-Extractivism as a new Strategy of Capitalism?” Geographical Review (August): 1–19.
O’Connor, J. R., ed. 1998. Natural Causes: Essays in Ecological Marxism. New York: Guilford Press.
Obeng-Odoom, F. 2021. The Commons in an Age of Uncertainty: Decolonizing Nature, Economy and Society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Observatorio Plurinacional de Salares Andinos (OPSAL). 2021. Salares Andinos. Fundación Tanti. Citováno dne 3. června 2025. https://cl.boell.org/sites/default/files/2020- 12/Libro%20Salares%20Andinos%20OPSAL.pdf.
OECD. 2024. Society at a Glance 2024: OECD Social Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. Citováno dne 13. června 2025. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/society- at-a-glance-2024_918d8db3-en.html.
OECD. 2023. Mining Regions and Cities in the Region of Antofagasta, Chile. Paris: OECD Publishing. Citováno dne 9. července 2025. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/mining-regions-and-cities-in-the-region-of- antofagasta-chile_336e2d2f-en.html.
Parrique, T., J. Barth, F. Briens, A. Kuokkanen, & J. H. Spangenberg. 2019. “Evidence and Arguments against Green Growth as a Sole Strategy for Sustainability.” European Environmental Bureau.
Persson, H., & M. Dymitrow. 2024. “A World-Leading Periphery: Exploring Representations of Northern Sweden in View of Its Green Transition.” Fennia- International Journal of Geography 202 (1): 55–72.
Petavratzi, E., D. Sanchez-Lopez, A. Hughes, J. Stacey, J. Ford, & A. Butcher. 2022. “The impacts of environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues in achieving sustainable lithium supply in the Lithium Triangle.” Mineral Economics 35 (3–4): 673– 699.
81
Pettitt, J. 2022. “How the U.S. Fell Behind in Lithium, the ‘White Gold’ of Electric Vehicles.” CNBC. Citováno dne 3. června 2025. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/15/how- the-us-fell-way-behind-in-lithium-white-gold-for-evs.html.
Poveda, B. R. 2020. Estudio de caso sobre la gobernanza del Litio en Chile. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
Quinteros-Condoretty, A. R., S. R. Golroudbary, L. Albareda, B. Barbiellini, & A. Soyer. 2021. “Impact of Circular Design of Lithium-Ion Batteries on Supply of Lithium for Electric Cars towards a Sustainable Mobility and Energy Transition.” Procedia CIRP 100: 73–78.
Ritchie, H. 2024. “Tracking global data on electric vehicles.” Our World in Data. Citováno dne 3. června 2025. https://ourworldindata.org/electric-car-sales
Ritchie, H., & P. Rosado. 2024. “The World’s Lithium Is Mined in Just a Handful of Countries.” Our World in Data. Citováno dne 8. června 2025. https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/the-worlds-lithium-is-mined-in-just-a-handful- of-countries
Roche, L., A. Link, S. Marinova et al. 2024. “S-LCA of lithium mining in Chile and its potential impacts on water and the local community.” Int J Life Cycle Assess.
Sanchez-Lopez, M. D. 2023. “Geopolitics of the Li-ion battery value chain and the Lithium Triangle in South America.” Latin American Policy 14 (1): 22–45.
Schandl, H., M. Fischer-Kowalski, J. West, S. Giljum, M. Dittrich, N. Eisenmenger, A. Geschke, M. Lieber, & H. Weinzettel. 2018. “Global Material Flows and Resource Productivity: Forty Years of Evidence.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 22 (4): 827–38.
Seefeldt, L. J. 2022. “Water as property: Contention between indigenous communities and the lithium industry for water rights in Chile.” Latin American Policy 13 (2): 328– 53.
Sérandour, A. 2020. “Does the ‘Lithium Triangle ’Exist? Political Geography of an Andean Regionalization (Argentina, Bolivia, Chile).” Belgeo 4.
Sovacool, B. K. 2021. “Who Are the Victims of Low-Carbon Transitions? Towards a Political Ecology of Climate Change Mitigation.” Energy Research and Social Science 73: 101916.
SQM. 2021. Green Bond Financing Framework. Santiago, Chile: Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM).
SQM. 2018. Sustainability Report. Citováno dne 3. června 2025. https://www.sqm.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/SQM- SUSTAINABILITYREPORT-2018.pdf.
82
Statista. 2024. “Gini Coefficient: Income Distribution in Chile (2010–2022).” Statista. Citováno dne 3. června 2025. https://www.statista.com/statistics/983056/income- distribution-gini-coefficient-chile/.
Stenbacka, S., & S. H. Cassel. 2020. “Introduktion – Periferier och Periferialisering.” In Periferi som Process, 7–24. Stockholm: Svenska Sällskapet för Antropologi och Geografi.
Svampa, M. 2015. “Commodities Consensus: Neoextractivism and Enclosure of the Commons in Latin America.” South Atlantic Quarterly 114 (1): 65–82.
US Congress. 2021. Green New Deal Resolution, H.Res. 332, 117th Congress. Citováno dne 20. června 2025. https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house- resolution/332/text
USGS. 2022. “Mineral Commodity Summaries.” U.S. Geological Survey. Citováno dne 8. června 2025. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2022/mcs2022.pdf.
USGS. 2024. “Mineral Commodity Summaries.” U.S. Geological Survey. Citováno dne 8. června 2025. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2024/mcs2024.pdf.
Vives-Miró, S. 2022. “The Urbanization of Poverty: Rethinking the Production of Unjust Geographies.” Fennia 200 (1): 41–51.
Voskoboynik, D. M., & D. Andreucci. 2021. “Greening Extractivism: Environmental Discourses and Resource Governance in the ‘Lithium Triangle.’” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 5 (2): 1–23.
Wallerstein, I. 1974. The Modern World-System. New York: Academic Press.
Warlenius, R., G. Pierce, V. Ramasar, E. Quistorp, J. Martínez-Alier, L. Rijnhout, & I. Yanez. 2015. “Ecological Debt: History, Meaning, and Relevance for Environmental Justice.” EJOLT Report #18. Barcelona: EJOLT, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Wójcik, M., K. Dmochowska-Dudek, P. Jeziorska-Biel, & P. Tobiasz-Lis. 2018. “Understanding Strategies for Overcoming Peripherality: A Polish Experience of Transition.” Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series 40: 173–92.
Yergin, D., & J. Stanislaw. 1998. The Commanding Heights: The Battle Between Government and the Marketplace That Is Remaking the Modern World. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Vol. 5. Sage.

Předběžná náplň práce

Lithium se v posledních letech stalo klíčovým prvkem tzv. dvojí transformace –– ekologické a digitální –– a jeho těžba je stále častěji chápána jako podmínka přechodu k bezemisní budoucnosti. Tento tlak však prohlubuje socio-ekologické nerovnosti v oblastech globálního Jihu, kde se surovina těží. Tato diplomová práce analyzuje případ těžby lithia v chilské oblasti Salar de Atacama prostřednictvím teoretických rámců ekologického imperialismu a periferizace. Práce se zaměřuje na pět analytických dimenzí –– mezinárodní politickou ekonomii, vlastnické struktury, postavení místních komunit, ekologické dopady a procesy periferizace –– skrze něž kriticky zkoumá struktury a vztahy utvářející současný extraktivní režim. Tyto kategorie jsou dále doplněny o srovnávací analýzu tří konceptů –– nerůst, ekomodernismus a surovinový nacionalismus –– jež jednak doplňují zvolený rámec o jeho možná slepá místa, jednak umožňují nahlédnout alternativní směry k současnému modelu rozvoje. Výsledky ukazují, že chilský lithiový sektor zůstává hluboce zakořeněn v nerovných mocenských strukturách, přičemž decentralizované a spravedlivé přístupy k rozhodování o přírodních zdrojích zůstávají omezené. Práce přispívá k debatě o socio-ekologické transformaci tím, že kombinuje kritickou teorii se specifickou lokální realitou a nabízí podněty k přehodnocení současných přístupů k zelené transformaci.

Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce

In recent years, lithium has emerged as a key element in the so-called dual transformation — both ecological and digital — and its extraction is increasingly seen as a precondition for a zero-emission future. However, this pressure has deepened socio-ecological inequalities in regions of the Global South where lithium is extracted. This thesis analyzes lithium mining in Chile’s Salar de Atacama through the theoretical frameworks of ecological imperialism and peripheralization. The analysis focuses on five dimensions — international political economy, ownership structures, the position of local communities, ecological impacts, and processes of peripheralization — through which it critically examines the structures and relations shaping the current extractive regime. These categories are further complemented by comparative analysis of three different approaches — degrowth, ecomodernism, and resource nationalism — which both reveal potential blind spots in the primary framework and help articulate alternative development paths. The findings demonstrate that the Chilean lithium sector remains deeply embedded in unequal power structures, while decentralized and just approaches to natural resource governance remain limited. By combining critical theory with a grounded case study, the thesis contributes to the debate on socio-ecological transformation and offers insights for rethinking current approaches to the green transition.