Témata prací (Výběr práce)Témata prací (Výběr práce)(verze: 341)
Detail práce
   Přihlásit přes CAS
Transmission of memory; the heritage trail and Jeju Uprising
Název práce v češtině: Přenos paměti, stezka kulturního dědictví a vzpoura na ostrově Jeju
Název v anglickém jazyce: Transmission of memory; the heritage trail and Jeju Uprising
Klíčová slova: Přenos paměti|vzpoura na ostrově Jeju|stezka kulturního dědictví|kulturní paměť|masakr
Klíčová slova anglicky: Transmission of memory|Jeju Uprising|Heritage trail|cultural memory|massacre
Akademický rok vypsání: 2020/2021
Typ práce: diplomová práce
Jazyk práce: angličtina
Ústav: Ústav světových dějin (21-USD)
Vedoucí / školitel: Mgr. Ondřej Daniel, Ph.D.
Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno a potvrzeno stud. odd.
Datum přihlášení: 10.11.2020
Datum zadání: 10.11.2020
Datum potvrzení stud. oddělením: 20.11.2020
Datum a čas obhajoby: 22.06.2021 10:15
Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby:24.05.2021
Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 22.06.2021
Odevzdaná/finalizovaná: odevzdaná studentem a finalizovaná
Oponenti: Mgr. Miroslav Michela, Ph.D.
  Péter Erdösi
 
 
Zásady pro vypracování
A massacre is remembered and transmitted as a collective frame and for that reason, individual and personal stories are often being forgotten. Hence, this thesis aims to shed more lights on the stories of individuals and victims in transmitting memories of a massacre. In doing so, it investigates how the memories of the troubled past during the Jeju Uprising of the Republic of Korea are remembered and transmitted. This event has multiple names such as the April 3rd Incident, Jeju Killings, Jeju Rebellion and simply 4.3 (Sasam) that represents the date of armed uprising in Jeju, 1943. As the different names imply, there exists polysemic memories and narratives within the same discourse. With a case study of the 4.3 trails, which follow the historic sites and the places of the massacre of Jeju Uprising, the research question includes how each trail helps to transmit memories and decentralize the official narrative of Jeju Uprising. This thesis hypothesizes that the active performance of the trails enables visitors and docents (consisting of residents and victims of the villages) to build a sense of belonging to the lost villages, which were completely wiped out during the military operation. In order to prove this, a fieldwork was conducted for interviews, and by observing participants and using a narrative analysis for finding the representation gap between official and local, as well as collective and individual memories.
Seznam odborné literatury
Assmann, J., & Czaplicka, J. (1995). Collective Memory and Cultural Identity. New German Critique, (65), 125-133. doi:10.2307/488538Apaydin, V. (Ed.). (2020). Critical Perspectives on Cultural Memory and Heritage: Construction, Transformation and Destruction. London: UCL Press. Choi, Suhi. (2020). Right to Mourn: Trauma, Empathy, and Korean War Memorials, Oxford: Oxford University PressHalbwachs, Maurice, 1877-1945. (1980). The collective memory. New York: Harper & RowHobsbawm, E. J., and T. O. Ranger. (1983). The Invention of tradition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Landsberg, A. (2004). Prosthetic memory: The transformation of American remembrance in the age of mass culture. New York: Columbia University Press.Nora, P. (1984). Les lieux de mémoire. Paris: Gallimard.The National Committee for Investigation of the Truth about the Jeju April 3 Incident. (2003) The Jeju 4·3 Incident Investigation Report, Jeju: Jeju 4·3 Peace Foundation Winter, J. (2010). Sites of Memory. In RADSTONE S. & SCHWARZ B. (Eds.), Memory: Histories, Theories, Debates (pp. 312-324). NEW YORK: Fordham University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1c999bq.25Young, J. (1992). The Counter-Monument: Memory against Itself in Germany Today. Critical Inquiry, 18(2), 267-296.
 
Univerzita Karlova | Informační systém UK