Témata prací (Výběr práce)Témata prací (Výběr práce)(verze: 341)
Detail práce
   Přihlásit přes CAS
A Study of the Trade Effects of China's Direct Investment in Central and Eastern European Countries
Název práce v češtině: Studie obchodního efektu čínských přímých investic v zemích střední a východní Evropy
Název v anglickém jazyce: A Study of the Trade Effects of China's Direct Investment in Central and Eastern European Countries
Klíčová slova: FDI, CEECs, China, trade effect, trade scale, trade gravity model
Klíčová slova anglicky: FDI, CEECs, China, trade effect, trade scale, trade gravity model
Akademický rok vypsání: 2018/2019
Typ práce: diplomová práce
Jazyk práce: angličtina
Ústav: Katedra ruských a východoevropských studií (23-KRVS)
Vedoucí / školitel: doc. Ing. Tomáš Cahlík, CSc.
Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem
Datum přihlášení: 24.11.2019
Datum zadání: 24.11.2019
Datum a čas obhajoby: 17.06.2020 10:00
Místo konání obhajoby: Jinonice - U Kříže 8, Praha 5, J2081, 2081, Jinonice - místn. č. 2081
Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby:21.05.2020
Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 17.06.2020
Oponenti: Filipa Figueira, Ph.D.
  Mgr. Karel Svoboda, Ph.D.
 
 
Kontrola URKUND:
Seznam odborné literatury
REFERENCES
Armaroli, N. & Balzani, V., 2011. Towards an electricity-powered world. Energy & Environmental Science, 4(9), pp.3193–3222.

Anon, 2010. U.S., Brazil Settle Longstanding Cotton Trade Dispute. Foreign Policy Bulletin, 20(3), pp.190–211.

Buckley, P.J. & Casson, M., 1990. The future of the multinational enterprise / Peter J. Buckley and Mark Casson 2nd ed., London: Macmillan.

Braunerhjelm, P., & Svensson, R., 1996. Host country characteristics and agglomeration in foreign direct investment. Applied Economics, 28(7), 833-840.

Bhagwati, J.N., 1987. VERs, Quid Pro Quo DFI, and VIEs: Political-Economy-Theoretic Analyses. International Economic Journal, 1(1), pp.1–14.

Campbell, J.T., Eden, L. & Miller, S.R., 2012. Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter? Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1), pp.84–106.

Dunning, J.H., 1980. Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), pp.9–31.

Eaton, J. & Tamura, A., 1996. Japanese and U.S. Exports and Investment as Conduits of Growth. NBER Working Paper Series, p.5457.

Eaton, J., & Tamura, A., 1994. Bilateralism and Regionalism in Japanese and U.S. Trade and Direct Foreign Investment Patterns. Journal of The Japanese and International Economies, 8(4), 478-510.

Fahinde, C. et al., 2015. EXTERNAL FINANCIAL INFLOWS AND DOMESTIC INVESTMENT IN THE ECONOMIES OF WAEMU: CROWDING-OUT VERSUS CROWDING-IN EFFECTS. The Journal of Developing Areas, 49(3), pp.229–248.

García-Herrero, A. & Xu, J., 2017. How to handle state-owned enterprises in EU-China investment talks. IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc, pp.IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc, 2017.

Gorodnichenko, Y., Svejnar, J. & Terrell, K., 2008. Globalization and innovation in emerging markets. NBER Working Paper Series, p.14481.

Gray, G., 1998. Looking for a way back. Euromoney, (348), pp.95–98.

Helpman, E., Melitz, M., & Yeaple, S., 2004. Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms. American Economic Review, 94(1), 300-316.

Head, K., & Ries, J., 2001. Overseas Investment and Firm Exports. Review of International Economics, 9(1), 108-122.

Horst, T., 1972. The Industrial Composition of U.S. Exports and Subsidiary Sales to the Canadian Market. The American Economic Review, 62(1), pp.37–45.

Research on China's contrarian investment trade effect on EU under "going out" strategy - based on FGLS and PCSE modified panel data model.

Jagdambe, S., 2018. Impact of AIFTA on Agriculture Trade Creation & Trade Diversion: Gravity Model Analysis. IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc, pp.IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc, 2018.

Jiang, B., Xing, X., & Li, J., 2015. Research on China's contrarian investment trade effect on EU under "going out" strategy - based on FGLS and PCSE modified panel data model. International Trade Issues, 9:167-176.

Jacoby, W., 2014. Different cases, different faces: Chinese investment in Central and Eastern Europe. Asia Europe Journal, 12(1-2), pp.199–214.

Jiang, G., & Jiang, D., 2014. The export effect of foreign direct investment by Chinese enterprises. Economic Research, 5: 160-173.

Jeon & Jeon, Kwang W, 2000. International review of cytology. Volume 198, A survey of cell biology / edited by Kwang W. Jeon., San Diego: Academic Press.

Johanson, J. & Mattsson, L.-G., 1987. Interorganizational Relations in Industrial Systems: A Network Approach Compared with the Transaction-Cost Approach. International Studies of Management & Organization: Organizing: The Network Metaphor, 17(1), pp.34–48.

Khan, A. et al., 2019. Does energy consumption, financial development, and investment contribute to ecological footprints in BRI regions? Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26(36), pp.36952–36966.

Ker, Alan P., 2013. Unconditional Quantile Estimation: An Application to the Gravity Framework. , 150399.

Kojima, K., 1978. Direct Foreign Investment: A Japanese Model of Multinational Business Operations. Croom Helm, London.

Lipsey, R.E. & Ramstetter, E.D., 2003. Japanese exports, MNC affiliates, and rivalry for export markets. Journal of The Japanese and International Economies, 17(2), pp.101–117.

Lim, S.-H., 2001. Effects of outward foreign direct investment on home country exports: The case of Korean firms. Multinational Business Review, 9(1), pp.42–49.

Murphy-Braynen, M. et al., 2018. Toward Improving Export Diversification and Economic Growth in Small Island Developing States, pp.ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

Martins, J., 2015. Policy Space and Policy Autonomy under the WTO: A Comparison of Post-Crisis Industrial Policies in Brazil and the US. Law and Development Review, 8(2), pp.389–432.

Ma, X., Tong, T.W. & Fitza, M., 2013. How much does subnational region matter to foreign subsidiary performance? Evidence from Fortune Global 500 Corporations’ investment in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(1), pp.66–87.

Martin, X., 2013. Solving theoretical and empirical conundrums in international strategy research: Linking foreign entry mode choices and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(1), pp.28–41.

Mitze, T., 2010. Estimating Gravity Models of International Trade with Correlated Time-Fixed Regressors: To IV or not IV? IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc, pp.IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc, 2010.

Mao, X., Zhang Z., &Wang G., 2006. The effect of foreign direct investment in the Yangtze river delta region. Journal of International Trade, 3: 73-80.

Mundell, R.A., 1957. International Trade and Factor Mobility. The American Economic Review, 47(3), pp.321–335.

Mundell, R., 1957. International Trade and Factor Mobility. The American Economic Review, 47(3), 321-335.

Ramsey, D. et al., 2019. Eliminating Opposition: The Belt Road Initiative and Security Implications for the Mediterranean as China Leverages Economic Influence, pp.ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

Rugman, A.M. & Verbeke, A., 1990. Multinational Corporate Strategy and the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. MIR: Management International Review, 30(3), pp.253–266.

Saavedra-rivano, N. & Ruiz Estrada, M., 2016. An alternative free trade agreement scheme to developing countries: the micro-free trade territory (MFTT). Quality and Quantity, 50(5), pp.2293–2311.

Samuelson, P., 1949. International factor-price equalization once again. Economic Journal, 59, pp.181–197.

Tao, C. et al., 2019. Effects of China's OFDI on Exports: A Context Analysis with the "21st-Century Maritime Silk Road" Regions. Journal of Coastal Research, si(94), pp.903–907.

Tridico, P. et al., 2018. Economic growth, welfare models, and inequality in the context of globalization. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 29(1), pp.118–139.

Taylor, L., 2010. Aid-Foreign Direct Investment Linkages: A Case Study of Aid and Foreign Direct Investment in Uganda, pp.PQDT - UK & Ireland.

Xiang, B., 2005. The trade effect of China's foreign direct investment. Statistics and Decision-making, 24: 29-32.

Xu, B., 2001. Analysis of the motivation of China's direct investment in Western Europe. Nankai Institute of Economic Research, 1:6-10.

Ueda, K., 1983. Permanent and temporary changes in the exchange rate and trade balance dynamics. Journal of International Economics, 15(1), pp.27–43.

Vernon, R., 1966. International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2), 190-207.

Wooldridge, J.M., 2016. Introductory econometrics: a modern approach / Jeffrey M. Wooldridge. Sixth edition.; Student.,

Wu, L. et al., 2016. Exchange rate, international trade, and FDI: Empirical evidence from China, pp. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

Wang, X., 2007. An empirical analysis of FDI and export trade. Business Research, 4: 180-183.

Wang, H., & Xu, X., 2003. A study on the relationship between Japanese trade and direct investment in China (1983-2001). The World Economy, 8: 28-37.

Wang, X., 2003. The relationship between FDI and trade. Finance and Economics, 1: 80-85.

Yao, Z., & Li, Z.,2011. The development trend and policy prospect of China's FDI. International economic review, 2011(02):127-140+6.

Zhou, P., & Duan, X., 2012. Review of the trade effect of foreign direct investment. Journal of Xinjiang university of finance and economics, 1: 58-62.

Zhang, Z., 2011. Analysis of the effect of China's direct investment in Africa on China-Africa trade. Modern Finance and Economics (Journal of Tianjin University of finance and economics), 31(4); 67-71.

Zhang, H., & Yan, G., 2010. Study on trade effect of East Asian emerging economy FDI. International Economic and Trade Exploration, 26 (6): 66-70.

Zhang, Y., 2007. The relationship between FDI and trade: complementarity or substitution. Journal of International Trade, 7(6).


Předběžná náplň práce
This paper aims to explore the relationship between China’s investment in Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs) and China-CEECs trade. Since the 1950s, the research on the relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) and foreign trade has become one of the topics of theoretical and empirical analysis. Many scholars have conducted extensive studies on the relationship between FDI and trade from different perspectives and theoretical and empirical perspectives. Under the background of “the Belt and Road”, CEECs, as important trading partners in this strategy, have gradually expanded their trade with China. This paper explores the current situation and characteristics of China’s direct investment and trade with CEECs from the perspective of the relationship between FDI and foreign trade. The development of China’s direct investment and trade with the CEECs is explored from the perspectives of total volume, country, and products by qualitative analysis. Meanwhile, the trade gravity model is established to empirically analyze the influence of China’s direct investment in the CEECs on China-CEECs trade scale from the three aspects of total trade volume, export, and import. The results show that China’s direct investment in the CEECs has a long-term positive effect on the scale of trade between China and the CEECs. The long-term impact of China’s direct investment in the CEECs on the scale of trade between China and CEECs is greater than the short-term impact. In the long run, the reverse import effect of China’s direct investment to the CEECs is greater than the export effect, and in the short run, the export effect of China’s direct investment to the CEECs is greater than the reverse import effect.
Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce
This paper aims to explore the relationship between China’s investment in Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs) and China-CEECs trade. Since the 1950s, the research on the relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) and foreign trade has become one of the topics of theoretical and empirical analysis. Many scholars have conducted extensive studies on the relationship between FDI and trade from different perspectives and theoretical and empirical perspectives. Under the background of “the Belt and Road”,the CEECs, as important trading partners in this strategy, have gradually expanded their trade with China. This paper explores the current situation and characteristics of China’s direct investment and trade with the CEECs from the perspective of the relationship between FDI and foreign trade. The development of China’s direct investment and trade with the CEECs is explored from the perspectives of total volume, country, and products by qualitative analysis. Meanwhile, the trade gravity model is established to empirically analyze the influence of China’s direct investment in the CEECs on China-CEECs trade scale from the three aspects of total trade volume, export, and import. The results show that China’s direct investment in the CEECs has a long-term positive effect on the scale of trade between China and the CEECs. The long-term impact of China’s direct investment in the CEECs on the scale of trade between China and the CEECs is greater than the short-term impact. In the long run, the reverse import effect of China’s direct investment to the CEECs is greater than the export effect, and in the short run, the export effect of China’s direct investment to the CEECs is greater than the reverse import effect.
 
Univerzita Karlova | Informační systém UK