Germany’s foreign policy. Is Federal Republic of Germany still a "civilian power"?
|Název práce v češtině:||Německá zahraniční politika. Je Spolková republika Německo "civilní mocností"?|
|Název v anglickém jazyce:||Germany’s foreign policy. Is Federal Republic of Germany still a "civilian power"?|
|Klíčová slova anglicky:||Germany, foreign policy, civilian power, role theory, European Policy of Germany, power|
|Akademický rok vypsání:||2018/2019|
|Typ práce:||diplomová práce|
|Ústav:||Katedra mezinárodních vztahů (23-KMV)|
|Vedoucí / školitel:||PhDr. Martin Jeřábek, Ph.D.|
|Řešitel:||skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem|
|Datum a čas obhajoby:||13.09.2021 08:00|
|Místo konání obhajoby:||Pekařská 16, JPEK314, 314, Malá učebna, 3.patro|
|Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby:||27.07.2021|
|Datum proběhlé obhajoby:||13.09.2021|
|Oponenti:||Mgr. Kristián Földes|
|Seznam odborné literatury|
|Aggestam, Lisbeth, and Adrian Hyde-Price. “Learning to Lead? Germany and the
Leadership Paradox in EU Foreign Policy.” German Politics 0, no. 0 (April 16,
2019): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2019.1601177.
Alessi, Christopher. “Learning to Fight: How Afghanistan Changed the German
Military.” Spiegel Online, October 15, 2013, sec. International.
Backman, Carl W. “Role Theory and International Relations: A Commentary and
Extension.” International Studies Quarterly 14, no. 3 (1970): 310–19.
Baumann, Rainer, and Gunther Hellmann. “Germany and the Use of Military Force:
‘Total War’, the ‘Culture of Restraint’ and the Quest for Normality.” German
Politics 10, no. 1 (April 1, 2001): 61–82.
BMZ, Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development. “Protecting
Internally Displaced Persons through German Development Cooperation.” Federal
Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, April 2017.
Breuning, Marijke. “Role Theory in Politics and International Relations.” The Oxford
Handbook of Behavioral Political Science, July 10, 2018.
Crawford, Beverly, and Kim B. Olsen. “The Puzzle of Persistence and Power: Explaining
Germany’s Normative Foreign Policy.” German Politics 26, no. 4 (October 2,
2017): 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2017.1364365.
Dettke, Dieter. “The 2003 Iraq War as a Turning Point in German–American Relations:
Political Leadership and Alliance Cohesion.” German Politics 27, no. 2 (April 3,
2018): 158–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2018.1446082.
Eberle, Jakub. Discourse and Affect in Foreign Policy : Germany and the Iraq War.
Routledge, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429487392.
Eberle, Jakub, and Vladimír Handl. “Ontological Security, Civilian Power, and German
Foreign Policy Toward Russia.” Foreign Policy Analysis. Accessed September 23,
Gourevitch, Peter A., Robert O. Keohane, Stephen D. Krasner, David Laitin, T.J. Pempel,
Wolfgang Streeck, and Sidney Tarrow. “The Political Science of Peter J.
Katzenstein.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41, no. 04 (October 2008): 893–99.
Gray. S, Colin. “Hard Power and Soft Power: The Utility of Military Force as an
Instrument of Policy in the 21st Century.” Strategic Studies Institute, April 2011.
Harnisch, Sebastian. “Change and Continuity in Post-Unification German Foreign
Policy.” German Politics 10, no. 1 (April 1, 2001): 35–60.
Hofhansel, Claus. “Germany, Multilateralism, and the Eastern Enlargement of the EU.
CES Germany & Europe Working Paper No. 01.4, 2001.” Working Paper, 2001.
Holsti, K. J. “National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy.” International
Studies Quarterly 14, no. 3 (1970): 233–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/3013584.
Johnston, Karin. “Germany, Afghanistan, and the Process of Decision Making in German
Foreign Policy: Constructing a Framework for Analysis,” 2011.
Katzenstein, Peter J. Tamed Power : Germany in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University
Koenig, Nicole. “Leading Beyond Civilian Power: Germany’s Role Re-Conception in
European Crisis Management.” German Politics 0, no. 0 (July 16, 2018): 1–18.
Kohlbacher, Florian. “The Use of Qualitative Content Analysis in Case Study Research.”
Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7 (1),
Maull, H. “Germany and the Use of Force: Still a ‘Civilian Power’?” Survival 42, no. 2
(January 1, 2000): 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/survival/42.2.56.
Maull, Hanns, and Sebastian Harnisch. Germany as a Civilian Power? : The Foreign
Policy of the Berlin Republic. Manchester ; New York : Manchester University
Press, 2001. https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/34883166.
Maull, Hanns W. “Germany and Japan: The New Civilian Powers,” January 28, 2009.
Maull, Hanns. W. “Germany’s Leadership in Europe: Finding Its New Role.” Rising
Powers Quarterly, Regional Leadership and multipolarity in the 21st century, 3, no.
1 (February 2018): 87–111. http://risingpowersproject.com/quarterly/germanysleadership-in-europe-finding-its-new-role/.
Maull, Hanns W. “Reflective, Hegemonic, Geo-Economic, Civilian … ? The Puzzle of
German Power.” German Politics 27, no. 4 (October 2, 2018): 460–78.
Noetzel, Timo. “The German Politics of War: Kunduz and the War in Afghanistan.”
International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) 87, no. 2
(2011): 397–417. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20869666.
Tewes, Henning. “The Emergence of a Civilian Power: Germany and Central Europe.”
German Politics 6, no. 2 (August 1, 1997): 95–116.
Tewes, Henning. “What Is Civilian Power?” In Germany, Civilian Power and the New
Europe: Enlarging NATO and the European Union, edited by Henning Tewes, 9–
32. New Perspectives in German Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2002.
Tewes, Henning. “Why Is Germany a Civilian Power?” In Germany, Civilian Power and
the New Europe: Enlarging NATO and the European Union, edited by HenningTewes, 33–50. New Perspectives in German Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan
UK, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289024_3.
Wendler, Frank. “Recalibrating Germany’s Role in Europe: Framing Leadership as
Responsibility.” German Politics 26, no. 4 (October 2, 2017): 574–90.
Wolff, Jonas. “Democracy Promotion and Civilian Power: The Example of Germany’s
‘Value-Oriented’ Foreign Policy.” German Politics 22, no. 4 (December 1, 2013):
Wood, Stephen. “Germany and the Eastern Enlargement of the EU: Political Elites,
Public Opinion and Democratic Processes.” Journal of European Integration 24,
no. 1 (January 2002): 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330290014642
|Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce|
|Since 1945 Germany has vowed for peace and stability in a unified Europe by incorporation of normative principles in its foreign policy. These characteristics of Germany’s foreign policy when analyzed from the point of view of role conception, it is termed as a “civilian power”. This serves as the primary basis of this thesis, it aims to understand Germany’s foreign policy methods as a “civilian power” post-unification specifically since 1990.
This is done by incorporating four case studies which gives us a an overview of Germany's foreign policy since 1990 and aims to provide answer to the question Is the Federal Republic of Germany still a “Civilian power”?