Privatizace vězeňství v Anglii a Walesu

• Název práce v češtině: Privatizace vězeňství v Anglii a Walesu
• Název v anglickém jazyce: Prison privatization in England and Wales
• Klíčová slova: Anglie a Wales, privatizace věznic, PFI spolupráce, teorie principála a agenta, nedokonalost smlouvy, informační asymetrie, monitoring věznic
• Klíčová slova anglicky: England and Wales, Prison privatization, PFI (Private Finance Initiative), Principal-agent theory, Incomplete contract, Information asymmetry, Prison monitoring
• Akademický rok vypsání: 2017/2018
• Typ práce: diplomová práce
• Jazyk práce: čeština
• Ústav: Katedra evropských studií (23-KZS)
• Vedoucí / školitel: prof. Mgr. Tomáš Weiss, M.A., Ph.D.
• Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem
• Datum přihlášení: 14.06.2018
• Datum zadání: 14.06.2018
• Datum a čas obhajoby: 15.09.2020 08:15
• Místo konání obhajoby: Pekařská 16, JPEK107, 107, Malá učebna, 1.patro
• Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby: 30.07.2020
• Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 15.09.2020
• Oponenti: Mgr. Jan Váška, Ph.D.

Seznam odborné literatury

Bureš, Oldřich a kolektiv. Privatizace bezpečnosti: České a zahraniční zkušenosti. Praha: Grada Publishing, 2013.

Butler, Eamonn. Milton Friedman: A Guide to His Economic Thought. London: Blackstone Audio, 1985.

Cavadino, Michael a James Dignan. Penal Systems: A Comparative Approach. London: SAGE Publications, 2006.

Dempsey, John S. Introduction to Private Security. Belmont: Wasworth: Cengage Learning, 2010.

Gamble, Andrew. The Free Economy and the Strong State: The Politics of Thatcherism. London: Palgrave, 1988.

Geeraert, Arnout. The EU in International Sports Governance: A Principal-Agent Perspective on EU Control of FIFA and UEFA. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

Greenwood, John, Robert Pyper a David Wilson. New Public Administration in Britain. Abingdon on Thames: Routledge, 2001.

Harding, Richard W. Private Prisons and Public Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1997.

James, Adrian, Keith Bottomley, Alison Liebling a Emma Clare. Privatizing Prisons: Rhetoric and Reality. London: SAGE Publications, 1997.

Johnston, Les. The Rebirth of Private Policing. Abingdon on Thames: Routledge, 2005.

Jones, Trevor a Tim Newburn. Policy Transfer And Criminal Justice: Exploring US Influence over British Crime Control Policy. London: Open University Press, 2006.

Laffont, Jean-Jacques a David Martimort. The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.

Le Vay, Julian. Competition for Prisons: Public Or Private? Bristol: Policy Press, 2016.

Logan, Charles. Private Prisons: Cons & Pros. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.

Miller, Eddie a Robert Corfe. New Socialist Business Values: For Industrial Resurgence. Bury St Edmunds: Arena Books, 2002.

Moss, Katrina. Medium Secure Psychiatric Provision in the Private Sector. Surrey: Ashgate Pub, 1998.

Newburn, Tim. Crime and Criminal Justice Policy. London: Longman, 2003.

Vlček, Josef. Výkladový lexikon pojmů tržní ekonomiky. Praha: Victoria Publishing, 1992.

Shefer, Guy a Alison Liebling. Prison privatization: In search of a business-like atmosphere? Cambridge: SAGE Publications, 2008.

South, Nigel a Robert Weiss. Comparing Prison Systems. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Publishers, 1998.

Tallberg, Jonas. European Governance and Supranational Institutions: Making States Comply. London: Routledge, 2003.

Allen, Grahame. The Private Finance Initiative (PFI): research paper 03/79. London: The House of Commons Library, 2003, http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/RP03-79/RP03-79.pdf (staženo 15. 5. 2020).

Roth, Lenny. Privatisation of Prisons: Background Paper No 3/04. Parliament of New South Wales: NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service, 2004, https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/researchpapers/Documents/privatisation-of-prisons/bg03-04.pdf (staženo 15. 3. 2020).

Sturge, Georgina. UK Prison Population Statistics: briefing paper, Number CBP-04334. The House of Commons Library, 2019, http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN04334/SN04334.pdf (staženo 5. 6. 2020).

Abrahamsen, Rita a Michael Williams, “Security Privatization and Global Security Assemblages”. The Brown Journal of World Affairs 13, č. 1 (2011): 171-180. http://www.jstor.org (staženo 12. 5. 2020).

Aman, Alfred a Carol Greenhouse, „Prison Privatization and Inmate Labor in the Global Economy: Reframing the Debate over Private Prisons“. Fordham Urban Law Journal 42, č. 2 (2014): 355-409, https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol42/iss2/1/ (staženo 13. 5. 2020).

Andrew, Jane. „Prisons, the Profit Motive and Other Challenges to Accountability“. Working Papers Series (2006): 877-904. http://www.researchgate.net (staženo 27. 3. 2020).

Avant, Deborah. “The Privatization of Security and Change in the Control of Force”. International Studies Perspectives 5 (2004): 153-157. http://www.researchgate.net (staženo 14. 2. 2020).

Lieutenant Commander Bharadwaj, Atul, Indian Navy. „Privatization of Security: The Mercenary-Market Mix“. Defence Studies 3, č. 2 (2003): doplň stránky. https://www.tandfonline.com/ (staženo 15. 5. 2020).

Dixon, Tim. „Private Prisons“. John Howard Society of Alberta (2002): 1-28. https://johnhoward.ab.ca/wp-content/uploads/docs/PrivatePrisons_2002.pdf (staženo 10. 4. 2020).

Friedmann, Alex. „Apples-to-Fish: Public and Private Prison Cost Comparisons“ Fordham Urban Law Journal 42, č. 2 (2016): 503-568, https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol42/iss2/4/ (staženo 13. ledna 2020).

Gaes, Gerry. „Costs and Benefits of Privatization Can Be Tricky to Assess“. Corrections Today (2008): 122-123. https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Costs+and+benefits+of+privatization+can+be+tricky+to+assess.-a0193095975 (staženo 12. 4. 2020).

Gunderson, Anna. „The Political and Economic Determinants of the American States' Reliance on Private Prisons“. Department of Political Science, Emory University (2017): 1-39. http://www.annagunderson.com/uploads/1/5/3/2/15320172/pp.pdf (18. 5. 2020).

Harding, Richard. „Private Prisons“. Crime and Justice 28 (2001): 265-346. http://www.jstor.org (staženo 12. 5. 2020).

Hart, Oliver, Andrei Shleifer a Robert Vishny. „The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and Application to Prisons“. The Quarterly Journal of Economics (1997): 1127-1161. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/shleifer/files/proper_scope.pdf (staženo 13. 5. 2020).

Headley, Andrea a Jean-Claude Garcia-Zamor, „The Privatization of Prisons and its Impact on Transparency and Accountability in Relation to Maladministration“. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education 1, č. 8 (2014): 23-24, http://www.researchgate.net (staženo 14. 2. 2020).

Heath, Joseph. „The Uses and Abuses of Agency Theory“. Business Ethics Quarterly 19, č. 4 (2009): 497-528. http://www.researchgate.net (staženo 24. 3. 2020).

Hefetz, Amir a Mildred Warner, „Privatization and Its Reverse: Explaining the Dynamics of the Government Contracting Process“. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14, č. 2 (2004): 171-190, https://www.inthepublicinterest.org/wp-content/uploads/Priatization_and_its_Reverse.pdf (staženo 14. 4. 2020).

Isima, Jeffrey. “The Global Marketplace and the Privatisation of Security”. IDS Bulletin 40, č. 20 (2009): 113-118, https://core.ac.uk/reader/43539200 (staženo 16. 1. 2020).
Jensen, Michael a William Meckling, „Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure“. Journal of Financial Economics (1976): 305-360, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304405X7690026X (staženo 14. 4. 2020).

Kim, Pauline T. „Beyond Principal-Agent Theories: Law and the Judicial Hierarchy“. Northwestern University Law Review 105, č. 2 (2011): 535-575, https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1167&context=nulr (staženo 12. 4. 2020).

Kyle, Peter H. „Contracting for Performance: Restructuring the Private Prison Market“. William & Mary Law Review 54, č. 6 (2013): 2087-2114, https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3492&context=wmlr (staženo 13. 1. 2020).

Lundahl, Brad, Chelsea Kunz, Cyndi Brownell, Norma Harris a Russ Vleet. „Prison Privatization: A Meta-analysis of Cost and Quality of Confinement Indicators“. Research on Social Work Practice 19, č. 4 (2009): 383-394. http://www.researchgate.net (staženo 6. 5. 2020).

Morris, John. „Government and Market Pathologies of Privatization: The Case of Prison Privatization“. Politics & Policy 35, č. 2 (2007): 318-341.

Poth, Stephan a Torsten J. Selck, „Principal Agent Theory and Artificial Information Asymmetry“. Politics: Political Studie Association 29, č. 2 (2009): 137-144, https://journals.sagepub.com/ (staženo 15. 3. 2020).

Ramirez, Mark D. „African Americans´ Principled Opposition to Prison Privatization“. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice 13 (2015): 217-236, https://www.tandfonline.com/ (staženo 12. 5. 2020).




Shalifa, Baliga. „Shaping the Success of Social Impact Bonds in the United States: Lessons learned from Privatization of U.S. Prisons“. Duke Law Journal 63, č. 2 (2013): 437-439, https://dlj.law.duke.edu/article/shaping-the-success-of-social-impact-bonds-in-the-united-states-lessons-learned-from-the-privatization-of-u-s-prisons/ (staženo 14. 4. 2020).

Snidal, Duncan. „The Game Theory of International Politics“. World Politics 38, č. 1 (1985): 25-57. http://www.jstor.org (staženo 12. 5. 2020).

Taulbee, James Larry. “The Privatization of Security: Modern Conflict, Globalization and Weak States”. Civil Wars 5, č. 2 (2002): 1-24, https://www.tandfonline.com/ (staženo 12. 5. 2020).

Drbohlavová, Marta. „Výkon trestu odnětí svobody v nestátních objektech“. Diplomová práce, Univerzita Karlova v Praze, 2008.

Gaechter, Martin. „Prisons for Profit and Modern Bounty Hunters: How useful is it to pay private companies to confine prisoners and catch criminals?“. Esej, Queensland University of Technology 2007.

Gregson, Joseph Shannon. „Comparing Public and Private Prison Systems“. Diplomová práce, University of Michigan-Flint, 2000.

Lobner, Linda. „How well do Public-Private Partnerships work?“. Diplomová práce, Universität Wien, 2009.

Martinovský, Petr. „Hodnocení politiky privatizace vězeňství“. Diplomová práce, Masarykova Univerzita, 2010.

Trubačová, Zuzana. „Privatization of the California Prison System“. Diplomová práce, Univerzita Karlova v Praze, 2016.

Zwieb, Dan. „Některé otázky privatizace věznic“. Diplomová práce, Univerzita Karlova v Praze, 2009.

Předběžná náplň práce

Diplomová práce se zabývá procesem privatizace vězeňských zařízení ve Velké Británii specificky v Anglii a Walesu s důrazem na spolupráci probíhající ve formě PFI, při níž se soukromý sektor uchází nejen o správu zařízení, ale i jeho návrh a výstavbu. Díky přenosu výkonu těchto služeb lze na vztah mezi státem a soukromým provozovatelem nahlížet skrze teorie principála a agenta. Tato teorie je ve své nejčistší podobě tvořena jedním principálem a právě jedním agentem, na kterého je převeden výkon služby, část rizik s ním spojená a i určitá rozhodovací pravomoc. Základním předpokladem vztahu mezi principálem a agentem je dle teorie nesoulad v cílech aktérů a agentova snaha jednat oportunisticky na úkor výkonu služby pro principála. V tomto duchu práce zkoumá rozhodnutí z roku 2018 dále nenavazovat nové PFI spolupráce. V tomto scénáři je Anglie a Wales principálem a provozovatelé vězeňských zařízení jejím agentem. Hypotézou práce je, že toto rozhodnutí dále PFI spolupráce neuzavírat souvisí s problematickými aspekty vztahu mezi principálem a agentem, tj. kontrola agentova jednání je pro principála příliš náročná. Práce tedy zkoumá, jakým způsobem se Anglii a Walesu podařilo vystavět kontrolní mechanismus, který znemožňuje oportunistické jednání jejího agenta ve výkonu správy vězeňských zařízení, a tím odpovídá na otázku, zda je možné vysvětlit rozhodnutí vlády nenavazovat nové PFI spolupráce z roku 2018 pomocí teorie principála a agenta.

Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce

The diploma thesis deals with the process of prison privatization in the United Kingdom particularly in England and Wales especially in the form of PFI deals, in which the private sector not only manages prison facility but also designs and constructs the buildings. Due to transfer of this kind of service we can look at the relationship between state and private provider trough the lenses of Principal-agent theory. This theory, in its purest form, is constituted of one principal and one agent to whom the performance of the service is transferred, part of the risks associated with it and also a certain decision-making power are transferred as well. According to the theory, the basic precondition for the relationship between the principal and the agent is a discrepancy in the goals of the actors and the agent's effort to act opportunistically at the expense of the performance of the service for the principal. In this sense, the thesis examines the decision from 2018 not to launch new PFI or its successor PF2 projects. In this scenario, England and Wales are the principal and the prison operators are the agents. The hypothesis of the thesis is that this decision not to launch new PFI projects is related to problematic aspects of the relationship between the principal and the agent and that the control of the agent's actions is too demanding for the principal. Thus, the thesis examines how England and Wales managed to build a control mechanism to prevent the opportunistic actions of its agent in the administration of prisons and thus answers the question of whether it is possible to explain the government's decision not to launch new PFI and PF2 projects from 2018 by using the Principal-agent theory.