Témata prací (Výběr práce)Témata prací (Výběr práce)(verze: 341)
Detail práce
   Přihlásit přes CAS
Specific Contribution of the Roman Catholic Church to the European Integration according to the Article 17.3. of the TFEU: EU perception of the dialogue with COMECE
Název práce v češtině: Osobitý přínos Římsko-katolické církve k evropské integrace podle článku 17(3) SFEU: vnímání dialogu s COMECE Evropskou unií
Název v anglickém jazyce: Specific Contribution of the Roman Catholic Church to the European Integration according to the Article 17.3. of the TFEU: EU perception of the dialogue with COMECE
Klíčová slova: Evropská unie, BEPA, evropský hodnotový prostor, evropská identita, Smlouva o Ústavě pro Evropu, Článek 17.3 Smlouvy o fungování EU, Římsko-katolická církev, COMECE
Klíčová slova anglicky: European Union, BEPA, European ideational order, European Identity, The Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, Article 17.3 of the TFEU, the Roman Catholic Church, COMECE
Akademický rok vypsání: 2017/2018
Typ práce: diplomová práce
Jazyk práce: angličtina
Ústav: Katedra mezinárodních vztahů (23-KMV)
Vedoucí / školitel: Mgr. Viera Martinková, Ph.D.
Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem
Datum přihlášení: 12.06.2018
Datum zadání: 12.06.2018
Datum a čas obhajoby: 07.09.2020 00:00
Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby:31.07.2020
Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 07.09.2020
Oponenti: PhDr. Martin Jeřábek, Ph.D.
 
 
 
Kontrola URKUND:
Seznam odborné literatury
Academic Articles
ANNICCHINO, Pasquale, 2013. Religion and EU Institutions. Ecclesiastical Law Journal. September 2013. Vol. 15, no. 3, p. 326–331. DOI 10.1017/S0956618X13000458.
CHALLAND, Benoît, 2009. From Hammer and Sickle to Star and Crescent: the Question of Religion for European Identity and a Political Europe. Religion, State and Society. March 2009. Vol. 37, no. 1–2, p. 65–80. DOI 10.1080/09637490802693544.
CHECKEL, Jeffrey T., 1999. Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe. International Studies Quarterly. 1999. Vol. 43, no. 1, p. 83–114.
CHECKEL, Jeffrey T, 2006. Constructivist approaches to European integration. ARENA, ARENA Working Papers. 2006. P. 41.
DE VLIEGER, Pieterjan and TANASESCU, Irina, 2012. Changing Forms of Interactions between the European Commission and Interest Groups: The Case of Religious Lobbying. Journal of European Integration. July 2012. Vol. 34, no. 5, p. 447–463. DOI 10.1080/07036337.2011.595485.
FINNEMORE, Martha and SIKKINK, Kathryn, 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization. 1998. Vol. 52, no. 4, p. 887–917.
FORET, François, 2009. Religion: a Solution or a Problem for the Legitimisation of the European Union? Religion, State and Society. March 2009. Vol. 37, no. 1–2, p. 37–50. DOI 10.1080/09637490802693213.
FUKUYAMA, Francis and KATZENSTEIN, Peter J., 1997. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. Foreign Affairs. 1997. DOI 10.2307/20048042.
HOOGHE, Liesbet and MARKS, Gary, 2009. A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus. British Journal of Political Science. January 2009. Vol. 39, no. 1, p. 1–23. DOI 10.1017/S0007123408000409.
HOUSTON, Kenneth, 2009. The Logic of Structured Dialogue between Religious Associations and the Institutions of the European Union. Religion, State and Society. March 2009. Vol. 37, no. 1–2, p. 207–222. DOI 10.1080/09637490802694088.
———, 2014. Church–EU Dialogue under Article 17.3: Consensus-Seeking Instrument or Power Strategy? Politics and Religion. March 2014. Vol. 7, no. 1, p. 148–176. DOI 10.1017/S1755048313000424.
JANSEN, Thomas, 2000. Europe and Religions: the Dialogue between the European Commission and Churches or Religious Communities. Social Compass. 2000. Vol. 47, no. 1, p. 103–112. DOI 10.1177/003776800047001011.
KRATOCHVÍL, Petr and DOLEŽAL, Tomáš, 2014a. Náboženství a evropská integrace: vývoj a současné trendy. Politologická revue. 2014. Vol. 20, no. 1, p. 167–180.
———, 2014b. The ideational clinch of the Roman Catholic Church and the EU: The Europeanization of the Catholic clergy’s discourse? Journal of Language and Politics. 2014. Vol. 13. DOI 10.1075/jlp.13.1.08kra.
KRIJTENBURG, Margriet, 2015. Robert Schuman’s Commitment to European Unification. Philosophia Reformata. 26 May 2015. Vol. 80, no. 1, p. 140–157. DOI 10.1163/23528230-08001008.
LEUSTEAN, Lucian N., 2013b. Religious Actors in the European Union. Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto. 2013. No. 48, p. 95. DOI 10.18543/ced-48-2013pp95-106.
———, 2013c. Roman Catholicism, diplomacy, and the European communities, 1958-1964. Journal of Cold War Studies. 2013. DOI 10.1162/JCWS_a_00308.
MINKENBERG, Michael, 2007. Democracy and Religion: Theoretical and Empirical Observations on the Relationship Between Christianity, Islam and Liberal Democracy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies - J ETHN MIGR STUD. 20 July 2007. Vol. 33, p. 887–909. DOI 10.1080/13691830701432731.
MUDROV, Sergei, 2011. The Christian Churches as Special Participants in European Integration. Journal of Contemporary European Research. 1 August 2011. Vol. 7, p. 363–379.
PORTARU, Adina, 2017. Europe -In Search of a Soul? Article 17 TFEU and its Functioning. Nottingham Law Journal [online]. 2017. [Accessed 25 July 2020].
Available from: https://www.academia.edu/35475096/Europe_In_Search_of_a_Soul_Article_17_TFEU_and_its_Functioning
SCHLESINGER, P. and FOSSUM, John, 2007. The European Union
and the Public Sphere: A Communicative Space in the Making? . 1 January 2007. DOI 10.4324/9780203960851.
SCHLESINGER, Philip and FORET, François, 2006. Political Roof and Sacred Canopy?: Religion and the EU Constitution. European Journal of Social Theory. February 2006. Vol. 9, no. 1, p. 59–81. DOI 10.1177/1368431006060463.
TSEBELIS, George and PROKSCH, Sven-Oliver, 2007. The Art of Political Manipulation in the European Convention. Journal of Common Market Studies. 1 February 2007. Vol. 45, p. 157–186. DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00707.x.
WEISSENRIEDER, Maureen and FAIRCLOUGH, Norman, 1997. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. The Modern Language Journal. 1997. DOI 10.2307/329335.
WENDT, Alexander, 1992. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization. 1992. Vol. 46, no. 2, p. 391–425.
ŽÁK, Petr, 2013. Proměny vztahu papežství k Evropské integraci: Od Pia XII. k Benediktu XVI. Mezinárodní Vztahy. 2013.
Academic works
KUBIŠ, Vojtěch, 2017. Postoj římsko-katolické církve k Delorsově iniciativě „Srdce a duše pro Evropu“ [online]. Bachelor´s Thesis. Prague: Univerzita Karlova. [Accessed 28 July 2020]. Available from:
https://is.cuni.cz/webapps/zzp/download/130207544/?lang=cs
ŽÁK, Petr, 2014. Svatý stolec, římskokatolická církev a evropská integrace: od Pia XII. k Benediktu XVI. [online]. Dissertation. Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Filozofická fakulta. [Accessed 25 July 2020]. Available from: https://theses.cz/id/s801nz/
Books
CHAPLIN, Jonathan and WILTON, Gary, 2015. God and the EU: Retrieving the Christian Inspirations of the European Project. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-43921-9.
CHILTON, Paul and SCHÄFFNER, C., 2002. Introduction : themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse. In: Politics as text and talk : analytic approaches to political discourse. 4. John Benjamins. Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture. ISBN 90-272-2694-6.
CHRISTIANSEN, Thomas, 1996. Reconstructing European Space: From Territorial Politics to Multilevel Governance. European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre.
CINI, Michelle and BORRAGAN, Nieves Perez-Solorzano (eds.), 2016. European Union Politics. Fifth edition. Oxford ; New York, NY: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-870893-3.
DEUTSCH, Karl Wolfgang, 1957. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton University Press.
DRULÁK, Petr, 2008. Jak zkoumat politiku: kvalitativní metodologie v politologii a mezinárodních vztazích. Praha: Portál. ISBN 978-80-7367-385-7.
FLOWERDEW, John and RICHARDSON, John E. (eds.), 2018. The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon New York, NY: Routledge. Routledge handbooks in applied linguistics. ISBN 978-1-315-73934-2.
FORET, François and SCHLESINGER, Philip, 2007. Religion and the European public sphere. In: The European Union and the Public Sphere: A Communicative Space in the Making? London: Routledge. ISBN 0-203-96085-8.
GEORGE, Stephen, 2004. Multi-level Governance and the European Union. In: Multi-level Governance. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-160096-8.
GUY PETERS, B. and PIERRE, Jon, 2004. Multi-level Governance and Democracy: A Faustian Bargain? In: Multi-level Governance. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-160096-8.
HALLIDAY, M.A.K. and MATTHIESSEN, Christian M.I.M., 2013. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar: Fourth edition. ISBN 978-1-135-98341-3.
HOGEBRINK, Laurens, 2015. Europe’s Heart and Soul: Jacques Delors’ Appeal to the Churches. 1. Globethics.net. ISBN 978-2-88931-092-0.
JONES, Erik, MENON, Anand et al. (eds.), 2012. The Oxford Handbook of the European Union. OUP Oxford. ISBN 978-0-19-954628-2.
KAISER, Wolfram, 2007. Christian democracy and the origins of European Union. ISBN 978-0-511-49705-6.
KRATOCHVÍL, P. and DOLEŽAL, T., 2015. The European Union and the Catholic Church: Political Theology of European Integration. Springer. ISBN 978-1-137-45378-5.
LEUSTEAN, Lucian N., 2007. The Place of God: Religious Terms in the Debate on the European Constitution. In: La Constitution européenne : Elites, mobilisations, votes. Bruxelles: Université de Bruxelles. ISBN 978-2-8004-1387-7.
LEUŞTEAN, Lucian (ed.), 2013a. Representing religion in the European Union: does God matter? London ; New York: Routledge. Routledge studies in religion and politics. ISBN 978-0-415-68504-7.
LEUȘTEAN, Lucian, 2014. The Ecumenical Movement and the Making of the European Community. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-871456-9.
MARKS, Gary, 1992. Structural Policy in the European Community. In: Europolitics: Institutions and Policy-making in the ´New´ European Community [online]. Washington DC: Brookings Institution. p. 191–224. Available from:
http://garymarks.web.unc.edu/files/2016/09/marks-Structural-Policy-in-the-European-Community.pdf
MASSIGNON, Bérengère and WILLAIME, Jean-Paul, 2007. Des dieux et des fonctionnaires : Religions et laïcités face au défi de la construction européenne. Rennes: PU Rennes. ISBN 978-2-7535-0488-2.
MCCREA, Ronan, 2010. Religion and the public order of the European Union. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-959535-8.
———, 2013. Religious contributions to law- and policy-making in a secular political order: the approach of European institutions. In: Representing religion in the European Union: does God matter? London ; New York: Routledge. p. 217–236. Routledge studies in religion and politics. ISBN 978-0-415-68504-7.
MUDROV, Sergei A., 2014. Christian churches in the process of the EU treaties’ reform. In: Representing Religion in the European Union: Does God Matter? First edition. New York, NY: Routledge. p. 152–166. ISBN 978-0-203-10977-9.
NELSEN, Brent F. and GUTH, James L., 2015. Religion in the European Union: The Forgotten Factor. In: Nations under god: the geopolitics of faith in the twenty-first century. ISBN 978-1-910814-06-2.
PAGOULATOS, George and TSOUKALIS, Loukas, 2014. Multilevel Governance. In: The Oxford Handbook of The European Union. First edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 62–78. ISBN 978-0-19-871479-8.
POLLOCK, David, 2014. Article 17: Reasons for concern. In: Representing Religion in the European Union: Does God Matter? First edition. New York, NY: Routledge. p. 122–136. ISBN 978-0-203-10977-9.
RONAN MCCREA, 2009. The Recognition of Religion within the Constitutional and Political Order of the European Union [online]. London School of Economics / European Institute. Available from:
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/53359/1/__Libfile_repository_Content_European%20Institute_LEQS%20Discussion%20Papera_LEQSPaper10.pdf
ROSAMOND, Ben (ed.), 2016. Theorizing the European Union after Integration Theory. In: European Union politics. Fifth Edition. Oxford ; New York, NY: Oxford University Press. p. 79–96. ISBN 978-0-19-870893-3.
SCHIMMELFENNIG, Frank, 2014. Constructivist Perspectives. In: The Oxford Handbook of the European Union. First Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 34–47. ISBN 978-0-19-871479-8.
SCHNABEL, Patrick R., 2014. Der Dialog nach Art. 17 III AEUV: “In Anerkennung ihrer Identität und ihres besonderen Beitrags.” 1. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. ISBN 978-3-16-153069-2.
TURNER, Frank, 2012. The Roman Catholic Church and the European institutions: Dialogue and advocacy at the European Union. In: Representing Religion in the European Union: Does God Matter? ISBN 978-0-203-10977-9.
WÆVER, Ole, 2017. 9. Discursive Approaches [online]. Oxford University Press. [Accessed 25 July 2020]. ISBN 978-0-19-185087-5. Available from:
https://www.oxfordpoliticstrove.com/view/10.1093/hepl/9780199226092.001.0001/hepl-9780199226092-chapter-9
WERKNER, Ines-Jacqueline and LIEDHEGENER, Antonius, 2013. Europäische Religionspolitik: Religiöse Identitätsbezüge, rechtliche Regelungen und politische Ausgestaltung. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-658-00959-5.
Předběžná náplň práce
Cílem této diplomové práce je analyzovat, jak Evropská unie vnímá pojem specifický přínos církví do evropského integračního procesu v kontextu článku 17.3
Smlouvy o fungování EU. Specifický přínos církví je analyzován na případě Římsko-katolické církve (ŘKC), jakožto dominantního náboženského aktéra v dialogu realizovaného v rámci čl. 17.3. Časově je práce vymezena dvěma obdobími. Nejprve je zkoumán specifický přínos ŘKC v kontextu debaty o Evropské ústavě. Na základě diskurzivní analýzy projevů a pozměňovacích návrhů, se hledá odpověď na otázku, do jaké míry je specifický přínos církve dáván do souvislosti s (evropskými) hodnotami.
Druhé období je vymezeno lety 2009, kdy vstoupila v platnost Lisabonská smlouva. Analýza je uzavřena rokem 2014, kdy byla úroveň dialogu s církvemi poněkud degradována. Tehdy totiž odpovědnost za dialog převzalo DG JUST namísto BEPA, orgánu operujícího přímo pod vedením předsedy Evropské komise. Na základě projevů a dalších dokumentů pořízených z jednotlivých setkání mezi představiteli EU a ŘKC je zkoumáno, jaká očekávání evropští politici od církve měli. Cílem je zjistit, v čem byla tato očekávání specifická, a proč byl dialog s církvemi oddělen od dialogu s občanskou společností. Z mého výzkumu vyplývá, že specifickým přínosem ŘKC pro EU nebyl ani tolik její ideový potenciál jako spíše její samotná struktura. Ta totiž zahrnovala všechny úrovně společnosti, od obcí po mezinárodní prostředí. Takováto síť nabízela EU jedinečný komunikační kanál, skrze který by mohla propagovat svoji politiku na národním a lokálním stupni.
Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce
The aim of the thesis is to analyse how the EU perceives the specific contribution of Churches to the European integration as stated in the Article 17.3 of the TFEU. The specific contribution is analysed on the case of Roman Catholic Church (RCC) which predominates in the dialogue under the Article 17.3. There are two time periods addressed in the thesis. Firstly, the specific contribution is addressed in the context of the debate on the EU constitution. It is examined, based on the analysis of politicians´ speeches and MEPs amendments, whether the specificity is rooted in the area of values. Second period is marked by the year 2009 when the TFEU entered into force, and 2014 when the dialogue with Churches was somewhat degraded. In fact, the new body responsible
for the interaction became DG JUST, thereby replacing BEPA, i.e. organization directly reporting to the President of the Commission. Based on the analysis of the speeches and other relevant documents regard all the official meetings, I examine what the EU politicians expected from the Church and what was Her specificity according to them. Against this background is also analysed the fact that the dialogue with Churches was separated from the civil society organizations. It results from the research that the EU perceived the specific contribution of the RCC not on the ideational level. Rather, EU appreciated Her structure ranging from local communities to international space. In fact, the RCC fully-fledged institutionalization was valued as a useful mean for the EU to promote its policies at national and local level.
 
Univerzita Karlova | Informační systém UK