Témata prací (Výběr práce)Témata prací (Výběr práce)(verze: 368)
Detail práce
   Přihlásit přes CAS
Enemies, Rivals or Friends – Chinese Economic Diplomacy in Visegrád countries since 2012
Název práce v češtině: Nepřátelé, soupeři nebo přátelé - čínská ekonomická diplomacie vůči zemím Visegrádu po roce 2012
Název v anglickém jazyce: Enemies, Rivals or Friends – Chinese Economic Diplomacy in Visegrád countries since 2012
Klíčová slova: Čína, ekonomická diplomacie, země Visegrádu, konstruktivismus, mezinárodní vztahy
Klíčová slova anglicky: China, Economic Diplomacy, Visegrád countries, Constructivism, International Relations
Akademický rok vypsání: 2016/2017
Typ práce: diplomová práce
Jazyk práce: angličtina
Ústav: Katedra ruských a východoevropských studií (23-KRVS)
Vedoucí / školitel: Mgr. Karel Svoboda, Ph.D.
Řešitel: skrytý - zadáno vedoucím/školitelem
Datum přihlášení: 31.05.2017
Datum zadání: 31.05.2017
Datum a čas obhajoby: 05.09.2018 08:30
Místo konání obhajoby: Jinonice - U Kříže 8, Praha 5, J2081, 2081, Jinonice - místn. č. 2081
Datum odevzdání elektronické podoby:29.07.2018
Datum proběhlé obhajoby: 05.09.2018
Oponenti: Mgr. Ing. Petra Cibulková
 
 
 
Kontrola URKUND:
Seznam odborné literatury
Monographs
Chang Chiyun. Confucianism: A Modern Interpretation. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd, 2013.

Confucius. Confucian Analects, The Great Learning & The Doctrine of the Mean. Translated by Legge James. New York: Dover Publications, 2013.

Confucius. The Analects (Penguin Classics). Translated by Lau Din Cheuk. London: Penguin Books, 1988.

Dallmayr Fred and Zhao Tingyang. Contemporary Chinese Political Thought: Debates and Perspectives (Asia in The New Millennium). Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky, 2012.

Lam Willy Wo-Lap. Chinese Politics in The Era of Xi Jinping: Renaissance, Reform, Or Retrogression? Oxford: Routledge, 2015.

Li Shaojun. An Introduction to the International Politics. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2009.

Lin Justin Yifu. Demystifying The Chinese Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Mearsheimer John Joseph. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2014.

Mencius. Mencius. Translated by Lau Din Cheuk. London: Penguin Classics, 2005.

Mencius. The Works of Mencius. Translated by Legge James. New York: Dover Publications, 2011.

Ni Shixiong. Contemporary International Relation Theories. Shanghai: Fudan University Press, 2004.

Nylan Michael. The Five “Confucian” Classics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014.

Qin Yaqing. Rationality and International Cooperation, Liberalism in World Politics. Beijing: World Affairs Press, 2008.

Qin Yaqing. Power, Institutions, and Culture. Beijing: World Affairs Press, 2016.

Wendt Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

Wight Martin Wight. International Theory: The three traditions. Leicester: Leicester Univ. Press, 1996.

Yan Xuetong et al. Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.

Zhang Tingyang. The Tianxia System: An Introduction to The Philosophy of World Institution. Beijing: China Renmin University Pres, 2011.

Journal Articles
Akamatsu Kaname. “A Historical Pattern of Economic Growth in Developing Countries.” The Developing Economies 1, no. s1 (August 1962):3-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.1962.tb01020.x.

Bu Shaohua. “From an Antagonistic Relation to a Strategic Partnership - Bilateral Relation between China and the Czech Republic.” Reference News of PRC, March 31, 2016. http://ihl.cankaoxiaoxi.com/2016/0331/1115865.shtml.

Bu Shaohua. “China-EU ‘sub-regional cooperation: motivation and future direction.” China International Studies, 2016, no. 2: 822.

Bunce Valerie. "The Political Economy of the Brezhnev Era: The Rise and Fall of Corporatism. " British Journal of Political Science 13, no. 02 (1983): 129. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400003197.

Chen Dongxiao and Yu Ye. “Global Economic governance: New Challenges and China’s Approaches.” China International Studies, 2017, no. 1: 11.

Éltető Andrea and Szunomár Ágnes. "Ties of Visegrád Countries with East Asia - Trade and Investment." SSRN Electronic Journal 214, no. 1215-5241 (2015): 1-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2720805.

Gan Junxian. “The Belt and Road Initiative for India: Walking Alone or Dancing with China.” China International Studies, 2015, no. 4: 1.

Góralczyk Bogdan. “China’s interests in Central and Eastern Europe: enter the dragon.” European Views 16, no. 1 (2017):153-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-017-0427-9.

Hu Dawei. “China’s cooperative diplomacy - An analysis of Cooperation between China and CEECs.” China International Studies, 2015, no. 6: 822.

Liu Zuokui. "The Role of Central and Eastern Europe in The Building of Silk Road Economic Belt." China International Studies 47, no. 2-3 (2014): 184-195.

Liu Zuokui. "The Analysis of Chinese Investments in CEE Countries under the New Situation," China International Studies 37, no. 1 (2012): 108-120.

Nieh Chien-Chung. “The Implication and the Impact of Establishing RMB Offshore Market.” Prospect and Exploration 12, no. 10 (October 2014):12-17. https://www.mjib.gov.tw/FileUploads/eBooks/e78daf1e12404ba6815547379acb12c2/Section_file/f54fe05c6951453599203e3a452f42f1.pdf.

Shi Yi. “A Book Review: From the Silk Road to a World Landbrigde.” China International Studies, 2015, no. 6: 822.

Spruds Andris. "Towards A Balanced Synergy of Visions and Interests: Latvia’s Perspectives in 16+1 And Belt and Road Initiatives." Croatian International Relations Review 23, no. 78 (2017): 37-56. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0006.

Su Ge. “One Belt One Road Initiative – From a global perspective” China International Studies, 2016, no. 2: 820.

Xing Liju Xing. “To Interpret China’s Foreign Policy with Neighboring Countries from the Perspective of Cultural Traditions: Centered on ‘Amity, Candor, Reciprocity, and Tolerance’.” China International Studies, 2014, no. 3: 820.

Xing Liju Xing. “The Humanistic Exchanges Beneficial to the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’: Difficulties and Their Possible Solutions.” China International Studies, 2016, no. 6: 822.

Zou Jialing Zou et al. “Spatial patterns and economic effects of China's trade with countries along the Belt and Road.” Progress in Geography 34, no. 5 (2015): 598-605. http://www.progressingeography.com/EN/Y2015/V34/I5/598.

Zhao Huaipu and Wang Zhenling. "US-EU Dialogue On East Asia and Coordination On Their China Policies." China International Studies 6, no. 22 (2016): 58-74.

Zhu Zhiqun. “China's "Peaceful Rise" in the 21st Century: Domestic and International Conditions.” The China Journal, 2007 no. 58: 228-230. http://doi.org/10.2307/20066356

Website Content
Campbell Charlie. "China Says It's Building the New Silk Road. Here Are Five Things to Know Ahead of a Key Summit.” Time, May 12, 2017. http://time.com/4776845/china-xi-jinping-belt-road-initiative-obor/.

Cooperation Between China and Central and Eastern European Countries. "Wen Outlines Proposals On Building Closer China-Central and Eastern Europe Ties." April 26, 2012. http://www.chinaceec.org/eng/ldrhw_1/2012hs/hdxw/t1410542.htm.

China News. “A Solemn Statement of Ministry of Foreign Affairs of PRC towards Slovak President's meeting with the Dalai Lama.”  October 21, 2016. http://military.china.com/news/568/20161021/23798930.html.

Deloitte and Bank of China. “Investment Report in CEECs,” Deloitte and Bank of China, September 10 2017. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/cn/Documents/international-business-support/deloitte-cn-ibs-boc-central-europe-investment-handbook-zh-17121 5.pdf.

Griffiths James. "Just What Is This One Belt, One Road Thing Anyway?" CNN, May 12, 2017. https://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/11/asia/china-one-belt-one-road-explainer/index.html.

Kong Tianping. "On ‘One Belt One Road’ Initiative and the Cooperation between China and CEECs.” Institute of European Studies of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, April 11, 2017. http://ies.cssn.cn/wz/yjcg/zogx/201704/t20170411_3482616.shtml.

Lin Justin Yifu. “What opportunities can OBOR bring to the world economic development?” China Foreign Exchange, July 17, 2017. http://www.sohu.com/a/134788522_184153.

Mardell Jacob. "The 'Community of Common Destiny' In Xi Jinping's New Era." The Diplomat, October 25, 2017. https://thediplomat.com/2017/10/the-community-of-common-destiny-in-xi-jinpings-new-era/.

National Bureau of Statistics of China. “China Statistics Yearbook 2015.” 2016. http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/Statisticaldata/AnnualData/.

People News. “China's First Ministerial Level Consultation with Visegrád Group.”  May 21, 2015. http://world.people.com.cn/n/2015/0521/c1002-27037461.html.

Price Water House Coopers (PwC). “Infrastructure Report (China-CEECs).” March 30, 2017. http://pg.jrj.com.cn/acc/Res/CN_RES/INDUS/2017/10/17/8cc89766-f4db-43e5-924b-185a4385658f.pdf.

Pyffel Radoslaw. “Seven asymmetries in Polish-Chinese relations – how to deal with them?” polska-azja, August 21, 2015. http://www.polska-azja.pl/r-pyffel-seven-asymmetries-in-polish-chinese-relations-how-to-deal-with-them/.

Schwab Klaus. “The Global Competitiveness Report 2015–2016.” World Economic Forum, September 22, 2015. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/gcr/2015-2016/Global_Competitiveness_Report_2015-2016.pdf.

Travel News. “Chinese Tourism Report 2017 (European market).” June 12, 2017. http://travel.news.cn/2017-06/12/c_1121136796.htm.

World Bank. “World Development Indicators 2015.” April 7, 2015. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/795941468338533334/World-development-indicators-2015.

Government Publications
Government of People’s Republic of China. “Government Work Report at the 4th Session of the 11th National People's Congress.” March 15, 2011. http://www.gov.cn/2011lh/content_1825233.htm.

Government of People’s Republic of China. “Government Work Report at the 1st Session of the 13th National People's Congress.” March 22, 2018. http://www.gov.cn/premier/2018-03/22/content_5276608.htm.

PRC. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Joint Statement On the Establishment of a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. 2013, Pub. 3 (29), Beijing: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

PRC. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Joint Statement On the Establishment of a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. 2017, Pub. 5 (13), Beijing: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

PRC. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Joint Statement On the Establishment of a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. 2016, Pub. 6 (21), Beijing: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Interview
Ma Jack Yun. “Countries relevant to the One Belt One Road Initiative.” Interviewed by Zhang hao, China Daily, May 14, 2017.
Předběžná náplň práce
Tato práce má za cíl interpretovat čínskou ekonomickou diplomacii v zemích tzv. Visegrádské čtyřky od roku 2012. Znalost čínských politicko-ekonomických postojů vůči zemím Visegrádu je důležitá pro zdravé bilaterální vztahy. Čína od roku 2012 podnikla sérii kroků, jmenovitě iniciativy 16+1 a Novo hedvábná stezka s cílem vybudovat těsnější vztahy se zeměmi Visegrádu. Jakkoliv se Visegrádská čtyřka nemůže v měřítku světové ekonomiky Číně rovnat. Tato práce pomocí konstruktivistické analýzy vysvětlí motivace Číny a význam zemí Visegrádu. Poté zkoumáním dat popíše oboustranné dopady v politice, ekonomice a kultuře. Práce využívá metodu (1) kvalitativní analýzy dat a (2) teoretický přístup. Sebraná data pochází z knih, žurnálů, důvěryhodných internetových zdrojů a odborných médií. Teorie vychází z konstruktivismu Alexandra Wendta. Prostřednictvím těchto analýz práce komplexně zkoumá příčiny a pohnutky, které stojí za čínskou ekonomickou diplomacií v zemích Visegrádu. Výsledky spolupráce jsou jak pozitivní, tak negativní. Budoucnost vztahů Číny a zemí Visegrádu záleží na vzájemné interakci.
Předběžná náplň práce v anglickém jazyce
This dissertation aims to interpret Chinese economic diplomacy in Visegrád countries since 2012. An accurate cognition of China’s political-economic stance towards Visegrád countries is vital for bilateral relations. Since 2012, China has promoted a series of economic policies, namely 16+1 and OBOR, to build a closer relationship with Visegrád countries. However, the Visegrád countries are not equivalent to China in the world economy. By combining Constructivist analysis, this article will explain China’s motivation, and Visegrád countries’ significance. Then, by examining data, this article attempts to demonstrate bilateral outcomes in politics, economics, and cultures. Two major research methods refer to (1) qualitative analysis of data and (2) theoretical approach. Data have been collected from books, journals, credible internet sources and authoritative media. Theory refers to Alexander Wendt’s Constructivism. Through these analyses, a comprehensive examination of the causes behind Chinese economic diplomacy in Visegrád countries is achieved. Outcomes of cooperation are both positive and negative. The future relations between China and Visegrád countries depend on mutual interactions.
 
Univerzita Karlova | Informační systém UK